CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
B. SUGGESTION
This research provides information of the effect of rotation reading towards students‟ reading and writing interest. However, some suggestions are presented regarding to these two information that should be taken into consideration by English teachers, English teachers program designer and further research as well.
For English teachers in SMPN 1 Labakkang that it is important to enrich students‟ reading sources not only the printed books at the library but also the e- book in the online library. Teachers can also invite students to visit many online library.
For English teachers program designer that it is important for them to conduct a training about e-library for the teacher where teachers can be trained how to operate the e-library in order that students can enrich their reading sources from online sources.
For further research that this research is limited to a quantitative research that evaluates the running program at certain school. It is important for the next researcher to conduct an experiment of this rotation reading method and collaborate it with other strategy that can increase students writing interest.
BIBLIOGRAPHY
“Literacy”. Education Development Centre. https://www.edc.org/ (retrieved on the 11 of May 2020).
“Literacy”. National Institute for Literacy. https://www.investigatorclub.com (retrieved on the 11 of May 2020).
“Pengertian Literasi”. Wikipedia the Free Encyclopedia.
https://id.wikipedia.org/wiki/ (retrieved on the 11 of May 2020).
Abrori. 2018. “Improving Reading Literacy through Seven Programs of Reading Interest containg Da‟wah Message”. Attarbiyah: Journal of Islamic Culture and Education. vol.3. no.2. pp. 205-225. DOI:
10.18326/attarbiyah.v3i2.205-225.
Aebersold, Jo A. & Mary L. Field. 1997. From Reader to Reading Teacher. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Arndt, H. L., & Woore, R. 2018. “Vocabulary Learning From Watching Youtube Videos And Reading Blog Posts”. Language Learning & Technology, vol.3. no. 22. pp.124-142.
Barton, D. 2001. “Directions for literacy research: analysing language and social practices in at textually mediated world”. Language and Education. 104.
Berge, K. L. 2004. Skriftkultur [Writing culture]. K. L. T. G. D. S. W. Berge pp.
5–13. Oslo: Norsk sakprosa.
Boscolo, Pietro et al. 2011. Interest in an Expository text: How does it flow from reading to writing?. (Elsevier: Learning and Instruction.
Farahzad, F. & Emam A. 2010. “Reading-Writing Connections in EAP courses:
Implications and Application. Journal of Langage Teaching and Research.
vol.No.5.pp. 596-604.
Frederickson, N. C., & Tony.2002. Special education needs, inclusion and diversity: A textbook. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Fulmer, Sara M. & Jan C. Frijters. 2011. Motivation During an Excessively Challenging reading Task: The Buffering Role of Relative Topic Interest.
Routledge: The Journal of Experimental Education.
Genlott, Annika Agelli and Ake Gronlund. 2013. “Improving Literacy Skills through Learning Reading by Writing: the iWTR Method Presented and Tested”. Computers and Education. vol.67. pp. 98-104.
Granruth, Laura Brierton & Tatiana Pashkova-Balkenhol. 2018. “the Benefits of Improved Information Literacy Skills on Student Writing Skills:
Developing Collaborative Teaching Model with Research Librarians in Undergraduate social Work Education”. Journal of Teaching in Social Work. vol.38. no.5. pp. 453-469. DOI: 10.1080/08841233.2018.1527427.
Harp, Shannon F. & Richar E. Mayer. 1997. “The Role of Interest in Learning from Scientific Text and Illustrations: On the Distinction between
Emotional Interest and Cognitive Interest”. Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol. 89. No. 1.
Hartadi, Arif. 2013. Minat Baca Masyarakat Indonesia. Jakarta: Grafindo.
Hidi, Suzanne. 2001. “Interest, Reading, and Learning: Theoretical and Practical Consideration”, Educational Psychology Review. Vol.13. No.3.
Horn, Van. 1988. Tulis Apa yang Kamu Lihat (terjemahan). Jakarta: Rosdakarya.
Huan Shyang Lin., et al. 2013. “Exploring the Development of College Students„
Situational Interest in Learning Science”. International Journal of Science Education. Vol. 35. No. 13.
Jayanti, Maya et.al. 2018. “School Literacy Movement through Reading Angle Optimization in Classes to Improve Student‟s Reading Interest”. Social, Humanities, and Education Studies: Conference Series. vol. 1. no.2. pp.
280-285.
John R. Kirby, Angela Ball & B. Kelly Geler, “The Development of Reading Interest and Its Relation to Reading Ability”, Journal of Research in Reading, Vol. 34, issues 3, (Oxford: Blackwell Publishing: 2011), p. 263.
75
John W. Best , Research in Education, (New Jersey: Prentice Hill, 1977), p.21.
Keraf, Gorys. 1997. Komposis., Jakarta: Ikrar Mandiri Abadi.
Kintsch, W. “Learning from text, Level of Comprehension, or: Why Anyone Would Read a Story away”. Poetics. 9.
Kirby, John R., Angela Ball & B. Kelly Geler. 2011. “The Development of Reading Interest and Its Relation to Reading Ability”. Journal of Research in Reading. Vol. 34. Issues 3. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Krapp, Andreas. 1999. “Interest, Motivation and Learning: An Educational- Psychological Perspective, European Journal of Psychology of Education.
Vol. XIV. No. 1.
Krashen, S. 2016. “Compelling Reading and Problem-solving: The Easy Way (and the Only Way) to High Levels of Language, Literacy, and Life Competence. In Epoch Making in English Language Teaching and Learning. Twenty-fifth International Symposium on English Teaching. (pp.
115-125).
Lenski, Susan & Jill Lewis (ed.). 2008. Reading success for Sruggling Adolescence Learner. The Guilford, Inc.
Luke, A. F., & Peter. 1997. “The social practices of reading”. In P. F, Sandra Muspratt, & Allan Luke (Eds.). Constructing critical literacies (pp. 185–
225). New Jersey: Hampton Press.
Magner, Ulrike I.E. et al., 2012. “Triggering Situational Interest by Decorative Illustrations both Fosters and Hinders Learning in Computer-Based Learning Environments”. Learning and Instruction xxx.
Mansur Hidayat, “Pengertian dan Prinsip Pendidikan Literasi.”
https://tintaliterasi.blogspot.com/2017/10/pengertian-dan-prinsip- pendidikan.html., (retrieved on the 11 of May, 2020)
Mark, Sadoski. 2001. “Resolving the Effect of Concreteness on Interest, Comprehension, and Learning Important Ideas from Text”. Educational Psychology Review. Vol. 13. No. 3.
Nell K. Duke. 2006. “Authentic Literacy Activities for Developing Comprehension and Writing”. International Reading Association. pp. 344- 355. DOI: 10.1598/RT.60.4.4.
Nuruddin, 2017. “Budaya Menulis Masih Sulit di Masyarakat Indonesia”.
https://www.suara.com/news. (retrieved on the 13 April 2020)
Oakhill, Jane V. & Alison Petrides. 2007. Sex Diffrences in the Effect of Interest on Boys’ and Girls’ Reading Comprehension. British: The British Journal of Psychology.
Ong, W. J. 1982. Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word. London:
Methuen.
Ortiz, Camilo et al. 2001. Parental Influence on Child Interest in Shared Picture Book Reading. (Elsevier: Early Childhood Research Quarterly.
Romli, M and Syamsul, A., Jurnalistik Terapan: Pedoman Kewartawanan dan Kepenulisa,. (Bandung: Batic Press, 2003), p.75.
Samad, Daniel. 1997. Dasar-Dasar Meresensi Buku. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Sara M. Fulmer & Jan C. Frijters, Motivation During an Excessively Challenging reading Task: The Buffering Role of Relative Topic Interest, (Routledge:
The Journal of Experimental Education, 2011), p. 188.
Saryono. 1997. Belajar Bahasa. Jakarta: Grafindo.
Silvia, Paul J. 2006. Exploring The Psychology of Interest. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Spooren, Wilbert et.al. 1998. “The Role of Interest and Text Structure in professional Reading”. Journal of Research in Reading. Volume 21. Issue 2.
Sudjiman,Panutti. 1984. Kamus Istilah Sastra. Jakarta: PT Gramedia.
Sugiyono, Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D, (Bandung: Alfabeta, 2012), p. 128.
Suwandi, 2016, http://perpustakaan .narotama.ac.id (retrieved on the 13 April 2020)
Tarigan, HG. 2000. Keterampilan Menulis. Bandung: Angkasa.
85
APPENDICES
86 Appendix 1: Questionnaires for Respondents
KUESIONER UNTUK SISWA (Minat Membaca)
Angket ini bukan tes dan tidak ada pengaruhnya terhadap nilai kamu sebagai siswa. Oleh karean itu, jawablah pertanyaan di bawah ini dengan jujur sesuai keadaanmu dan tidak perlu meniru atau mencocokkan kepada teman.
- Bacalah dengan seksama setiap pertanyaan berikut!
- Pilihlah jawaban yang paling sesuai dengan keadaan kamu dengan tanda silang ( X ) pada jawaban yang tersedia!
1. Menurutmu apakah membaca itu penting?
a. sangat penting b penting c. biasa saja d. tidak penting e. sangat tidak penting
2. Berapa jam kamu membaca tiap hari di luar jam belajar?
a. 4 jam atau lebih b. 3 jam
c. 2 jam d. 1 jam
e. Kurang dari 1 jam atau tidak membaca
3 . Berapa kali kamu mengunjungi perpustakaan dalam sebulan?
a. 4 kali atau lebih b. 3 kali
c. 2 kali d. 1 kali
e. Kurang dari 1 kali atau tidak pernah
4. Berapa bahan bacaan yang kamu miliki selain buku pelajaran?
a. 11 atau lebih b. 8-10
c. 5-7 d. 2-4
e. 1 atau kurang
5. Berapa jumlah langganan majalah/koran /tabloid kamu?
a. 4 kali atau lebih b. 3 kali
c. 2 kali d. 1 kali e. tidak ada
6. Apakah kamu menyisihkan uang jajan untuk membeli bahan bacaan?
a. sangat sering b. sering
87 c. kadang-kadang
d. jarang e. tidak pernah
7. Apakah kamu menyukai metode belajar yang diberikan oleh guru berupa tugas baca?
a. sangat suka b. suka c. biasa biasa d. tidak suka e. sangat tidak suka
8. Apakah kamu membaca ketika sedang menunggu sesuatu?
a. sangat sering b. sering
c. kadang-kadang d. jarang
e. tidak pernah
9. Apakah kamu senang jika mendapat hadiah ulang tahun berupa buku?
a. sangat senang b. senang c. biasa-biasa d. tidak senang e. sangat tidak senang
10. Apakah ketika kamu sedang membaca, jiwa kamu dalam keadaan tenang?
a. sangat sering b. sering
c. kadang-kadang d. jarang
e. tidak pernah
Catatan: Skor setiap jawaban: a : 5, b : 4, c: 3, d: 2, e: 1
88
KUESIONER UNTUK SISWA (Minat Menulis)
Angket ini bukan tes dan tidak ada pengaruhnya terhadap nilai kamu sebagai siswa. Oleh karean itu, jawablah pertanyaan di bawah ini dengan jujur sesuai keadaanmu dan tidak perlu meniru atau mencocokkan kepada teman .
- Bacalah dengan seksama setiap pertanyaan berikut!
- Pilihlah jawaban yang paling sesuai dengan keadaan kamu dengan tanda silang ( X ) pada jawaban yang tersedia!
11. Menurutmu apakah menulis itu penting?
a. sangat penting b penting c. biasa saja d. tidak penting
e. santgat tidak penting
12. Berapa jam kamu menulis tiap hari di luar jam belajar?
a. 4 jam atau lebih b. 3 jam
c. 2 jam d. 1 jam
e. Kurang dari 1 jam atau tidak menulis
13 . Berapa kali kamu mengunjungi perpustakaan dalam sebulan untuk mencari referensi?
a. 4 kali atau lebih b. 3 kali
c. 2 kali d. 1 kali
e. Kurang dari 1 kali atau tidak pernah
14. Berapa bahan bacaan yang kamu miliki selain buku pelajaran?
a. 11 atau lebih b. 8-10
c. 5-7 d. 2-4
e. 1 atau kurang
15. Berapa jumlah langganan majalah/koran/tabloid kamu?
a. 4 kali atau lebih b. 3 kali
c. 2 kali d. 1 kali e. tidak ada
16. Apakah kamu menyisihkan uang jajan untuk membeli bahan bacaan untuk referensi?
a. sangat sering b. sering
89 c. kadang-kadang
d. jarang e. tidak pernah
17. Apakah kamu menyukai metode belajar yang diberikan oleh guru berupa tugas menulis?
a. sangat suka b. suka c. biasa biasa d. tidak suka e. sangat tidak suka
18. Apakah kamu menulis ketika sedang menunggu sesuatu?
a. sangat sering b. sering
c. kadang-kadang d. jarang
e. tidak pernah
19. Apakah kamu senang jika mendapat hadiah ulang tahun berupa buku?
a. sangat senang b. senang c. biasa-biasa d. tidak senang e. sangat tidak senang
20. Apakah ketika kamu sedang menulis, kamu merasa bangga dengan tulisanmu?
a. sangat sering b. sering
c. kadang-kadang d. jarang
e. tidak pernah
Catatan: Skor setiap jawaban: a : 5, b : 4, c: 3, d: 2, e: 1
90
Appendix 2. Result of Validity and Reliability Testing of Questionnaires RESULT OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF INSTRUMENT:
READING INTEREST (r tabel = 0.278) Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 50 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 50 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
,618 7
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
Y1.1 19,44 8,945 ,375 ,501
Y1.4 21,82 8,681 ,353 ,632
Y1.5 22,42 6,330 ,332 ,441
Y1.6 21,28 6,369 ,506 ,358
Y1.8 20,82 6,355 ,560 ,340
Y1.9 20,04 8,815 ,352 ,546
Y1.10 20,22 7,481 ,324 ,452
91
RESULT OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF INSTRUMENT:
WRITING INTEREST (r tabel = 0.278) Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 50 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 50 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
,689 7
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
Y2.11 18,39 13,826 ,422 ,673
Y2.14 20,92 12,993 ,315 ,742
Y2.15 21,49 11,838 ,415 ,650
Y2.16 20,16 11,181 ,537 ,618
Y2.18 20,18 10,403 ,539 ,611
Y2.19 19,08 11,660 ,458 ,639
Y2.20 19,37 10,321 ,488 ,627
92
RESULT OF VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF INSTRUMENT:
ROTATION READING (r tabel = 0.278) Case Processing Summary
N %
Cases Valid 50 100,0
Excludeda 0 ,0
Total 50 100,0
a. Listwise deletion based on all variables in the procedure.
Reliability Statistics
Cronbach's Alpha N of Items
,607 6
Item-Total Statistics
Scale Mean if Item Deleted
Scale Variance if Item Deleted
Corrected Item-Total Correlation
Cronbach's Alpha if Item Deleted
X2 16,96 10,651 ,370 ,589
X3 16,24 7,941 ,509 ,477
X7 15,08 12,279 ,354 ,619
X12 16,50 10,214 ,332 ,566
X13 16,76 7,329 ,586 ,429
X17 15,26 11,707 ,368 ,619
93 Appendix 3. Result of Data Analysis
RESULT OF T-test OF ROTATION READING CLASS AND NON ROTATION READING CLASS: READING INTEREST
Group Statistics
Group N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Hasil Siswa Baca Gilir 129 33,8217 4,60714 ,40564
Non Baca Gilir 129 28,9457 5,35652 ,47162
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for Equality
of Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2- tailed)
Mean Differenc
e
Std. Error Difference
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference Lower Upper Hasil
Siswa
Equal variances assumed
1,635 ,202 7,838 256 ,000 4,87597 ,62206 3,65096 6,1009 8
Equal variances not assumed
7,838 250,39 8
,000 4,87597 ,62206 3,65083 6,1011 1
94
RESULT OF T-test OF ROTATION READING CLASS AND NON ROTATION READING CLASS: WRITING INTEREST
Group Statistics
Group N Mean Std. Deviation Std. Error Mean
Hasil Siswa Baca Gilir 129 33,6744 5,45602 ,48038
Non Baca Gilir 129 26,6124 5,74634 ,50594
Independent Samples Test
Levene's Test for Equality of
Variances t-test for Equality of Means
F Sig. t df
Sig. (2- tailed)
Mean Difference
Std.
Error Differe nce
95% Confidence Interval of the
Difference Lower Upper Hasil
Siswa
Equal variances assumed
,192 ,661 10,122 256 ,000 7,06202 ,69766 5,68813 8,43590
Equal variances not assumed
10,122 255,315 ,000 7,06202 ,69766 5,68811 8,43592
95 Appendix 4. Letters of Permission
96
97
98
99
100 Appendix 5. Documentation