RESPONSE TO REVIEWER’S COMMENTS
Thank you very much to review our manuscript. A revision has been conducted by addressing the reviewer’s comments. The detail revisions are listed below:
Reviewer comment: (1). Please to write paper carefully follow the Author guideline of BCREC journal. Abstract MUST consist of very short background
(if any), purpose of
research, short method, findings/results (not too much data, but findings), and conclusion with respect to purpose of research. References MUST be typed
according the guidelines as well,
Thank you, The abstract has been revised by including short background, research purpose, short method, and also short explanation of results and finding. The conclusion has also been revised comply to the purpose of research. The bibliography has also been revised comply to the reference writing style of BCREC. We hope that the revision is enough to increase the
paper quality prior to publication;
(2). Please use Endnote or Mindedly software to cite the reference in body text journal.
Yes, thank you, we have used Mendeley to insert citations as well as to insert Bibliography
(3). Please add the data of the effect of initial concentration to determine the maximum dye removal capacity onto CWP and the data of the effect temperature to determine the thermodynamic parameters.
Thank you. A series of MO adsorption at a various initial concentration has been conducted as requested by reviewer. The result is described in Figure 4.
A discussion about this has also been added in text within the yellow block
sentences.
A series of MO adsorption onto CWP at a various temperature has also been conducted as requested, and the result has been depicted in Figure 8.
Discussion about thermodynamics study as well as the method to determine have also been added in text within the yellow block-sentences.
We hope that all of the revision able to increase the manuscript quality, and now it is appropriate for publication. Thank you for the review and for the recommendations. All are valuable to us.
