NO. 10
SECOND
REPORTON FOLSOM COMPLEX
ROBERTS 2324
SMITHSONIAN M
(SCKLLANEOUS COLLECTIONS VOL. 95The
end scrapers arcmore
variable andnondescript inform
than the types just described.They
constitute only 2.4 percent of the series, which might be taken asan indication that they vi^ere not as widely used as theother forms. Suchwas
not necessarily thecase, however,asnumerous
implements included in the side scraper class because their predominant features pertain to thatform
also have an endscraper.So
faras shapeis concerned,thistool adheresto no particularj^attern.Any random
flakeseemstohavesufficed for such an implement. Itsmain
feature is a scraping edge at one or both ends of the flake.The
sides and lateral surfaces generally remain untouched.The
ends differfrom
those of the "snub-nosed" group inthatthey are not thickandbulky, but aremore
chisellike in form.They
are eitherstraight across, slightly convex, or have a sweeping curvenot unlike present-day blunt-endtable knives.The
size range varies between an example with a length of 35mm,
a breadth of 18mm,
anda thickness of 5mm, and
one witha length of48mm,
a breadth of22^mm,
anda thickness of4mm.
Tlie "thumbnail" scrapers are not
numerous
in the collection.Only
1.6percent of the scrapers are listed underthis classification.They
constituteadefinite type, however.The name
is derivedfrom
theclose resemblance between their shape and that of the ordinary thumbnail.They
arethin, roughly rectangularinoutline witha con- vexscraping edge. Fragmentsfrom
channelflakesseemtohave been favored as materialfrom
which tomake
these implements.The
size range is notgreat.
Examples
in the collection arefrom
14 to 15mm
inwidth, 15to17mm
in length,and2to3mm
inthickness.The
broken series or scraper edges comprise 13.4 percent of the scraper group.Most
of the specimensare probablyportions of side scrapers,but as previouslymentionedthey are notsufficientlyclearcut inform
towarrantmore
definite classification.A
curiousimplement,theonlyoneofitskind thus far foundatthe site, isone which can betermeda core scraper (fig.4). Itwas made from
a smallcore,notfrom
aflakeaswerethemajority of thetools.The
long, slender facetswhere
chips wereremoved
in the shaping processshow
that themaker was
possessed of great skill.Whether
the objectwas
the])r()ductof abitofexperimentalwork
or belongsto adefinite, although minor, type isaquestion which canbeanswered onlybyadditionaldigging. Ifno
other*examplesare foundinacom-
parable series of specimens, it unquestionably should be considered unique. Core scrapers have been found in parts of Alaska and insome
sections of Siberia. This implement is not correlative to the types from those places, however, and itmay
be that in the lastNO. lO
SECOND
KKI'ORTON
KOLSOMCOM
I'l.KX—
ROBERTS 2$analysis it should be rci,^'irdc(l as an aberrant form of end scraper or "snub-nosed" scraper.
One
type of scra])er—
the turtieback"—
found durint,^ the i«^^^4excavationsisnot represented in the collectionobtained in 19,^5.
The
failuretoobtain additional exanii)les indicates that itmust have Ixcn a very minor form.
No
sug^'esti(jnsasto]K)Ssil)leuses forthe various types of scrapers have beenmade
in foregoing paragraphs. Thereisnodefiniteknowl- edge on the subject, but to judge from the later Indians, such tools must have been absolutely essential in the domestic life of their makers. That they constituted an important ]xirt of the implement groupisshow^nbythefactthat almosta third of thesjKximensbelong in this category.They
no doubt functioned in the dressingof skins, the remo\ing of llesh from l)ones, for cutting bones, and for the-Xoduk- scraper, (.\ctiial size.)
snujothing of s])ear and arrow shafts.
The
"snub-nosed '' scrapers would be particularly well adaptedto the scrajMug ofmarrow
fromsplit long bones.
The
convex scrapers, such asfigure 3, b, are just thetype oftoolneededinthe sha])ing ofwooden
shafts.ORAVERS
AND
C11ISEI.-(;RAVERSThe
toolsin thesetwo gnnips aresimilar inmany
respects (pi. (j).Although they are definitely related and the terms used to designate
them
overla])tosome
extent, there isadistinctionbetween thes])eci-mens
inthesegroups.The
gravers constitute 5.6 percent of thecol- lection.They
are of particular interest because they suggest that themakersof theFolsom
pointswerealsoadeptatsome form
of the engraver'sart.As
yet there isonlymeager
evidence of the character of this type of delineation, but the 1935 investigations established thefactthatmarkingsweremade
onboneandsoft stone. Fragments fromtwo
objects of i)olishedbone,burned inafire,exhibit finelycut lineswhich appeartohave been comjjonents ofsome
kind of decora- tion.A
bonedisk witha seriesof short grcjoves borderingtheedgesRoberts, 1935,p.24.
26
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS
COLLECTIONS VOL. 95 onboth faces (pi. 9, e),suggests theuse ofanimplement suchasone of the so-calledgravers.A
fragmentfrom
a similarlymarked
bonewas
found bytheDenver
party,anda portion of a correspondingly shaped andcut objectmade from
soapstone—
found by Maj. R. G.Coffin
—
shows that materials other than bone were subjected to ornamentationof a typewhichcouldbeexecutedonlybyuse of such atool.Anotherpossiblefunction for thegravertype of point has occurred to the writer, namely, its use intattooing. This custom prevailed to agreater orlessextentthroughoutthecountry
among
thelaterIndians andmay
have been oneof thetraitsofFolsom
man.The
small,very sharptipswould
readilypuncture the skin for the application of pig- ment. Unfortunately,the "canvas"onwhich suchdesigns aredrawn
is highly perishable, and there is little likelihood of finding direct evidence that tattooing
was
done.Most
of thegravers consist ofchance flakesmodified only by the presence of short, needlelike points on one side or end.Any
piece of stone, provided itwas
thin enough,was
suitable. Sometimes a channel flake (pi. 9,a),was
employed, and occasionallya fragmentfrom
a broken scraper.On
the whole, however, nondescript scrapsfrom
chipper's debris were all that themaker
required.The
small sharppointswerenot fortuitous:theyweredefinitelychipped.They
dififer
from
theusualdrillinthatone face of the pointisflat,andthe otheris beveledalong the edges andhas a slight bevel atthe tipof thepoint. Drillsarechippedonallsides.The
graversmay
havefrom
oneto fivepointsonasingle flake.The
implementsin thisgroup range in sizebetween one witha length of 19mm,
breadthof 13mm,
and thicknessof 3mm,
and another with a length of 55mm,
breadth of 33mm,
andthicknessof6mm. The
actualgraverpointsdonotvary greatly in size.They
consistently range between 1.5 and 2mm
in length and i and 1.5mm
inwidth atthebase.The
chisel-gravers aremore
definitely shaped than the gravers.They
are not asnumerous, the type forming only i percent of the totalcollection,butthey nevertheless are adistinct tool (pi.9,k,I,m).
They
also weremade from
flakes. In contrast to the gravers, the pointsarebroaderandmore
elongated. Thereisa pronouncedbevel onthetip,and
theendof thelatterisastraightedge, convex onrare examples,rather than asharppoint. These implementsexhibit betterworkmanship
than that on the simple gravers.The
chipping is not confinedtothe pointsbut as a ruleextendsalong the edges,sometimes evenaroundthebase.The
chisel-graversrangefrom
25 to37mm
inlength,
from
13to27mm
inbreadth,and from
3 to8mm
inthickness.NO. 10
SECOND
REPORTON FOLSOM COMPLEX
ROBERTS 2"]The
pointsrange between3and10mm
inlength,from
4to 7mm
in widthatthebase,andfrom
2to 3mm
inwidthatthe cutting end.Both gravers and chisel-gravers are found in combination with othertools. Thereis a definitegroup of "snub-nosed" scrapers ex- hibiting the feature, and not a