Associate editor's report form >>>

(1)

12/19/2019 Review Form Response

http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/1013/1361 1/4

REVIEW FORM RESPONSE

1. Originality of the article

Free of Plagiarism/Similarity (max 20%) * [1] Completely Correct

Comments

The similarity index of the article by iThenticate is 5%.

New article/not yet Published (presented/ in proceeding max 30%) * [1] Completely Correct

Comments

Based on the similarity index checked by

iThenticate, it can be assumed that the article is new.

2. Related to nuclear/atomic science and technology * [1] Completely Correct

Comments

The article discusses neutron diffusion calculation on 160 MWth Integral Pressurized Water Reactor (IPWR) core using the PARCS nodal diffusion code employing the fewgroup spatially homogenized crosssections generated from the Serpent Monte Carlo code.

3. Reference

The number of references at least 10 *

(2)

[1] Completely Correct

Comments

The article has 18 references

The use of recent references 80% (maximum 5 years ago) * [2] Partly Correct

Comments

11 out of 18 references are less than 5 years old

Type of the references (primarily, secondary etc.) 85% from journal * [2] Partly Correct

Comments

Only 9 out of 18 references are from journal

Cross link reference (traceable) * [2] Partly Correct

Comments

Most references are traceable

Reference style standard: Elsevier numeric without title * [3] Not Correct at all

Comments

(3)

Title of the article and page number are still included

When reference has more than 3 Authors, write only 3 name, et al. * [3] Not Correct at all

Comments

All authors are still written

Article follows the Atom Indonesia template and guidelines * [1] Completely Correct

Comments

The article has followed the template

Table (clear, without vertical line) * [1] Completely Correct

Comments OK

Figure (clear, min 300 dpi) * [1] Completely Correct Comments

OK

(4)

Is the Level of English appropriate? * [1] Excellent

Comments OK

Final recommendation: * Continue review process Return to the Author Reject

Final Comments *

Authors need to revise the article by responding to comments provided above before it goes through to Reviewers.

Close

* Denotes required field