DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdullah, F. & Ward, R., 2015. Developing a General Extended Technology Acceptance Model for E-Learning (GETAMEL) by analysing commonly used external factors. Elsevier: Computers in Human Behavior.
Ajzen, I. & Fishben, 1980. Theory of Reasoned Action. Yogyakarta: Andi Publisher.
Akman, I. & Turhan, C., 2015. User acceptance of social learning systems in higher education:. Innovations in Education and Teaching International.
Al-Gahtani, S. S., Hubona, G. S. & Wang, J., 2007. Information technology (IT) in Saudi Arabia: Culture and the acceptance and use of IT.
Information & Management.
Alharbi, S. & Drew, S., 2014. Using the Technology Acceptance Model in Understanding Academics' Behavioural Intention to Use Learning Mangaement Systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications.
Prosedur Penelitian : Suatu Pendekatan Praktek.
Arikunto, S., 2002.
Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.
Auwdinata, P., 2018. Pengaruh Organizational Justice terhadap Organizational Citizenship Behaviour dengan Organizational Commitment sebagai Variabel Intervening pada PT Sunindo Gapura Prima. AGORA, 6(1).
Blackmon, J., 2016. eLearning 101: A Practical Guide. Cincinnati:
Trivantis Corporation.
Davis, F. D., 1989. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, adn User Acceptance of Information Technology. Ann Arbor: Management Information Systems Research Center.
Delone, W. H. & McLean, E. R., 2016. Information Systems Success Measurement. Boston: now publishers inc.
Destiana, B., 2012. Analisis Penerimaan Pengguna Akhir Terhadap penerapan Sistem E - Learning dengan Menggunakan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) di SMA N 1 Wonosari, Yogyakarta: s.n.
Djunanto, R. A. & Papilaya, F. S., 2018. Analisis Kepuasan Penerimaan Pengguna Akhir Sistem Branch Delivery System (Bds) Pada Layanan Teller Cash Recycler (TCR) Menggunakan End. Indonesia Journal of Information System.
Doll, W. J. & Torkzadeh, G., 1988. The Measurement of End-User Computing Satisfaction. MIA Quarterly.
Erlirianto, L. M., Ali, A. H. & Herdiyanti, A., 2015. The Implementation of the Human, Organization, and. Elsevier.
Fatma, 2020. Wawancara terkait NUADU [Interview] (1 Desember 2020).
Gaur, A. S. & Gaur, S. S., 2009. Statistical Methods for Practice and Research: A guide to data analysis using SPSS. New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Ghislandi, P., 2012. e-LEARNING – Theories, Design, Software, and Apllications. s.l.:InTech.
Ghozali, I., 2012. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariat dengan Program IBM SPSS 20. Semarang: Badan penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Haryanto, H. & Kaltsum, H. U., 2016. E-Learning Program Adoption:
Technology Acceptance Model Approach. Solo, The International Conference on Teacher Training and Education (ICTTE).
Hwang, H., Jung, K. & Kim, S., 2019. Web GeSCA: Generalized
Structured Component Analysis. [Online]
Available at: http://sem-gesca.com/GeSCA_Manual.pdf [Accessed Thursday July 2021].
Hwang, H. & Takane, Y., 2015. Generalized Structured Component Analysis: A Component-Based Approach to Structural Equation Modeling. Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis Group.
Ilmi, C. R., 2018. Evaluasi Faktor Penerimaan Pengguna Sistem Informasi E - Learning Universitas Negeri Surabaya dengan menggunakan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM), Malang: repository.ub.ac.id.
Jogiyanto, 2007. Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan. Yogyakarta: Andi.
Jr., J. F. H., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J. & Anderson, R. E., 2019.
Multivariate Data Analysis. Boston: Cengage Learning, EMEA.
Kamel, S. & Hassan, A., 2003. Assessing the Introduction of Electronic Banking in Egypt Using the Technology Acceptance Model. s.l.:IDEA GROUP PUBLISHING.
Karim, J. & Lasena, M., 2017. Analisis Kebijakan E-Procurement di pemerintah Provinsi Gorontalo Menggunakan Metode Technology Acceptance Model dan End User Computing Satisfaction. ILKOM Jurnal Ilmiah, Volume Volume 9.
Khan, G. F. & Moon, J., 2011. E-learning motivation, Students' Acceptance/Use of Educational Portal in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Peru. Emerald, 35(1), pp. 66-85.
King, W. R. & He, J., 2006. A meta-analysis of The Technology Acceptance Model. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Kline, R. B., 2016. Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. 4th Edition ed. New York: The Guilford Press.
Kumar, R., 2011. Reaserch Methodology: a step-by-step guide for beginners. Third Edition ed. s.l.:SAGE Publications Inc.
Laudon, K. C. & Laudon, J. P., 2014. Management Information Systems Managing the Digital Firm. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
Makarim, N. A., 2020. Surat Edaran Nomor 4 Tahun 2020 tentang Pelaksanaan Kebijakan Pendidikan dalam Masa Darurat Penyebaran Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19). s.l.:Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan republik Indonesia.
Mehrens, W. A. & Lehman, I. J., 1984. Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology. Ann Arbor: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Mohammadi, H., 2015. Investigating users’ perspectives on e-learning: An integration of TAM and IS success model. Elsevier.
Mugo, D., Njagi, K., Chemwei, B. & Motanya, J., 2017. The Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and its Application to the Utilization of Mobile Learning Technologies. British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science.
Muhaimin, M. et al., 2016. Predicting factors affecting intention touse Web 2. 0 in learning: evidence from science education. J. Baltic Sci. Educ..
NUADU, 2020. About. [Online]
Available at: https://nuadu.com/en/about
Nunnally, J. & Bernstein, I., 1994. The Assessment of Reliability.
Psychometric Theory, 3. 3rd edition ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc.
Nursalam & Efendi, F., 2008. Pendidikan Dalam Keperawatan. Jakarta:
Penerbit Salemba.
Priyatno, D., 2014. SPSS 22: Pengolah Data Terpraktis. Yogyakarta:
ANDI .
Radner, R. & Rothschild, M., 1975. On the Allocation of Effort. Journal of Economic Theory.
Rahayu, F. S., Budiyato, D. & Palyama, D., 2017. Analisis Penerimaan e- Learning Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) (Studi Kasus:
Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta). JUTEI, Volume Volume.1.
Rahimi, E., Van den Berg, J. & Veen, W., 2015. Facilitating student- driven constructing of learning environments using Web 2.0 personal learning environments. Computers & Education.
Ratri, S. M., 2016. Analisis Faktor - Faktor yang Memengaruhi Penggunaan E-Learning Moodle oleh Guru SMK Negeri 2 Yogyakarta dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journl Elektronika Pendidikan Teknik Informatika.
S., L. P. & Lemeshow, S., 2008. Sampling Populations: Methods and Applications. Fouth Edition ed. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Sanders, J. R. & Worthen, B. R., 1987. Educational Evaluation:
Alternative Approaches and Practical Guidelines. New York: Longman.
Santoso, S., 2012. Analisis SEM Menggunakan Amos. Jakarta: Elex Media Komputindo.
Solimun, 2002. Multivariate Analysis Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) Lisrel dan Amos: Aplikasi Manajemen, Ekonomi Pembangunan, Psikologi Sosial, Kedokteran, dan Agrokompleks. Malang: UM PRESS.
Sukendro, et al., 2020. Using an extended Technology Acceptance Model to understand students’ use of e-learning during Covid-19: Indonesian sport science education context. Elsevier Ltd..
Tangke, N., 2004. Analisa Penerimaan Penerapan Teknik Audit Berbantuan Komputer (TABK) dengan menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) pada BPK RI. Jurusan Ekonomi Akuntansi.
Tsingos, D., 2014. E - learning: Concepts, Trends, Applications. San Francisco: Epignosis learning technologies.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B. & Davis, F. D., 2003. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. Management Information Systems Research Center, 27(3), pp. 425-478.
Wibowo, A., 2008. Kajian tentang Perilaku Pengguna Ssitem Informasi dengan Pendekatan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Konferensi Nasional Sistem Informasi.
Yulianingsih, E., 2016. Analisis Kepuasan terhadap penggunaan E - Learning menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model dan End User Computing Satisfaction. Jurnal Ilmiah MATRIK, Volume Vol. 18, pp. 27 - 42.
Yusuf, A. M., 2014. Metode Penelitian: Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Penelitian Gabungan. Edisi Pertama ed. Jakarta: KENCANA.
(Halaman ini sengaja dikosongkan)
