4/2/2019 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/744/1016 1/3
REVIEW FORM RESPONSE
Referee's Report >>
1. The Title is Appropriate * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The title is appropriate with the content of the manuscript.
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate * [2] Partly Correct
Comment
The magnitude of the magnetic field should be described in the abstract.
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The important results of the experiment in this study about nanostructure and magnetic field ordering in aqueous Fe3O4 ferrofluids using SANS Small-Angle Neutron Scattering technique has been described and reported in the manuscript.
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound) * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
4/2/2019 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/744/1016 2/3
The manuscript presents experiment and results of nanostructure and magnetic field ordering in aqueous Fe3O4 ferrofluids using SANS Small-Angle Neutron Scattering technique with high scientific quality.
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion) * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The description of experimental, theory, results, discussion and conclusion in the manuscript is well organized.
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The length of the manuscript is appropriate to the content.
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals *
[2] Partly Correct
Comment
The numbers of recent references (2014-now) in the manuscript are less than 80%.
4/2/2019 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/744/1016 3/3
The English is alright * [1] Completely Correct
Comment
The manuscript is written in good English.
Final Comments To the Author *
The manuscript is potential to be published in Atom Indonesia. However, the author should improve the
numbers of recent references (2014-now) in the manuscript to be more than 80%.
Confidential Comments to the EIC
The manuscript is potential to be published in Atom Indonesia. However, the author should improve the numbers of recent references (2014-now) in the manuscript to be more than 80%.
This Paper is recommended to be * Accepted without further revision Accepted with minor revision Major Revision is required Rejected
Close
* Denotes required field
