it is so called because it flows without viscosity.1 Provided we discount the liquid crystalline substances discussed in Section 6.6, helium is the only known substance with a liquid–liquid boundary, shown as the λ-line(lambda line) in Fig. 4.7. The phase diagram of helium-3 differs from the phase diagram of helium-4, but it also possesses a superfluid phase. Helium-3 is unusual in that the entropy of the liquid is lower than that of the solid, and melting is exothermic.
4.5 THE DEPENDENCE OF STABILITY ON THE CONDITIONS 123
Solid
Liquid
Gas
Solid stable
Liquid stable
Gas stable Temperature,T
Chemical potential,
Tf Tb
m
Fig. 4.9 The schematic temperature dependence of the chemical potential of the solid, liquid, and gas phases of a substance (in practice, the lines are curved). The phase with the lowest chemical potential at a specified temperature is the most stable one at that temperature. The transition temperatures, the melting and boiling temperatures (TfandTb, respectively), are the temperatures at which the chemical potentials of the two phases are equal.
(a) The temperature dependence of phase stability
The temperature dependence of the Gibbs energy is expressed in terms of the entropy of the system by eqn 3.50 ((∂G/∂T)p= −S). Because the chemical potential of a pure substance is just another name for its molar Gibbs energy, it follows that
p
= −Sm (4.1)
This relation shows that, as the temperature is raised, the chemical potential of a pure substance decreases: Sm>0 for all substances, so the slope of a plot of µagainstTis negative.
Equation 4.1 implies that the slope of a plot of µagainst temperature is steeper for gases than for liquids, because Sm(g)>Sm(l). The slope is also steeper for a liquid than the corresponding solid, because Sm(l)>Sm(s) almost always. These features are illus- trated in Fig. 4.9. The steep negative slope of µ(l) results in its falling below µ(s) when the temperature is high enough, and then the liquid becomes the stable phase: the solid melts. The chemical potential of the gas phase plunges steeply downwards as the temperature is raised (because the molar entropy of the vapour is so high), and there comes a temperature at which it lies lowest. Then the gas is the stable phase and vapor- ization is spontaneous.
(b) The response of melting to applied pressure
Most substances melt at a higher temperature when subjected to pressure. It is as though the pressure is preventing the formation of the less dense liquid phase. Excep- tions to this behaviour include water, for which the liquid is denser than the solid.
Application of pressure to water encourages the formation of the liquid phase. That is, water freezes at a lower temperature when it is under pressure.
We can rationalize the response of melting temperatures to pressure as follows. The variation of the chemical potential with pressure is expressed (from the second of eqn 3.50) by
T
=Vm (4.2)
This equation shows that the slope of a plot of chemical potential against pressure is equal to the molar volume of the substance. An increase in pressure raises the chemical potential of any pure substance (because Vm>0). In most cases, Vm(l)>Vm(s) and the equation predicts that an increase in pressure increases the chemical potential of the liquid more than that of the solid. As shown in Fig. 4.10a, the effect of pressure in such
D F
∂µ
∂p A C
D F
∂µ
∂T A C
Chemical potential,
Tf Tf´ Temperature,T (a)
High pressure
Low pressure
Tf
Tf´
Temperature,T (b)
High pressure
Low pressure
Chemical potential,
Fig. 4.10 The pressure dependence of the chemical potential of a substance depends on the molar volume of the phase. The lines show schematically the effect of increasing pressure on the chemical potential of the solid and liquid phases (in practice, the lines are curved), and the corresponding effects on the freezing temperatures. (a) In this case the molar volume of the solid is smaller than that of the liquid and µ(s) increases less than µ(l).
As a result, the freezing temperature rises.
(b) Here the molar volume is greater for the solid than the liquid (as for water), µ(s) increases more strongly than µ(l), and the freezing temperature is lowered.
a case is to raise the melting temperature slightly. For water, however, Vm(l)<Vm(s), and an increase in pressure increases the chemical potential of the solid more than that of the liquid. In this case, the melting temperature is lowered slightly (Fig. 4.10b).
Example 4.1 Assessing the effect of pressure on the chemical potential
Calculate the effect on the chemical potentials of ice and water of increasing the pressure from 1.00 bar to 2.00 bar at 0°C. The density of ice is 0.917 g cm−3and that of liquid water is 0.999 g cm−3under these conditions.
Method From eqn 4.2, we know that the change in chemical potential of an incom- pressible substance when the pressure is changed by ∆pis∆µ =Vm∆p. Therefore, to answer the question, we need to know the molar volumes of the two phases of water. These values are obtained from the mass density, ρ, and the molar mass, M, by using Vm=M/ρ. We therefore use the expression ∆µ =M∆p/ρ.
Answer The molar mass of water is 18.02 g mol−1(1.802×10−2kg mol−1); therefore,
∆µ(ice)= = +1.97 J mol−1
∆µ(water)= = +1.80 J mol−1
We interpret the numerical results as follows: the chemical potential of ice rises more sharply than that of water, so if they are initially in equilibrium at 1 bar, then there will be a tendency for the ice to melt at 2 bar.
Self-test 4.1 Calculate the effect of an increase in pressure of 1.00 bar on the liquid and solid phases of carbon dioxide (of molar mass 44.0 g mol−1) in equilibrium with densities 2.35 g cm−3and 2.50 g cm−3, respectively.
[∆µ(l)= +1.87 J mol−1,∆µ(s)= +1.76 J mol−1; solid forms]
(c) The effect of applied pressure on vapour pressure
When pressure is applied to a condensed phase, its vapour pressure rises: in effect, molecules are squeezed out of the phase and escape as a gas. Pressure can be exerted on the condensed phases mechanically or by subjecting it to the applied pressure of an inert gas (Fig. 4.11); in the latter case, the vapour pressure is the partial pressure of the vapour in equilibrium with the condensed phase, and we speak of the partial vapour pressureof the substance. One complication (which we ignore here) is that, if the condensed phase is a liquid, then the pressurizing gas might dissolve and change the properties of the liquid. Another complication is that the gas phase molecules might attract molecules out of the liquid by the process of gas solvation, the attachment of molecules to gas phase species.
As shown in the following Justification, the quantitative relation between the vapour pressure, p, when a pressure ∆Pis applied and the vapour pressure, p*, of the liquid in the absence of an additional pressure is
p=p*eVm(l)∆P/RT (4.3)
This equation shows how the vapour pressure increases when the pressure acting on the condensed phase is increased.
(1.802×10−2kg mol−1)×(1.00×105Pa) 999 kg m−3
(1.802×10−2kg mol−1)×(1.00×105Pa) 917 kg m−3
Piston permeable to vapour but not to liquid Pressure,DP
(a) (b)
Vapour plus inert pressurizing gas
Fig. 4.11 Pressure may be applied to a condensed phases either (a) by
compressing the condensed phase or (b) by subjecting it to an inert pressurizing gas.
When pressure is applied, the vapour pressure of the condensed phase increases.
4.5 THE DEPENDENCE OF STABILITY ON THE CONDITIONS 125
Justification 4.1 The vapour pressure of a pressurized liquid
We calculate the vapour pressure of a pressurized liquid by using the fact that at equilibrium the chemical potentials of the liquid and its vapour are equal: µ(l)= µ(g). It follows that, for any change that preserves equilibrium, the resulting change inµ(l) must be equal to the change in µ(g); therefore, we can write dµ(g)=dµ(l).
When the pressure Pon the liquid is increased by dP, the chemical potential of the liquid changes by dµ(l)=Vm(l)dP. The chemical potential of the vapour changes by dµ(g)=Vm(g)dpwhere dpis the change in the vapour pressure we are trying to find.
If we treat the vapour as a perfect gas, the molar volume can be replaced by Vm(g)= RT/p, and we obtain
dµ(g)=
Next, we equate the changes in chemical potentials of the vapour and the liquid:
=Vm(l)dP
We can integrate this expression once we know the limits of integration.
When there is no additional pressure acting on the liquid, P(the pressure experi- enced by the liquid) is equal to the normal vapour pressure p*, so when P=p*,p= p* too. When there is an additional pressure ∆Pon the liquid, with the result that P=p+ ∆P, the vapour pressure is p(the value we want to find). Provided the effect of pressure on the vapour pressure is small (as will turn out to be the case) a good approximation is to replace the pinp+ ∆Pbyp* itself, and to set the upper limit of the integral to p*+ ∆P. The integrations required are therefore as follows:
RT
pp*=
p*p*+∆PVm(l)dP
We now divide both sides by RTand assume that the molar volume of the liquid is the same throughout the small range of pressures involved:
pp* = p*p*+∆PdPThen both integrations are straightforward, and lead to
ln = ∆P
which rearranges to eqn 4.3 because elnx=x.
Illustration 4.1 The effect of applied pressure on the vapour pressure of liquid water
For water, which has density 0.997 g cm−3at 25°C and therefore molar volume 18.1 cm3mol−1, when the pressure is increased by 10 bar (that is, ∆P=1.0×105Pa)
= =
where we have used 1 J =1 Pa m3. It follows that p=1.0073p*, an increase of 0.73 per cent.
Self-test 4.2 Calculate the effect of an increase in pressure of 100 bar on the vapour pressure of benzene at 25°C, which has density 0.879 g cm−3. [43 per cent]
1.81×1.0×10 8.3145×298 (1.81×10−5m3mol−1)×(1.0×106Pa)
(8.3145 J K−1mol−1)×(298 K) Vm(l)∆P
RT
Vm(l) RT p p*
Vm(l) RT dp
p dp
p RTdp
p
RTdp p
Pressure,p
Temperature,T Phase Phase
dT dp
a
b
Fig. 4.12 When pressure is applied to a system in which two phases are in equilibrium (at a), the equilibrium is disturbed. It can be restored by changing the temperature, so moving the state of the system to b. It follows that there is a relation between dpand dTthat ensures that the system remains in equilibrium as either variable is changed.
Pressure,p
Temperature,T Solid
Liquid
Fig. 4.13 A typical solid–liquid phase boundary slopes steeply upwards. This slope implies that, as the pressure is raised, the melting temperature rises. Most substances behave in this way.
4.6 The location of phase boundaries
We can find the precise locations of the phase boundaries—the pressures and tem- peratures at which two phases can coexist—by making use of the fact that, when two phases are in equilibrium, their chemical potentials must be equal. Therefore, where the phases αandβare in equilibrium,
µα(p,T)=µβ(p,T) (4.4)
By solving this equation for pin terms of T, we get an equation for the phase boundary.
(a) The slopes of the phase boundaries
It turns out to be simplest to discuss the phase boundaries in terms of their slopes, dp/dT. Let pandTbe changed infinitesimally, but in such a way that the two phases α andβremain in equilibrium. The chemical potentials of the phases are initially equal (the two phases are in equilibrium). They remain equal when the conditions are changed to another point on the phase boundary, where the two phases continue to be in equilibrium (Fig. 4.12). Therefore, the changes in the chemical potentials of the two phases must be equal and we can write dµα=dµβ. Because, from eqn 3.49 (dG= Vdp−SdT), we know that dµ = −SmdT+Vmdpfor each phase, it follows that
−Sα,mdT+Vα,mdp= −Sβ,mdT+Vβ,mdp
whereSα,mandSβ,mare the molar entropies of the phases and Vα,mandVβ,mare their molar volumes. Hence
(Vβ,m−Vα,m)dp=(Sβ,m−Sα,m)dT (4.5)
which rearranges into the Clapeyron equation:
= (4.6)
In this expression ∆trsS=Sβ,m−Sα,mand∆trsV=Vβ,m−Vα,mare the entropy and volume of transition, respectively. The Clapeyron equation is an exact expression for the slope of the phase boundary and applies to any phase equilibrium of any pure sub- stance. It implies that we can use thermodynamic data to predict the appearance of phase diagrams and to understand their form. A more practical application is to the prediction of the response of freezing and boiling points to the application of pressure.
(b) The solid–liquid boundary
Melting (fusion) is accompanied by a molar enthalpy change ∆fusHand occurs at a temperatureT. The molar entropy of melting at Tis therefore ∆fusH/T(Section 3.3), and the Clapeyron equation becomes
= (4.7)
where∆fusVis the change in molar volume that occurs on melting. The enthalpy of melting is positive (the only exception is helium-3) and the volume change is usually positive and always small. Consequently, the slope dp/dTis steep and usually positive (Fig. 4.13).
We can obtain the formula for the phase boundary by integrating dp/dT, assuming that∆fusHand∆fusVchange so little with temperature and pressure that they can be treated as constant. If the melting temperature is T* when the pressure is p*, and T when the pressure is p, the integration required is
∆fusH T∆fusV dp
dT
∆trsS
∆trsV dp dT
4.6 THE LOCATION OF PHASE BOUNDARIES 127
Comment 4.2
Calculations involving natural logarithms often become simpler if we note that, provided −1<x<1, ln(1 +x)
=x−–12x2+–13x3· · · . If x<<1, a good approximation is ln(1 +x)≈x.
pp*dp=
TT*Therefore, the approximate equation of the solid–liquid boundary is
p≈p*+ ln (4.8)
This equation was originally obtained by yet another Thomson—James, the brother of William, Lord Kelvin. When Tis close to T*, the logarithm can be approximated by using
ln =ln 1 + ≈
therefore,
p≈p*+ (T−T*) (4.9)
This expression is the equation of a steep straight line when pis plotted against T(as in Fig. 4.13).
(c) The liquid–vapour boundary
The entropy of vaporization at a temperature Tis equal to ∆vapH/T; the Clapeyron equation for the liquid–vapour boundary is therefore
= (4.10)
The enthalpy of vaporization is positive; ∆vapVis large and positive. Therefore, dp/dT is positive, but it is much smaller than for the solid–liquid boundary. It follows that dT/dpis large, and hence that the boiling temperature is more responsive to pressure than the freezing temperature.
Example 4.2 Estimating the effect of pressure on the boiling temperature
Estimate the typical size of the effect of increasing pressure on the boiling point of a liquid.
Method To use eqn 4.10 we need to estimate the right-hand side. At the boiling point, the term ∆vapH/Tis Trouton’s constant (Section 3.3b). Because the molar volume of a gas is so much greater than the molar volume of a liquid, we can write
∆vapV=Vm(g)−Vm(l)≈Vm(g)
and take for Vm(g) the molar volume of a perfect gas (at low pressures, at least).
Answer Trouton’s constant has the value 85 J K−1mol−1. The molar volume of a perfect gas is about 25 dm3mol−1at 1 atm and near but above room temperature.
Therefore,
≈ 85 J K−1mol−1 =3.4×103Pa K−1 2.5×10−2m3mol−1
dp dT
∆vapH T∆vapV dp
dT
∆fusH T*∆fusV
T−T*
T*
D F T−T*
T*
A C T T*
T T*
∆fusH
∆fusV dT
T
∆fusH
∆fusV
Pressure,p
Temperature,T Liquid
Gas
Fig. 4.14 A typical liquid–vapour phase boundary. The boundary can be regarded as a plot of the vapour pressure against the temperature. Note that, in some depictions of phase diagrams in which a logarithmic pressure scale is used, the phase boundary has the opposite curvature (see Fig. 4.7).
This phase boundary terminates at the critical point (not shown).
We have used 1 J =1 Pa m3. This value corresponds to 0.034 atm K−1, and hence to dT/dp=29 K atm−1. Therefore, a change of pressure of +0.1 atm can be expected to change a boiling temperature by about +3 K.
Self-test 4.3 Estimate dT/dpfor water at its normal boiling point using the infor- mation in Table 3.2 and Vm(g)=RT/p. [28 K atm−1] Because the molar volume of a gas is so much greater than the molar volume of a liquid, we can write ∆vapV≈Vm(g) (as in Example 4.2). Moreover, if the gas behaves perfectly,Vm(g)=RT/p. These two approximations turn the exact Clapeyron equa- tion into
=
which rearranges into the Clausius–Clapeyron equation for the variation of vapour pressure with temperature:
= (4.11)°
(We have used dx/x=d ln x.) Like the Clapeyron equation, the Clausius–Clapeyron equation is important for understanding the appearance of phase diagrams, particu- larly the location and shape of the liquid–vapour and solid–vapour phase boundaries.
It lets us predict how the vapour pressure varies with temperature and how the boil- ing temperature varies with pressure. For instance, if we also assume that the enthalpy of vaporization is independent of temperature, this equation can be integrated as follows:
lnlnp*pd ln p=
TT*= − −
wherep* is the vapour pressure when the temperature is T* and pthe vapour pressure when the temperature is T. Therefore, because the integral on the left evaluates to ln(p/p*), the two vapour pressures are related by
p=p*e−χ χ = − (4.12)°
Equation 4.12 is plotted as the liquid–vapour boundary in Fig. 4.14. The line does not extend beyond the critical temperature Tc, because above this temperature the liquid does not exist.
Illustration 4.2 The effect of temperature on the vapour pressure of a liquid
Equation 4.12 can be used to estimate the vapour pressure of a liquid at any tem- perature from its normal boiling point, the temperature at which the vapour pres- sure is 1.00 atm (101 kPa). Thus, because the normal boiling point of benzene is 80°C (353 K) and (from Table 2.3), ∆vapH7=30.8 kJ mol−1, to calculate the vapour pressure at 20°C (293 K), we write
χ = − = − D
F 1 353 1 293 A C 3.08×104
8.3145 D
F 1 353 K 1
293 K A C 3.08×104J mol−1 8.3145 J K−1mol−1
D F 1 T*
1 T A C
∆vapH R
D F 1 T*
1 T A C
∆vapH R dT
T2
∆vapH R
∆vapH RT2 d ln p
dT
∆vapH T(RT/p) dp
dT
4.7 THE EHRENFEST CLASSIFICATION OF PHASE TRANSITIONS 129
Pressure,p
Temperature,T Gas Solid
Liquid
Fig. 4.15 Near the point where they coincide (at the triple point), the solid–gas
boundary has a steeper slope than the liquid–gas boundary because the enthalpy of sublimation is greater than the enthalpy of vaporization and the temperatures that occur in the Clausius–Clapeyron equation for the slope have similar values.
and substitute this value into eqn 4.12 with p*=101 kPa. The result is 12 kPa. The experimental value is 10 kPa.
A note on good practice Because exponential functions are so sensitive, it is good practice to carry out numerical calculations like this without evaluating the inter- mediate steps and using rounded values.
(d) The solid–vapour boundary
The only difference between this case and the last is the replacement of the enthalpy of vaporization by the enthalpy of sublimation, ∆subH. Because the enthalpy of sub- limation is greater than the enthalpy of vaporization (∆subH= ∆fusH+ ∆vapH), the equation predicts a steeper slope for the sublimation curve than for the vaporiza- tion curve at similar temperatures, which is near where they meet at the triple point (Fig. 4.15).
4.7 The Ehrenfest classification of phase transitions
There are many different types of phase transition, including the familiar examples of fusion and vaporization and the less familiar examples of solid–solid, conducting–
superconducting, and fluid–superfluid transitions. We shall now see that it is possible to use thermodynamic properties of substances, and in particular the behaviour of the chemical potential, to classify phase transitions into different types. The classification scheme was originally proposed by Paul Ehrenfest, and is known as the Ehrenfest classification.
Many familiar phase transitions, like fusion and vaporization, are accompanied by changes of enthalpy and volume. These changes have implications for the slopes of the chemical potentials of the phases at either side of the phase transition. Thus, at the transition from a phase αto another phase β,
T
−
T
=Vβ,m−Vα,m= ∆trsV
p
−
p
= −Sβ,m+Sα,m= ∆trsS=
(4.13)
Because∆trsVand∆trsHare non-zero for melting and vaporization, it follows that for such transitions the slopes of the chemical potential plotted against either pressure or temperature are different on either side of the transition (Fig. 4.16a). In other words, the first derivatives of the chemical potentials with respect to pressure and tempera- ture are discontinuous at the transition.
A transition for which the first derivative of the chemical potential with respect to temperature is discontinuous is classified as a first-order phase transition. The con- stant-pressure heat capacity, Cp, of a substance is the slope of a plot of the enthalpy with respect to temperature. At a first-order phase transition, Hchanges by a finite amount for an infinitesimal change of temperature. Therefore, at the transition the heat capacity is infinite. The physical reason is that heating drives the transition rather than raising the temperature. For example, boiling water stays at the same tempera- ture even though heat is being supplied.
∆trsH Ttrs D
F
∂µα
∂T A C D F
∂µβ
∂T A C
D F
∂µα
∂p A C D F
∂µβ
∂p A C