CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD RESEARCH METHOD
B. Suggestion
42
CHAPTER V
CONCLUTION AND SUGGESTION A. Conclusion
Based on the findings and discussion, it could be concluded that the students’ perception at Elevent Grade Students at SMKN 4 Jeneponto on the use of Listen-Read-Discuss Strategy in improving students’ reading comprehension had positive perception. It was proved by the result of likers score analysis, it was 30 (100%) students perception chategory which score classification is 41 – 80 then the mean score show the result are (62.4), means positive. It means that, the students like when listening, reading, and discussing using Listen- Read-Discuss Strategy in reading comprehension.
43
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Adams, Marilyn Jager. (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning about Print. New York: McGraw-Hill Companies.
Anderson, M. & Anderson, K. (2003). Text Type in English 2. Macmillan Educational Australia: PTY, Ltd.
Anderson, D. L. & Fisher, K. M. (2002). Biology Concept Cartoons : A Constructivist Tool for Dealing With Alternative Conception, Makalah pada Seminar Tahunan the National Science Teacher Association. San Diego: CA.
Boer, De and Dallmann. (1964). The Teaching of Reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, Inc.
Brown, Douglas. H. (2000). Teachinf by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy. California: Longman.
Crystal, D. (2000). The Cambrige Encyclopedia of Laanguage 3rd (Third) edition.Cambrige University Press.
Deddy Mulyana (2005).Ilmu Komunikasi. Bandung: PT Rosda Karya Offset
Dawes, John (2008). Do Data Characteristics Change According to the Number of Scale Points Used an Experiment Using 5-point, 7-point and 10-point Scale. International Journal of Market Research, 50 (1), 61-77.
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/228445427_Do_Data_Char acteristics_Change_According_to_the_Number_of_Scale_Points_Us e_an_Experiment_Using_5_Point_7_Point_and_10_Point_Scale.
Dennis, D. V. (2008). Are Assessment Data Really Driving Middle School Reading Intruction? What We Can Learn From One Student’s Experience.
Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 51, 578-587.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.51.7.5
Fauziah, Eliza Shirath. (2016). Model Listen-Read-Discuss (LRD) Dalam Pembelajaran Dokkai. Journal of Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran
Bahasa Jepang (e-ISSN:2528-5548).
https://doi.org/10.17509/japanedu.v1i1.2653
Gay, L.R, G.E. Mills. (2006). Educational Research ( Competencies for Analysis and Applicasions). USA: Pearson.
Guthrie, John T. (2008). Engaging Adolescents in Reading. London: Corwin Press.
44
Hanapi Hanapi & Ngatimah (2018). The Listen, Read, Discuss (LRD) Strategy in Improving the Students’ Reading Skill of Recount Text at SMPN 2
Buru. ResearchGate.
http://www.researchgate.net/publication/328538545
Harris, R. A. & Sipay, E. R. (1980). How to Increase Reading Ability. NY: David McKay.
Heilman, A, et.al. (1988). The Principles and The Practices of Teaching Reading.
Ohio. Charles E. Merill Publishing Co. p.246
Hidayati, Khusnul. (2014). The Influence of Questioning Strategy on Students’
Achievement in Reading. Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University. http://notjustsurviving.wordpress.com/2009/01/27/three- kinds-of reading/.Access On February 02nd 2017.
Ibrahim Robby. (2017). The Use of Listen Read Discuss Strategy and Reading Motivation Toward the Students’ Reading Comprehension. Jurnal Pendidikan, Vol 4, No 2, Agustus 2017
Idmas Irdawani. (2020). The Use of Extensive Reading Activity on Students’
Reading Comprehension at Tenth Grade of SMA Muhammadiyah Sungguminasa.
Jalalludin Rakhmat (2011). Psikologi Komunikasi. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Kristin Lems and Leah D Miller. (2010). Teaching Reading to English Language Learner. New York: The Guilford Press.
Manzo, Anthony V &Casela, Ula P.(2008). Teaching Children to be Literate: A Reflective Approach. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc Maulana Azad (2015). Language and Language Skills. ResearchGate Journal,
(03), 20-15. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274310952 Moejiono. (1992). Stategi Belajar Mengajar, Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikandan
Kebudayaan Derektorat jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Proyek Pembinaan
Tenaga Pendidikan,
http://ayomengajarindonesia.blogspot.com/2012/12/belajar- kelompok.html
Neno. (2013). Keterampilan Bahasa Inggris English Skill Yang Wajib Anda Kuasai.
Diakses 24 Oktober, 2020 from Website: Active English, https://fadlan90.wordpress.com/2017/04/21/speaking-skill-dalam- bahasa-ingris/
45
Nunan, David. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. New York : McGrawHill Companies.
Pardo, L S. (2004). What Every Teacher Needs to Know about Comprehension: in the Reading Teacher. Columbus: Pearson.
Patel, M. F. & Jain, Praveen M. (2008). ENGLISH Language Teaching. Jaipur : Sunrise Publisher & Distributors.
Peter.Afflerbach, P, David. Pearson, & Scott.G.Paris (2008). Clarifying Differences Between Reading Skills and Reading Strategies. The Reading Teacher Journal, 61 (5), 354-373, 20-08. Doi. 10.1598/RT.61.5.1
Rahayu Lisa, Ratmadina. (2004). The Use of QTA ( Question The Author) in Teaching Reading Comprehention to Senior High School Students. Journal of English Language Teaching.Vol.2 No.3 Serie A, June 2014.
http://ejournal.unp.ac.id/index.php/jlt/article.
Retmawasari Nita. (2013). Keefektifan Strategi Listen-Read-Discuss (LRD) Dalam Pembelajaran Membaca Pemahaman Pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA Negeri 1 Tempel Yogyakarta.Yogyakarta.
Rusydie, Salman. (2011). Prinsip – Prinsip Manahemen Kelas. Jogjakarta: DIVA Press.
Sharon J. Crawley and King Merritt. (2000). Remediating Reading Difficulties.
New York: The McGraw-Hill.
Subana, M dana Sunarti. (2000). Strategi Belajar Mengajar Bahasa Indonesia:
Berbagai Pendekatan, Metode dan Media Pengajaran. Bandung:
Pustaka Setia.
Sugiyono. (2017). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Kualitatif Kuantitatif dan R & D.
Bandung: Alfabeta
Sumanto (2014).Psikologi Umum, Yogyakarta: CAPSSarlito W.
Sarwono (2004). Pengantar Psikologi Umum. Yogyakarta: Andi Offset.
Tarekhelabsy. (2003). Successful Reading Strategies for Second Language Learners. Colombus: Outskirtspress
Terasne, Sugianto Nananh, Wahab Abdul, & Ulfa Maria. (2018). Improving Students’ Reading Comprehension Through Listen-Read-Discuss (LRD) Strategy at MA Nurussabah Prayah Tengah. Journal of English Language
Teaching, 5 (2). e-ISSN: 2548-5865.
http://ojs.ikipmataram.ac.id/index.php/joelt.
46
Tiemey, Robert J. (1980). Definition of Reading Comprehension According to Experts,
(Online),(https://www.google.co.id/search?dcr=0&q=definition+of+reading +comprehension+according+to+experts&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwih7MyvnO 7WAhV BopQKHSGbBQoQ1QIIfigA&biw=1280&bih=688)
Yusanti Elfa. (2017). The Influence of Using Listen-Read-Discuss (LRD) Strategy Towards Students’ Reading Comprehension on Narrative Text at The First Semester of the Eleventh Grade of SMA Perintis 1 Bandar Lampung in 2017/2018 Academic Year. Lampung.
47
48
QUESTIONNAIRE IDENTITAS
Nama :
Kelas : PETUNJUK
1. Angket ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui persepsi siswa terhadap penerapan Listen-Read-Discuss Strategy (strategi belajar Mendengarkan – membaca – diskusi) silahkan beri tanda centang (√) pada pertanyaan – pertanyaan yang mengambarkan persepsi anda terhadap penerapan Listen-Read-Discuss Strategy (Strategi belajar Mendengarkan – membaca – diskusi) dalam pembelajaran bahasa inggris.
2. Dibawah ini terdapatt beberapa pertanyaan dengan lima pilihan jawaban yang tersedia. Berikut pilihan jawabannya :
SD : Strong Disagree (sangat tidak setuju) D : Disagree ( Tidak Setuju)
A : Agree ( Setuju)
SA : Strong Agree (Sangat Setuju) Appendix 1
49
No. STATEMENTS SA A D SD
1. After teacher was giving axplaination then, reading, and discussing help me to comprehend the text
2. teacher’s axplaination, reading, and discussing doesn’t help me to comprehend the text
3. After teacher was giving axplaination then, reading, and discussing help me to make the right conclution
4. teacher’s axplaination then, reading, and discussing doesn’t helps me to make the right conclution
5. After teacher was giving axplaination then, reading, and discussing I can get indirect message on the story
6 teacher’s axplaination then, reading, and discussing I can’t get indirect message on the story
7 Using story as learning material helps me to get the main idea on the text
8 Using story as learning material doesn’t help me to get the main idea on the text 9 After listen teacher’s axplaination,
reading a text, and discussing I am able to understand and find the meaning on the text
10 After listening teacher’s axplaination, reading a text, and discussing I am not able to understand and find the meaning on the text
11 After listening teacher’s axplaination, reading a text, and discussing I know that fact on the text
12 listening teacher’s axplaination, reading a text, and doesn’t help me to know the fact on the text
50
13. After listening teacher’s axplaination, reading a text, and discussing I can get information on the text”
14. After listening teacher’s axplaination, reading a text, and discussing I can’t get information on the text
15. After listening teacher’s axplaination, reading a text, and discussing I know content of text
16. listening teacher’s axplaination, reading a text, and discussing doesn’t help me to know the content of text
17. After listening teacher’s axplaination, reading a text, and discussing I know the meaning of text
18. listening teacher’s axplaination, reading a text, and discussing doesn’t help me to know the meaning of text
19. After listening teacher’s axplaination, reading a text, and discussing I can get information
20. listening teacher’s axplaination, reading a text, and discussing doesn’t help me to gain information
Adapted from Manzo & Casale, (2008).
51
Appendix 2
52
53
54
55
Nama
Pertanyaan
Jumlah
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Azizah nur utari 5 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 2 2 3 4 5 3 4 61
Fatur ramadhan 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 2 3 5 5 54
Aspiamin Fahrul 4 5 4 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 58
Aditia Saputra 3 5 5 5 4 2 4 3 2 2 2 3 4 3 5 52
Dimas Adrian Saputra 3 3 2 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 4 2 3 3 49
Firdawati 3 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4 3 4 66
Dewi pratiwi 4 5 5 5 5 3 5 5 3 3 2 2 4 5 5 61
Andi nining Natira 5 5 5 4 4 3 4 5 2 3 3 3 5 3 5 59
Agung laksono 2 5 4 4 3 4 4 3 4 4 5 4 2 5 5 58
Alda saputri handayani 5 5 5 4 5 2 4 5 3 2 1 1 5 3 4 54
Dian ayu pratiwi 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 60
Asrini wulan 4 4 4 5 4 3 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 5 5 59
Ika adelia wahid 3 1 3 3 3 2 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 3 3 40
Burhan tias 4 4 4 4 5 4 2 4 4 4 4 4 2 4 4 57
Alfina damayanti 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 2 2 2 4 4 2 5 4 52
Andi suci putri guntur 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 61
Iskayati 3 3 4 5 3 2 4 4 2 2 2 2 2 4 4 46
Fitra mardiana 3 4 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 5 4 4 4 4 56
Ismail 3 4 5 5 4 2 4 5 2 2 3 3 3 4 5 54
Juharnisa 5 4 5 5 5 3 4 5 3 2 2 2 5 4 4 58
Andi novita ayu 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 5 5 54
Dito ananda.s 3 4 4 3 4 4 3 3 5 5 3 1 3 4 3 52
fera dejuliani 4 4 4 4 3 2 4 5 3 4 3 2 4 5 5 56
The Result of Students’ Perception on the Use of Listen-Read-Discuss Strategy in improving the student’s reading comprehension at Elevent
Grade of SMK 4 Jeneponto Appendix 3
56
danil 3 3 4 4 3 3 2 3 3 4 4 3 4 3 4 50
akbar 2 4 3 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 4 3 2 1 5 45
andi fadli wardana 4 3 2 5 1 4 3 4 5 5 4 5 3 5 5 58
A. Annas chandra 4 4 5 4 4 2 3 4 3 2 2 2 5 4 5 53
Muh. Nur fajri 1 3 4 4 4 5 1 3 5 5 5 5 2 3 4 54
Nur alisah 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 49
Ardi 4 5 4 4 5 3 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 4 4 56
1642
57
CURRICULUM VITAE
CITRA HARDIANA was born on February, 13rd 1999 in Bonto Baddo, Jeneponto. She is the first daughter of Kaharuddin Dg Tawang and Sudartina Dg Layu. She has one brother and one little sister. She started her study at SDN No. 61 Batu Menteng and graduated in 2010. She continued her study at SMPN 2 Bangkala and graduated in 2013. Then she studied in SMKN 4 Jeneponto and finished in 2016. She was accepted at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar as a Student of English Education Departement in 2016.
At the end of her study, she could finish her thesis under the title The Analysis of Students’ Perception on the Use of Listen-Read-Discuss Strategy in Improving the Student’s Reading Comprehension at SMKN 4 Jeneponto ( a Descriptive Quantitative Study at Eleventh Grade of SMKN 4 Jeneponto)
Appendix 4
58
Appendix 5
59
Appendix 6
DOCUMENTATION
60