Associate editor's report form >>

(1)

2/28/2019 Review Form Response

http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/936/1117 1/4

REVIEW FORM RESPONSE

Associate editor's report form >>

1. Originality of the article

Free of Plagiarism/Similarity (max 20%) * [1] Completely Correct

Comments

Less than 20%

New article/not yet Published (presented/ in proceeding max 30%) * [2] Partly Correct

Comments

2. Related to nuclear/atomic science and technology * [1] Completely Correct

Comments

3. Reference

The number of references at least 10 * [2] Partly Correct

Comments

(2)

Not all references are written according to the rule

The use of recent references 80% (maximum 5 years ago) * [2] Partly Correct

Comments

10 out of 34 are more than 5 years

Type of the references (primarily, secondary etc.) 85% from journal * [2] Partly Correct

Comments

20 out of 34 are from journal

Cross link reference (traceable) * [1] Completely Correct Comments

Reference style standard: Elsevier numeric without title * [1] Completely Correct

Comments

(3)

When reference has more than 3 Authors, write only 3 name, et al. * [2] Partly Correct

Comments

7 references are not written according to rule

Article follows the Atom Indonesia template and guidelines * [1] Completely Correct

Comments

Table (clear, without vertical line) * [1] Completely Correct

Comments

PLease add the results of research conducted so far in a table

Figure (clear, min 300 dpi) * [1] Completely Correct

Comments

Figure 5 and figure 6A is similar, erase one is better.

Is the Level of English appropriate? * [1] Completely Correct

Comments

(4)

Final recommendation: * Continue review process Return to the Author Reject

Final Comments *

BNCT as the main object of the manuscript need to be more described, mainly the results of research. More than half of the text body describes the breast cancer. Its questionable that research activities only written in one paragraph.

Close

* Denotes required field