Published by McGraw-Hill, an imprint of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 1221 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10020. No part of this publication may be reproduced or distributed in any form or by any means or stored in a retrieval system or retrieval system, without the prior written consent of The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., including, but not limited to, on any network or other electronic storage or transmission or transmission for distance learning. Marketing Executive: Leslie Oberhuber Development Director: Rhona Robbin Senior Development Editor: Jennie Katsaros Senior Project Manager: Holly Irish.
Media Project Manager: Jabez Bethuel Manuscript Editor: Toni Zuccarini Ackley Cover Designer: Preston Thomas Buyer II: Tandra Jorgensen. Credits: The credits section for this book begins on page C-1 and is considered an extension of the copyright page. Inclusion of a site does not imply endorsement by the authors or McGraw-Hill, and McGraw-Hill does not warrant the accuracy of the information presented on these sites.
Em Griffin is Professor Emeritus of Communication at Wheaton College in Illinois, where he has taught for more than 35 years and was named Teacher of the Year.
The Rhetoric
Dramatism
Narrative Paradigm
Media Ecology
Semiotics
Cultural Studies
Cultivation Theory
Genderlect Styles
Standpoint Theory
PREFACE FOR INSTRUCTORS
The other lists indicate places to look for material on each of the major issues raised in the chapter. I believe professors and students alike will get a good chuckle at the cartoons I've selected for each chapter and section introduction. I made at least one significant change in two-thirds of the theory chapters.
This could be a research update, a shift in the theorist's thinking, a new example that runs through the theory, or a complete reorganization of the chapter. Andrew rewrote the chapters on social penetration, social information processing, and damped group theory. Glenn wrote the new chapter on uses and gratifications and has a major rewrite of the chapter on cultivation theory.
Jennie has been my go-to person at McGraw-Hill for the last five editions of the text - we've seen them all together.
A FIRST LOOK AT
COMMUNICATION
THEORY
EIGHTH EDITION
EM GRIFFIN
DIVISION ONE
CHAPTER
Messages
In that sense, this theory book is like a landscape atlas that brings together 32 must-see locations. The visual image of this intersection of interests has prompted some to call communication an intersectional discipline. The difference is that communication scholars park at the crossroads and focus on the message, while other disciplines simply drive through on their way to other destinations.
Communication theorists use the word text as a synonym for a message that can be studied, regardless of the medium. To illustrate the following four parts of the definition, suppose you received this cryptic text message from a close, same-sex friend: "Pat and I spent the night together." You immediately realize that the name Pat refers to the person with whom you have an ongoing romantic relationship. An analysis of this text and the context surrounding its transmission provides a useful case study for examining essential features of communication.
Creation of Messages
Interpretation of Messages
If it's the latter, Pat was a willing or unwilling partner (perhaps drunk or the victim of a confessed rape).
A Relational Process
Messages That Elicit a Response
When you see a picture of the theorist, it is taken from one of my conversations with. By the end of the course, you can have up to 32 cards in your set of communication theories. For easier reference to positions on the scale, I have numbered the five columns at the bottom of the diagram.
So for easy reference I have reproduced the appropriate "slice" of the chart on the first page of each chapter. The same can be said of the turf wars shared between objective and interpretive researchers. This is why I have included a student-written application in almost all of the 32 chapters that contain a specific theory.
This principle focuses on the character of the communicator and not on the act of communication. 36 With or without my addition of an ethical tradition, Craig's framework can help make sense of the great diversity in the field of communication theory. On the first page of each of the next 32 chapters, I will link each theory to one or more traditions.
DIVISION TWO
How many points for differentiation would the phrase “humorous and totally funny” score on the Role Category Questionnaire?
Message production in the mind: James Price Dillard, "The Goals-Plans-Action Model of Interpersonal Infl uence," in Perspectives on Persuasion, Social Infl uence, and Compliance Gaining, John Seiter and Robert Gass (eds.), Pearson, Boston , MA, 2003, pp. Daily newspapers across the country feature syndicated advice columns by Michelle Singletary (“The Color of Money”) and Abigail Van Buren (“Dear Abby”). To explain this curious finding, Altman reasoned that "the dormitory environment inherently offers many opportunities for social contact," and therefore.
Berger, a professor of communication at the University of California, Davis, notes that "the beginnings of personal relationships are fraught with uncertainty." Berger welcomes this extension: "The broadening of the scope of the theory suggests the potential utility of reconceptualizing and expanding the original formulation." 8 For example, Malcolm Parks (University of Washington) and. If you change a strategy at the top—for example, by seeking mercy for a poor student in trouble—the change will trickle down the hierarchy, requiring changes in many behaviors below.
Berger has come to the conclusion that uncertainty is central to all social interaction: "The probability of perfect communication is zero." The complexity of a communication plan is measured in two ways – the level of detail the plan contains and the number of contingency plans prepared in case the original one does not work. At the time, the Internet was the province of scientific and academic users - the first home web browser, Mosaic, was not released until the following year.
Walther's SIP focuses on the first link of the chain - the personal information available through CMC and its effect on the composite mental image of the other that each creates. Over a long period of time, the issue is not the amount of social information that can be transmitted online; rather, it is the rate at which that information uploads. After offering a similar summary, Walther asks, "Is this the best one can hope to achieve when communicating electronically—the sheer potential for intimacy where time permits?" 15 His answer is no—in a number of cases, CMC actually surpasses the quality of relational communication available when parties speak face-to-face.
For such traits, Walther suspects that "the justifying principle may not apply so strongly." 32 And so the idea of justification remains a work in progress. Walther, Tracy Loh, and Laura Granka, "The Exchange of Verbal and Nonverbal Cues in Computer-Mediated and Face-to-Face Affinity," Journal of Language and Social Psychology, Vol. According to Canary and Stafford, it is "the degree to which partners agree on which of them should decide on relationship goals and behavioral routines."3 They may have an egalitarian relationship, or perhaps one person often defers to the other but is genuinely happy to do so.
It is important to understand that when Baxter uses the term relational dialectic, she is not referring to being of two minds—the cognitive dilemma within the head of an individual who is dealing with conflicting desires.
DRILLING DOWN ON BAKHTIN’S CONCEPT OF DIALOGUE
- OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL OF PRIVATE INFORMATION
- RULES FOR CONCEALING AND REVEALING
- DISCLOSURE CREATES A CONFIDANT AND CO-OWNER
- COORDINATING MUTUAL PRIVACY BOUNDARIES
- BOUNDARY TURBULENCE—RELATIONSHIPS AT RISK
The exceptions are the new freshmen who Tyler said refer to me as "the boyfriend". Dialogue as Dialectical Flux – Complexity of Close Relationships We have already examined Bakhtin and Baxter's belief that all social life is the product of "a contradictory, tension-filled unity of two opposing tendencies." 14 The existence of these contrasting forces means that the development and maintenance of a relationship is bound to be an unpredictable, inconclusive, indeterminate process—more like playing improvisational jazz than following the score of a well-known song. She notes that "Beckham's uncanny ability to 'bend' the ball around a wall of players into the goal is a good metaphor for what young girls (and film directors) are going for.
Bakhtin on the Chain of Expression: Mikhail Bakhtin, “The Problem of Speech Genres,” in Speech Genres & Other Late Essays, Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist (eds.), V. Co-owners of private information must negotiate mutually acceptable privacy rules about tell others. When co-owners of private information do not negotiate effectively and adhere to mutually agreed upon privacy rules, border turbulence is the likely outcome.
Instead of talking about self-disclosure as many relational theorists do, Petronio refers to the disclosure of private information. First, much of the private information we reveal to others is not about ourselves. Our belief is so strong that Petronio defines privacy as 'the feeling that one has the right to possess private information'. 3 You may feel this way about your overall GPA or even the grade you receive for this course.
With the first three principles, she has mapped out how people deal with their private information: they think they own it and that they have control over it (Principle 1) through the use of privacy rules (Principle 2). Border Ownership The rights and responsibilities that co-owners of private information have to control its dissemination. A confidential counselor who is fully committed to handling private information according to the privacy rules of the original owner.
When co-owners of private information do not effectively negotiate and follow common privacy rules, border turbulence is the likely result. 20 I will illustrate the first two from research she has conducted on family and friends as health care advocates—the triangular interactions that occur when patients bring someone with them to their doctor's appointments.
