CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
B. Suggestion
Based on the conclusion and implications that have been explained above, some suggestions will be directed toward the students, English teacher and the other researchers.
1. For Students
The students are expected to learn and explore more about negotiation of meaning. By understanding negotiation of meaning, the students at class XI MIPA 1 SMAN 1 Barru would be more aware of how the language is actually being
used. Thus, the students can avoid misunderstanding or misconception or misconceptions in interpreting the speakers‟ intended messages.
2. For English Teacher
When the researcher collected the data, the researcher found that students do not knowabout negotiation of meaning, they confused how they used negotiation of meaning intheir conversation. Thus, it is important to give information and comprehending about negotiation of meaning. When students already know about negotiation of meaning and they know how and when they use negotiation of meaning. Therefore, the English teacher at class XI MIPA 1 SMAN 1 Barru, it is important to give knowledge about negotiation of meaning first before start collects thedata.
3. To other researcher
The researcher expected that the limitation of this research will encourage other researchers who wish to carry out similar study to investigate more about negotiation of meaning. It is also suggested to enlarge the study by investigating the students‟ negotiation of meaning since the present study has not explored it yet. Moreover, could make some progress of this study.
43
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Bialystok, Ellen. 1990. Communication Strategies: a Psychological Analysis of Second Language Use. London: T.J. Press. Ltd.
Branden K. 1997. Effects of Negotiation of Language Learner’s Output. Language Learning. Vol 47. No 4. Pp 589-636.
Brown , D. H., & Yule, G. 1983. Teaching Sspoken Language: Approach Based on the Analysis of Conversational English. Cambridge: Cambridge University.
Brown H, Douglas. 1994. Teaching by Principles. New Jersey: Prentice Hall Regent
Brown, H. Douglass. 2001. Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Aproach to Language Pedadogy. San Fransisco: State University.
Byrne, Don. 1984. Teaching Oral English. New Jersey: Lingman Group Ltd.
Chaney, A.L., and T.L. Burk. 1998. Teaching Oral Communication in Grades K- 8. Boston: Allyn&Bacon.
Duff, P. (1986). Another Look at Interlanguage Talk; Taking Task to Task.
Rowley Mass: New Burry House Publisher.
Foster, P. 1998. A Classroom Prespective on the Negotiation of Meaning. Applied Linguistic. Vol 19. No 1. Pp 1-23.
Grass, S.M. and Varonis, E.M. 1984. The Effect of Familiarity on the Comprehensibility of Non-Native Speech. Language Learning. Vol. 34. No 1.Pp 65-89.
Harmer, Jeremy. 2007. The Practice of English Language Teaching. Harlow:
Pearson Education Limited
Harris, David. 1974. English as Second Language. New York: Mc, Graw Mill.
Husni, Na‟imatul (2015). Techniques of Negotiation of Meaning Used by English Departement Students in Speaking Activity. Thesis. Universitas Negeri Padang.
Lado, Robert. 1961. Language Teaching a Scientific Approach. New York:
Mc.GrewHill Inc.
Lado, Robert. 1977. Language Testing. Tata Mc. Gorw. New Dehli: Hill Publishing Co. Ltd.
Leedy, Paul.1974. Practical Research Planning and Design. New Jersey: Mac Millan Publishing Company Co. Inc.
Miles, M.B. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Murcia, M. C. (1978). Teaching English as Second or Foreign Language. (2nd ed.).New York: Harper Collins Ltd.
Nunan, D., 2003. Practical English Language Teaching. NY:McGraw-Hill.
Pica, T. 1987. Interlanguage Adjustments as an Outcome of NS-NNS Negotiated Interaction. Language Learning.Vol. 38. No 1.Pp 45-73.
Pica, T. and Doughty, C.1985. The Role of Group Work in Classroom Second Language Acquisition. Studies in Second language acquisition.Vol. 7.Pp 233-248.
Pica, T. Holliday, L. Lewis, N. Berducci, D. And Newman, J. 1991. Language Learning through Interaction: What Roles does Gender Play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition.Vol. 11.Pp 63-90.
Pica, T. Holliday, L. Lewis, N. and Morgenthaler, L. 1989. Comprehensible Output as an Outcome of Linguistic Demands on the learner. Studies in Second Laqnguage Acquisition. Vol. 11. Pp 63-90.
Pica, T. Lincoln-Parker, F. Paninos, D. and Linnel, J. 1996. Language Learner’s Interaction: How does it Address the Input, Output, and Feed Back Need of L2 learners? TESOL Quarterly. Vol 30.Pp 59-84.
Pica, T. and Young, R. 1986. Making Input Comprehensible. Do Interactional Modifications Help ? I.T.L. Review of Applied Linguistics. Vol 72.Pp 1-25 Rivers. W.M. 1978. Teaching Foreign Language Skills. Chicago: University
Press.
Sarah. 2016. Exploring Critical Thinking and Negotiation of Meaning Through MinecraftEDU: A Case Study of Elementary Language Learners. Thesis.
Boise State University.
Setiawati, N. (2017). An Analysis of Negotiation of Meaning in Speaking Class at the Second Grade of SMAN 1 Pasir Sakti. Bandar Lampung: University of Lampung.
Setiyadi, A. B. (2006). Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Yogyakarta:
Graha Ilmu
Sugiono. 2014. Metode Penelitian Management. Bandung: Alfabeta
45
Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar. 2018. Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi.
Makassar: Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.
Varonis, E.M. and Gass, S. M. 1985. Non-native/ Non-native conversations: A Model for Negotiation of Meaning. Applied Linguistics. Vol 6. No.1. Pp 71-90.
Welty, D. A., & Dorothy, R. W. (1976). The Teacher Aids in the Interlocutor Team. New York: Mc Grew Hill.
Yufrizal, Hery. 2001. Language Acquisition Student Text Book. Bandar Lampung:
Lampung University
Yufrizal, Hery. 2007. Negotiation of Meaning by Indonesian EFL Learners.
Bandung. Pustaka Reka Cipta.
Yufrizal, Hery. 2008. An Introduction to Second Language Acquisition ( A Text Book for ESL Learners and ESL Teachers). Bandung: Pustaka Reika Cipta.
47
INSTRUMENTS
CLASS : MEETING:
OBSERVATION SHEETS Time Negotiation of
Meaning
The Result of Negotiation of Meaning
Frequency 1 Trigger
Signals
Response
Follow-up
2 Trigger
Signals
Response
Follow-up
Adapted from : Pica et.al (1991)
DATA RESULT
TRANSCRIPT
A: Hey maya B: Hey indah A: How are you?
B: I‟am good, you?
A: I‟am good too
B: It seems you are confused A: where is the bank?
B: Bank?
A: Bank yes bank
B: Bank is merdeka street near from east road
A: Hey, you are adi, right?
B: Yes, I am
A: I am Diana. I used to live here, we also went to the same elementary school.
Don‟t you remember me?
B: Oh my god! I remember you! You were the one who accindentally broke the glass window of my house, right?
A: Yeah, but it was just accident
B: You‟ve changed a lot. You look prettier A: Really? Thank you
B: By the way, what school do you go to A: I went to school at SMAN 1 Barru B: Where is the school?
49
A: What?
B: Where is the school?
A: School is near field on west way and across parking area
A: Hey Tiara B: Hey Ana
A: Are you busy this week?
B: I‟m not busy, why?
A: I want to take you to the mall B: Where is the mall?
A: Mall is in pahlawan street across gas station
A: Dilan, this is my good friend from jakarta. Milea B: Hey, nice to meet you
A: Nice to meet you
B: She was high school in Makassar A: Where is the school?
B: Sorry? What school, senior high school?
A: Yes, senior high school
B: School is near from field and across of parking area.
A: Today I‟am being kind and I will treat you B: woww.. it was really fun. Thanks
A: what do you want to order now?
B: Order food?
A: Yes.. food and drink
B: Ok. I want to order fried rice and juice
A: Hi Lisa, today you look beautiful B: Thankyou Ria, you are also beautiful A: By the way, who is your boyfriend now?
B: I dom‟t have boyfriend. Because I haven‟t got the criteria that I want.
A: What are actually your boyfriend criteria?
B: My criteria are faithfull, responsible, and uh… can uh..
A: Can guide?
B: Yes Can guide?
A: Hopefully as soon as we are meet with people like that B: Amin…
51
DATA RESULT ANALYSIS
CLASS : XI MIPA 1 FIRST MEETING
OBSERVATION SHEETS Time Negotiation of
Meaning
The Result of Negotiation of Meaning
Frequency
1 Trigger - Where is bank?
- Where is the school?
- Where is the school?
- Where is the mall?
4
Signals - Bank?
- What?
2
Response - Bank yes bank? 1
Follow-up - Bank is merdeka street near from east road - School is near field on
west way and across parking area
- Mall is in pahlawan street acroos gas station
3
Adapted from : Pica et.al (1991)
CLASS : XI MIPA 1 SECOND MEETING
OBSERVATION SHEETS Time Negotiation of
Meaning
The Result of Negotiation of Meaning
Frequency
1 Trigger - My criteria are faithfull,
responsible, and uh… can uh..
- Where is the school?
- Now what do you order?
3
Signals - Sorry? Near what?
- Order food?
- Can guide?
3
Response - Yes. Food and drink
- Yes. Can guide
2
Follow-up - School is near from field and across of parking area
- Ok. want to order fried rice and juice
2
Adapted from : Pica et.al (1991)
53
DOCUMENTATION
55