• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Contraceptive Pill Usage by Age and Parity

N/A
N/A
nurhayati nong

Academic year: 2025

Membagikan "Contraceptive Pill Usage by Age and Parity"

Copied!
5
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

HASIL OLAH DATA

Frequency Table

Kontrasepsi Pil

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent Valid

Pil 28 50,0 50,0 50,0

Tidak Pil 28 50,0 50,0 100,0

Total 56 100,0 100,0

Umur

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid

< 20 Tahun 11 19,6 19,6 19,6

20-35 Tahun 32 57,1 57,1 76,8

> 35 Tahun 13 23,2 23,2 100,0

Total 56 100,0 100,0

Paritas

Frequency Percent Valid Percent Cumulative Percent

Valid

Primipara 24 42,9 42,9 42,9

Multipara 21 37,5 37,5 80,4

Grandemultipara 11 19,6 19,6 100,0

Total 56 100,0 100,0

Crosstabs

Case Processing Summary Cases

Valid Missing Total

N Percent N Percent N Percent Umur * Kontrasepsi Pil 56 100,0% 0 0,0% 56 100,0%

Paritas * Kontrasepsi Pil 56 100,0% 0 0,0% 56 100,0%

(2)

Umur * Kontrasepsi Pil

Crosstab

Kontrasepsi Pil Total Pil Tidak Pil

Umur < 20 Tahun Count 10 1 11

Expected Count 5,5 5,5 11,0

% Within Kontrasepsi Pil 35,7% 3,6% 19,6%

20-35 Tahun Count 14 18 32

Expected Count 16,0 16,0 32,0

% Within Kontrasepsi Pil 50,0% 64,3% 57,1%

> 35 Tahun Count 4 9 13

Expected Count 6,5 6,5 13,0

% Within Kontrasepsi Pil 14,3% 32,1% 23,2%

Total

Count 28 28 56

Expected Count 28,0 28,0 56,0

% Within Kontrasepsi Pil 100,0

% 100,0% 100,0

% Chi-Square Tests

Value Df Asymp. Sig.

(2-Sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 9,787a 2 ,007

Likelihood Ratio 11,022 2 ,004

Linear-By-Linear

Association 8,045 1 ,005

N Of Valid Cases 56

A. 0 Cells (0,0%) Have Expected Count Less Than 5. The Minimum Expected Count Is 5,50.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal By Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,386 ,007

N Of Valid Cases 56

A. Not Assuming The Null Hypothesis.

B. Using The Asymptotic Standard Error Assuming The Null Hypothesis.

(3)

Paritas * Kontrasepsi Pil

Crosstab

Kontrasepsi Pil Total Pil Tidak Pil

Paritas

Primipara

Count 18 6 24

Expected Count 12,0 12,0 24,0

% Within Kontrasepsi Pil 64,3% 21,4% 42,9%

Multipara

Count 6 15 21

Expected Count 10,5 10,5 21,0

% Within Kontrasepsi Pil 21,4% 53,6% 37,5%

Grandemultipara

Count 4 7 11

Expected Count 5,5 5,5 11,0

% Within Kontrasepsi Pil 14,3% 25,0% 19,6%

Total

Count 28 28 56

Expected Count 28,0 28,0 56,0

% Within Kontrasepsi Pil 100,0

% 100,0% 100,0

% Chi-Square Tests

Value Df Asymp. Sig.

(2-Sided)

Pearson Chi-Square 10,675a 2 ,005

Likelihood Ratio 11,092 2 ,004

Linear-By-Linear

Association 6,910 1 ,009

N Of Valid Cases 56

A. 0 Cells (0,0%) Have Expected Count Less Than 5. The Minimum Expected Count Is 5,50.

Symmetric Measures

Value Approx. Sig.

Nominal By Nominal Contingency Coefficient ,400 ,005

N Of Valid Cases 56

A. Not Assuming The Null Hypothesis.

B. Using The Asymptotic Standard Error Assuming The Null Hypothesis.

(4)

Case Processing Summary

56 100,0% 0 ,0% 56 100,0%

Paritas * Kontrasepsi Pil * Umur

N Percent N Percent N Percent

Valid Missing Total

Cases

Paritas * Kontrasepsi Pil * Umur Crosstabulation

10 1 11

10,0 1,0 11,0

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

10 1 11

10,0 1,0 11,0

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

8 5 13

5,7 7,3 13,0

57,1% 27,8% 40,6%

4 11 15

6,6 8,4 15,0

28,6% 61,1% 46,9%

2 2 4

1,8 2,3 4,0

14,3% 11,1% 12,5%

14 18 32

14,0 18,0 32,0

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

2 4 6

1,8 4,2 6,0

50,0% 44,4% 46,2%

2 5 7

2,2 4,8 7,0

50,0% 55,6% 53,8%

4 9 13

4,0 9,0 13,0

100,0% 100,0% 100,0%

Count Expected Count

% within Kontrasepsi Pil Count

Expected Count

% within Kontrasepsi Pil Count

Expected Count

% within Kontrasepsi Pil Count

Expected Count

% within Kontrasepsi Pil Count

Expected Count

% within Kontrasepsi Pil Count

Expected Count

% within Kontrasepsi Pil Count

Expected Count

% within Kontrasepsi Pil Count

Expected Count

% within Kontrasepsi Pil Count

Expected Count

% within Kontrasepsi Pil Primipara

Paritas

Total

Primipara

Multipara

Grandemultipara Paritas

Total

Multipara

Grandemultipara Paritas

Total Umur

< 20 Tahun

20-35 Tahun

20-35 Tahun

Kontrasepsi Pil

Tidak Kontrasepsi

Pil Kontrasepsi Pil

Total

(5)

Chi-Square Tests

.b 11

3,514c 2 ,173

3,594 2 ,166

1,157 1 ,282

32

,034d 1 ,853

,000 1 1,000

,034 1 ,853

1,000 ,657

,032 1 ,859

13 Pearson Chi-Square

N of Valid Cases Pearson Chi-Square Likelihood Ratio Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases Pearson Chi-Square Continuity Correctiona Likelihood Ratio Fisher's Exact Test Linear-by-Linear Association N of Valid Cases Umur

< 20 Tahun 20-35 Tahun

20-35 Tahun

Value df

Asymp. Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(2-sided)

Exact Sig.

(1-sided)

Computed only for a 2x2 table a.

No statistics are computed because Paritas is a constant.

b.

2 cells (33,3%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,75.

c.

4 cells (100,0%) have expected count less than 5. The minimum expected count is 1,85.

d.

Symmetric Measures

.c 11

,315 ,173

32

,051 ,853

13 Contingency Coefficient

Nominal by Nominal N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by Nominal

N of Valid Cases

Contingency Coefficient Nominal by Nominal

N of Valid Cases Umur

< 20 Tahun 20-35 Tahun 20-35 Tahun

Value Approx. Sig.

Not assuming the null hypothesis.

a.

Using the asymptotic standard error assuming the null hypothesis.

b.

No statistics are computed because Paritas is a constant.

c.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

This study was aimed to identify the relationship between cow's parity and age to services per conception (S/C), conception rate (CR), and gestation length (GL) of Holstein

3, 2018 Addressing Global Health Challenges: Policy, Research and Practices ICASH-A013 THE CORRELATION BETWEEN ANTENATAL CARE, PARITY AND MATERNAL AGE AMONG PREGNANT WOMEN WITH

LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1 Frequency table according to the gender of respondents TABLE 2 Frequency distribution according to the age group of the respondents TABLE 3 Frequency

v LIST OF TABLES PAGE Table 4.1 Involvement of old-age pensioners in micro-lending 38 Table 4.2 Gender of the borrowers 39 Table 4.3 Age distribution of the participants 41 Table

The distribution of TT genotypes and T on LPL PvuII > T gene variations age group ≤ 45 years had a greater frequency in the Met-S group compared to TC and CC genotypes although no

Distribution of Respondents Based on Placenta Weight in Otanaha Hospital, Gorontalo City Placenta Weight Frequency Percentage Normal 31 51,7% Abnormal 29 48,3% Total 60 100,0%

Literatures report different reasons method and fertility related and factors to discontinue specific methods, where the major factors reported include: Age of partici- pants, parity,

Adam Malik Hospital, with complete medical record data containing age, parity, history of cesarean section, and placenta accreta score as inclusion criteria and mothers who have other