22/2/2019 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/908/1099 1/3
REVIEW FORM RESPONSE
Editor's Report >>
1. The Title is Appropriate * [1] Completely Correct
Comment -
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate * [1] Completely Correct
Comment -
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
The structure of writing this article should follow the structure used by the Atom Indonesia journal (Abstract, Introduction, experimental methods, results and
discussion, conclusion).
Some of the results obtained have not been discussed comprehensively.
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound) * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
22/2/2019 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/908/1099 2/3
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion) * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
The writing structure of this article is not in accordance with the Atom Indonesia Journal.
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
Some paragraphs still need to be revised.
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals *
[1] Completely Correct
Comment -
The English is alright * [2] Partly Correct Comment
22/2/2019 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/908/1099 3/3
Final Comments To the Author *
The structure of writing this article should follow the structure used by the Atom Indonesia journal (Abstract, Introduction, experimental methods, results and discussion, conclusion)
Line 131-145:
It is necessary to add a brief explanation of the results of the field trials presented in Table 1 and explain the obstacles that occur.
Line 232-264
It is necessary to add a brief explanation of the quantitative and qualitative improvements that will be obtained from this pilot project design compared to the current program
Line 293-300
It would be very good if this paragraph also discussed the calculation of cost benefit analysis by other researchers from other countries.
Please describe about the types of SIT objects that can be sterilized.
Confidential Comments to the EIC
This article has been well prepared and in accordance with the scope of the Atom Indonesia Journal. However, this article still requires several improvements according to the suggestions above.
This Paper is recommended to be * Accepted without further revision Accepted with minor revision Major Revision is required Rejected
Close
* Denotes required field
ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL
Editor’s Report
Article No. : #908
Title of Paper : Current Status and Recent Achievements of The Sterile Insect Technique Program Against Dengue Vector, Aedes aegypti, in Indonesia
Comment on Descriptions 1. The Title is Appropriate*
[ X ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment : -
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate*
[ X ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment : -
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported*
[ ] Completely correct [X ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The structure of writing this article should follow the structure used by the Atom Indonesia journal (Abstract, Introduction, experimental methods, results and discussion, conclusion) Line 131-145:
It is necessary to add a brief explanation of the results of the field trials presented in Table 1 and explain the obstacles that occur.
Line 232-264
It is necessary to add a brief explanation of the quantitative and qualitative improvements that will be obtained from this pilot project design compared to the current program Line 293-300
It would be very good if this paragraph also discussed the calculation of cost benefit analysis by other researchers from other countries.
Please describe about the types of SIT objects that can be sterilized.
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound)*
[ ] Completely correct [ X ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion)*
[ ] Completely correct [ X ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The writing structure of this article is not in accordance with the Atom Indonesia Journal
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content*
[ ] Completely correct [ X ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
Some paragraphs still need to be revised
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals*
[ X ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The English is alright*
[ ] Completely correct [ X ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
Final Comments To the Author*
Line Number Comment :
The structure of writing this article should follow the structure used by the Atom Indonesia journal (Abstract, Introduction, experimental methods, results and discussion, conclusion)
122-123 Please describe with the results on evaluation of sterility
124 What is the dose rate used?
249 Please add “the bar” on the figure that describe how wide the studied area.
131-145:
It is necessary to add a brief explanation of the results of the field trials presented in Table 1 and explain the obstacles that occur.
232-264
It is necessary to add a brief explanation of the quantitative and qualitative improvements that will be obtained from this pilot project design compared to the current program
Line 293- 300
It would be very good if this paragraph also discussed the calculation of cost benefit analysis by other researchers from other countries.
Please describe about the types of SIT objects that can be sterilized.
Confidential Comments to the EIC:
Comment :
This article has been well prepared and in accordance with the scope of the Atom Indonesia Journal. However, this article still requires several improvements according to the suggestions above.
This paper is recommended to be [ ] Accepted without further revision [ X ] Accepted with minor revision [ ] Major Revision is required [ ] Rejected
