PELYCODUS,
cf.TRIGONODUS
MatthewThree
lowerjaw
portionsand
a third uppermolar from
the BitterCreek
localityseem
close to the species Pelycodus trigonodus thatMatthew
describedfrom
theGray
Bull horizon in theBighorn
Basin.The
lower molars are indistinguishablefrom
those inGray
Bull lower jaws in the NationalMuseum
collection referred to this species. P4 inU.S.N.M. No.
22256, however, seems relatively a little largerthan noted intheGray
Bullspecimens;nevertheless, inY.P.M.
No.
14075 the correspondence in the size of this tooth is very close.Fragments
of a pair of lowerjaws (U.S.N.M. No. 22258)
withM2 and Ma from
the lower partorGray
Bull horizon of theKnight
escarpment to the southwest of
Elk Mountain
in the Fossil Basin correspond closely to theabove
BitterCreek
materialand
are also tentatively referred to P. trigonodus. Possibly isolated teethfrom
theRed
Desert locality east ofSteamboat Mountain
represent thesame
species. Their size is in accordance.PELYCODUS,
near P.JARROVII
(Cope)Four jaws and
a maxillafrom
the slopes of Fossil Butte in the Fossil Basin nearly all exhibit distinctly larger teeth than in the BitterCreek
specimens.These may
also representPelycodus
trigonodus but
would
appear to represent at least amore advanced
mutant.The
larger of these can be closelymatched
in proportions of teeth inGray
Bull materials tentatively identified asPelycodus
jarrovii.
There may
besome
doubt, however, as towhether
P. jar- rovii, originally based onNew Mexican
material, should be recog- nized inWyoming,
but if it is, earlier P. trigonodusmay
be dis- tinguishedfrom
iton
scarcelymore
thanan
arbitrary size range, or, as in the case of Bridger Notharctus tenebrosusand
Notharctus robustior,by an
arbitrary stratigraphic limit. Itmay
be further noted that the species of Pelycodus represented in the exposuresaround
Fossil Butte exceeds in size Notharctus limosus of theLa Barge
fauna, but notN.
venticolus.The
maxilla(U.S.N.M. No. 22259) from
the saddle to the north of Fossil Butte is rather close in size to the type of P. trigonodus, butshows
betterevidence for ahypocone on
themolars. In thelatter respect it can be closelymatched
insomewhat
largerBighorn
Basin specimens referred toP. jarrovii. It is particularly close inboth sizeand
development of ahypocone
crest toA.M. No. 4174
labeled"small
form
of Pelycodus jarrovii"from an undetermined
level in theBighorn
Basin.PELYCODUS? PRAETUTUS,6 new
species (Plate4, figures 2-4)Type.
—
Rightramus
of mandible withP3
(incomplete) -M2,U.S.N.M. No.
22262.Horizon and
locality.— Gray
Bull(Sand
Coulee) equivalent of Knight, i\ miles south of BitterCreek
Station,Sweetwater
County,Wyo.
^
From
Latin, prae, before, and Cope's species P. tutw.NO. I
LOWER EOCENE MAMMALIAN FAUNAS GAZIN 29
Specific characters.— Much
smaller thanPelycodus?
tutus Cope,but resembles it in
most
of the following:Lower
molars elongated.Trigoniddecidedly
narrow
with paraconid well separatedfrom
meta- conid in bothMi and M2.
Talonid basin broad, deep,and compara-
tively smooth. Posterior crest
from
hypoconid swingsdown
tocingulum
posterointernallyand
is separatedfrom
the entoconidby
a deep notch. Entoconid high, relatively conicaland forward
in position. It joins the metaconidby
a high, laterally flexed crest.Material.
—
In addition to thetype (pi. 4, fig.4) there isa portion of the leftramus
of a mandible with P2-P4(Y.P.M. No.
14697;pi. 4, fig. 2)
and
ajaw fragment
withM3 (Y.P.M. No.
14698;pi. 4, fig. 3), probably not of thesame
individual, inMarsh's
collectionfrom
the BitterCreek
locality.An
isolated lower molar, evidentlyM2, from
theRed
Desert locality east ofSteamboat
Mountain, also belongs to this form.Discussion.
— The
characters of the lower molars, first notedby Cope
(1877, p. 141)and
laterby Matthew
(1915c, p. 441) for Pelycodus tutus,and
here observed inP.?
praetutus, are so very distinctive in comparison withGray
Bull, Lysite,and
otherSan
Joseand
lowerKnight
material that theremight seem
justification in recognizing a distinct genus,were
it not for the striking variability of these features in later Notharctus.While
the paraconid seems progressively lowered or reduced inmuch
of the material ofNo-
tharctus, the talonid largely retains the
form
seen in Pelycodus trigonodus but with the greater isolation of the entoconidfrom
the posterior crest, particularly inM2,
approaching, although not quite reaching, the condition seen inP.f
tutusand
P.f praetutus asan
extreme. Nevertheless, typical Pelycodus apparently exhibits greater stability in these featuresand
theP.f
praetutus-P.f tutus lineseems
rather distinctive in comparison with contemporaries.NOTHARCTUS LIMOSUS
Gazin (Plate4, figure 5)Several additional jaws, maxillae,
and
isolated teeth belonging to Notharctus limosushave
been obtainedfrom Knight
exposures be- neath the Fontenelle tongue in the vicinity ofBig Piney and La
Barge.These do
not, however, yieldany new
informationbeyond
thatcovered inthe earlier report.A
maxilla (P.U.No.
16123) withM^-M^
collectedby Morris
from Knight
beds beneath the Tipton tongue nearDad, Wyo.,
re- semblesN.
limosusin generalform and
inthe relative width (trans-versely) of the upper molars but is appreciably smaller, being
more
nearly comparable in size to Pelycodus ralstoni.
The
length of theupper molar
series in thisspecimenis 10.8mm., whereas
inN.
limosiis,U.S.N.M. No.
19293, the comparablemeasurement
is 12.8mm.
Moreover,
both thehypocone and
mesostyle in the Princeton speci-men may
be just alittle less developed.The
precise horizon for this specimen is notknown
; possibly itcame from low
inthe section.A
maxillaand jaw
fragmentfound
byHenry W.
Roehler about416
feetbelow
the Tipton tongueon
the southeast flank of theRock
Springs upliftmay
well represent A'', limosus.While P*
in the maxilla is a little larger than this tooth in the figured specimen (1952, pi. I, fig. 6) of A^. limosus, the molars correspond rather closely.Moreover, M2
in thejaw
fragment has a length comparable tothatin specimens of AT. limosus,which
is lessthan inN.
nunienus, but its relative widthseems
unusual for either form.NOTHARCTUS,
cf.NUNIENUS
(Cope)Various lower
jaws and
isolated teeth of Notharctusfound
in theNew Fork
beds are consistently larger thanany
of the specimens representing Notharctus limosus in theLa Barge
fauna.These may
well represent the Lost
Cabin
species A^. nunienus.The
size of the teethcompares
very favorably with Cope's species.NOTHARCTUS,
cf.VENTICOLUS
OsbornThe
material representing the larger species of Notharctus, N., cf.venticolus, in the
La Barge
fauna has been increasedby
about six lowerjaw
portionsand two
maxillae.Only
one or possiblytwo jaw
fragments with single teeth appears to be of thesame
species in theNew Fork
fauna.However,
a lowerjaw (U.S.N.M. No. 22254)
withMl and M2 and two
isolated molarsfrom
the Cathedral Blufifstongue near Flat
Top Mountain on
the east side of theWashakie
Basinseem
almost identical to certain of theLa Barge
specimens of this form.No. 22254
is only slightly larger than the type ofN.
venticolus.
The
specimen (P.U.No.
16109) citedby Morris
(1954,p. 197) as Notharctus, sp.,
from
the Cathedral Bluffs,was
cataloged in the Princeton collections as Notharctus venticolus. It exhibitsan
M2
that can also be closelymatched
in theLa Barge
material of Notharctus, cf. venticolus, although it is a little smaller than inNo.
22254 from
these beds.NOTHARCTUS,
sp.A
lowerjaw (U.S.N.M. No.
22255) withP3-M2 from
beds be- lieved to be a part of the Cathedral Bluffs tongue,on
the northwest
Dalam dokumen
Smithsonian miscellaneous collections
(Halaman 33-37)