Gilbert (1977: 287,
7
citations);Saunders
(1888,index).Panzer'scollec- tionwas
giventoZMHU and
the materialwas
integrated into thegeneral collection.We do
notknow of any modern worker who
hasbeen
ableto identifyauthenticPanzer
type materialinZMHU. Some of
the species illustratedinhisFavnae
insectorvmgermanicae came from
othercollec- tionsand,hence,may be found
inotherplaces.Poda von Neuhaus, Nicolaus (1723-1798)
Gilbert (1977: 300,1 citation);Schiner (1856,criticalrevision
of
Diptera speciesin1763
work).Nothing
isknown of
thecollectionsof Poda.We
wrote
totheSteiermarkischesLandesmuseum,
Graz,and were informed
thatdespite extensive searchesforPoda's
collectionno
informationabout
itsexistence
had
everbeen
discoveredand
the collectionisassumed
tohave been
destroyed(J.Madler
inlitt.,9
July 92)Preyssler,
Johann Daniel Edvard (17??-post 1838)
Gilbert [nodata].Rozkosny
etal.(1982,noteson
Diptera).Robineau-Desvoidy, Andre Jean
Baptiste(1799-1857)
Gilbert (1977: 319,
7
citations);Royer
(1931, noteson
collection);Sabrosky
(1974, defenceof).What remains of
theRobineau-Desvoidy
collection isnow
atMNHNP,
butmost of
it isknown
tohave been
destroyed.A check
hasbeen made
intheremmants of
his collection for the speciesenumerated
inthispaper,but nothingsurvives.Rondani, Camillo (1807-1879)
Gilbert (1977: 322,
16
citations);Guigla
(1957, typesinGenoa); Sabrosky
(1961, bibliographicnotes);Hennig
(1961,muscid
types);Pape
(1988, noteson
collection&
sarcophagidtypes).Roser, Karl Ludwig Friedrich von (1787-1861)
Gilbert (1977: 324, 1 citation).
Roser
materialisnow
inthemuseum
atLudwigsburg (SMN).
Rossi, Pietro
(17387-1804)
Gilbert (1977: 324, 3 citations); Baccetti (1962, biographic
&
bibliog- raphicnotes).Horn and Kahle
(1936:23
1)stated that theRossi
collectionpassed
toFr6d6ricde
Sanvitaleof Parma and
part thereof(orall) laterpassed
viaJ.Hellwig
toZMHU
inBerlin. Baccetti(1962:20),however, noted
thatno Rossi
typeshave been found
in Berlin.Schrank, Franz von Paula (1747-1835)
Gilbert (1977: 342,
2
citations).See
Gistl,1837b.38 Systematic Database of Musca Names
Scopoli,
Johann Anton (1723-1788)
Gilbert (1977: 344,
7
citations);Higgins (1963,fateof
collectionand
noteson
plates for1763
work); Schiner (1856, critical revision of Diptera species in1763
work);Voss
(1881, detailed informationon
lifeand
collections);Guglia (1972
inScopoli 1972, biography).Thomson, Carl Gustaf (1824-1899)
Gilbert (1977: 381, 8citations);Persson (1964, general notes
on
types;1972, notes
on "Eugenies Resa"
material).Thunberg, Carl Peter (1743-1828)
Gilbert (1977: 382, 8 citations); Karsholt
&
Schmidt-Nielsen (1986, collection notes).Walker, Francis (1809-1874)
Gilbert (1977:400,
14
citations);Smith &
Taylor (1964, typesatOxford);Pont
(1966, typenotes);Lopes
(1975, typenotes);Graham
(1979, biog- raphy);Walker
(1984, materialinMelbourne); Thompson
(1989,collec- tion,label&
typenotes).Wiedemann,
ChristianRudolph Wilhelm (1770-1840)
Gilbert (1977: 414, 3 citations);
Zimsen
(1954, types inCopenhagen);
Thompson
(1989,collection,label&
typenotes).Zetterstedt,
Johann Wilhelm (1785-1874)
Gilbert (1977:425, 5citations);
Ander
(1952,collection notes);Persson (1964, noteson
types);Michelsen
(1985,anthomyiid
spp.);Pape
(1986, sarcophagidspp.).Systematic Database of Musca Names
Scope
All
names proposed
incombination
withthegenus-group name Musca
ornow
includedinthegenus Musca
arereviewed
here.Thisdefinitionisbroad because
flymaggots were
describedas ascaridworms and
fossilcockroacheswere mistaken
for flies!So some names proposed
incombination
with Ascaris(Phylum Nematoda) now
are tobe found
assynonyms of Musca
domestica
and some names proposed
incombination
withMusca
arenow found
assignedtospeciesintheorderBlattodea.A few
othernames
associ- ated with theseMusca names have been
included.When a name was
originally
proposed
inanothergenus
but subsequentlyplacedinMusca and
Introduction 39
there
renamed because of homonymy,
theoriginalname
isincludeddespite itscurrentplacement.For example, Gmelin
(1790:2865)
transferredRhagio maculatus
FabriciustoMusca and renamed
itasMusca
adspersusbecause
theFabricianname was a
juniorsecondary homonym of Musca maculata
Scopoli (1763:326).Rhagio maculatus
isincluded sothatinformationon
its type-localityand
type-depositoryisavailable. Likewise, dataforall valid seniorsynonyms of names proposed
inMusca
are included.A number
ofsubsequent
usages, usuallyrepresentingnew
combinations,are alsoincludedbecause
theywere
listedinSherborn'sIndexAnimalium.
InSherborn,there is usuallyno
indicationof
the statusof
includednames. We have
thus includedallnames
listedforMusca
inSherborn and have
identifiedtheir status.These
subsequent usagesof Musca names can be
confusingtomodern
workers.For example, Schumann
(1986: 18)and Kurahashi
(1989:703)
treated Scopoli's misidentificationof Musca
carnariaLinnaeus
(a sarco- phagid,but
Scopoli applied thename
toa
calliphorid) asan
availablename.
Likewise,
Hennig
(1963: 857)rejectedthename Musca
laetaFallenbecause Sherborn
(1922:3355)
listedMusca
laetaTurton
but did notindicate that theTurton name was
onlya subsequent
useof Syrphus
laetusFabricius.Altogether,thedatabase includes 2,077
names, of which
1,709 areavail- able,904
arevalid,305
arejuniorhomonyms, and 368
areunavailable.A
number of new names
(3),new combinations
(64)and new synonyms
(57) aregiven.Format
The
generalformat of
theentries in the alphabeticallistis given below.Square
bracketsheredenote
informationonly
includedwhen
relevantValid names
aregiveninBOLD
facetype; available,but
invalidnames
aregiven initalics',and
unavailablenames
are inRoman.
name
Author, publicationyean page of
indication and/or description (Originalgenus).Type
localityorstatusof name. Kind of
typeSex of
typeDepositoryof
type.Family, currentvalidname
including authorto theextentknown. [Comments and
furtherinformation.]Type
localitydata aregiveninfullforallavailablenames
exceptreplace-ment names and
emendations.These
datawere
takenfrom
the original literatureunlessmore
detaileddatawere
availablefrom
typespecimens
orfrom subsequent
studies.Localitynames have been
correctedtoconform
to currentusage and
political boundarieswhere
possible.When
this is not possible,theoriginaldata aregivenindouble
quotes("...").For replacement names and
emendations,the statusof
thename
is given,such
as"emend.
[=emendation
of]of
x-usAuthor"
or"n. n.[=new name
for]x-usAuthor".40 Systematic Database of Musca Names
For nomina
nuda,localitydataare given,ifknown. For
allother unavailablenames,
the statusofthename
isgiven,such
as "incosp. [=incorrect original spellingof]x-us Author," or "missp. [=misspellingof]x-usAuthor."Data
are alsoprovided on
thetypesof names
or authenticmaterial (ofnomina nuda) where
such are available.Two
indexesareprovided:One
lists thenames by
biogeographicalrealm and
theotherby
thecurrenttaxonomical position.The
traditionaldivisionof
theworld
into bioticregionsisused and
ourdefinitionof
those regionsconforms
totheones used by
thevarious regionalDipteracatalogs.The taxonomic
indexlists thenames by
family, genus,and
species towhich
theycurrentlybelong.Inboth
indexes,theindexterm
is first,separatedby a
colonand
followedby
thelistof
thenames
that areassociated withtheterm.Cut-off
date
All
"Musca" names found
intheliteraturebefore 1 January1992 have been
includedinthe database.Lists
of
abbreviationsused
For
the statusof a name,
thefollowing abbreviationsare used:N.n.=
New
nameproposedfor...Incosp.=Incorrect original spellingof...
Missp.=[Subsequent] misspelling of...
Emend.
=
Emendationof...For
thekind
of type specimen(s),thefollowing abbreviationsare used:A
=adult,6*9
=
male(s)andfem*»le(s), 9=female,L =
larva,6 =
male,X =
fossilFor
thekind
oftype, thefollowing abbreviationsareused:HT =
holotype,LT =
lectotype,NT
=neotype,ST =
syntypes,andT
=type, statusunknownortypicalspecimen(s).Holotype
isused when one specimen was
designated asthetype or holotype or equivalent termin the original descriptionorwhen
the original descriptionIntroduction 41
Dalam dokumen
Systematic database of Musca names (Diptera)
(Halaman 45-49)