CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION INTRODUCTION
Pertemuan 4 45 Menit) kerjasama yang baik
D. Speaking Skill Assessment
Pertemuan 4 ( 45 Menit)
1) Accuracy
Table 3.1. Criteria Score of Vocabulary Classification Score Criteria
Excellent
Very good
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
6
5
4
3
2
1
Speak without too great an effort with a fairly wide range of expression. Searches for words occasionally but only one or two unnatural pauses.
Has to ake an effort at time to research for words. Nevertheless smooth delivery on the whole and only a few unnatural.
Although he has to make an effort and search for words, there not too many unnatural pauses.
Fairly smooth delivery mostly.
Has to make an effort for much of the time.
Often has to search for the desired meaning.
Rather halting delivery and fragmentary. Range of expressions often limited.
Long pauses while be search for the desired meaning frequently and halting delivery.
Almost gives up making the effort at time limited range of expresssions.
Full of long and unnatural pauses. Very halting and fragmentary delivery. At times and gives
making the effort. Very limited range of expressions.
(Heaton in Harnita, 2015:29) 2) Fluency
Table 3.1. Criteria Score of Self-Confidence
Classification Score Criteria
Excellent
Very good
Good
Fair
Poor
Very poor
6
5
4
3
2
1
Their speaking is very understandable and high of self-confidence.
Their speaking is very good of self-confidence Their speak effectively and good of self- confidence.
Their speak sometimes hasty but high fairly good of self-confidence.
Their speak hasty and more sentences no self- confidence.
Their speak very hasty and more sentences no self-confidence.
(Heaton in Harnita, 2015:30) To calculate of the score using the following simple formula:
The students score = the gain score x 100 the maximum score
Assessment Score
No. Huruf Rentangangka
1. Very good (A) 86-100
2. Good (B) 71-85
3. Enough (C) 56-70
4. Less (D) ≤ 55
4. Pengayaan
Bagi siswa yang telah mencapai target pembelajaran sebelum waktu yang dialokasikan berakhir, kegiatan pengayaan perlu diberikan.
5. Pengayaan
Bagi siswa yang belum mencapai target pembelajaran pada saat dialokasikan, kegiatan perbaikan perlu diberikan.
………...……..,... Juli 20...
Mengetahui
KepalaSekolah …………. Guru Mata
Pelajaran
……… ……….
NIP/NRK. NIP/NRK.
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTSTEST (PRE-TEST) Instructions: Express your opinion about the topic!
1. What do you think about Game Online?
RESEARCH INSTRUMENTS TEST (POST-TEST) Instructions: Express your opinion about the topic!
2. What do you think about Smartphone?
Table Classify Pre-test and Post-test Students’ Speaking Skill on Accuracy (vocabulary)
NO NAMA
Accuracy
(vocabulary) Classify D
D2 pre post pre post X2-X1
1 HASBIH AMIRUDDIN 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
2 M. ILMI ZULFIKAR 2 4 3.3 6.7 3.3 11.1
3 TASBIH AMIRUDDIN 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
4 AHMAD MUZAKKIR 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
5 AKHMAD HISYAM 1 1 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.0
6 ASTRID FHATIA HAMZAH 3 5 5.0 8.3 3.3 11.1
7 FIKA WULANSARI 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
8 HARYADI 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
9 M. AIDIL 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
10 MUH. TAUFIK AL HIDAYAH IDRIS 3 4 5.0 6.7 1.7 2.8
11 MUHAMMAD FATHIR
MUSADDAD HAQ 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
12 MUHTAHIDATUL HIKMAH 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
13 NUR JAMILAH 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
14 NUR NABILAH YANI 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
15 NURHIDAYAH 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
16 NURUL IQRAMIA 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
17 RAHMAT HIDAYAT MANSYUR 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
18 RIRIN RENANDA RUSTAM 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
19 SAHID 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
20 SAPRIANI 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
21 SARNA 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
22 SRI DEVI 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
23 ST. AMINAH 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
24 ZAENAL ZAINUDDIN 3 5 5.0 8.3 3.3 11.1
25 SYAHRUL RAMADHAN 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
26 NURHAEDA 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
27 M. ADILAH ZUFAR ASHARI 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
28 MIFTAHUL JANNA 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
29 IKHWAN FAUZI 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
∑X 44 75 73.3 125.0 51.7 102.8
Xmean 1.51 2.48 2.4 4.2 2669.44
D 0.97 1.8
∑X
Xmean
∑D
(∑D)2
∑D2
Table ClassifyPre-test and Post-test Students’ Speaking Skill on Fluency (Self- Confidence)
NO NAMA
Fluency (Self- Confidence)
Classify D
D2 pre post pre post X2-X1
1 HASBIH AMIRUDDIN 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
2 M. ILMI ZULFIKAR 3 4 5.0 6.7 1.7 2.8
3 TASBIH AMIRUDDIN 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
4 AHMAD MUZAKKIR 3 4 5.0 6.7 1.7 2.8
5 AKHMAD HISYAM 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
6 ASTRID FHATIA HAMZAH 3 5 5.0 8.3 3.3 11.1
7 FIKA WULANSARI 1 3 1.7 5.0 3.3 11.1
8 HARYADI 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
9 M. AIDIL 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
10 MUH. TAUFIK AL HIDAYAH IDRIS 3 4 5.0 6.7 1.7 2.8 11 MUHAMMAD FATHIR MUSADDAD
HAQ 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
12 MUHTAHIDATUL HIKMAH 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
13 NUR JAMILAH 1 3 1.7 5.0 3.3 11.1
14 NUR NABILAH YANI 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
15 NURHIDAYAH 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
16 NURUL IQRAMIA 2 2 3.3 3.3 0.0 0.0
17 RAHMAT HIDAYAT MANSYUR 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
18 RIRIN RENANDA RUSTAM 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
19 SAHID 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
20 SAPRIANI 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
21 SARNA 2 4 3.3 6.7 3.3 11.1
22 SRI DEVI 1 1 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.0
23 ST. AMINAH 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
24 ZAENAL ZAINUDDIN 3 5 5.0 8.3 3.3 11.1
25 SYAHRUL RAMADHAN 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
26 NURHAEDA 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
27 M. ADILAH ZUFAR ASHARI 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
28 MIFTAHUL JANNA 2 3 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
29 IKHWAN FAUZI 1 2 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
∑X 50 82 83.3 136.7 53.3 116.7
Xmean 1.72 2.83 2.9 4.7 2844.4
D 1.11 1.8
∑X
Xmean
∑D
(∑D)2
∑D2
Students ACCURACY
Pre (X1) Post (X2) D (X2-X1) D2
S-1 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-2 3.3 6.7 3.3 11.1
S-3 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-4 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-5 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.0
S-6 5.0 8.3 3.3 11.1
S-7 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-8 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-9 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-10 5.0 6.7 1.7 2.8
S-11 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-12 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-13 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-14 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-15 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-16 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-17 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-18 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-19 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-20 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
APPENDIX A.1
Table of students achievement in speaking skill
S-21 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-22 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-23 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-24 5.0 8.3 3.3 11.1
S-25 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-26 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-27 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-28 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-29 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
TOTAL ∑X=73.3 ∑X=125.0 ∑D=51.7 ∑D2=102.8 ̅=2.4 ̅=4.2 (∑D)2=2669.44
1 Students
Fluency
Pre (X1) Post (X2) D (X2-X1) D2
S-1 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-2 5.0 6.7 1.7 2.8
S-3 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-4 5.0 6.7 1.7 2.8
S-5 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-6 5.0 8.3 3.3 11.1
S-7 1.7 5.0 3.3 11.1
S-8 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-9 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-10 5.0 6.7 1.7 2.8
S-11 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-12 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-13 1.7 5.0 3.3 11.1
S-14 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-15 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-16 3.3 3.3 0.0 0.0
S-17 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-18 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-19 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-20 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-21 3.3 6.7 3.3 11.1
S-22 1.7 1.7 0.0 0.0
S-23 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-24 5.0 8.3 3.3 11.1
S-25 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-26 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-27 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
S-28 3.3 5.0 1.7 2.8
S-29 1.7 3.3 1.7 2.8
TOTAL ∑X=83.3 ∑X=136.7 ∑D=53.3 ∑D2=116.7 ̅=2.9 ̅=4.7 (∑D)2=2844.4
APPENDIX A.2
a. Calculating the t-test analysis of speaking skill in terms of accuracy
̅ = =
= 1.78 t =
̅
√
t =
√
t =
√
t =
√
t =
√ t =
t = 16.2
b. Calculating the t-test analysis of speaking skill in terms of fluency
̅ =
=
= 1.84 t =
̅
√
t =
√
t =
√
t =
√
t =
√ t =
t = 12.3
APPENDIX A.3
a. The students‟ mean score of the pre-test and post-test in speaking skill in terms of accuracy.
Pre-test: ̅̅̅̅ =
=
=2.53
Post-test: ̅̅̅̅=
=
=4.31
b. The students‟ mean score of the pre-test and post-test in speaking skill in terms of fluency.
Pre-test: ̅̅̅̅ =
=
=2.9
Post-test: ̅̅̅̅=
=
=4.7
APPENDIX A.4
The percentage of the students‟ development in speaking ability
a. Accuracy
P = X 100%
P =
X 100%
P =
X 100%
P =75%
b. Fluency
P = X 100%
P =
X 100%
P =
X 100%
P =62.07%
APPENDIX A.5
Classification of students‟ scores in speaking skill.
1. Classification of students‟ scores in speaking skill in terms of accuracy.
Students Pre-test classification Post-test classification
S-1 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-2 3.3 very poor 6.7 fairly
S-3 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-4 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-5 1.7 very poor 1.7 poor
S-6 5.0 poor 8.3 very good
S-7 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-8 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-9 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-10 5.0 poor 6.7 fairly good
S-11 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-12 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-13 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-14 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-15 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-16 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-17 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-18 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-19 1.7 poor 3.3 very poor
S-20 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-21 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-22 1.7 very poor 3.3 poor
S-23 3.3 very poor 5.0 very poor
S-24 5.0 poor 8.3 very good
S-25 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-26 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-27 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-28 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-29 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
2. Classification of students‟ scores in speaking skillin terms of fluency.
students Pre-test classification post post
S-1 1.7 very poor 3.3 good
S-2 5.0 poor 6.7 fairly good
S-3 1.7 very poor 3.3 poor
S-4 5.0 poor 6.7 fairly good
S-5 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-6 5.0 poor 8.3 very good
S-7 1.7 very poor 5.0 poor
S-8 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-9 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-10 5.0 poor 6.7 fairly good
S-11 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-12 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-13 1.7 very poor 5.0 poor
S-14 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-15 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-16 3.3 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-17 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-18 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-19 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-20 1.7 very poor 3.3 poor
S-21 3.3 very poor 6.7 poor
S-22 1.7 very poor 1.7 very poor
S-23 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-24 5.0 poor 8.3 very good
S-25 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-26 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-27 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
S-28 3.3 very poor 5.0 poor
S-29 1.7 very poor 3.3 very poor
APPENDIX A.6
Table Distribution of T-Value
DF A = 0.1 0.05 0.025 0.01 0.005 0.001 0.0005
∞ ta =
1.282
1.645 1.96 2.326 2.576 3.091 3.291
1 3.078 6.314 12.706 31.821 63.656 318.289 636.578
2 1.886 2.92 4.303 6.965 9.925 22.328 31.6
3 1.638 2.353 3.182 4.541 5.841 10.214 12.924
4 1.533 2.132 2.776 3.747 4.604 7.173 8.61
5 1.476 2.015 2.571 3.365 4.032 5.894 6.869
6 1.44 1.943 2.447 3.143 3.707 5.208 5.959
7 1.415 1.895 2.365 2.998 3.499 4.785 5.408
8 1.397 1.86 2.306 2.896 3.355 4.501 5.041
9 1.383 1.833 2.262 2.821 3.25 4.297 4.781
10 1.372 1.812 2.228 2.764 3.169 4.144 4.587 11 1.363 1.796 2.201 2.718 3.106 4.025 4.437
12 1.356 1.782 2.179 2.681 3.055 3.93 4.318
13 1.35 1.771 2.16 2.65 3.012 3.852 4.221
14 1.345 1.761 2.145 2.624 2.977 3.787 4.14
15 1.341 1.753 2.131 2.602 2.947 3.733 4.073
16 1.337 1.746 2.12 2.583 2.921 3.686 4.015
17 1.333 1.74 2.11 2.567 2.898 3.646 3.965
18 1.33 1.734 2.101 2.552 2.878 3.61 3.922 19 1.328 1.729 2.093 2.539 2.861 3.579 3.883
20 1.325 1.725 2.086 2.528 2.845 3.552 3.85
21 1.323 1.721 2.08 2.518 2.831 3.527 3.819
22 1.321 1.717 2.074 2.508 2.819 3.505 3.792
23 1.319 1.714 2.069 2.5 2.807 3.485 3.768
24 1.318 1.711 2.064 2.492 2.797 3.467 3.745
25 1.316 1.708 2.06 2.485 2.787 3.45 3.725
26 1.315 1.706 2.056 2.479 2.779 3.435 3.707 27 1.314 1.703 2.052 2.473 2.771 3.421 3.689 28 1.313 1.701 2.048 2.467 2.763 3.408 3.674
29 1.311 1.699 2.045 2.462 2.756 3.396 3.66
30 1.31 1.697 2.042 2.457 2.75 3.385 3.646
60 1.296 1.671 2 2.39 2.66 3.232 3.46
120 1.289 1.658 1.98 2.358 2.617 3.16 3.373
1000 1.282 1.646 1.962 2.33 2.581 3.098 3.3
DOKUMENTATION
CURRICULUM VITAE
The researcher, Emilia was born on Mei 21th, 1997 in Lamarua, South Sulawesi. She is the last daughter from two sister and one brothers from the marriage of Abdul Rahman and Rohani. She began her study at SDN 112 Botto and graduated in 2009. Then she continued her education at Mts As‟adiyah No.34 Doping and graduated in