28 SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. I39extend anteriorly, generally following the outer slope of the
median
troughformed
bythe fold.The
vasculamedia
branch atmidvalveand
thebranchesform
a course similartothoseof the opposite valve.The
genusNeohemithyris
as definedby Yabe and
Hatai in 1934 is identical to Basiliola.The
authors of this genus emphasize the con- junct deltidial platesand
the nature of the foramen.Specimens
of Rhynchonellalucida Gould, type species of Neohemithyris,have
beencompared
with B. bcecheriand proved
generically identical. In fact theJapanesespecies suggestsimmature
B. beecheri.Specimens (U.S.N.M. 499321) from Vanua Mbalavu,
Lau, Fiji, referred byLadd and
Hoffmeister (1945, pp. 329-330) toNeohemi-
thyrislucida, areyoung forms
havingthecharacters ofBasiliola.The
genus Basiliola thus proves tohave
a far wider range in the Pacific than hitherto believed.BASILIOLA ELONGATA
Cooper,new
species Plate 14,C
Not Basiliola pompholyx Dall, Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus., vol. 57, p. 292, 1920 (U.S.N.M.235844and 300266).
Shell thin, of about
medium
size, elongate oval in outline; greatest width anterior to the middle; beakacute,forming an
angle of about 8o°. Anteriormargin
nearly straight;anteriorcommissure
moderately uniplicate; valves subequal in depth, the brachial valve being slightly deeper than the other; surfacemarked
onlyby
concentric lines of growth.Pedicle valve gently
convex
in lateral profile, with themaximum
convexity in the posterior half; anterior profile broadly but gently convex;
umbonal
region moderatelyand
narrowly swollenand
with steep lateral slopes; sulcus originating just anterior to the middle, broadand
shallow; tongue shortand
abruptly truncated; flanks gently inflatedand
with gentle slopes.Foramen
elongate-oval, fairly large; deltidial plates conjunctand
with amarked
lipon
the anterior sideof the foramen.Brachial valve fairly evenly
and
moderatelyconvex
in lateral pro-file; strongly
convex
inanterior profile;umbonal and median
regions inflated;umbonal
slopes steep; fold originating atabout midvalve, in the anterior third slightlyelevatedabove thesurroundingflankswhich
are moderately swollenand
steep sided.Pedicle valve interior with small teeth
and
short, inconspicuous dental plates; diductor field moderately large, flabellate not strongly inserted; genital areasnarrowlycrescentic;pallialmarks
notstronglyBrachial length
NO. 5
RHYNCIIONELLOID BRACHIOPODS — COOPER
3 greater depth than the pedicle valve; anteriorcommissure
uniplicate, the fold being broadand
gentle;beak
erect, small, inconspicuousforamen
small, round, slightly auriculate, submesothyrid; deltidial plates conjunct. Surfacesmooth
but with obscure anterior costation in old individuals.Pediclevalvewith
narrow
delthyrial cavitybounded by
short dental platesplasteredagainst theshellwall;vasculamedia
short, prominent.Brachial valve with short, slender socket ridges
bounding narrow
corrugatedsockets;outer socket platesmoderatelybroadand
shallow, attachedto longand
exceptionallybroad falcifercrura;adductor field subcircular, deeply inserted; pallial trunks not impressed.Type
species (by original designation). Eohemithiris alexi Hert- leinand
Grant, 1944,p. 55.Comparison.
— The
entireanatomy
of Eohcmithyris ismost
like that of Basiliolaand
othermembers
of the Basiliolidae. It differs,however, in being
more
nearly equivalve,whereas
Basiliolais strongly inequivalve; the deltidium of Eohcmithyris isonly slightly auriculateand
does nothave
the elaborate development of the pedicle collar seen in Basiliola.The
pallialmarks
of Basiliola aremore
strongly developed inall species butthose of the typespecies of Eohcmithyris aremuch
abbreviated.The
outer hinge plates attaching the crurato the socket ridges arenarrower
inEohcmithyris thanin Basiliola.Comparison
of Eohcmithyrisand
Rhytirhynchia is essentially thesame
as that with Basiliola.The
brachial valve of Rhytirhynchia ismuch
deeper than that of Eohcmithyris but the anterior costation of theformer
ismuch
stronger than that seen in Eohcmithyriswhich seems
to be a rare feature.Eohemithyris is quite suggestive of Aetheia in outline
and
beak characters but differsfrom
it in interior details.No
development of innerhinge plates appears tohave
takenplace in Eohemithyris.No
othermembers
of the Basiliolidaecompare
closelywithEohemi-
thyris.
Geological horizon.
— Eocene (Domengine and Capay
formations).Assigned
species.— Four
species are assigned to this genus,two
fossil
and two Recent
Eohemithiris alexi Hertleinand Grant, Eocene, California.
Eohemithyris? gettysbitrgensis Cooper, Miocene, California.
Hemiihyris columns Hedley, Recent, Australia.
RhynchonellagrayiWoodward, Recent, Fiji Islands.
was thought by its authors tobe similar to Hemithyris and an early relative of
it, the correction of spelling in the latter by Bronn is essential in the former.
The spelling ofEohemithiris iscorrected to Eohemithyris inZoological Record for 1950, p. 21.
32
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. I39 Distribution.— The
fossil speciesarefrom
theEocene and Miocene
of Californiabut one Recentform
isfrom
offsoutheastern Australia,and
another offthe Fiji Islands.Discussion.
— The name
chosen for this genus is unfortunateand
inappropriate because the interior detailsnow make
it clear that it is totally unrelated to Hemithyris as itsname
implies. Relationship to the Basiliolidaeseems
clear in the broad falcifer crura, the details of the deltidial plates, foramen,and smooth
exterior. Eohemithyrisis theoldest
known member
of the Basiliolidaebut its roots are prob- ablydeepinthe Cretaceous. Itisalsointerestingthatspeciesareliving today.Hemithyris
colurnusHedley
is here assignedto thisEocene
genus.This Australianspecieshas never been satisfactorily placed
and some
objectionsmay
be raised to assigning it to Eohemithyris,an Eocene
speciesnow known
onlyfrom
California. In spite of the timegap
indicated, close comparison of the California
and modern
Australian species leavesfew
anatomical points of difference.The
exterior ofH.
colurnus is essentially identical to that of Eohemithyris alexi.Both
are thick-shelledforms
with translucent to almost transparent shells, especiallywhen
they are wet.They
are both coarsely fibrous.The
beak characters of thetwo
are identical. It is not possible tomake
a comparison of the pedicle collars of thetwo
species becauseitisvery difficultto determinethese details inEohemithyris. Actually
some
uncertainty exists as towhether
the fossil species has a pedicle collar, but the area of the beak is so thickened thatsome
sort of tubulararrangement must
be present.Inside the pedicle valve the dental plates of the
modern
speciesmay
besomewhat
less prominent than those of the fossilform
;
dental plates are definitely present in both however. It is to be ex- pected that those of the older species might be better developed than those of the
modern
form.The
delthyrial cavitiesand
muscle areas of thetwo seem
identical; the pallial trunks of themodern form
are betterimpressed butthismay
be a matter of preservation rather than one of generic distinction.Inside the brachial valve thecrura
and
hingeplatesare almostiden- tical,no
features of generic value having been detected.The
outer hinge plates are of about thesame
size,narrower
than in Basiliola butmuch
wider than in Aphelesia.The
adductor field of themodern
species is deeply impressed as in Eohemithyris alexi but the pallial
marks
of the Recent species aremore
plainly impressed.The
sock- ets ofH.
colurnusare strongly corrugated butthe corrugation of theNO. 5
RHYNCHONELLOID BRACHIOPODS — COOPER
33Eocene
species is not so strong in the specimens examined. Thishowever
could hardly be regarded as a generic difference.Other
species of Eohemithyris can be expected in other Tertiary depositsand
should be looked for.Rhynchonella grayi
Woodward
is another species that has never beencorrectly placed generically.Through
thekindnessof Dr.Helen M. Muir-Wood and
the authorities of the BritishMuseum
Iam
ableto furnish exterior
and
interior views of this species. It is clearly very similar toHemithyris columns
but ismore
strongly costate in the anterior third. Eohemithyris alexiand columns
are both ob- scurely to definitely costate in the anterior part. Davidson's figures of R. grayi greatly exaggerate the plication.The
interiorsand
beak characters of R. grayi are clearly identical to those of E.columns and
E. alexi, except for the swellings of shell materialon
the hinge plate, consequentlythe species is assigned to Eohemithyris.The
shell profileand
beakcharacters exclude R. grayifrom
assignment either to Basiliola or Rhytirhynchia.Lack
of inner hinge plates separates R. grayifrom
Aetheia which, except for the anterior costation, itotherwise resembles in its exterior characters.
EOHEMITHYRIS? GETTYSBURGENSIS
Cooper,new
species Plate 8,B
Shell large, subpentagonal in outline, slightly wider than long;
sidesnarrowly
rounded
;widest slightlyanterior tomidvalve;anteriorcommissure
strongly uniplicate; surfacemarked
onlyby
concentriclines of growth.
Pedicle valve less deep than the brachial valve, moderately
convex
in lateral profile
and
with the strongest convexity in the posterior third; anterior profile nearly flat but with themedian
region slightly concave; beaklow, incurved;umbo
moderately swollen; sulcus origi- natingon
theumbo,
shallowand narrow
but deepeningand widening
anteriorlytooccupy slightlymore
thanhalf thewidth atthe anterior flankssomewhat
flattenedand
with gentle slopes to the margins tongue moderatelygeniculate, moderately longand
broadly rounded.Brachial valve gently
and
fairly evenlyconvex
in lateral profile;anterior profilemoderately strongly
domed
; fold originating at about midvalve, low, flattened,and
prominent only at the anterior; flanksbounding
fold slightly depressed, gently rounded.Umbonal
region only slightlyconvex.Interior.
—
Strong, short dental plates visible in pedicle valve;small, short socket ridges visible in brachial valve but
no
trace of amedian septum
or ridge seen through the moistened shell.34