Referee's Report >>>

10/2/2019 Review Form Response

http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/963/1248 1/3

REVIEW FORM RESPONSE

Referee's Report >>>

1. The Title is Appropriate * [1] Completely Correct Comment

2. Abstract

The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate * [2] Partly Correct

Comment

Please add one or two sentences on the  background of this research

3. Main Text

The results are important to be reported * [1] Completely Correct

Comment

   

The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound) * [1] Completely Correct

Comment

10/2/2019 Review Form Response

http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/963/1248 2/3

   

The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion) * [1] Completely Correct

Comment

   

The length of the paper is appropriate to the content * [1] Completely Correct

Comment

   

The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals *

[1] Completely Correct Comment

   

The English is alright *

[2] Adequate

10/2/2019 Review Form Response

http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/963/1248 3/3

Comment

Final Comments      To the Author *

Please add one or two sentences on the  background of this research.

The texts on figures 2­7 are too small, hardly  readable. Please reproduce them with bigger  fonts.

     Confidential Comments to the EIC

This Paper is recommended to be * Accepted without further revision Accepted with minor revision Major Revision is required Rejected

Close

* Denotes required field

ATOM INDONESIA

Referee’s Report

Article No. : # 963

Title of Paper :

Gamma Radiosynthesis of Colloidal Silver Nanoparticles Stab

ilized in ι

- Carrageenan under Atmospheric Gases: A Surface Plasmon Resonance based Study

Referee Name :

Comment on Descriptions 1. Title

[X] Appropriate [ ] Should be changed 2. Abstract

Yes[X] No[ ] Is the length reasonable?

Yes[X] No[ ] Is it an appropriate summary of the content?

3. Main Text

Yes[ X ] No[ ] Is there anything new in this work?

Yes[ X ] No[ ] Is the relation to previous studies adequately stated?

Yes[ X ] No[ ] Are the assumption(s) and/or method(s) described comprehensively?

Yes[ X ] No[ ] Are the new results adequately emphasized?

Line # Referee’s Comments

12 Please add one or two sentences on the background of this research 12 The present study explores the gamma radiosynthesis ….

12 …(AgNPs) in varies various concentrations of ι-carrageenan solutions.

12 Behaviours of AgNPs……..

12 ……which were measured….

12 Result shows showed

12 antioxidant activities which increasing increased 12 The SPR spectra indicates indicated that 211-

217

In your research why your irradiated solution remains colorless whereas other researchers found brownish solution after irradiation. This phenomenon needs explanation.

269 This peak corresponding corresponds to…….

626-

647 The texts on figures 2-7 are too small, hardly readable. Please reproduce them with bigger fonts

Final comments and recommendations:

In the acknowledgements, authors should acknowledge the Research and Development Centre for Marine and Fisheries Product Processing and Biotechnology, Ministry of Marine and Fisheries Affair, Indonesia, for providing them with the ι-carrageenan.

This paper is recommended to be [ ] Accepted without further revision [ X ] Accepted with minor revision [ ] Major Revision is required [ ] Rejected