• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Write about procedure text with the topic that has been given using your own words

BIBLIOGRAPHY

APPENDIX 1 INSTRUMENT

2. Write about procedure text with the topic that has been given using your own words

a. How to make fried rice.

b. How to make orange juice c. How to operate blender 3. Minimal One paragraph

Name : Class:

APPENDIX 2 INSTRUMENT

POST-TEST 1. Write your name and class on the answer sheet!

2. Write about procedure text with the topic that have given using your own words.

a. How to make fried rice.

b. How to make orange juice c. How to operate blender 3. Minimal One paragraph

Name : Class:

APPENDIX 3

The Analytical Scoring Rubric of Writing Procedure adapted from Jacob in Arthur Hughes

CONTENT

30 – 27

EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: substantive, thorough development of topic, effective and appropriate details of topic or story

26 – 22

GOOD TO AVERAGE: adequate range, adequate development of topic, sufficient details of topic or story

21 – 17

FAIR TO POOR: little substance, inadequate development of topic and detail

16 – 13

VERY POOR: non-substantive, not pertinent, or not enough to evaluate

ORGANIZATION

20 – 18

EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: fluent expression, ideas clearly stated/supported, well-organized, logical sequencing, cohesive

17 – 14

GOOD TO AVERAGE: somewhat choppy, loosely organized but main ideas stand out, logical but incomplete sequencing

13 – 10

FAIR TO POOR: non – fluent, ideas confused or disconnected, lacks logical sequencing

9 – 7

VERY POOR: does not communicate, no organization, or not enough to evaluate

VOCABULA RY

20 – 18

EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: effective word/idiom choice and usage, word form mastery

GOOD TO AVERAGE: occassional errors of

17 – 14 word/idiom form, choice, usage but meaning not obscured

13 – 10

FAIR TO POOR: frequent errors of word/idiom form, choice, usage, meaning confused or obscured

9 – 7 VERY POOR: little knowledge of English vocabulary, idioms, word form, or not enough to evaluate

LANGUAGE USE LANGUAGE USE

25 – 22 EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: effective complex constructions, few errors of agreement, tense, number, word order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions

21 – 18

GOOD TO AVERAGE: effective but simple

construction, minor problems in complex construction, several errors of agreement, tense, number, word order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions but meaning seldom obscured

17 – 11

FAIR TO POOR: major problems in simple/complex constructions, frequent errors of negation, agreement, number, word order/function, articles, pronouns, prepositions and/or fragments, run-ons, deletion, meaning confused or obscured

10 – 5

VERY POOR: virtually no mastery of sentence construction rules, dominated by errors, does not communicate, or not enough to evaluate

MEC HANI CS5

EXCELLENT TO VERY GOOD: demonstrates mastery of conventions, few errors of spelling,

punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing

4

GOOD TO AVERAGE: occasional errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing but meaning not obscured

3

FAIR TO POOR: frequent errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, poor handwriting, meaning confused or obscured

2

VERY POOR: no mastery of conventions, dominated by errors of spelling, punctuation, capitalization, paragraphing, handwriting illegible, or not enough to evaluate

UJI REFERENSI Bab

I

Nama Pengarang Judul Buku Pembimbing I Pembimbing II 1 Mark Anderson

and Cathy Anderson

Text types in English 2, (South Yarra:

Mc Millan Education Ltd,2003), P.50 2 Jack C. Richards Methodology in

Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice,

(New York:

Cambridge University Press; 2002) p.

303 3 Tricia Hedge, Writing,

(Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990), p.

5 4 Jeremy Harmer The Practice of

English Language Teaching, (New York: Longman, 1991), p. 257 Bab

II

Nama Pengarang Judul Buku Pembimbing I Pembimbing II

5 Alan Meyers Gateway to

Academic Writing:

Effective sentences, paragraph, and

Essay, ( New York: Pearson

Education, 2005), p.1 6 Vivian Zamel Writing: The

Process of Discovering

Meaning, TESOL Quarterly, vol.

16, June 1982, p.195 7 James C. Raymond Writing, (New

York: Harper and Row Publisher, Inc,

1980), p.2 8 Ben Heasley, dkk. Study Writing,

(Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 2006),

P.11

9 George E.

Wishon and Julia M. Burks

Let’s Write English, (New

York: Litton Educational

Publishing, 1980), p.369 10 John Langan English Skills,

(New York:

McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc,

2001) seventh edition, p. 17 11 Donald Pharr and

Santi V. Buscemi

Writing Today Brief edition,

(New York:

McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc,

2005), p.29

12 John Langan Exploring

Writing ( Paragraphs and

Essay ) , (New York: McGraw Hill, 2008), p.25 13 John Langan College Writing

Skills with Readings Fifth

Edition (New York: McGraw-

Hill Companies, Inc, 2001), P.36 14 Martha Heasley

Cox

Writing Form Process Purpose, (San

Francisco:

Chandler Publishing Company, 1962), p.261-

330 15 Mark Anderson

and Cathy Anderson

Text types in English 3, (South Yarra:

Mc Millan Education Ltd,2003), P.28 16 Carlene Walter Procedural

Witing Grade Three, (New

York: The Medium,2015),

p.2 17 Linda Gerot and

Peter Wignell

Making sense of Functional

Grammar (Sydney: Gerd

Stabler Antipodean Educational Enterprises, 1994),p.238.

18 Mark Anderson and Cathy Anderson

Text types in English 2, (South Yarra:

Mc Millan Education Ltd,2003), P.52 19 Ortrun Zuber

Skerritt

Video in Higher Education, ( Great Britain :

Nichols Publishing Company, 1984), p. 247

20 John McGOVERN Video

Applicatons in English Languge Teaching, ( Britai Council : Pergamon Press,

1983), p.17 21 Oxford Advanced

Learner’s Dictionary

Oxford University Press, 2000.

22 Susan Stempleski and Barry Tomalin

Video in Action ( Recipes for Using V ideo in

Language Teaching), ( Cambridge : Prentice Hall International Group, 1990), p.

15-16 23 Susan Stempleski Video in Second

Language Teaching.(

Cambridge : Prentice Hall International Group, 1990),

p.9 Bab

III

Nama Pengarang Judul Buku Pembimbing I Pembimbing II

24 Sugiono Metode

Penelitian Pendidikan,

(Bandung:

Alfabeta, 2012), P.114 25 Arthur Hughes Testing for

Language Teachers 2nd Ed, (Cambridge:

Cambridge University Press, 2003), p.

104.

Jakarta, 27 Juli 2017 Menyatakan,

Pembimbing 1 Pembimbing 2

Dr. Ratna Sari Dewi, M.Pd. Desi Nahartini M.Ed

Appendix 5 RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN

(RPP)

(EXPERIMENTAL CLASS)

Sekolah : SMP Islam Plus Daarus Salaam Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris

Kelas : IX (Sembilan)

Semester : Ganjil

Tema : How to Make Fried Rice Aspek/ Skill : Writing

Alokasi Waktu : 2 X 40 Menit Tahun Pelajaran : 2016/2017 A. Standar Kompetensi

12. Mengungkapkan makna dalam teks tulis fungsional dan esai pendek sederhana berbentuk descriptive dan procedure untuk berinteraksi dengan lingkungan sekitar

Dokumen terkait