ATOM INDONESIA JOURNAL
Author’s Responses toward Associate Editor's Report
Article No. : #443
Title of Paper : Temperature and Salinity Effect on Bioaccumulation, Gill Structure and Radiation Dose Estimation inthe Milkfish ChanoschanosExposed to 137Cs Name All Author’s :
Criteria Evaluation
Associate editor's evaluation
Author’s Responses
Yes No Comments
1. Originality of the article
Free of
Plagiarism/Similarity (max 20%)
v
To be reviewed later Thank for the comments, we sincerely hope our revised manuscript will meet the AIJ’s requirement.
New article/ not yet Published (presented/
in proceeding max 30%)
v
To be reviewed later Thank for the comments, we sincerely hope our revised manuscript will meet the AIJ’s requirement.
2. Related to
nuclear/atomic science and technology
V
Thank for the comments.
3. Reference
The number of references at least 10
v Too many old references We have used 19 references to justify and explain more with regard to our experimental result.
The use of recent references 80%
(maximum 5 years ago)
v The number of your recent references (2011- now)30/46 less than 80%.
The use of recent international journal is reccomended.
We have replaced the old references with the new ones which explains the similar or the same thing with the old ones
Type of the references (primarily, secondary etc.) 85% from journal
v
The use of older and seconadrduce the quality of the paper. Please use international journals as the primary references.
Try to find the newest one as reccomended by Atom Indonesia.
We have used all primary references from International Journals as suggested by editorial in revised manuscript.
Cross link reference (traceable)
Reference style standard: Elsevier numeric without title
v Reference style for journal must follow the Atom Indonesia.
True example ( add page numbers) :
39. H. Koyama, S.
Okamoto,
N.Watanabe, et al,
We have followed reference style standard in revised manuscript.
Comp. Biochem.
Physiol., 181(2015)59.
Article follows the Atom Indonesia template and guidelines
v
Sub section should in bold letter
We have followed the AIJ’s template and guidelines and we have bolded subsection in revised manuscript
Table (clear, without vertical line)
v Remove the vertical lines We have removed vertical lines for Table. 1, 2
Figure (clear, min 300 dpi)
v No border is required for Figs. 3, 4, 5.
We have erased border for Fig. 3, 4, 5 and gave more sign inside figure to clearly described gill structure.
Final recommendation:
1. Continue review process [ ]
2. Return to the Author [v]
3. Reject [ ]
Comments:
The author should revise the article as suggested above, before further substance review.
