• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Suggestion

Dalam dokumen SURAT PERJANJIAN (Halaman 76-98)

CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION

B. Suggestion

Based on the conclusion above, the researcher gives some suggestions as follows:

1. For the Teacher

Teacher are expected to be able to help students to be more active in the learning process by using strategies that are suitable for students to help students to improve their learning achievment.

2. For Student

This strategy for students could be an alternative to speak English fluently during the learning process.

3. For the next Researcher

It is expected to use new variations in teaching using the Roundtable and used other methods to collect student data.

57

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Ahen, JA. 2009. Students’ Perception towards English for Self Expression. Sarawak:

University Malaysia Sarawak.

Alkaromah, Husni Anisa. 2017. The Use of Round Table Technique to Improve Students’ Speaking Skill at the Second Semester of the Eight Grade of SMP N 3 Bandar Lampung in the Academic Year of 2016/2017. Lampung: Raden Intan State Islamic University of Lampung.

Angell, J. R. 2015. “Perception” chapter 6 in psychology: An introductory study of the structure and function of human conscious, third edition. New York:

Henry Holt and Company.

Anifa, Nur. 2019. Submitted to the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah University of Makassar in Partial Fulfillment of Require ment for the Degree of English Department. Makassar: Muhammadiyah University of Makassar.

Astuti, Yani. 2013. Increasing Students Ability Through Story Telling. Bandung.

Bailey, Kathleen M. 2005. Practical English Language Teaching: Speaking. New York: The McGraw-Hill.

Brown. 2001. Teaching By Principles: An Interactive Approach To Language Pedagogy. San Fransisco: Addisowesley Longman, Iac.

Burns, A., & Joyce, H. 1997. Focus on speaking. Sydney: National Center for English Language Teaching and Research.

Burns, Anne. 2010. Doing Action Research in English Language Teaching. New York: Rutledge 270 Madison Ave.

Erwadi, 2004. A Study on Effectiveness of Using Picture In Teaching Speaking at SLPTN 6 Pekanbaru. Pekanbaru: A Thesis Unpublished Paper.

Fitriani, 2010. Methodology Penelitian pendidikan “Usaha Rational”. Surabaya.

Indonesia.

58

Hapsari, Anggita Sinta. 2011. The Use of Roundtable Technique to Improve Students Achievment in Writing Hartatory Exposition Text ( A Case of Grade XI Students of SMA N 1 Batang in the Academic Year 2010/2011). Semarang:

Semarang State University.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Edinburgh Gate:

Pearson Education Limited.

Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. England:

Pearson Education Limited.

Heaton, JB. 1978. The Components of Speaking Ability. London: Longman.

Heriansyah, H. 2012. Speaking problems faced by the English department students of Syiah Kuala University. Lingua Didaktika: Jurnal Bahasa dan Pembelajaran Bahasa, 6(1), 37-44.

Hong, K. –S., Ridzuan, A. A., & Kuek, M. –L. 2003. Students’ attitudes Towards the use of Internet for Learning: A Study at a University in Malaysia.

Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 45-49.

Jowell, Roger. 2015. Understanding and measuring attitudes.

Kagan, S. 1990. Cooperative Learning. San Clemente, CA: Kagan Publications.

Kagan, S. 2009. Kagan cooperative learning. Kagan publishing.

Linse, T Caroline. 2005. Practical English Language Teaching: Young Learners.

New York: McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.

Luoma, S. 2004. Assessing speaking. Cambridge University Press.

Lou, Leaver. 2005. Round table on Language and Linguistics. Georgetown University Press.

Nunan, David. 2000. Language Teaching Methodology. Malaysia city: Pearson education Ltd.

Nurohman, Muhamad Misbah. 2018. Analysis of The Students Perception Toward Reading Strategies (A Study of the 4th Semester Students of IAIN Salatiga in the Academic Year of 2017/2018). Salatiga: State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN).

Pollard, Andrew. 2008. Reflective Teaching 3 rd Edition: Evidence Informed Professional Practice. Continuum International Publishing Group.

Rahmat. 2005. Revolusi Kecerdasan Abad 21. Bandung :172.

Robbins, Stephen and Coulter, Marry. 2002. Manajemen. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Slameto. 2003. The Students Percevein Learning English. Masyarik University.

Sudarmono, Sadjana. 2012. Metode Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Dasar. 14-28.

Sudjana, Nana. 2012. Penelitian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Remaja Rosda Karya.

Sugiyono. 2017. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung:

Alfabeta, CV.

Sumsriani. 2019. Students Perception n the Use of Students Team Achievement Divisions (STAD) technique. Makassar: Makassar Muhammadiyah University.

Surati, S. 2015. Using Round Robi n Brainstorming to Improve Students’ Ability in Reading Narrative Text. Semarang: State Institute for Islamic Studies (IAIN) Salatiga.

Thornbury, S. 2005. How to Teach Speaking. New York: Pearson Education Inc.

Ulfa Pattola. 2019. The Students’ Perception towards the Use of Smartphone in Learning Process (A Descriptive Research at the fifth Semester English Department Students in Muhammadiyah University of Makassar).

Makassar: Makassar Muhammadiyah University.

Ur, P. 2000. A Course in Language Teaching: Practice and Theory. Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press.

60

Wati, A., Bharati, D.A.L., Hartono, R. 2014. The Scientific Approach in Teaching Speaking for Various Texts (The Case of Three Teacher Candidates of Wiralodra University Indramayu in The Academic year 2013/2014. English Education Journal, 4 (2). 146 - 150.

Yana, Santoso Iman, Parmawati Aseptiana. 2020. Improving Students’ Writing Skill Through Round Table Technique. Bandung: IKIP Siliwangi.

Zhang, S. 2009. The Role of Input, Interaction, and Output In the Development of Oral Fluency. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 91-100.

A

P

P

E

N

D

I

X

62

Appendix 1 QUESTIONNAIRE

“The Students’ Perception of Teaching and Learning Speaking Using Roundtable Strategy at the Grade Twelve of SMA Muhammadiyah

Sungguminasa”

Nama : Kelas : Petunjuk Pengisian:

a. Tulislah identitas anda pada tempat yang sudah disediakan b. Bacalah dengan teliti seluruh pernyataan dibawah ini

c. Pilihlah pada kolom jawaban yang tersedia dengan alternative jawaban yaitu:

SA : Strongly Agree A : Agree

N : Neutral D : Disagree

SD : Strongly Disagree d. Jawablah dengan sejujur-jujurnya

NO ITEMS Strong Agree

Agree Neutral Disagree Strongly Disagree 1 Roundtable strategy is an effective

learning strategy for speaking.

( Strategi Roundtable adalah strategi pembelajaran yang efektif untuk berbicara)

2 I feel that learning speaking using Roundtable strategy encourage me to participate actively.

( Saya merasa belajar berbicara menggunakan strategi Roundtable dorong saya untuk berpartisipasi secara aktif)

3 Roundtable strategy can develop my motivation in speaking.

( Strategi Roundtable dapat menambah motivasi saya dalam berbicara)

4 I feel happy in learning using Roundtable Strategy.

( Saya merasa senang dalam belajar dengan menggunakan strategi Roundtable.)

5 Through Roundtable strategy, I can understand the material easily.

( Melalui strategi Roundtable saya dapat memahami materi dengan mudah)

6 I participated actively during group activities with using Roundtable strategy.

( Saya berperan aktif selama kegiatan kelompok dengan menggunakan strategi Roundtable)

64

7 I am confident enough to deliver my opinions in group.

( Saya cukup percaya diri untuk menyampaikan pendapat saya dalam grup)

8 I feel relaxed learning using Roundtable strategy.

( Saya merasa rileks belajar dengan menggunakan strategi Roundtable) 9 Roundtable Strategy can improve my

learning ability.

( Strategi Roundtable dapat meningkatkan kemampuan belajar saya)

10 Round Table strategy can helps to increase my speaking skills.

( Strategi Round Table dapat membantu mengembangkan kemampuan berbicara saya)

11 Roundtable strategy is not an effective strategy.

( Strategi Roundtable adalah bukan strategi yang efekktif)

12 Roundtable strategy can not increase my motivation in speaking.

( Srategi Roundtable tidak dapat menambah motivasi belajar saya dalam berbicara)

13 I can not understand the material easily through Roundtable strategy.

( Saya tidak dapat memahami materi dengan mudah memalui strategi Roundtable)

14 I feel demotivated to learning on using Roundtable strategy

( Saya merasa kurang aktif belajar

dalam menggunakan strategi Roundtable)

15 I feel so confused about the material instructions given by the teacher.

( Saya merasa bingung tentang instruksi materi yang diberikan oleh guru)

16 I feel that I cannot participate actively during group activities with using Roundtable strategy.

( Saya merasa tidak berperan aktif selama kegiatan kelompok dengan menggunakan strategi Roundtable) 17 I do not feel confident to speak about

my opinions in group.

( Saya merasa tidak percaya diri untuk berbicara tentang pendapat saya didalam kelompok)

18 I‟m not happy to hear my friends opinion in my groups.

( Saya merasa tidak senang mendengarkan pendapat teman saya didalam kelompok)

19 I feel Roundtable strategy can not increase my teamwork skills in group.

( Saya merasa strategi Roundtable tidak dapat mengembangkan kemampuan kerja sama saya dalam berkelompok)

20 I feel Roundtable strategy can not help me to increase my speaking skills.

( Saya merasa strategi Roundtable tidak dapat mengembangkan kemampuan berbicara saya)

(Adapted from Sumsriani, 2019)

64

Appendix 2 Students

Name

Number of Question

Final

score Category 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

Ifa Dwiyana 4 5 5 5 4 3 3 3 5 5 3 4 4 4 3 3 4 5 4 5 81 Excellent

Sarmila 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 66 Good

Muh Ikhsan

Hidayah 4 4 4 4 5 3 3 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 76 Good

Andi Rafika

Nurlillah Mz 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 4 81 Excellent Indra

Pramana

Putra 3 4 3 3 3 3 2 2 4 4 4 4 4 3 2 3 2 4 2 4 63 Good

Ifan Dwi 4 3 4 3 4 4 5 4 5 4 2 4 3 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 73 Good

Firman 3 3 4 3 4 4 3 3 4 3 2 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 2 3 64 Good

Fitriani 4 3 3 3 4 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 2 5 3 3 3 4 3 64 Good

Nurhayati 5 3 5 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 2 3 66 Good

Muhammad

Al Mahdi 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 99 Excellent

Hayani 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 75 Good

Annisa

Hasmi Lati 3 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 5 5 5 87 Excellent

Dewinta 3 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 4 5 2 4 4 4 2 4 2 4 4 4 72 Good

Komarudin 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 68 Good

Apfry Syilia 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 77 Good Andi Muh

Akhdan 4 4 3 3 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 67 Good

Nurul Latifah

Ali 5 4 4 5 4 4 3 1 5 4 4 4 5 3 3 5 4 3 5 5 80 Excellent

Sabda Alam 4 5 3 3 4 3 4 3 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 2 3 3 4 73 Good Novita

Apriliani 4 3 4 2 5 1 4 4 4 1 4 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 56 Fair

Sakri 3 2 5 3 3 4 3 4 1 1 2 1 1 3 5 1 2 3 2 1 50 Fair

Rahmia 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 3 5 4 4 5 4 81 Excellent

Wadief Ainun

Hafifah S 4 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 2 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 63 Good

Kisran 5 2 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 86 Excellent

Muh Andika 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 5 5 5 4 94 Excellent Andi Rama

Ramadhan 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 3 2 2 70 Good

Ilham

Ananda 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 5 94 Excellent

Total Score 1.986 73,56%

66

Which Excellent = 9 students Good = 16 students Fair = 2 students

Poor = -

Very Poor = -

Category the students‟ perception:

Excellent Good Fair

DOCUMENTATION

68

70

72

Sertificat of Turnitin

74

Dalam dokumen SURAT PERJANJIAN (Halaman 76-98)

Dokumen terkait