However,
theaeroplane could only be flownat thisspeed evenin still air provided thepilotwere
alert.The
second factor is a stronglydamped
subsidenceD=
—g.i2,which damps
to half amplitudein .08 second.The
third factor isan
oscillation,D- + .2^iD +
.292=
o,£>=
'-.ii6±.528f,having- a periodof
"^5=
12 seconds,which
isdamped
tohalf ampli- .52btudein
t= ^-^ =6
seconds. This oscillationis stable, butthedamp-
.116 '^
ingisonlymoderate,
and
itmay
wellbe felton theaeroplaneinflight.In
some
types of aeroplane, it is likely that thismotion may
beundamped and
hence the amplitude of successive oscillations will be increasing, givingrise to instability of anew
character.§11.
THE "SPIRAL DIVE"
The motion found
corresponding toE.y negative, as at slow speed,may
betraced tothe resistance derivatives involved in theexpression forE.,.Thus
:
E. = g(N^Lr-L,Nr),
and Eo
willbe positiveonlywhen Lv/Nv
is greaterthanLr/Nr. For
stability, or E.^ positive,
L^ and
A^,- should be largeand Nv and
L,- small.The
derivativeLv
dependson
the rollingmoment due
to side slipand
can bemade
largeand
positiveby an upward
dihedral angle to thewings
orby
verticalfin surfaceabove
the center of gravity of the aeroplane.At low
speedand
high angleof incidencewe
see thatLv
is diminished. Thus,at6°
and
44.6 miles,L„ =
3.44, whileat 12°and
36.9 miles, L,=
i.9i.The drop
in speed is only about 18 per cent.Hence
the drop in L,j cannot bedue
to the lower speed, butmust
bedue
to the greater angle of incidence.Letibetheangle
between
thewind
directionand
the centerline of thewings where yaw
ij/ is zero. Let cj> be the anglethrough which
eachwing
tip is raised,and
letthe anglebetween
thewind
direction for ayaw
1/'and
the plane of the chord of theup wind wing
be i'.Then
itcaneasily beshown
bygeometry
that approximatelywhen
i, \p,and
/?are small^and
expressed incircularmeasure.^A. Page,
"The
Aeroplane," p. 82, Griffin, London, 1915.NO. 5 STABILITY OF
AEROPLANES IIUNSAKER AND OTHERS
69 In our casep=i°6,
then fori=i2° and
i/'=io°, i'=i2°3, while fori=
6°,i'=
6°3. This is an increase of incidence with io°yaw
of but2.5percentatlow
speed,and
5percentatintermediate speed.Sincea sideslipisequivalenttoayaw,
and
sincetherollingmoment due
to sideslip is largely causedby greaterlifton
thewing which
istoward
the wind, it appears reasonable to conclude that this greaterlift is a consequence of the greater angle of incidence.
But we
see above, by arough
calculation, that the relative increase in incidence on a dihedralwing
for given angle ofyaw
ismuch
greater for the 6° attitudethan forthe 12° attitude.The
falling offofLv
observed experimentally is, therefore, to be expected for an aeroplane with raisedwing
tips.A
discussionmight
beopened
here as towhether
itwould
not be preferable to use vertical fin surfacesabove the center of gravity or aswept backwing
(" retreat") toobtain thedesired rightingmoment Lv
on side slip, ratherthan the dihedralarrangement. Until further experimentshave
beenmade,
it is not profitable to speculate on this question, but onewould
seeno
reason a priori to expect the coeffi- cient Lr, givenby
vertical fins, todepend
inany way upon
the angle of incidence of thenormal
flight attitude.To
preserve stability,we must make
A^- large also. This coeffi- cient is ameasure
of thedamping
of angular velocity inyaw, and
can bemade
greatby
vertical surfaceforward and
aft of the center of gravity.A
rectangularbody
with flatsides, verticalfin surfaceat the tail (rudder),and
the increased drift on theforward moving wing
allcombine
to resistordamp
the spininyaw. The
designercan, at his pleasure, increase both L,.and Nr
by proper fin disposition.Note
thatNr
is notdifferent at different speeds.On
the other hand, it is necessary tomake Nv
or theyaw due
to side slip small.A
preponderance of fin surface aft willmake Nv
large
and
is, therefore, dangerous.A machine
thatshows
strong"weather
helm
" or has great so-called directional stability is likely to be unstable because the largeNv may make £,
negative.The
vertical fin surface should be fairly well balanced fore
and
aft,and
directional restoringmoments
should not be great.Note
thatNv
does notvary
much
with different speeds.The
derivativeLr
is characteristic of the rollingmoment due
to velocity ofyaw
or spinand was shown
to be caused by the greater air speed on the outerwing
in turning. It is not generally possible foradesignertomake Lr
small,though
a shortspanwillhelp matters.JO
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. 62Note
thatLr
is greatestatlow
speedand
high angle of incidence. Itshould be unaffected
by
dihedral angle of wings.The
instability corresponding to£0
negative is, therefore, a ten-dency on
side slip to the right, for example, tohead
to the righttoward
the relativewind on
account ofmuch
fin surfaceaft.At
thesame
time,due
tothe spininyaw,
themachine
tends tooverbank
on account of the greater lifton
the left wing.The
increased bank, increases the side slip, theyaw becomes more
rapidand
in turn theoverbanking
tendency is magnified.The
aeroplane starts offon
a spiral diveand
will spin with greaterand
greater angular velocity.The term
" spiral instabiUty" hasbeen given to this motion.Spiral instability appears to be the
most
probableform
of insta- bility present in an ordinary aeroplane. It appears to be readily corrected by modification of fin surfaceand
there appears to beno
excuse forleavingituncorrected. Itis true thatan
alert pilotshouldhave no
trouble in keepingan
aeroplane out of a spiral dive, but in case of breaking of a control wire disasterwould
be certain if themachine were
spirally unstable.§12.
"ROLLING"
The
secondapproximate
factorwhen A^C^
is smallcompared
withB^,
is seen to reduceto:
or
Now
Yv, Lp,and Nr may
be expected to be always negative in ordinary machines,and
the radii of gyrationKa and Kb
are essen-tially positive.
Hence
this rootD
willalways
be negativeand
themotion
adamped
subsidence. It will be observed thatYv
expresses resistance to side slip,Lp damping
ofan
angular velocity in rolldue
to thewings,
and Nr damping
of an angular spininyaw.
Inmagni-
tude
Lp
is usually so great that Yvand Nr may
be neglected, givingroughly
A/
27 ^at
low
speed, or a subsidencedamped
50 per cent in?=.o8
second.NO. 5 STABILITY
OF AEROPLANES HUNSAKER AND OTHERS
JlThe more
exact calculationmade
in §iishowed
t=.0'/6 second.In a
machine
of very short spanand
greatmoment
of inertia in roll,we might
expect ^'^-^tobecome
small, but never positive so long asforward
speed is maintained.When
an aeroplane is at such an attitude that further increase in angleof incidenceproducesno more
lift ("stalled "),thedamping
of arollbythewings
Lpmay
vanish.Then
thedownward moving
wing, although its angle of incidence be increased, hasno
additional liftover the other and, hence, there is
no
resistance to rolling. In this critical attitude, pilotshave
reported that the lateral control by ailerons hasno
effectand
theaeroplaneis unmanageable.In
any
reasonable attitudeshort of stalling, thereappears tobeno
reason to fear instability in " rolling" corresponding to this second factorof the equation.§13.
THE
"DUTCH ROLL
"In the
approximate
solution of the biquadratic, the third factor,for
most machines
willhave A^C^
smallcompared
with B^^,and we may
write:
Considering the usual
magnitudes
of the derivatives entering in Bo, Co, Do, E2,we may
writevery approximately:
^2= —Kc'Lp, C^=(NrLp-LrNp), E, = g(NrLr-L,Nr).
C E
•The motion
isdamped and
stable, provided '—
,v^ is positive,and
the period27r
W ^ 4^0 _
/C2\Bo__ ^.
D,orapproximately
=
/'=
27r^
^-.
Since
^
"^^ jg ordinarily of the order of i or 2 the periodmay
be of the orderof6 or 12 seconds. This period is rapidcompared
with^2
SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS
VOL. 62
Dalam dokumen
Dynamical stability of aeroplanes (with three plates)
(Halaman 78-82)