ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL
Referee’s Report
Article No. : #979
Title of Paper : Characteristics of Stable Isotope Compositions (δ18O and δ2H) of Surface Water in Bengkulu city
Comment on Descriptions 1. The Title is Appropriate*
[X] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate*
[X ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported*
[X ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound)*
[ X] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion)*
[ X] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content*
[X ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals*
[ ] Completely correct [X] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The references consist only 69.56%. You can calculate by MS Excel and give the recent journals as 1 and other references (books, journal published below 2015, website) as 0 ). Then it will show you the percentage of
primary references and recent journals.The English is alright*
[X] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
Final Comments To the Author*
Line Number Comment :
ABSTRACT
Rain water should be rainwater Add comma after consequently Add “the” after water level Put space before “Therefore”
15
Put “the” before latitude
45Change to : because of
54Put comma before therefore
114change to : standards
73change to : compositions
78Add “the” before isotopic
85change to : because of
87
change to : the previous study ….
123
change to : seawater
165change to : the surface
174
change to : province
186change to : cap
203
Please provide better/bigger picture the Picarro L21140-i analyser
247change to : closes
253
change to : a longer river
267change to : A previous
277change to : the local
285change to : maybe
286change to : the tropical
323change to : have a slope
328change to : may be
340change to : rainwater
353change to : the water body
367change to : changing pattern
382change to : Geochemistry
Confidential Comments to the EIC:
Comment :
This paper is recommended to be [ ] Accepted without further revision [X] Accepted with minor revision [ ] Major Revision is required [ ] Rejected
31/3/2020 Review Form Response
aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/979/1378 1/3
REVIEW FORM RESPONSE
Referee's Report >>>
1. The Title is Appropriate * [1] Completely Correct Comment
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound) * [3] Not Correct at all
Comment
31/3/2020 Review Form Response
aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/979/1378 2/3
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion) * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals *
[2] Partly Correct Comment
The English is alright * [1] Excellent Comment
Final Comments
The references consist only 69.56%. You can calculate by MS Excel and give the recent journals as 1 and other references (books, journals published before 20145, website) as 0 ). Then it will show you the percentage of primary references and recent journals
31/3/2020 Review Form Response
aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/979/1378 3/3
To the Author *
Confidential Comments to the EIC
This Paper is recommended to be * Accepted without further revision Accepted with minor revision Major Revision is required Rejected
Close
* Denotes required field
Please revised the article as my attached suggestion