What I Would Do Differently
APPENDIX 4 SURVEY RESULTS
Q1 - Agreement to Participate
The research in which you are about to participate is designed to identify the current knowledge of apologetics of the participant. The central issue is “why” you believe in Biblical Inerrancy, and the scientific, historical, and archaeological lessons that are derived from Scripture. This research is being conducted by John “Sandy” Pidgeon for the purpose of collecting data for a ministry project. In this research, you will answer questions before the project and you will answer the some of the same questions at the conclusion of the project. Any information you provide will be held strictly confidential, and at no time will your name be reported or identified with your responses. Participation is strictly voluntary and you are free to withdraw at any time. By completion of this survey, you are giving informed consent for the use of your responses in this project. All instrumentation complies with the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary ethics
protocols.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
Agreement to Participate The research in which you are about to participate is designed to identify the current knowledge of apologetics of the participant. The central issue is
“why” you believe in Biblical Inerrancy, and the scientific, historical, and archaeological lessons that are derived from Scripture. This research is being conducted by John
“Sandy” Pidgeon for the purpose of
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 46
collecting data for a ministry project.
In this research, you will answer questions before the project and you will answer the some of the same questions at the conclusion of the project. Any information you provide will be held strictly confidential, and at no time will your name be reported or identified with your responses.
Participation is strictly voluntary and you are free to withdraw at any time. By completion of this survey, you are giving informed consent for the use of your responses in this project. All instrumentation complies with the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary ethics protocols.
# Answer % Count
1 Yes 100.00% 46
4 No 0.00% 0
Total 100% 46
Q1 - Do you consider yourself a Christian?
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count 1
Do you consider yourself a Christian?
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 48
# Answer % Count
1 Yes 100.00% 48
3 No 0.00% 0
Total 100% 48
Q2 - Have you repented of your sin and trusted in Jesus Christ for salvation?
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
Have you repented of your sin and trusted in Jesus Christ for salvation?
1.00 3.00 1.04 0.29 0.08 48
# Answer % Count
1 Yes 97.92% 47
3 No 2.08% 1
Total 100% 48
Q3 - Are you married?
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1 Are you
married? 1.00 3.00 1.25 0.66 0.44 48
# Answer % Count
1 Yes 87.50% 42
3 No 12.50% 6
Total 100% 48
Q4 - What is your age in years?
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count 1 What is your age
in years? 2.00 6.00 4.21 1.21 1.46 48
# Answer % Count
1 18-24 0.00% 0
2 25-34 8.33% 4
3 35-44 22.92% 11
4 45-54 25.00% 12
5 55-64 27.08% 13
6 65-over 16.67% 8
Total 100% 48
Q5 - I have been challenged by agnostic or atheist acquaintances, saying that the Bible is unsupported by science and/or history.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
I have been challenged by agnostic or atheist acquaintances, saying that the Bible is unsupported by science and/or history.
1.00 6.00 4.10 1.75 3.05 48
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 14.58% 7
2 Disagree 8.33% 4
3 Somewhat disagree 10.42% 5
4 Somewhat agree 10.42% 5
5 Agree 31.25% 15
6 Strongly agree 25.00% 12
Total 100% 48
Q6 - I am able to respond to atheist or agnostic secular challenges to my faith.
# Field Minimu
m
Maximu m
Mea n
Std Deviati
on
Varian ce
Cou nt
1
I am able to respond to
atheist or agnostic secular
philosophical/scientific/hist orical challenges to my
faith.
2.00 6.00 4.65 1.09 1.19 48
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
2 Disagree 6.25% 3
3 Somewhat disagree 6.25% 3
4 Somewhat agree 27.08% 13
5 Agree 37.50% 18
6 Strongly agree 22.92% 11
Total 100% 48
Q7 - My inability to respond to atheist or agnostic opposition hinders my ability to move people to evangelism.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
My inability to respond to atheist or agnostic opposition hinders my ability to move people to evangelism.
1.00 6.00 3.08 1.27 1.62 48
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 12.50% 6
2 Disagree 25.00% 12
3 Somewhat disagree 16.67% 8
4 Somewhat agree 35.42% 17
5 Agree 8.33% 4
6 Strongly agree 2.08% 1
Total 100% 48
Q8 - I believe the Holy Bible is inerrant.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count 1 I believe the Holy
Bible is inerrant. 3.00 6.00 5.79 0.58 0.33 48
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
2 Disagree 0.00% 0
3 Somewhat disagree 2.08% 1
4 Somewhat agree 2.08% 1
5 Agree 10.42% 5
6 Strongly agree 85.42% 41
Total 100% 48
Q9 - The Bible is fully supported by science.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count 1
The Bible is fully supported by science.
1.00 6.00 4.90 1.37 1.88 48
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 4.17% 2
2 Disagree 4.17% 2
3 Somewhat disagree 8.33% 4
4 Somewhat agree 8.33% 4
5 Agree 31.25% 15
6 Strongly agree 43.75% 21
Total 100% 48
Q10 - The Bible is fully supported by history.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count 1
The Bible is fully supported by history.
3.00 6.00 5.46 0.71 0.50 48
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
2 Disagree 0.00% 0
3 Somewhat disagree 2.08% 1
4 Somewhat agree 6.25% 3
5 Agree 35.42% 17
6 Strongly agree 56.25% 27
Total 100% 48
Q11 - The Bible is fully supported by archaeology.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count 1
The Bible is fully supported by archaeology.
4.00 6.00 5.56 0.61 0.37 48
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
2 Disagree 0.00% 0
3 Somewhat disagree 0.00% 0
4 Somewhat agree 6.25% 3
5 Agree 31.25% 15
6 Strongly agree 62.50% 30
Total 100% 48
Q12 - A lack of the knowledge of the science/history with respect to Christianity inhibits my ability to discuss Christianity with non-Christians.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
A lack of the knowledge of the science/history with respect to Christianity inhibits my ability to discuss Christianity with non-Christians.
1.00 6.00 2.90 1.42 2.01 48
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 16.67% 8
2 Disagree 35.42% 17
3 Somewhat disagree 6.25% 3
4 Somewhat agree 29.17% 14
5 Agree 8.33% 4
6 Strongly agree 4.17% 2
Total 100% 48
Q13 - I have been exposed to scientific/historical apologetics during sermons and Bible studies.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
I have been exposed to scientific/historical apologetics during sermons and Bible studies.
1.00 7.00 5.54 1.68 2.83 48
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 2.08% 1
2 Disagree 8.33% 4
3 Somewhat disagree 8.33% 4
5 Somewhat agree 10.42% 5
6 Agree 37.50% 18
7 Strongly agree 33.33% 16
Total 100% 48
Post-Survey Q1 - Agreement to Participate
The research in which you are about to participate is designed to identify the current knowledge of apologetics of the participant. The central issue is “why” you believe in Biblical Inerrancy, and the scientific, historical, and archaeological lessons that are derived from Scripture. This research is being conducted by John “Sandy” Pidgeon for the purpose of collecting data for a ministry project. In this research, you will answer questions before the project and you will answer the some of the same questions at the conclusion of the project. Any information you provide will be held strictly confidential, and at no time will your name be reported or identified with your responses. Participation is strictly voluntary and you are free to withdraw at any time. By completion of this survey, you are giving informed consent for the use of your responses in this project. All instrumentation complies with the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary ethics
protocols.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
Agreement to Participate The research in which you are about to participate is designed to identify the current knowledge of apologetics of the participant. The central issue is
“why” you believe in Biblical Inerrancy, and the scientific, historical, and archaeological lessons that are derived from Scripture. This research is being conducted by John
“Sandy” Pidgeon for the purpose of collecting data for a ministry project.
In this research, you will answer questions before the project and you will answer the some of the same
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 36
questions at the conclusion of the project. Any information you provide will be held strictly confidential, and at no time will your name be reported or identified with your responses.
Participation is strictly voluntary and you are free to withdraw at any time. By completion of this survey, you are giving informed consent for the use of your responses in this project. All instrumentation complies with the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary ethics protocols.
# Answer % Count
1 Yes 100.00% 36
4 No 0.00% 0
Total 100% 36
Q2 - Have you repented of your sin and trusted in Jesus Christ for salvation?
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
Have you repented of your sin and trusted in Jesus Christ for salvation?
1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 37
# Answer % Count
1 Yes 100.00% 37
3 No 0.00% 0
Total 100% 37
Q3 - Are you married?
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1 Are you
married? 1.00 3.00 1.32 0.74 0.54 37
# Answer % Count
1 Yes 83.78% 31
3 No 16.22% 6
Total 100% 37
Q4 - What is your age in years?
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count 1 What is your age
in years? 2.00 6.00 4.41 1.20 1.43 37
# Answer % Count
1 18-24 0.00% 0
2 25-34 5.41% 2
3 35-44 21.62% 8
4 45-54 21.62% 8
5 55-64 29.73% 11
6 65-over 21.62% 8
Total 100% 37
Q5 - My knowledge was enhanced by the apologetic lessons.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count 1
My knowledge was enhanced by the apologetic lessons.
4.00 6.00 5.27 0.79 0.63 37
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
2 Disagree 0.00% 0
3 Somewhat disagree 0.00% 0
4 Somewhat agree 21.62% 8
5 Agree 29.73% 11
6 Strongly agree 48.65% 18
Total 100% 37
Q6 - I would like to study apologetics similar to the lessons.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count 1
I would like to study apologetics similar to the lessons.
3.00 6.00 5.11 0.83 0.69 37
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
2 Disagree 0.00% 0
3 Somewhat disagree 2.70% 1
4 Somewhat agree 21.62% 8
5 Agree 37.84% 14
6 Strongly agree 37.84% 14
Total 100% 37
Q7 - This knowledge enhances my own faith.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count 1
This knowledge enhances my own faith.
4.00 6.00 5.19 0.73 0.53 37
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
2 Disagree 0.00% 0
3 Somewhat disagree 0.00% 0
4 Somewhat agree 18.92% 7
5 Agree 43.24% 16
6 Strongly agree 37.84% 14
Total 100% 37
Q8 - I believe the Holy Bible is inerrant.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count 1 I believe the Holy
Bible is inerrant. 3.00 6.00 5.84 0.55 0.30 37
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
2 Disagree 0.00% 0
3 Somewhat disagree 2.70% 1
4 Somewhat agree 0.00% 0
5 Agree 8.11% 3
6 Strongly agree 89.19% 33
Total 100% 37
Q9 - This knowledge would enable my family and friends to begin a walk in faith.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
This knowledge would enable my family and friends to begin a walk in faith.
2.00 6.00 4.89 1.01 1.02 37
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
2 Disagree 2.70% 1
3 Somewhat disagree 5.41% 2
4 Somewhat agree 24.32% 9
5 Agree 35.14% 13
6 Strongly agree 32.43% 12
Total 100% 37 Q10 - Apologetics knowledge of the science/history with respect to Christianity increases my ability to discuss Christianity with non-Christians.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
Apologetics knowledge of the science/history with respect to Christianity increases my ability to discuss Christianity with non-Christians.
4.00 6.00 5.35 0.67 0.44 37
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
2 Disagree 0.00% 0
3 Somewhat disagree 0.00% 0
4 Somewhat agree 10.81% 4
5 Agree 43.24% 16
6 Strongly agree 45.95% 17
Total 100% 37
Q11 - I would like apologetics in all the scientific and historical fields to be a part of every sermon and Bible study.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
I would like apologetics in all the scientific and historical fields to be a part of every sermon and Bible study.
2.00 7.00 5.38 1.36 1.86 37
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
3 Somewhat disagree 8.11% 3
5 Somewhat agree 40.54% 15
6 Agree 21.62% 8
7 Strongly agree 24.32% 9
Total 100% 37
Q12 - I would like MBC to offer formal classes in apologetics by the staff or qualified professors.
# Field Minimum Maximum Mean Std
Deviation Variance Count
1
I would like MBC to offer formal classes in apologetics by the staff or qualified professors.
5.00 7.00 6.38 0.75 0.56 37
# Answer % Count
1 Strongly Disagree 0.00% 0
2 Disagree 0.00% 0
3 Somewhat disagree 0.00% 0
5 Somewhat agree 16.22% 6
6 Agree 29.73% 11
7 Strongly agree 54.05% 20
Total 100% 37
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Aikman, David. One Nation without GOD: The Battle for Christianity in an Age of Unbelief. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2012.
American Humanist Association. Accessed November 12, 2018.
https://americanhumanist.org/what-is-humanism/manifesto2/.
Baggett, David, and Jerry L. Walls. God and the Cosmos: Moral Truth and Human Meaning. New York: Oxford University Press, 2016.
Barrett, C. K. The First Epistle to the Corinthians. Black’s New Testament Commentary.
London: Continuum, 1968.
________. The Second Epistle to The Corinthians. Black’s New Testament Commentary London: Continuum, 1973.
Barrow, John D., and Frank J. Tipler. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. New York:
Oxford University Press, 1986.
Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2006.
Beilby, James K. Thinking about Christian Apologetics. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2011.
Berlinski, David. The Devil’s Delusion: Atheism and Its Scientific Pretensions. New York: Crown Publishing, 2008.
Bilger, Micaiah. “Presbyterian Minister Blesses Planned Parenthood Abortion Clinic in God’s Name, Volunteers as Its Chaplain.” Life News. May 11, 2018.
http://www.lifenews.com/2018/05/11/presbyterian-minister-blesses-planned- parenthood-abortion-clinic-in-gods-name-volunteers-as-its-chaplain/.
Blomberg, Craig L. The Historical Reliability of the New Testament. Nashville: B & H, 2016.
Boa, Kenneth D., and Robert M. Bowman, Jr. Faith Has Its Reasons: An Integrative Approach to Defending Christianity. Colorado Springs: NavPress, 2001.
Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. Discipleship. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2003.
Bratcher, R. G., and W. D. Reyburn. A Translator’s Book on the Book of Psalms. New York: United Bible Societies, 1991.
Broocks, Rice. God’s Not Dead. Nashville: W Publishing, 2013.
Bruce, F. F. New Testament History. New York: Doubleday, 1971.
Burge, Gary, Lynn Cohick, and Gene L. Green. The New Testament in Antiquity. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2009.
Bush, L. Russ. The Advancement: Keeping the Faith in an Evolutionary Age. Nashville:
B & H, 2003.
Cabal, Ted. The Apologetics Study Bible. Nashville: Holman Bible, 2007.
Cabal, Theodore, and Peter J. Rastor. The Controversy for the Ages: Why Christians Should Not Divide Over the Age of the Earth. Wooster, OH: Weaver Book, 2017.
Carson, D. A. Christ & Culture Revisited. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2008.
________. The Gagging of God. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2011.
________. The Intolerance of Tolerance. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2013.
Carson, D. A., and Douglas Moo. An Introduction to the New Testament. Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 2005.
Copan, Paul, Tremper Longman, Christopher Reese, and Michael Strauss, eds. Dictionary of Christianity and Science. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2017.
Coulter, Ann. Treason: Liberal Treachery from the Cold War to the War on Terrorism.
New York: Crown Forum, Random House, 2003.
Courtois, Stephane, ed. The Black Book of Communism: Crimes, Terror, Repression.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999.
Cowan, Steven B., and Stanley N. Gundry, eds. Five Views on Apologetics. Grand Rapids:
Zondervan, 2000.
Coyne, Jerry A. Faith versus Fact: Why Religion and Science Are Incompatible. New York: Penguin Books, 2015.
Craig, William Lane. Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics. Wheaton, IL:
Crossways, 1994.
Dalin, David G., and John Rothmann. Icon of Evil: Hitler’s Mufti and the Rise of Radical Islam. New York: Random House Publishing, 2008.
Darwin, Charles. “DCP LETT 13230.xml ‘To William Graham.’” Darwin Correspondence Project. July 3, 1881. Accessed June 28, 2017. http://www.darwinproject.ac.uk/
letter/DCP-LETT-13230.xml.
Davids, Peter H. The Letters of 2 Peter and Jude. The Pillar New Testament Commentary.
Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2006.
Davies, Brian. Thomas Aquinas’s Summa Contra Gentiles: A Guide and Commentary.
Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016.
de Toqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. Edited by J. P. Mayer and Max Lerner.
New York: Harper and Row, 1966.
Dembski, William, and Sean McDowell. Understanding Intelligent Design: Everything You Need to Know in Plain Language. Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 2008.
Dembski, William, and Jonathan Wells. How to Be an Intellectually Fulfilled Atheist (Or Not). 3rd ed. Dallas: Foundation for Thought and Ethics, 2015.
Earley, Dave, and David Wheeler. Evangelism Is . . . Nashville: B & H, 2010.
Edgar, William K., and K. Scott Oliphint. Christian Apologetics Past and Present. Vol. 1.
Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2009.
________. Christian Apologetics Past and Present. Vol. 2. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2011.
Egnor, Michael. “Behe’s Irreducible Complexity Validated by Chemistry Nobel.”
Evolution News & Science Today. October 15, 2018. https://evolutionnews.org/
2018/10/behes-irreducible-complexity-validated-by-chemistry-nobel/.
Ellingworth, Paul, and Howard A. Hatton. A Handbook on Paul’s First Leter to the Corinthians. New York: United Bible Societies, 1993.
Elwell, Walter A., ed. Baker Commentary on the Bible. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1989.
________, ed. Evangelical Dictionary of Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2001.
Emerson, Ralph Waldo. Ralph Waldo Emerson Selected Essays. Edited by Larzer Ziff.
New York: Penguin Books, 1982.
Erickson, Millard J. Christian Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2013.
Fay, William, and Linda Evans Shepherd. Share Jesus without Fear. Nashville: Broadman
& Holman, 1999.
Faye, Jan. “Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics.” In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. July 24, 2014. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-copenhagen/.
Fea, John. Was America Founded as a Christian Nation? Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 2011.
Fee, Gordon D. Paul, the Spirit, and the People of God. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1996.
Feinberg, John S. Can You Believe It’s True? Christian Apologetics in a Modern &
Postmodern Era. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2013.
Flynn, Tom. “Secular Humanism Defined.” Secular Humanism. Accessed November 14, 2018. https://secularhumanism.org/what-is-secular-humanism/secular-humanism- defined/.
Freund, Richard A. Digging through the Bible: Understanding Biblical People, Places, and Controversies through Archaeology. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2009.
Gagnon, Robert A. J. The Bible and Homosexual Practice. Nashville: Abingdon, 2001.
Garland, D. E. 2 Corinthians. The New American Commentary, vol. 29. Nashville:
Broadman & Holman, 1999.
Geisler, Norman. Christian Apologetics. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2013.
Geisler, Norman, and Frank Turek. I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2004.
Geisler, Norman L., and Ronald M. Brooks. When Skeptics Ask: A Handbook on Christian Evidences. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1990.
Geivett, R. Douglas, and Gary Habermas. In Defense of Miracles: A Comprehensive Case for God’s Action in History. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1997.
Goswami, Amit. GOD Is Not Dead: What Quantum Physics Tells Us about Our Origins and Who We Are. Hampton Roads, VA: Hampton Roads, 2008.
Groothuis, Douglas. Christian Apologetics: A Comprehensive Case for Biblical Faith.
Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2011.
________ “Why Truth Matters Most: An Apologetic for Truth-Seeking in Post-Modern Times.” Journal of the Evangelical Theological Society 47, no. 3 (September 2004):
441-54.
Gros, Martin L. The End of Sanity. New York: Avon Books, 1997.
Habermas, Gary R. The Risen Jesus and Future Hope. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 2003.
Habermas, Gary R., and Michael R. Licona. The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus. Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2004.
Haisch, Bernhard. The GOD Theory: Universes, Zero Point Fields, and What’s Behind It All. Newburyport, MA: Red Wheel/Wieser, 2006.
________. The Purpose Guided Universe: Believing in Einstein, Darwin, and God.
Fairlakes, NJ: New Page Books, 2010.
Harris, M. J. The Second Epistle to the Corinthians. New International Greek Testament Commentary Series. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 2005.
Holden, Joseph M., and Geisler, Norman L. The Popular Handbook of Archeology and the Bible. Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 2013.
Isbouts, Jean-Pierre. Archaeology of The Bible: The Greatest Discoveries from Genesis to the Roman Era. Washington, DC: National Geographic Partners, 2016.
Jamieson, R., and A. R. Fausset. Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible. Vol. 1. Oak Harbor, WA: Logos Research Systems, 1997.
Jeremiah, David. What in the World Is Going On? Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2008.
Johnson, Alan F. 1 Corinthians. The New IVP Commentary Series, vol. 7. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2004.
Jones, Timothy Paul. Conspiracies and the Cross: How to Intelligently Counter the Ten Most Popular Arguments against the Gospel of Jesus. Lake Florentine, FL:
Frontline, 2012.
________. How We Got the Bible. Torrance, CA: Rose Publishers, 2015.
Keener, Craig. The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2014.
Keil, C. F., and F. Delitzsch. Biblical Commentary of the Old Testament. Edinburgh:
T. and T. Clarke, 1935.
________. Commentary on the Old Testament. Vols. 1 and 5. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 1996.
Keller, Timothy. The Reason for God: Belief in an Age of Skepticism. New York:
Penguin Group, 2008.
Kostenberger, Andreas J., Darrell Bock, and Josh D. Chatraw. Truth in a Culture of Doubt: Engaging Skeptical Challenges to the Bible. Nashville: B & H, 2014.
Ladd, George Eldon. A Theology of the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Wm. B.
Eerdmans, 1974.
Lane, Tony. A Concise History of Christian Thought. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2006.
Lange, J. P., and P. Schaff. A Commentary on the Holy Scripture. Bellingham, WA:
Logos Bible Software 2016.
Lange, J. P., P. Schaff, C. W. E. Nagelsbach, S. T. Lowrie, and D. Moore. A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures: Isaiah. Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software, 2008.
Lapin, Daniel. America’s Real War. Sisters, OR: Multnomah, 1999.
Leisola, Matti, and Jonathan Witt. Heretic: One Scientist’s Journey from Darwin to Design. Seattle: Discovery Institute Press, 2018.
Lennox, John. God and Stephen Hawking. Oxford: Lion Books, 2011.
Lenski, R. C. H. The Interpretation of St. Paul’s First and Second Epistle to the Corinthians. Minneapolis: Augsburg, 1963.
Lewis, Jack P. Historical Backgrounds of Bible History. Grand Rapids: Baker, 1971.
Licona, Michael R. The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach.
Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 2010.
Link, Mark. These Stones Will Shout: A New Voice for the Old Testament. Niles, IL:
Argus, 1975.
Linville, Mark D. “The Moral Argument.” In The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology, edited by William Lane Craig, 391-448. West Sussex, UK: Wiley- Blackwell, 2012.
Marshall, I. H. 1 Peter. The IVP New Testament Commentary Series. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity, 1991.
McDowell, Josh D. The New Evidence That Demands a Verdict. Nashville: Thomas
McDowell, Sean. Apologetics for a New Generation. Eugene, OR: Harvest House, 2009.
McRaney, Will. The Art of Personal Evangelism. Nashville: B & H, 2003.
Meyer, Stephen C. Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design. New York: Harper One-Harper Collins, 2013.
________. Signature in The Cell: DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design. New York: HarperCollins, 2009.
Mohler, R. Albert, Jr. We Cannot Be Silent. Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 2015.
Moreland, J. P. Scientism and Secularism: Learning to Respond to a Dangerous Ideology. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2018.
Morris, Leon. New Testament Theology. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1986.
Mortenson, Terry, and Thane H. Ury. Coming to Grips with Genesis: Biblical Authority and the Age of the Earth. Green Forest, AR: Master Books, 2008.
Musser, George. Spooky Action at a Distance. New York: Scientific American/Farrar, Straus and Giroux, 2015.
Nagel, Thomas. Mind and Cosmos: Why the Materialist Neo-Darwinian Conception of Nature Is Almost Certainly False. Oxford: Oxford Press, 2012.
Neuhaus, Richard John. The Naked Public Square. Grand Rapids: Wm. B. Eerdmans, 1984.
NIV Archaeological Study Bible. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2005.
Noll, Mark A. Turning Points: Decisive Moments in the History of Christianity. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2012.
Oakes, Peter. Galatians. Paideia. Grand Rapids: Baker, 2015.
Ott, Craig, and Stephen J. Strauss. Encountering Theology of Mission: Biblical
Foundations, Historical Developments, and Contemporary Issues. Grand Rapids:
Baker, 2010.
Plantinga, Alvin. Where Conflict Really Lies: Science, Religion, and Natrualism. New York: Oxford University Press, 2011.
Polkinghorne, John C. Science and Providence: God’s Interaction with the World.
Conshohocken, PA: Templeton Foundation Press, 2005.
Price, Randall, and H. Wayne House. The Zondervan Handbook of Biblical Archaeology.
Grand Rapids: World of The Bible Ministries, 2017.
Ramm, Bernard. Special Revelation and the Word of God: An Essay on the Contemporary Problem of Revelation. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans, 1961.
Ramsay, William Mitchell. The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament. London: Hodder and Stoughton, 1914.