ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL
Editor’s Report
Article No. : #761
Title of Paper : Investigation on the Performance of a Wickless-Heat Pipe Using Graphene Nanofluid for Passive Cooling System
Comment on Descriptions 1. The Title is Appropriate*
[√ ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
2. Abstract
The Content and Length of the abstract are appropriate*
[ ] Completely correct [√ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
Revision is required after correction the content of the paper.
3. Main Text
The results are important to be reported*
[√] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
Graphene is one among the prospective nano fluids. The author should include the novelty of the nano fluid theorem
The paper is of high scientific quality (scientifically sound)*
[ ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [√ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
What kind of demineralized water (DMW) did you use in your experiments, 10S, 20 S, 100 S?
Please define. How to get it?.
What kind of graphene did you use in your experiments, pure CNT, MWCNTs? Do you know the different amongst them?
Why do you choose 1 wt% of graphene? Why not 1.5 wt%, 2 wt%, 10 wt%? Pls explain.
How to arrange the homogeneous dispersion of the of the graphene in the fluid? The higher the nano materials contained, the more difficult to maintain the homogeneous dispersion.
What the potential boiling point rate of DMW containing 1 wt%, 1.5 wt%, 2 wt% etc of graphene so that you decide to select 1 wt% graphene?
Present your results (Figs. 4 to 16) together with that obtained by other researchers in order to
demonstrate the plus-minus of your experiments. Discuss it completely.
Refs. 26 and 36 should be written in complete.
The paper is well organized (experimental/theory/results/conclusion)*
[√ ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
The length of the paper is appropriate to the content*
[ ] Completely correct [√ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
Revision is required.
The references are adequate in complete / consist of 85% primary references and recent journals*
[√ ] Completely correct [ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
Refs. 26 and 36 should be revised.
The English is alright*
[ ] Completely correct [√ ] Partly correct [ ] not Correct at all
Comment :
Many gramatical error encountered.
Final Comments To the Author*
Line Number Comment :
Confidential Comments to the EIC:
Comment :
This paper is recommended to be [ ] Accepted without further revision
[ ] Accepted with minor revision [√ ] Major Revision is required [ ] Rejected
