4/9/2019 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/936/1182 1/3
REVIEW FORM RESPONSE
Editor's Report >>
1. The Title is Appropriate * [1] Completely Correct Comment
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
Please follow the reviewer comment
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound) * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
4/9/2019 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/936/1182 2/3
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion) * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals *
[1] Completely Correct Comment
The English is alright *
[1] Completely Correct
4/9/2019 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/936/1182 3/3
Comment
Final Comments To the Author *
Please revise the manuscript according to the reviewer suggestions
Confidential Comments to the EIC
The manuscript can be proceed for publication after it revised by the author
This Paper is recommended to be * Accepted without further revision Accepted with minor revision Major Revision is required Rejected
Close
* Denotes required field
ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL
Editor’s Report
Article No. : 936
Title of Paper : The Role of BNCT on Breast Cancer Treatment
Comment on Descriptions 1. The Title is Appropriate*
[ x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate*
[ x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported*
[ ] Completely correct [x ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
Please revise manuscript according to reviewer comments.
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound)*
[ x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion)*
[ x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content*
[x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals*
[ x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The English is alright*
[ x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
Final Comments To the Author*
Line Number Comment :
Please follow the suggestion of reviewer such as additional data from research activities that has been done by author
Confidential Comments to the EIC:
Comment : The manuscript can be proceed for publication after the author revise manuscript according to the reviewer suggestions/comments.
This paper is recommended to be [ ] Accepted without further revision [ x ] Accepted with minor revision [ ] Major Revision is required [ ] Rejected
