definite ministry in preserving the inspired Scriptures through millennia of transmission.” (Taken from: “Unger’s Bible Dictionary”; Unger, Merrill F.; Copyright 1957, Moody Bible Institute of Chicago; Moody Press.
Used by permission. p 528)
There are three sections to the preservation of the Scripture.
First, that the books of the canon were preserved throughout the time before they were viewed, or held as canonical.
Secondly, that since the books were set down by their authors the books have been preserved not only until the canon was set but even until our day.
Thirdly, I believe we can be assured that the Lord will also preserve His word until eternity future.
ARGUMENTS FOR PRESERVATION FROM SCRIPTURE 1. The Word is declared to be eternal: To be eternal the Word would need to be kept intact from Its inception throughout all time and into eternity.
(Psalm 119:152; Matthew 24:35; 1 Peter 1:23b; Psalm 12:6-7; Psalm 119:89)
2. Christ is the Word and Christ is eternal, so how can The Word change, even if there were no doctrine of preservation? The lack of preservation is a foolish thing to contemplate. (John 1:1)
3. The book of Revelation contains a warning to those that would tamper with it’s contents. By application, at the very least, we may say that God is in the business of watching over His Word and how it is transmitted.
(Revelation 22:18,19) In a similar vein the book of Deuteronomy contains a warning to the Israelites as well. “Ye shall not add unto the word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish anything from it,” (Deut 4:2) 4. One other item that clinches this doctrine of preservation is that Christ and the apostles, when quoting the Old Testament texts were using copies of copies, not the originals. This would show that Christ and the apostles held the copies to be of the same quality and authority as the originals.
5. Matthew 5:18 mentions,
“For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no way pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.”
This promise Demands Preservation.
The Westminster confession indicates that preservation has been believed even though few have written on the topic. Speaking of the Scriptures,
“...being immediately inspired by God and by His singular care and providence, kept pure in all ages....” (Pache, Rene, “The Inspiration And Authority Of Scripture”; p 186)
ARGUMENTS FOR PRESERVATION FROM LOGIC 1. If God went to the trouble to communicate the Word, His revelation of Himself, to man so that man might know Him, it would be sheer
foolishness to allow it to become corrupt along the way through the years, so that at some point in history it was not a true view of Him.
2. If God preserves as worthless a lot as man and beasts, I am sure that He would preserve the Word, which is His revelation to His creation. (Psalm 36:6; Psalm 145:20 mentions that he preserves those that love Him) 3. Consider a few texts. Colossians 1:16 mentions, “For by him were all things created, that are in heaven, and that are in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones,or dominions, or principalities, or powers — all things were created by him, and for him; And he is before all things, and by him all things consist.”
Hebrews 1:3,
“Who, being the brightness of his glory, and the express image of his person, and upholding all things by the word of his power,”
Nehemiah 9:6 mentions the preservation of the creation.
It only follows that if He protects all things as the above verses tell us — then He must preserve the Word for He preserves all things.
4. There have been those that have tried to destroy and eliminate the Bible, but we can see how much effect they have had. The Bible still is in
existence.
“No other book has ever been the object of such antagonism as has the Bible. In both ancient and modern times, kings and priests have tried desperately to destroy it and unbelieving intellectuals to ridicule and refute it. Untold numbers of copies have been burned and mutilated and hosts of its advocates persecuted and killed. But it has only multiplied the more, and today is read and believed by more people in more nations and languages than ever before, continually remaining for centuries the world’s best seller.” (Many Infallible Proofs by Henry M. Morris; p 15.)
In the conclusion of one of their chapters Geisler and Nix have a few comments that relate to the topic at hand.
“The history of the New Testament text may be divided into several basic periods: (1) the period of reduplication (to c. 325), (2) the period of standardization of the text (c. 325-c. 1500), (3) the period of crystallization (c.1500. 1648), and (4) the period of criticism and revision (c. 1648-present). During the period of criticism and revision, the struggle between proponents of the
“Received Text” and the “Critical Text” has been waged. In the final analysis, there is no substantial difference between their texts.
Their differences are mainly technical and methodological, not doctrinal, for the textual variants are doctrinally inconsequential.”
“Thus, for all practical purposes, both texts convey the content of the autographs, even though they are separately garnished with their own minor scribal and technical differences.” (Taken from: “A General Introduction To The Bible”; Geisler, Norman L/Nix, William E; Copyright 1968, Moody Bible Institute of Chicago;
Moody Press. Used by permission.; p 464)
APPLICATION OF THE DOCTRINE
1. If the Bible was inspired, if it is authoritative, if it is the Word of God, and if He has preserved it, then we may put our entire trust and faith into the Word.
2. When someone becomes worried as to the differences between the texts we can assure them that The Bible That We Have Is The Bible That God Wanted Us To Have. He Has Preserved It Unto Our Time, In The Form
Of Many Manuscripts, And Among These Manuscripts There Are No Differences That Change Any Doctrine.
3. The preservation of the Scripture might also be of encouragement to one that is having difficulty believing the preservation of the saint in his
salvation.