1. The Title is Appropriate * [1] Completely Correct Comment
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound) * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
Review Form Response http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormRespo...
1 of 3 18-12-2019, 10:47 AM
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion) * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
In the steady state analysis, the power of 2 MW was assumed, on the other hand, in the
transient analysis, the power of 1 MW was assumed. The clear reason for this difference should be described.
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals *
[2] Partly Correct
Comment
The editor could not find the reference [14]. It is the most important reference in this article. The article related to MTR-DYN code should be referred (not user
The English is alright *
Review Form Response http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormRespo...
2 of 3 18-12-2019, 10:47 AM
[2] Adequate Comment
Final Comments To the Author *
This article includes useful information and its logic is sound. The editor recommends
“Accept with minor revision”.
Confidential Comments to the EIC
This Paper is recommended to be * Accepted without further revision Accepted with minor revision Major Revision is required Rejected
Close
* Denotes required field
Review Form Response http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormRespo...
3 of 3 18-12-2019, 10:47 AM
ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL
Editor’s Report
Article No. : #977
Title of Paper : Safety Analysis of the TRIGA 2000 U3Si2Al Fuel Core Under Reactivity Insertion Accidents
Comment on Descriptions 1. The Title is Appropriate*
[ x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate*
[ x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported*
[ x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound)*
[ x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion)*
[ ] Completely correct [ x ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
In the steady state analysis, the power of 2 MW was assumed, on the other hand, in the transient analysis, the power of 1 MW was assumed. The clear reason for this difference should be described.
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content*
[ x ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals*
[ ] Completely correct [ x ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The editor could not find the reference [14]. It is the most important reference in this article. The article related to MTR-DYN code should be referred (not user manual).
The English is alright*
[ ] Completely correct [ x ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
There are a few strange sentences. Please check the comments below.
Final Comments To the Author*
Line Number Comment :
109 It is better to present simple explanation of WIMSD/5 although its detail is written in the chapter, METHODOLOGY.
Table 1 It is difficult to understand the geometry of fuel zone and plate. It is better to add a figure of FE and CE consists of fuel plates.
Table 2 The reactivities shown in Table 2 are measured or calculated ones? If these are calculated ones, how were they calculated?
191 The WIMSD/5 code is used to generate the cross-section sets. Which nuclear data library (ENDF? JENDL? JEFF?) was employed?
197 The MTR-DYN requires few-group neutron diffusion macroscopic cross section sets.
How many groups? It is better to describe it clearly.
272 The sentence “The coolant inlet…” makes no sense. Please reconsider.
Table 3 Generally, the unit of flow rate is kg/s (mass flow rate) or m3/s (volume flow rate).
kg/m2 s is strange. Please confirm it.
304
In the steady state analysis, the power of 2 MW was assumed, on the other hand, in the transient analysis, the power of 1 MW was assumed. The clear reason for this difference should be described.
342 The sentence “The maximum power…” is strange. Please reconsider.
423 What is SAR?
466 The editor could not find the reference [14]. It is the most important reference in this article. The article related to MTR-DYN code should be referred (not user manual).
All Notation of degree C is strange. It’s not a combination of 0 and C.
Confidential Comments to the EIC:
Comment :
This article includes useful information and its logic is sound. The editor recommends
“Accept with minor revision”.
This paper is recommended to be [ ] Accepted without further revision [ x ] Accepted with minor revision [ ] Major Revision is required [ ] Rejected
