1^'-] General No/cs. TTC^
Note on theAlleged Occurrence of Trochilus heloisa {Less, in
De
Latf.) withinNorth
American
Limits.— A recent careful examination of the specimen (No. 6072, U.S. Nat. Mus., El Paso, Texas, J. H. Clark*) on which thesupposedoccurrence ofthis species within our territoryis
based,
shows
thatanerror has beenmade
in its identification, it being notthis species atall,butayoung
example ofT. calliofeGould. Should T.heloisa befound withinourlimits,as will doubtlesssome
time be the case, itmay
beexpected tooccursomewhere
along the /owe;-Rio Grande, since it belongs to the moister region of eastern Mexico, the fauna of which is quite distinct from that of the arid central region in which El Paso issituated.—
Robert Ridgway,
Washington,D. C.Scenopceetes dentirostris.
— A new
genericname
seemstobe required forthe Tooth-billed Bowerbird of Australia, as Sceno/xeus ofRamsay,
1S75, ispreoccupied in entomology byScenopcens, Agassiz,1S47 {=Sccn-
o/iinus, Latreille, 1802).
—
Elliott
Coues, Washim^tou,D.C.
Ammodramus
caudacutus nelsoniandA
c. subvirgatus inConnecti- cut.—
I haveinmy
collectioneighteen specimens o(Am7nodramiistaken herebetweenOct. 4and 13, 1S90.Ten
aretrue nelsoni, foursubnirgafus, and theothers intermediates.They
were found in themeadows
near the Connecticut River, and seemed partial to certain localities.The
height ofthe migration was apparentlyon the loth of themonth when
thirteen weresecured,twomore
beingseen thatwere not captured.On
otherdaysonlyfrom one to three birds couldbe found.On
the daywhen
the largernumber
were killed, the birds appearedsomewhat
stupid,flyingfrom thethick grasswhen
disturbed and perch- ingon the wild oatswhere theyremained quiet.At
other times they werewildanddifficulttoobtain.—
Jno. H.Sage,Portland, Conn.
Note on
Junco
hyemalis thurberi Anthony.— A
collectionofbirds pur- chased inOctober, 1S89,t>J '^heAmerican Museum
of Natural History from Mr. E.C.Thurber, contains eleven specimens ofthe bird recently described by Mr.Anthony
under the abovename
{cf. Zoe, I, 8, p. 23S, Oct., 1890).An
examination of these specimens during the pastsum- mer
inconnectionwith BritishColumbia
material permitsme
to agree with Mr.Anthony
as to their distinctness from the dark coast form, yiinco hyemalis oreg07ius. Mr.Anthony,
however,hasmade
nocom-
parison withamuch
closerally,ynnco
hyemalis shufeldti,which differs from oregotiusin exactly thesame manner
asthe birds he has described as thurberi. Whilethesetwo formsmay
besubspecificallyseparable,there*Cf.Elliot,Illustr.B.N.
Am.
I.pi.xxi,—Cooper,Orn. Cala. I, 1870, p. 361.—B.B.