1. The Title is Appropriate * [1] Completely Correct Comment
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
Section ABSTRACT should, at least, mention reasearch gap, research objective, research methodology,
results and the meaning of the results. Please avoid equation in this section.
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
Authors need to describe the connection of this study to your previous studies.
What are the differences? What are the similarities?
Please explore these issues in section INTRODUCTION to avoid self-plagiarism.
Review Form Response http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormRespo...
1 of 3 02-07-2020, 10:57 AM
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound) * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
Please highlight the novelty of the research. Authors need to declare this in the last paragraph of section INTRODUCTION. Without this, the paper would get rejected.
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion) * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
In experimental section, add the accuracy of
measuring tools. What is the accuracy/error associated with experimental instruments and experimental data results? Are there any human errors ? How many times the experiments conducted? More discussion is needed.
In the discussion, authors need to compare your results to the results of other researchers.
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals *
[2] Partly Correct Comment
Review Form Response http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormRespo...
2 of 3 02-07-2020, 10:57 AM
The references still could be improved
The English is alright * [2] Adequate
Comment
English still needs to be improved. Please ask others, who are competent in English, to proofread your English in the
manuscript.
Final Comments To the Author *
Please revise the manuscript by responding to comments provided.
Confidential Comments to the EIC Authors need to clearly declare the novelty of the study and the differences from their previous studies.
This Paper is recommended to be * Accepted without further revision Accepted with minor revision Major Revision is required Rejected
Close
* Denotes required field
Review Form Response http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormRespo...
3 of 3 02-07-2020, 10:57 AM
In order to reach the requirements for the publication in this journal, some points should be investigated deeper.
1. Thank you for the confirmation about your previous studies. However, you need to clearly explain this issue in section INTRODUCTION. What are the differences? What are the similarities? Please explore these issues in section INTRODUCTION to avoid self-plagiarism.
2. Section ABSTRACT should, at least, mention reasearch gap, research objective, research methodology, results and the meaning of the results. Please avoid equation in this section.
3. Please highlight the novelty of the research. You need to declare this in the last paragraph of section INTRODUCTION. Without this, the paper would get rejected.
4. Please avoid figures in section INTRODUCTION
5. It is not common to have more than 4 references in one sentence. Please revise this issue.
6. If you want to refer to a figure, an equation, or a table in the body of the manuscript, you have to mention its number. Please avoid the use of ‘as follows’,
‘below’, ‘is’, ‘defined as’, etc.
7. In the discussion, you need to compare your results to the results of other researchers.
8. In experimental section, add the accuracy of measuring tools. What is the accuracy/error associated with experimental instruments and experimental data results? Are there any human errors ? How many times the experiments conducted? More discussion is needed.
9. The uncertainty of the experimental data should be estimated in detail
10. It needs to be explained whether in 1D and 2D analysis or in experimental data calculation, the physical properties of the material (thermal diffusivity, thermal conductivity and density) are considered constant or a function of temperature.
11. Section CONCLUSION just mention your main finding and must be written in a paragraph, not in pointers.
12. It would be better, if you could determine the future studies in the last paragraph of section CONCLUSION to show the readers how you want to proceed this work in the future
13. English still needs to be improved. Please ask other, who is competent in English, to proofread your English in the manuscript.
