• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Correlation between Job Satisfaction and Employee Loyalty at PT. XYZ

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Correlation between Job Satisfaction and Employee Loyalty at PT. XYZ"

Copied!
2
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Analysis of correlation between job satisfaction and employee’s loyalty at PT. XYZ

Page 73 of 91

Jonathan Teguh Wicaksono REFFERENCES

Arikunto, Suharsimi. 2000, Manajemen Penelitian, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

As’ sad, Moh. 1994, Psikologi Industri. Edisi keempat, Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Badan Pusat Statistik, 2009, “Statistic Indonesia” [Online] Available at:

http://www.bps.go.id/tab_sub/view.php?tabel=1&daftar=1&id_subyek=06&n otab=4

Beardwell, Ian and Len Holden. 1997, Human Resource Management: A contemporary perspective, Pitmann Publishing, Great Britain.

Bock, Wally. 2005, “Supervisory leadership” [Online] Available at:

Http://agreatsupervisor.com/questions/qloyaltydrivers.htm

Burns, Alvin C. and Ronald F. Bush. 2006, Marketing research, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Collins, Jill & Roger Hussey. 2003, Business research: A practical guide for undergraduate & postgraduate students, Palgrave, Basingstoke, UK.

Dessler, Garry. 2005, Human Resource Management. 10th ed, Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Erbert, Ronald J. and Ricky W. Griffin. 2005, Business Essentials. 5th ed, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Hair, J.F., W.C. Black, B.J. Babin, R.E. Anderson, and R.L. Tatham. 2006, Multivariate Data Analysis, 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall, NJ Handoko, T. Hani. 1994, Manajemen Personalia dan SDM, BPFE, Yogyakarta.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2001, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Bumi Aksara, Jakarta.

Hasibuan, Malayu S.P. 2000, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia: Dasar dan Kunci Keberhasilan, Gunung Agung, Jakarta.

Keith,Timothy Z. Multiple Regression And Beyond, 2005, Allyn & Bacon, Texas.

Kreiner, Robert and Angelo Kinicki. 2007, Organizational Behavior, Mcgraw-Hill, New York, USA.

(2)

Analysis of correlation between job satisfaction and employee’s loyalty at PT. XYZ

Page 74 of 91

Jonathan Teguh Wicaksono Levine, David M., D. Stephan, Timothy C. Krehbiel, Mark L. Berenson. 2005,

Statistics for Managers 4th Ed, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Luthans, Fred. 1992, Organizational Behavior. Sixth edition, McGraw Hill Inc, Singapore.

Maholtra, Naresh K. 2007, Marketing Research. An Applied Orientation, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Mangkunegara, Anwar Prabu. 2004, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia Perusahaan, Rosdakarya, Bandung.

Nickels, G. William, James M. McHugh, Susan M. McHugh. 2002, Understanding Business. 6th edition, McGraw-Hill, New York.

Pareek, Udai. 1996, Perilaku Organisasi. Indonesian translation, Pustaka Binaman Pressindo, Jakarta.

Poerwopoespito, F.X. Oerip S. and Utomo, T.A. Tatag. 2004, Mengatasi Krisis Manusia Di Perusahaan, Grasindo, Jakarta.

Robbins, Stephen P. 2005, Organizational Behaviour, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey.

Robbins, Stephen P. 1996, Perilaku Organisasi: Konsep, Kontroversi dan Aplikasi.

Indonesian Translation, Prenhallindo, Jakarta.

Saydam, Gouzali. 1996, Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia, Gunung Agung, Jakarta.

Spector, P.E. 1997, Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA .

Wexley, K.N. and G.A.Yukl. 1992, Perilaku Organisasi dan Psikologi Personalia.

Indonesian translation, Rineka Cipta, Jakarta.

Wijaya, Toni. 2009, Analisis Struktural Equation Modeling menggunakan AMOS, Universitas Atma Jaya Yogyakarta, Yogyakarta.

Zikmund, William G. 2003, Business Research Model, Thompson South-Western, USA.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Submitted to University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia.

analysis are known if the satisfaction variable The work coefficient obtained is 0.298 where this result shows that the direction of the correlation between job

While the compensation variable, supervisor support, and job satisfaction in explaining the employee retention variable amounted to 0.325 or about 32.5% and 67.5% was explained by other

Dependent Variable: Y Source: Research data processed by SPSS 25 2022 Based on the multiple linear analysis table above, it can be seen that the coefficient value of each Charismatic

Maka dari itu setiap karyawan yang memiliki sifat disiplin kerja yang baik pasti akan mampu menghasilkan sebuah produktivitas kerja yang baik karena waktu kerjanya akan dimanfaatkan

2 Hasil Reliabilitas Penelitian Hasil Reliabilitas Variabel Penelitian Variabel Penelitian Jmlh Pernyataan Cronbachs Alpha α kritis Ket Rotasi Pekerjaan X1 8 butir 0,827 > 0,7

This study aims to obtain empirical evidence of the effect of communication and work stress on the job satisfaction of Waroeng Special Sambal or SS employees at the branch of Mayjend

Predictors: Constant, Organizational Culture X1 Based on the test results obtained a determination value of 0.421 means that organizational culture has an influence contribution of