250 ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY
sarily follows that the dipterous
beak
is also a labium, but the question ofthe dipterousmouth
is obviously re-opened,and
Dr.Smith's homologies
must
bemost
carefully tested.The man-
dibular seta is a puzzle, but ifwe
homologize thetwo
pairs of jawsthere isno
reasonwhy
it should not becalled a mandibularlacinia.
Dr. Riley presented a paper of
which
thefollowing is an abstract:NOTES FROM CALIFORNIA: RESULTS OF MR. KOEBELE'S SECOND MISSION TO AUSTRALIA.
By
C.V. RILEY.
{Authorsabstract.'}
Dr. Riley,under thishead, gave an accountof hisobservations
upon
his recent trip to California as to the results ofMr.
Koebele's second missionto Australia.
He
briefly narrated the history ofthis mission as recorded in official publications oftheDepartment
of Agriculture,and
to the unpleasant controversybetween
the California StateBoard
of Horticultureand
theDepartment which had grown
out of this mission. Said StateBoard had
obtained an appropriationfrom
the State legislature for the importation of beneficial insectsand had
appealed tothe Secretary of Agriculture to haveMr. Koebele
sent over to Australia for thispurpose, the appropriation being placed atthe service of theDepartment. The
then Secretary,Hon.
J.M.
Rusk,
beingabsent, Acting SecretaryEdwin
Willets courteously declined, for reasons, the proposed arrangement.Upon
hisreturn,however, Secretary
Rusk,
having in the meantime, while in California, promised thatMr. Koebele
should be sent, reversedMr.
Wallets' decision.Mr. Koebele was
consequently sent under Dr. Riley's direction. As* timewent
on, the results ofthe introductionthroughMr.
Koebele'sefforts,asaconsequence of this second mission, causedmuch
discussion in California, the StateBoard and
its adherents claiming great success, while the practical fruit-growersas arulebegan
to lose faith. Dr. Riley alluded to several incidentswhich showed
the baneful effects;which
political influence andmethods
sometimes have onscientific investigation. In the fall of 1893 he
had
Messrs'.'' Coquillettand Koebele
directed to carefullyexamine and
report on the condition of the importationsand
thework
theywere
doing. Their reportswere
published in Insect Life, Vol. VI, pp. 24-29,and showed on
thewhole
that the imported insects had,up
to that time, failed to produceany marked
beneficialOF WASHINGTON. 251
results.
There were
exceptional instances,and
one particularly, at Santa Barbara,where Rhizobius
ventraliswas
reported tobe doingmuch good
in clearingolive trees of theBlack
Scale,Lecanitim
olece.The
controversy as towhat
theseinsectswere
doingcontinued, however, and hemade
it a point in his recenttrip to studyas far as possible the actual state of things.For
this purpose hehad made
observationsaround Sacramento,San
Francisco,Los Ange
les,
and
in various parts ofOrange and
of Santa Clara counties, as well as inand
around Santa Barbara.At Los Angeles
heexamined
with special interest the Kercheval orchard,where Orcus
chalybeusbad
been extensively colonizedand
cared forwith.much
assiduity.He
foundtherethatthe originaltreesupon which
the ladybirds had been colonized still containedmany
specimens ofthe
Red
Scale,Aspidiotus
aurantii,which
itwas
expected to exterminate, while the orchard, as awhole,was
ina sorry plightbothfrom
the scale andfrom
neglect.A fewspeci
mens
of the ladybird were
found after considerable search. In
several orchards around
Santa Barbara which were
very care
fullyexamined
he found but very little evidence of the work
of
Rhizobius, and none
of any
of theotherintroducedspecies. The same was
true at Redlands, Riverside, Pasadena, Altadena,and
other places where
he had
been able to make
careful examina
tions.
All over California the
Black
Scale is present this winter in smallernumbers
than usual. This isthe case in localitieswhere
Rhizobius has not been introduced, as well as in localitieswhere
it has been introduced,
and
this is probably the result of theex tremely hot, drysummer
of lastyear.Many
oftheyoung
scales, however, are still alive, even in localitieswhere
Rhizobiushad
been colonized.He
found afew
specimens ofLets
conformis, butnone
ofthe introduced specieswere
present in anylocality in anything like thesame numbers
as the native ladybirds, notablyChilocorus bivulnerus.
Dr. Riley called attention to the fact that in
Europe
andAmerica
our predaceous insects have, as a rule,some
propertythat protects
them from
the attacksof other animals. In the case of the Coccinellids this protection isbelieved to be due tosome
acrid secretion unpalatable to predaceous animalsand
other pre daceousand
parasitic insects.The
Australian Coccinellids, however,seem
to be of a lower typeand
not to share in such immunity.They
areknown
in the larva state to be quitecom
monly
parasitized, and,what
ismore
singular, are extensively eaten both in the larvaand imago
statesby
birds, the Englishsparrow
being conspicuousin thisrespect, asrecordedby French
and
other Australian writers.252 ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY
Considering that over 50 species of ladybirds
were
sent overby Mr.
Koebele, it is remarkable that sofew
ofthem
have held theirown
in California or multiplied so as to accomplishany
good.Orcus
chalybeusand
O. australasice, ofwhich
somuch was
expectedby Mr. Koebele and by
the StateBoard
of Horti culture, are practicallyunknown
to-dayamong
fruit-growers,and
only found in comparativelyfew numbers where
theywere
in troduced.The two
species of Rhizobiuswhich
have maintained themselvesshow
great variation in different localities.As
a consequence, the gas treatment is still beingvigorouslyemployed by
mostof thepeople concerned,and by
the countycommission
ers,
and where some
insecticides orother preventivemeans
isnot adopted, theorange groves are yet sufferingfrom
both theRed and
theBlack
Scales.The
policy,however, of introducingparasites
and
predaceous insectsfrom
abroad has a very strong holdon
the people of the State, but the present condition of things fully justified the positionwhich
hehad
taken,and
confirmedthe generarconclusions in his paperon
"Parasiticand
Predaceous Insects inApplied Entomology,"
read atthe meetingof theAs
sociationof
Economic
EntomologistsatMadison
inAugust, 1893 (vide Insect Life, Vol. VI,No.
2, pp. 130-141).As
the speakerhad
often insisted, hewas
stronglyoftheopin ion thatcareful study should always precedeany
attempt at in troducing species, for practical purposes.We
should satisfy ourselves firstas to thecountry of origin on the introduced inju riousform
;we
should then satisfy ourselvesthat inthat countryit is held in check
by
naturalenemieswhich
do not occurin this country.These
facts having been ascertained,we may
then endeavor to introduce such natural enemies, with
some hope
ofbeneficial results, especially if care be taken to introduce
them
without their naturalenemies. This favorable situation exists in the case oftheGypsy Moth, and
he expressed himselfas sur prised that theGypsy Moth Commission had
not sent over toEurope
forthe natural enemies of this insect, as hehad
himself urgedthem
to, several years ago.As
experience with thelastintroductionsfrom
Australia variedsomewhat
withlocality, hebelieved itwould
be advisable, eventhough
the chancesmight
be againstimportant practical results, to introduce the Australian Rhizobiidsthathad maintainedthem
selves in California to the Atlantic coast, since one of
them had
been found also to feedupon Aspidiotus
perniciosus,which was
just