22/10/2018 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/762/996 1/2
REVIEW FORM RESPONSE
Referee's Report >>
1. The Title is Appropriate * [1] Completely Correct Comment
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
Need a statement saying that FASSIP-01 is a large rectangular experimental loop. In the current version, there is no link between the large rectangular experimental loop and FASSIP-01. Moreover, comparison between experimental results and simulation results need to be clearly described.
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
1. The purpose of the study stated in lines# 118-121 is different from the one stated in lines# 124-128. Please clarify!
2. Be consistent with the usage of comma to represent thousands. Some numbers do not use comma, but other numbers use comma.
3. Lines#261-271 should be part of the METHODOLOGY and briefly mentioned in the INTRODUCTION.
4. Line #297: 4 kW or 4.4 kW???
5. Based on lines# 261-270, authors should discuss the results obtained from experimental without piping insulator and with a rock wool pipe insulator for both electrical heat power. Furthermore, authors also need to do comparison.
6. Authors also need to compare results obtain from experimental and simulation.
7. There is no link between the conclusion and the research objectives
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound) * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
Need to revise as suggested above
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion) * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
Need to revise as suggested above
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
22/10/2018 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/762/996 2/2
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals *
[1] Completely Correct Comment
What is the current status of Reference# 15?
The English is alright * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
Authors still need to check and re-check the English usage
Final Comments To the Author *
Please revise the paper as suggested
Confidential Comments to the EIC
Authors need to revise the paper. In the current version, there is no good link amongst statements from different parts.
This Paper is recommended to be * Accepted without further revision Accepted with minor revision Major Revision is required Rejected
Close
* Denotes required field
