Bonn-Germany, 24 May 2016

S

TATEMENT BY

I

NDONESIA AT

APA I

NFORMAL

C

ONSULTATION Bonn-Germany, 24 May 2016 Item 6

MATTERS RELATING TO THE GLOBAL STOCKTAKE REFERRED TO IN ARTICLE 14 OF THE PARIS AGREEMENT

(A) IDENTIFICATION OF THE SOURCES OF INPUT FOR THE GLOBAL STOCKTAKE (B) DEVELOPMENT OF THE MODALITIES OF THE GLOBAL STOCKTAKE.

Question 1: What input is needed for conducting the global stocktake, by when and from whom? What mechanism/channels could be used to feed this input into the global stocktake?

The inputs should be based on reports of IPCC, NDCs, BUR, Natcom, and various works of others, including those of non-party stakeholders such as think tanks, academicians, etc.

Those reports may be received 1 (one) year ahead of the first global stocktake in 2023. The crucial time window is needed to allow a thorough and comprehensive analysis over the reports, as well as to provide an ample time for drafting and disseminating the recommendation.

Mechanisms would include the establishment of a special task force composed of elements with internationally-recognized high standards of competence and credibility. In cases where Parties otherwise agreed (and when an establishment of such special task-force is deemed unpractical), the mandate of such undertaking may then be conferred to the Secretariat.

Question 2: How will the global stocktake be conducted, keeping in mind the need for simplicity and relevance, ownership and inclusiveness?

Global stocktaking could be preceded by workshops with a wide degree of involvement, ranging from governmental and non-governmental institutions. Results transpired from the workshops may then be further studied and serve as source for reference, both in the decision- as well as recommendation made for CMA.

Question 3: What is the relationship, if any, between the global stocktake and the facilitative dialogue to be conducted in 2018?

Facilitative Dialogue should be viewed both as the embryonic step as well as the miniature of Global Stocktake. The absence of statutory linkages between the two modalities should not hamper the use of Facilitative Dialogue as a forum where initial reviews of Global Stocktake may be exercised. Such approach may require a fine-tuning process to ensure that the Facilitative Dialogue incorporates the similar elements applied within the Global stocktake.