262
Clark, AnatomicalNotes.[a^u.
ANATOMICAL NOTES ON SOME GENERA OF PASSERINE BIRDS.
BY HUBERT LYMAN
CLARK.There
aremany
generaofPasserinebirds, therelationships of whicharestillmore
orlessuncertain,largelyowingtoour lackof knowledge of their anatomy.Thanks
to the kindness of Mr.Outran! Bangs, and his interest in having our knowledge along these lines extended, some alcoholic material has already been placedin
my
hands andmore
ispromised,whichwillenableme
to study theanatomy
of someof thesegenera ofdoubtfulaffinity.Through
thekindnessofDr. C.W. Richmond
andtheauthorities ofthe United StatesNationalMuseum,
towhom
Ihere expressmy
hearty thanks, representatives of the three following genera have beensentme, andIventure to present here theresults ofmy
studies. Such studies can onlybe carried on withprofit, where large collections of skins and alcoholic birds are accessible for comparison,andI
am
thereforeindebtedtoMr.Henshaw
andMr.
BangsforthefreedomwithwhichIhave beenpermittedtouse the collections inthe
Museum
ofComparativeZoology.Saltator.
An
adultmale specimenof Saltator africcpsLesson,from Mexico, lacking wingand tailfeathers, but otherwise in good condition, preservedinalcohol,hasbeencarefullystudiedincomparison with PipiloandPiranga.The
charactersofthebillandfeet ofSaltator aretoowellknown
toneedanycomment
from me,while thetongue showsno distinctivecharacter. Itisso similar tothat of Pipilo that the onlydifferenceisitsslightlygreaterfleshiness.Picrylosis.
The
general pterylosis of Saltator is like that of most oscinine birds and reveals no really distinctive feature.The
upper cervical tractislong andnarrow, only three feathers wide for most of its length, but the dorsal tract has the usual rhomboidalform. Otherspecimensshow
thatthewingispointedby
the sixth primary, which isnearly equalledby
the fifth and°i9i3"J Clark, AnatomicalA'otes.
263
seventh; the fourthislonger than the eighthwhichisabout equalto thethird; thesecondislongerthan the ninthwhich
may
l)eeither longer or shorterthanthefirst. Thisarrangementofthe primariesisquitedifferentfromthatshown byPiranga butisalmost exactly likethatfoundinPipilocri/throphthalmus.
The
tailis \-erymuch
graduatedandismade
upof12soft, broadrectrices.AUmcnfanj Canal.
No
notable characters are shown by the intestine orstomach,whicharenot distinguishablefrom thoseof Pipilo.The
intestinemeasures about225mm.
inlength,or rather lessthanthetotallengthofthebird,but oneandahalftimes the lengthofthebird,iftherectricesarenotincluded.The
stomach contained seedsand thepit ofasmall, cherry-likefruit,as wellasmuch
undetermined vegetable matter; no insectswere noted.Palatine Region.
The
palatine processes are longandconspicu- ous as in the finches and tanagers generally. There is a well- developed "secondarypalatineprocess"on eachsidemuch
as in Habia, although not so long or conspicuous as in that genus.They
are rather betterdevelopedthaninPiranga.The
maxillo- palatines arenotpeculiar.Sternum. There is no trace of an 'osseous bridge' from the anteriormarginofthesternum tothemanubrium,suchasoccurs in Piranga and Rhodinocichla.
Back
of the anterior margin whichisverticallyverymuch
thickened thereisabonyroofo\er the small space contained between the anterior margin and the sloping sides of the sternal floor. This bony roof is present inmany
finchesandtanagersbutshowsgreatdiversity initsextent and appearance. In Saltator, it isperforated bya conspicuous, circular, median foramen, posterior to which is a secondmuch
smaller opening. Therearenoopeningsin thisbonyroof in Pipilo butinHabia, there aretwoas inSaltator although theyareverymuch
smallerthaninthatspecies. In Piranga, thereare,in the male, two verylargeforaminasideby
sideanda smaller openingmay
be seeninthe posteriorface of theanterior margin; in the female,thelargeforaminaseemtobe wanting. Whetherthisbony roof and these foramina have anyspecial significance Iam
not prepared to say, but their appearance in Piranga (male\ Habia andSaltatorisstriking.Conclasiona.
The
resemblanceofSaltatorto Pipilo in itsana-264
Clark, AnatomicalNotes. [A^n tomical featuresisstriking,while intwodetails (secondary pala- tineprocessand forameninosseous roofabovesternum)inwhichitdiffersfromthatgenusitresembles Habia. Itlacksthe'osse- ous bridge'ofthe sternal
manubrium
somarked
in Pirangaand Rhodinocichla. It seems tome
thereforethatRidgway
is right in placing Saltatorinthe Fringillidre.Chlorophonia.
An
adultmaleofChlorophonia callophrys (Cabanis)from Costa Ricahasbeenatmy
disposal. Ithasbeen comparedchiefly Avith Piranga and Euphonia. Unfortunately alcoholic specimens of other Tanagridpehavenotbeenavailable,exceptingRhodinocichla.The
charactersofthebilland tongue need nocomments
fromme
butthetarsishowacertaincharacterwhichdoesnotseemtohave been noted hitherto.Tarsus. Examination of the alcoholic specimen revealed the interesting fact that the tarsi are distinctly booted.
The
three scales whichusually cover the frontofthe tarsusintanagers are fused togethersothat thereishardly atrace ofthelinesof division.On
notingthisfact, Iexaminedalargenumber
ofskins ofChloro- phonia (5 species),Pyrrhuphonia, and Euphonia(10 species) and severalgeneraofmoretypicaltanagers,with theresult,whichwas surprisingtome,thatabootedtarsus,asperfect asthatofa thrush,isby no
means
rareamong
thesetanagrinebirds. Ifinditoccurs in Pyrrhuphonia constantly inboth sexes andmay
wellbe con- sideredoneofthe genericcharacters. Itisalso fairlyconstantin Chlorophonia callophrys, longipcnnis, riridis, frontalis psiitacina, andoccipitalisbutislessfrequentintypical frontalisandinpretri.In all thesecases adult males generallyhave the tarsus booted, butinthe femalesasarule,andintheyoungthedivisionsbetween the scutes arestilltobeseen. InEuphoniaaffinis,bothsexes are, asarule,booted butinmostspecies ofthe genus, the scutesonthe frontofthe tarsus are quitedistinct. Bootedtarsiarealsofound, atleast inadultmalesofCalospiza,Poecilothraupis,Hemithraupis, Chlorospingus and Mitrospingus. ^>ry probably they \x\\\ be foundinother generaand theiroccurrence throughouttheTana- gridiedeserves detailed in^•estigation.
^"ioi^?"'^] Clark,AnaiomicalNotes.
265
Picrylosis.
The
general pterylosis of Chloroplioiiia deservescomment
because of the noticeable width of the tracts and the densityoftheir feathering. Thisisparticularly true oftheupper cervical tract.The
dorsal tract ('saddle') is not as broadly rhombic as in most oscines but the outer angles are rounded.The
posterior end of the'saddle'isalmost completely separated fromtheremainderofthedorsal tract,whichisatfirstnarrow and withfewfeathersbutbecomes broadandwell-featheredattheoil- gland.The
sternal tracts areabruptly contractedwherethey pass intotheventrals. Thereare nine primariesandnine secondaries in the wing; the sixth, seventhand eighth primaries are nearly equal, theseventh atriflethe longestperhaps; theninthisnext, withthefifth,fourth, third,secondandfirstinregular succession.Therearetwelverectrices of approximately equal length,though the outerones are ofcourse (sincethe tail is nearly square-cut) really the longest.
Alimentary Canal.
The
stomach is small but quite distinct.One
can distinguish a proventriculus about sixmm.
longand a gizzard ofaboutthesame
length.The
latterhasthin wallsbut the inner surfaceishard andcorrugated,so thereisnoreasonfor refusingtocallitagizzard. Forbesstates (P. Z.S.London,ISSO, p.145)thatinChlorophoniaviridisthereis"thesamenon-de\elop-ment
ofa gizzard" asinEuphonia. Itiscurious that there should be a noticeabledifferenceonthispointwithin thelimitsofasingle genus, butcertainly in Chlorophonia callophrysthe gizzard is far better developedthaninEuphonia.The
intestineinChlorophoniaisextraordinarilylong; inthespecimenbefore
me
itmeasures340mm.
ormore
than2| times thetotallengthofthebird. Naturally inits arrangementwithin thebodycavitywe
findtwo morefolds than isusualamong
tanagers.The
stomach contains seedsand indeterminable vegetablematter andremainsofat leastoneinsect.Palatine Region.
The
bony palateis remarkable for the very short palatineprocesses.They
areasshortandbluntorrounded asinmany
Mniotiltidse,sothat the palateisnotatalltanagrine in appearance. There is no secondary palatine process and the maxillo-palatinebonesshow nopeculiarities.The
vomerisnotice- ablybroadandthick,with theanteriormarginnot deeply notched.Sternum. Thereisnotrace ofthe osseous bridge norof forann'iia
266
Clark, AnatomicalNotes. [apJu inthe bony roof ofthespace backof theanteriormargin ofthe sternum. Inall particulars,the sternumappears to betypically fringilline.Conclusions.
The
details of anatomy.here given throw very littlelightontheaffinitiesofChlorophoniabutthereisnospecial relationship to the tanagersshown.The
palatine structure and the peculiarities ofthealimentary canalbothtend to separateitfromthat group.
EUPHONIA.
An
adult maleof Euphonia miniitafrom Costa Ricahas been availableforstudy and comparisons have beenmade
chiefly with Chlorophonia.The
bill and feet need no discussion here; the characterof the tarsal coveringin Euphoniahas been described above underChlorophonia.Tongue.
The
tongue of Euphonia is strikingly different from thatofChlorophoniaoranyofthe tanagrinebirdsIhave examinedand
resembles thatofsomeoftheCoerebidse. Itisalmosttubular, thesides being rolled inward but not quite meeting.The
tipis brushy.Pterylosis.
The
general plan of the pterylosisis not peculiar.The
dorsal saddle ismore
nearly rhombic than in Chlorophonia and the other tracts are not so broad nor so densely feathered asinthat genus.The
arrangementofthe nine primariesisessen- tiallythe same,buttheeighthisslightlythe longestandtheninthis a triflelonger thanthe sixth. There aretwelve nearly equal rectrices.
Alimentary Canal.
The
genus Euphonia has long been noted for the apparent absence of a stomach.The
specimen at hand doesnotseemto differ essentiallyfromtheonefiguredby Forbes(1. c).
The
intestineisverylong, about 180mm.,
or twice the totallengthofthebird,andismuch
convoluted,as inChlorophonia.Palatine Region.
The
palateof Euphoniahasbeen figuredby Parker (Trans. Zool. Soc. London, vol. 10, pi. 46,fig.3) and the specimen beforeme
agrees well with that figure except for the apparent absence of maxillo-palatines. Parker indicates these bones ratherindefinitelyand I have foundnothing thatseems to°i9i3 J General Notes.
267 me
tocorrespond with them.The
palatine processes areremark- ably long and pointed, a very characteristicfeatureof theskull andstrikingly differentfromthe conditionfoundinChlorophonia.The vomer
is deeply divided anteriorly as Parker has shown andthusisquitedifferentfromthatofChlorophonia.Sfenuou.
The
sternum shows noneofthe tanagrinepeculiarities of Pirangabutisalmost exactly similar to thatofChlorophonia.Conclusions.
The
differences between Euphonia and Chloro- phoniainthetongueandpalate aresomarkedas tomake
onehesi- tatebeforeassertingthat thetwogenera are nearlyallied. Differ- encesinthealimentary canaland inthefeetalso,may
notbeig- nored. In allofthese featuresEuphoniaapproachessomeofthe Coerebidffi-andthepossibility ofitsrelationship tosomemembers
ofthatfamilyshould not beignored. Itishoweverpossiblethat Euphonia minutaisnot representativeofthegenusandthatsome otherspecies
may
show moretanagrineaffinities.GENERAL NOTES.
HolboeH'sGrebeinConcord, Mass.
— OnDecember 15,1912, Bate-
man'sPondfrozeoverwath blackice,butathaw andrainresultedonthe
17thincovering theicewithnearlyaninchofwater. Duringthemoon-
lightnight that followed aHolboell'sGrebe (Cobjmbusholbaelli) attempted
to light inthepond andIbelievesettlingontheiceandwasunable again
totake wing. On
the following morning,ithavingturned cold during the
night,the birdwas foundwithitsbreast feathers frozenintheice. The
wristsofitswings were badlylaceratedbybeating against theiceto free
itself, butinother respects the birdwasuninjured. Aftermuchpiteous
squawking,itsfeatherswerecutfromtheiceandthe bird Uberated. Its
wings,however,wereinjured sobadlj'thatitwaskilledandisnowpre-
servedin thisMuseum.—
R.Heber
Howe,Jr., ThorcauMuseum,Concord,
Mass.
AdditionafNoteson'the Harlequin