• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Electric Power Systems Control Logic Thesis

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Electric Power Systems Control Logic Thesis"

Copied!
140
0
0

Teks penuh

First and foremost thanks to Ufuk Topcu and Necmiya Ozay, who were fantastic mentors. Special thanks to everyone at MCE and CMS for their support and friendship, including Cheryl Geer, Chris Silva, and Maria Koeper.

Motivation

The move toward more electric aircraft increases efficiency by reducing power output from the motors that would otherwise be needed to drive hydraulic and pneumatic components. Figure 1.1 compares the difference between a traditional aircraft power generation and distribution system with a more electric aircraft system.

Figure 1.1: A comparison between the electric generation and distribution on a traditional aircraft and on the Boeing 787 (i.e., a more-electric aircraft) [85].
Figure 1.1: A comparison between the electric generation and distribution on a traditional aircraft and on the Boeing 787 (i.e., a more-electric aircraft) [85].

Overview and Related Work

Formal Methods, Verification, and Synthesis

Past work in the avionics field has focused on aircraft performance analysis and power optimization using modeling libraries and simulations [91,94]. As a result, this has led to a greater emphasis on the use of formal methods to assist in the assurance and certification of performance.

Specification and Requirements Capture

Although the use of formal specification languages ​​and correct-by-construction synthesis methods are beneficial in the field of controller design, unfamiliarity of formal methods among engineers can present a challenge to widespread implementation of formal methods. Examples of languages ​​used in the context of cyber-physical systems can be found in [4] and [13].

Design Space Exploration and State Estimation

Domain-specific languages ​​have been proposed as a way to interface industrial engineers with domain knowledge with methods and tools used by computer scientists and software engineers. While general-purpose languages ​​(e.g., C or Java) may offer broader programming capabilities, domain-specific languages ​​(e.g., HTML or Verilog) provide more expressiveness and ease of use within a given domain [59].

Outline and Contributions

System Components

Depending on the power status of generators and buses, contactors can reconfigure, i.e. switch between open and closed. Contactors control the reconfiguration of the electrical power system topology, changing the paths along which power is delivered from generators to loads depending on the contingencies.

System Description

Four high-voltage rectifier units (HVRUs) are selectively connected to the four high-voltage AC buses, which convert alternating current to direct current. These essential buses are also selectively connected to two emergency low-voltage AC generators in the event of a failure on the HVAC side.

Figure 2.1: Single line diagram of an electric power system adapted from a Honeywell, Inc
Figure 2.1: Single line diagram of an electric power system adapted from a Honeywell, Inc

Temporal Logic

Linear Temporal Logic

High voltage AC Bus 2 and Bus 3 are also selectively connected to a set of transformers (marked as XFMR on the single line diagram) which convert high voltage AC power to low voltage AC power. The low voltage AC system is depicted in the two panels in Figure 2.1 just below the high voltage AC panels.

Figure 2.2: Semantics of LTL temporal modalities. Propositions are reasoned about over entire sequences of states
Figure 2.2: Semantics of LTL temporal modalities. Propositions are reasoned about over entire sequences of states

Other Temporal Logics

Reactive Synthesis

From state 1, if the environment determines that GL and GR are both set to 0, then the automaton goes to state 2 and the system variables C1 and C6 become 0. If the environment receives the transition from state 1 to state 3, then the system becomes C1 = 1 and C6 = 0.

Figure 2.3: A portion of the resulting controller automaton for a synthesized problem
Figure 2.3: A portion of the resulting controller automaton for a synthesized problem

Distributed Synthesis

The first is the size of the state space involved in local synthesis problems. If the possible values ​​of the variables included in the local specification are significantly smaller than the possible values ​​of the variables in the global specification, then.

Figure 2.4: A schematic for the decomposition of global specifications into distributed controllers for two subsystems
Figure 2.4: A schematic for the decomposition of global specifications into distributed controllers for two subsystems

Specifications for Aircraft Electric Power Systems

In practice, these reliability specifications define the combination of simultaneous errors that must be accounted for by the control protocol. A power system must still be able to meet its safety specifications given any combination of faults leading to the default level.

Table 3.1: Source Priority Table for HVAC Buses Priority Bus 1 Bus 2 Bus 3 Bus 4
Table 3.1: Source Priority Table for HVAC Buses Priority Bus 1 Bus 2 Bus 3 Bus 4

Formal Specifications For Aircraft Electric Power Systems

No combination of two contactors can be connected (and send the power into a bus) at the same time. For each safety-critical bus inB∈ Bs, these specifications can be written as follows.

Figure 3.1: A single-line diagram with two generators, two buses, and three contactors
Figure 3.1: A single-line diagram with two generators, two buses, and three contactors

Capturing Actuation Delays

If the contactor intent is open and the contactor state is closed, the contactor will open in [Tomin, Tomax] time units unless a close command is issued before opening. When the control command is equal to the state of the contactor, the state of the contactor remains the same, ie.

Case Study

Variables

Again, component variables and status variables are case-separated, e.g. the first generator is represented by G1, while its health state is denoted by g1. Controlled variables: Statusesc1, c2, c5, c6 of the contactors that connect the generators to the buses, each value can be open (0) or closed (1).

Specifications

The health statuses of all four sources g1, g2, g3 and g4 can have the values ​​healthy (1) and unhealthy (0). 2 and B1 ∈ N1(B2), if bus B1 is energized and contactor C1 is closed with power flowing to side 1, B2 will be energized.

Results

Centralized Controller Design

Once the environment acts, then the system responds and the automaton moves to its next state. Thus, as long as the environment meets its assumption, then the system will meet its specifications.

Figure 3.5: A simulation result for a centralized controller for the electric power system
Figure 3.5: A simulation result for a centralized controller for the electric power system

Distributed Control Architecture

In order to make the distributed master/slave synthesis problem feasible, additional assumptions and guarantees (i.e., interface refinements) must be implemented. To ensure that the interconnection is well-positioned, i.e., the interconnected system avoids deadlock, the environment variables must be separated into external and return parts.

Figure 3.6: A distributed controller decomposition for the electric power system. Components enclosed within the dashed rectangles are controlled by their own respective controllers
Figure 3.6: A distributed controller decomposition for the electric power system. Components enclosed within the dashed rectangles are controlled by their own respective controllers

Timing Benchmarks

Thus, the second column shows the total time that the core bus can be without power. However, as soon as the number of clocks used increases to 3, the computation time jumps several orders of magnitude.

Table 3.2: Synthesized Automaton Size No. of Clocks Clock “Ticks” Aut. Size Time [sec]
Table 3.2: Synthesized Automaton Size No. of Clocks Clock “Ticks” Aut. Size Time [sec]

Conclusions

The development of a domain-specific language provides an easy interface between industrial engineers with knowledge of aircraft systems and the methods/tools used by computer scientists and software engineers. In this chapter, we describe a domain-specific language for aircraft electrical power systems as well as an automatic specification generator available in TuLiP.

Input Files

Each component has an attribute of name and failure probability, that is, the probability that each component has to fail over a certain number of operational hours. The third input is a set of primitives used to represent the high-level requirements that specify the desired behavior of the system.

Figure 4.1: Architecture for the specification generator. The problem description includes three inputs: a single-line diagram, a component library, and a set of primitive specifications
Figure 4.1: Architecture for the specification generator. The problem description includes three inputs: a single-line diagram, a component library, and a set of primitive specifications

Specifications and Primitives

In addition, contactors have open time and close time characteristics, which indicate the time it takes to physically open or close the contactor.

Tool Integration

Untimed: SAT Solver (Yices)

In general, define Xij to be the set of all paths between two components Xi and Xj. From the above set of specifications, Yices solves a satisfiability problem and defines the configuration for all contactors, for each environment configuration.

Figure 4.3: Simplified version of a the single-line diagram. Two AC generators connect to two buses via three contactors.
Figure 4.3: Simplified version of a the single-line diagram. Two AC generators connect to two buses via three contactors.

Timed: TuLiP

Letxi,j represents the set of components along a path between generatorspi, pj, forpi, pj ∈ Gandi6=j. Letxi,b denote the set of all components (ie contactors and buses) along a path between busb and the environment variable pi for i∈ I, except b andpi.

Benchmarks

Given the set of automatically generated specifications, Table 4.2 compares the time it takes Yices and TuLiP to solve/synthesize a controller for a given topology. While the number of environment configurations is large, generating all other primitives takes only 10 seconds.

Figure 4.5: The base topology used to discuss the domain-specific language and conversion tool.
Figure 4.5: The base topology used to discuss the domain-specific language and conversion tool.

Broadening the Domain-Specific Language

  • Exceptions and Nominal Cases
    • Primitives
  • Sequence Diagrams
    • Live Sequence Charts
    • Live Sequence Chart Semantics
  • LTL-Live Sequence Chart Semantics
    • Superstep Requirements
    • Environment Assumptions
    • System Guarantees
  • Live Sequence Chart Example

The live sequence graph to temporal logic conversion can be shown to generate a formula that is at most quadratic in the size of the graph. Figure 4.8 is a generic example assume-guarantee live sequence graph for the system topology depicted from Figure 4.5 (with 2 base topology units).

Figure 4.6: An example sequence diagram with pilot, control, plant, and display actors
Figure 4.6: An example sequence diagram with pilot, control, plant, and display actors

Timed Temporal Logics

Timed Specifications

  • Protector
  • Supervisor
  • UPPAAL-TIGA

For the protector LRU, the voltage level v is an environmental variable and can take values ​​of bt (below threshold) and at (above threshold). Figure 4.10 shows the protector finite-state automata used for the time-controlled synthesis tool UPPAAL-TIGA, which includes two processes: Voltage and Fault.

Figure 4.10: UPPAAL-TIGA finite-state automata for the protector LRU.
Figure 4.10: UPPAAL-TIGA finite-state automata for the protector LRU.

Discrete-Time LTL

  • Protector
  • Supervior

If the contactor status is the same as the contactor command, the contactor status in the next step should not change. If the contactor command is set to close, the contactor status must be closed within Cmin and Cmax time.

Figure 4.11: UPPAAL-TIGA finite-state automata for the supervisor LRU
Figure 4.11: UPPAAL-TIGA finite-state automata for the supervisor LRU

Conclusions

Components

Examples of non-functional maps include the performance model, the calculation of a set of performance figures by solving the behavioral model, or the reliability model, which provides the failure probability of a component. Given a set of components at level l, a system can then be assembled by parallel assembly and represented as a new component at level l+1.

Contracts

Contract coherence can be calculated by defining a partial order of contracts, which formalizes a notion of refinement. Conjunction can be used to calculate the total contract for a component based on the contracts related to multiple views (concerns, requirements) in a design.

Signal Temporal Logic

Syntactically, a PSTL formula is an STL formula in which numerical constants, either in the constraints given by the predicates µ or in the time intervals of the temporal operators, can be replaced by symbolic parameters. An STL formula is obtained by pairing a PSTL formula with a valuation function that assigns a value to each symbolic parameter.

Design Space Exploration: Case Study

  • Electric Power System
  • Topology Synthesis
  • Control Synthesis
  • Distributed Synthesis
    • Results
    • Reliability Results
  • Real-Time Performance

The synthesized topology serves as a specification for the next step of control design. b) The original high-level power system specifications are translated into LTL formulas for. In Figure 5.3a) and b), horizontal connections between the DC buses and AC buses on the left and right sides of the system have been added.

Figure 5.1: Proposed electric power system topology and control design flow.
Figure 5.1: Proposed electric power system topology and control design flow.

Hardware Testbed

  • Testbed Specifications
  • Implementing Formal Specifications
  • Design and Implementation
  • Generation and Circuit Protection
  • Sensing

We assume that the time a generator stays healthy is not arbitrarily short, so that the AC bus-driven time (i.e. the time between two intervals when AC bus is not driven) is large enough to charge the capacitors on rectifier -units charged. A few lines of auto-generated code corresponding to this controller are shown in Figure 5.9.

Figure 5.5: Safe clock versus contactor delay region.
Figure 5.5: Safe clock versus contactor delay region.

Experiments

Testbed Characteristics

The time TI in equation (5.8) is negligible compared to andRe, so the time taken to read the health state from an environment variable can be approximated as c0/4.

Controller Tests

The first vertical line indicates a fault, the second vertical line is when the regulator reacts, and the third line is when the generator restarts. The measured bus de-energized times are listed in Table 5.8, which shows a maximum value of Tmax = 414.9 ms.

Conclusions

This chapter investigates the design problem of state estimation based on sensor placement for a given power system topology. Previous work in state estimation of electrical power systems has focused on static, centralized, continuous state estimation problems.

Problem Setup

General Problem Description

Equipping the system with a large number of sensors is an expensive and therefore undesirable solution for achieving accurate condition assessments. On top of the circuit and sensing topology is a distributed control architecture with a dynamic state estimation mechanism.

Figure 6.1: A single-line diagram of a simple circuit with AC and DC components.
Figure 6.1: A single-line diagram of a simple circuit with AC and DC components.

Mathematical Formulation

The overall goal is to design a strategy that the fault detection controller directs to adaptively estimate the discrete state of the circuit by taking "actions" (ie, closing and opening the controllable contactors) and then reading the measurements of voltage sensor. We denote by V(π, x˜ 0)⊆ V the set of all actions performed according to strategyπ, the state of the system is x0.

Strategy

Greedy strategy

Performance Guarantees

Implementation

Implementation Details

Model Reduction Via Abstraction

Examples

Small Circuit Tests

  • Average Execution Time
  • Average Remaining States

As shown in Figure 6.3, the greedy strategy with a horizon length ofk= 6 works as well as the brute force strategy, i.e. the value of the objective functionf at the end of 6 steps using the greedy strategy is the same as after the brute force strategy brutal 16 steps. Starting with 1600 possible states, the greedy strategy reduces the number of candidates to less than 20 states in all cases.

Figure 6.4: Histogram of execution time for the greedy strategy.
Figure 6.4: Histogram of execution time for the greedy strategy.

Large Circuit Tests

Using this performance measure to compare greedy and brute force strategies, we can see in Fig.

Background Results in Submodularity

Definitions

So f is adaptively submodular with respect to the distribution P[x]if for allψt, ψt0 such thatψis a subrealization ofψt0, and for allv∈ V\{v0,. The adaptive greedy algorithm, a generalization of the greedy algorithm [47], is a strategy that selects the action that maximizes the conditionally expected marginal benefit depending on the outcomes of all previous actions.

Figure 6.6: A single-line diagram of a larger circuit with AC and DC components.
Figure 6.6: A single-line diagram of a larger circuit with AC and DC components.

Proofs

In particular, by setting k =l we see that the greedy strategy that chooses k items stepwise takes at least (1−1/e) of the value of the optimal strategy that chooses k items stepwise. This expression of ∆(v|ψt) in terms of variables τi is similar for the partial realization ψt0; the only difference is the set St, which is represented in the function b with a different value of theτi.

Conclusions and Future Work

Given a given topology for an electric power system and a set of system requirements formalized in linear time logic, we automatically synthesized a control protocol for an electric power system in a more electric aircraft. Finally, we perform discrete state estimation using active control of switches within the power system in a distributed control architecture.

Future Work

To generate the correct controller according to the design for a given topology, we take advantage of reactive synthesis results from linear time logic specifications. Automatic verification of finite-state concurrent systems using timing logic specifications. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages ​​and Systems (TOPLAS.

Gambar

Figure 1.1: A comparison between the electric generation and distribution on a traditional aircraft and on the Boeing 787 (i.e., a more-electric aircraft) [85].
Figure 2.1: Single line diagram of an electric power system adapted from a Honeywell, Inc
Figure 2.2: Semantics of LTL temporal modalities. Propositions are reasoned about over entire sequences of states
Figure 2.3: A portion of the resulting controller automaton for a synthesized problem
+7

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

List of Figures 1 General Architecture of a Minicomputer Process Control System 28 2 An Architecture of a Multimicroprocessor Process Control System 29 3 The Structure of the