Tl.INlUT k!oLk,
mud
huk, toshout tukcaya'n, mink
kA-ra'k,avery small niousc (ijajgu'c, tliunili
qiA'tgu,ilojjlii^h ts'i'fiAl, warspear agA, interrogativoparticle kfik, maternaluncle fiuk,ear
tMi'., heron
nai|, (Icvillish s.ik, enlachon
iIai], togivefiKiil tilquests
IIAlllA
<l'(>e,
mud
huk, uponthem! (warcry) siya'n, mink
klAgA'n, Keene'smouse
si.lgo'sC', thumb (si.l
=
l)an(l)qla'xada (Masset,i|la.ad), dogtish tca'at, warspear
gua (Masset, gu), interrogative]>article
<ia, maternal uncli' giu, ear
tgo, heron nao, deviltish sao, eulaclion
davu,tngive lnod tnguests
•ollowmo is ;i li>t of i"is('si)t' 11 inofc (l(Hil)tfiil cliuriict*
Ti.i.Norr u, activeverbal prelix tin,with
ka,on, at At,something
-t, verbal suttix indicaliiig imipuse nf leadingverlj
qaca, human head(iia
=
nian) gan, to burnx6,among
qlAq!, for,on a<'Oount nf X,to run
ki, inthe direction of Jatsl'n, strong (la isajiretix) k!Ak!". tocut
xOql, togotosleep tAq, topusli,to sjiear q!at!,island
git, to do, tocometo be
tit, l)ody
kisl, tobefinished get,tobedark XAu, tolive, exist qoJi'i)!o,walrus t!A, springsalmon weq!, sculpin kah.'i'gu, seed tcukA'n, grass, brush
Resides these tliei-e are four or require
more
extended treatment, ofthe consonant// in wordsreferritThus, inTlingit/i((
means
nation oiIIaiiia
u, he (replaceslain rajiid discourse) dA'nat,incompanywith (thefinalsylla-
ble is probably the cunnective nt,
"with") ga (Masset), tn AtorAf, with,of
(tothismaycorrespond eitherthe post- positiondii,oftenuseil after infinitives, orthe causativeauxiliar\'fhi)
(ja'dji, head go, toburn su, among
k!iao, on accountof xao,todoquickly gui, toward(with nintinn)
i.a'dji, strong
ij!eit, tocut
(Jla,togotosleep
da-, todo anything by pushing
qii'La, reef
get,tobelike, tobeso iu, body
gi, tobefinished gfd, night xa'ida, person qo, sea otter
ta'gun, springsalmon k!;\1, sculpin qao,seed q!An, grass
live points of reseinl)iance which
One
of tliese is the persistence11^to race, people, town, house, etc.
people; ««,fort; ^7//,town: and fan
484 THE TLINGIT INDIANS
[kth.anx.20 familyor stem. InHaida
nameans
house,ortodwell,and hTnaorIna, town.The
occurrence of 1 as an initial vowel in Ilaida is rare and suggests the possibility that it stands for thepronoun
of the third person, which isidentical in form. Tlingit tan, on the other hiuid.suggests Atliapasean thnii>or dine.
A
second aiuiiogv is furnished bj- the Tlingit intensive, or, as Pi'o- fessor Boashascalled it,selectivesuffix-tc. Thisisplacedafternouns, pronouns, and even adverbs,to whichit is desin^dto call attention, as:llngi't, intensive lingi'ttc, people; xAt, intensive xAttc, 1; Lei, inten- siveLeiA'te,not. It recallsstrongly ivIlaidademonstrative,a'dj'i.
The
aby
itselfwould
represent th(> usual Haida demonstrative indicating something near at hand, and d), which is practically' thesame
as tc,the Tlingitintensive.
The
consonantn
is also persistently found in suffixes indicating dif- ferentsorts of pastaction.Thus
the onl}' Tlingit suffix of strongly temporal charai'ter is -n, -In, or -dv. This seems to correspondmost
nearly to the past ])erfect.At
thesame
time it appears to refer by preference to an action which has takensome
time, or has been a cus-tomary
action. In ILiida.on theoth(>rhand,we
have several suffixes;g'nt. which indicates a customary j)ast action which the speaker has himself observed or experienced; (Jaii, which indicates a simple past action experienced Ijv the speaker; y,i«, indicating any sort of past action; andtjAn, which indicates that an action has been or is being continued for
some
time.The
gor </ in each of these casesis notan insuperable obstacle to a relationship betweenthem
and the Tlingit suffix, because itis often dropped, especially in the Massetdialect, or afterd
or t; in fact it is a ciuestion whetherwe
should not rather regard the g sounds as insertions instead of constituent parts of the suffix.Most
curious of all, perhaps, is the analogy presented by certain affixes havingsfor their essentialelement. InTlingitthere isa prefix6--or.<.7-, which is alwaysplaced justbeforethe verb stem and
employed
in simpledirect statements, past, present, or future, for which reason
it
may
be called theindicative prefix. Examples:lH
da sa a'avixthi.he did notsee anything;
w
.s7dJA'(jx,they always killed them; dttcA'ttc ye'yaos'iqa, his wife told him; daqane'.e wastti', he was quarrelsome.In the
same
languagewe
find aparticle as of almostidenticalmeaning
(xAte xixtcli'kl".i.siyu' ducA'ttc de ayu' aolixa'c, this little frog it axis he let floatto his wife), and, in view of the great independence which the parts of the vei'b enjo}', it isconcluded that thetwo
areactually identical.Now,
thereisinHaida
averypuzzlingsuffix, -.s-or-.sv,which has averywide range of use. Afteranoun
preceded liythe indefinitepronoun
itmakes
the expression definite; in other cases itseems toshow
that the clause it follows is to be taken as a whole—
in otherwords,toturn it intoaparticiple or infinitive,andwith
some
speakerssn-ANTox)
THE TLINUIT ANU HAIDA LANfiUAGES 485
it even rephues the regular suffixes of tlie past tense.
The
Haida forms are, in fact,aboutwhat we
should expectif the Tlingit particle A,i shouldbecome
agglutinated to the verbs it sooften follows. Pos- siblywc
alst) have here an explanation of theorigin ofthe llaida verl)"to
be," which usuall}' appears as e'djt, but contracts to 7.t incompo-
sition.
The
consonant s also figures in another connection.Most
Tlingit interrogative pronouns and adverbs are accompanied by a syllable sa—
da't«i, what? irn'sahow? —
andHaida
interrogative pronouns and adverbscontain thissame
consonant.v with such uniformity as to lead one to suspectit wasoriginallyan affix, viz, gVsto,who?
(/(hvTi,why?
what? 7/7.V, what? i/ri'(/i/x, what? f/l'n(/t'f, where? (i7x7'{xf<ili(i<i)
whence?
Both languages also
make
a very extensive use ofa generaldemon-
strative
form
a to stand for noiuis or pronouns, and in both it isoften used toform compound
demonstratives or connectives. Finally, as savoringofdialecticchangeratiicrthan borrowing,attentionshould beCiilled to the fact thatthelast sixwords
compared
in thelistcompleted at th(> top of page 483 appear to change regularly fi'oni Tlingit toHaida
by drojipinga final k sound or replacing it with a or k.Concliixidiix. In spite of the very great divergences which these
two
languages present, the points lastconsidered, along withmany
of the coincidences noted on pages481-4S3, can hardly l)e ai'countcc! for on thebasis of either boriowing or coincidence.They seem
to the writer to be the faintecho of a time wiicn the ancestoi'sofsome
of the peoplenow
representedbythe llaida andTlingit spoke onetongue,and thereis certainly nothinginthe structureof stems,word^,orsentences to contradictthis view.At
thesame
time, in orderto l)ringaboutthe diU'erenceswhichnow
exist,thetwopeoplesnuist have lived long apart and have been subjected tovery diti'erent influences. Itisquitepossi- ble that,instead of being inmiediatrly related. Haida and 'IMingithave developedseparatelyfrom some
thirdlanguage, and, urdessitwere onenow
entirely extinct, thiswould
naturallybe Athapascan, theonlylan-guage in this region thateitjier of
them
resembles atall closely. \Vcshall be iuial)le to