• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Evaluation of Foam Rolling Effects on Jump Performance: A Comparative Study

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Membagikan "Evaluation of Foam Rolling Effects on Jump Performance: A Comparative Study"

Copied!
6
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Table 3: Jump measures with foam rolling (FR) or roller massage (RM) (17 studies, 32 measures). Differences in shading highlight measures from single studies.

Acronyms: CMJ: countermovement jump, DJ: drop jump, ES: effect size, Gastro: gastrocnemius, Glutes, gluteals, GRF: ground reaction force, Hams, hamstrings, Hip Flex: hip flexors, HJ: hurdle jump, immed: immediately post-test, ITB: iliotibial band, Lats:

latissimus dorsi, LJ: long jump, PF: plantar fascia, Quads: quadriceps, RA: recreationally active, RSI: reactive strength index, SJ:

squat jump, TFL: Tensor Fascia Latae, TA: tibialis anterior, Tr: trained, UT: untrained, VJ: vertical jump.

Authors Age Sex Trained State

Roller Set

#

Repetition Duration (s)

Recovery Between sets (s)

Rolling Speed

Rolling Intensity (%)

Muscles Rolled

Measure Site

Pre-test Post-test % ES

Aune et al.

2018 (1) 18±1 M:6

F:6 Tr FR 3 60 30 Self-

Select 100 Gastro DJ 0.75±1.5 1.7±1.6 2.6 0.01

Baumgart et al. 2019 (2)

26.6±2.7 M:

26 Tr FR 2 30 reps NR NR NR Quads,

Calves GRF 36.6±1 34.1±1.2 -6.8 -2.2

Behara et al. 2015 (3)

20.04±1.4 M:

14 Tr FR 1 60 NR NR NR

Hams, Quads, Glutes, Gastro

VJ 3.18±0.3 3.2±0.28 2.8 0.3

Drinkwater et al. 2019 (4)

24±1.7 M:

11 Tr FR 1 180 NR 1 100

Quads, Adductor ITB, Glutes, Hams

CMJ 29.4±5 27.8±4.1 -5.4 -0.3

Giovanelli et al. 2018 (5)

26.3±5.3 13 RA FR 1 60 NR 0.5 Hz 100

Gastro, TA, PF, Anterior Posterior Thigh, Glutes, TFL,

SJ 54.9±14.6 57.4±14.6 4.5 0.2

Giovanelli et al. 2018 (5)

26.3±5.3 13 RA FR 1 60 NR 0.5 Hz 100

Gastro, TA, PF Anterior Posterior Thigh, Glutes, TFL

CMJ 58.9±15.7 63.5±15.7 7.9 0.3

(2)

Grabow et al. 2018 (6)

27±4 M:8

F:8 RA RM 3 60 120 2

15% of Body Mass

Thigh DJ 0.12±02 0.11±0.03 -4.1 -

0.03 Grabow et

al. 2018 (6)

27±4 M:8

F:8 RA RM 3 60 120 2

21% of Body Mass

Thigh DJ 0.12±.04 0.11±0.03 -7.5 -0.3 Grabow et

al. 2018 (6)

27±4 M:8

F:8 RA RM 3 60 120 2

27% of Body Mass

Thigh DJ 0.13±.03 0.12±0.03 -5.5 -0.2

Healey et al. 2014 (7)

21.4±2.1 M:

13 RA FR 1 30 30 NR NR

Quads, Hams, Calves, Lats,

VJ 58.03±7.4 58.3±7.2 0.04 0.03

Healey et al. 2014 (7)

21.7±2.05 F:

13 RA FR 1 30 30 NR NR

Quads, Hams, Calves, Lats,

VJ 37.8±7.1 39.9±7.7 5.5 0.28

Henning et al. 2019 (8)

M:21.5

±1.7 F:20.2

±1.5

M:8 F:

11

Tr FR 3 20 NR NR NR

Lower Back, Glutes Quads, Hams, Calves, ITB

VJ 49.8±12.6 50.2±13.6 0.8 .03

Hodgson et al. 2017 (9)

M:26.6 F:25.6

M:7

F:5 RA RM 1 30 60 1 100 Quads

Hams CMJ 17.9±2.1 17.4±2.2 -3.1 -0.3

Hodgson et al. 2017 (9)

M:26.6 F:25.6

M:7

F:5 RA RM 2 30 60 1 100 Quads,

Hams CMJ 17.8±1.9 17.4±1.9 -2.5 -0.2

Hodgson et al. 2017 (9)

M:26.6 F:25.6

M:7

F:5 RA RM 3 30 60 1 100 Quads,

Hams CMJ 18.2±2.1 17.9±2.3 -1.6 -0.1

Hodgson et al. 2017 (9)

M:26.6 F:25.6

M:7

F:5 RA RM 4 30 60 1 100 Quads,

Hams HJ 0.23±.05 0.22±.06 -5.6 -0.2

Hodgson et al. 2017 (9)

M:26.6 F:25.6

M:7

F:5 RA RM 5 30 60 1 100 Quads,

Hams HJ 0.24±.06 0.23±.07 -7.3 -0.3

Hodgson et al. 2017 (9)

M:26.6 F:25.6

M:7

F:5 RA RM 6 30 60 1 100 Quads,

Hams HJ 0.24±.06 0.23±0.06 -5.3 -0.2

(3)

Hodgson et al. 2017 (9)

M:26.6 F:25.6

M:7

F:5 RA RM &

SS 2 30 60 1 70 Quads,

Hams CMJ 17.9±2.1 17.4±2.2 -3.2 -0.3

Hodgson et al. 2017 (9)

M:26.6 F:25.6

M:7

F:5 RA RM &

SS 2 30 60 1 70 Quads,

Hams HJ 0.23±.05 0.22±0.06 -5.6 -0.2

Jo et al.

2018 (10) 18-25

M:

16 F:9

RA FR 2 30 NR NR NR

Bilateral Hams, Quads, Calves Unilateral Hip Adductor ITB, Gastro

CMJ -3.0±3.0% -2.0±2.5% 1.0 NR

Jones et al.

2015 (11)

24.05

±2.02

M:

20 RA FR 1 30 30 1.5 NR

Quads, Hams, Glutes

GRF 24.6±2.1 24.6±2.1 0.1 .01

Jones et al.

2015 (11)

24.05

±2.02

M:

20 RA FR 1 30 30 1.5 NR

Gastro, Quads, Hams, Glutes

VJ 47.4±7.2 47.7±7.2 0.7 .04

Peacock et al. 2014 (12)

22.2±2.18 M:

11 Tr FR 1 30 30 5 NR Full Body VJ 67.6±9.7 72.9±10.6 7.8 0.5

Peacock et al. 2014 (12)

22.2±2.18 M:

11 Tr FR 1 30 30 5 NR Full Body VJ 228.8

±25.3 237.8±25.4 3.9 0.35 Phillips et

al. 2018 (13)

23.7±4.5 M:8

F:16 RA FR 1 60 0 6 100

Quads Triceps Surae

CMJ 19.5±4.2 19.3±4.2 -1.0 -.04 Phillips et

al. 2018 (13)

23.7±4.5 M:8

F:16 RA FR 1 300 0 6 100

Quads Triceps Surae

CMJ 19.7±3.9 18.7±3.8 -5.1 -0.3 Romero-

Moraleda et al. 2019 (14)

22.2±3.2 M:

32 F:6

RA FR 5 60 15 NR NR Quads CMJ 34.6±4.9 33.1±5.53 -4.5 -0.3

Sagiroglu et al. 2017 (15)

21.2±1.15 F:

18 Tr FR 1 30 30 6 100

Hams, Quads Glutes, Calves

CMJ 30.1±3.3 29.4±4.05 -2.3 -0.2

(4)

Sagiroglu et al. 2017 (15)

21.2±1.15 F:

18 Tr FR 1 60 30 6 100

Hams, Quads Glutes, Calves

CMJ 30.1±3.3 28.9±3.54 -3.9 - 0.35

Smith et al. 2018 (16)

22±3

M:8 F:

21

RA/UT FR 3 30 30 2 NR

Glutes, Hams, Quads Gastro

VJ 24.8±7.8 24.3±7.6 -1.8 -.05

Smith et al. 2018 (16)

22±3

M:8 F:

21

RA/UT FR 3 30 30 2 NR

Glutes, Hams, Quads Gastro

VJ 24.8±7.8 23.9±8.2 -3.3 -0.1

Smith et al. 2018 (16)

22±3

M:8 F:

21

RA/UT FR 3 30 30 2 NR

Glutes, Hams, Quads Gastro

VJ 24.8±7.8 24.2±8.2 -2.6 -0.1

Smith et al. 2018 (16)

22±3

M:8 F:

21

RA/UT FR 3 30 30 2 NR

Glutes, Hams Quads, Gastro

VJ 24.8±7.8 23.6±8.1 -4.5 -0.1

Smith et al. 2018 (16)

22±3

M:8 F:

21

RA/UT FR 3 30 30 2 NR

Glutes, Hams, Quads Gastro

VJ 24.8±7.8 24.2±8.4 -2.3 -.07

Yildiz 2018

(17) 24.3±5.5 M:

42 Tr FR 1 30 30 NR Deep

Tissue

Glutes, Hip Flex, Adductors Quads, Hams Gastro

CMJ 35.1±2.2 38.4±3.6 9.4 1.1

Yildiz 2018

(17) 24.3±5.5 M:

42 Tr FR 1 30 30 NR Deep

Tissue

Glutes, Hip Flex, Adductors Quads, Hams Gastro

SJ 35.1±1.8 36.7±3.5 4.5 0.6

Yildiz 2018

(17) 24.3±5.5 M:

42 Tr FR 1 30 30 NR Deep

Tissue

Glutes, Hip Flex, Adductors Quads, Hams Gastro

LJ 183.2±6.6 198±12.6 8.1 1.5

(5)

References

1. Aune, AAG, Bishop, C, Turner, AN, et al. Acute and chronic effects of foam rolling vs eccentric exercise on ROM and force output of the plantar flexors. J Sports Sci: 1-8, 2018.

2. Baumgart, C, Freiwald, J, Kuhnemann, et al. Foam rolling of the calf and anterior thigh: biomechanical loads and acute effects on vertical jump height and muscle stiffness. Sports (Basel)7(1): 27, 2019.

3. Behara, B, Jacobson, BH. The acute effects of deep tissue foam rolling and dynamic stretching on muscular strength, power, and flexibility in division I linemen. J Strength Cond Res 31(4): 888-892, 2015.

4. Drinkwater, EJ, Latella, C, Wilsmore, C, Bird, SP, Skein, M. Foam rolling as a recovery tool following eccentric exercise: potential mechanisms underpinning changes in jump performance. Front Physiol 10: 768, 2019.

5. Giovanelli, N, Vaccari, F, Floreani, M, et al. Short-term effects of rolling massage on energy cost of running and power of the lower limbs. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 13(10): 1337-1343, 2018.

6. Grabow, L, Young, JD, Alcock, LR, et al. Higher quadriceps roller massage forces do not amplify range-of- motion increases or impair strength and jump performance. J Strength Cond Res 32(11): 3059-3069, 2018.

7. Healey, KC, Hatfield, DL, Blanpied, P, Dorfman, LR, Riebe, D. The effects of myofascial release with foam rolling on performance. J Strength Cond Res 28(1): 61-68, 2014.

8. Henning, CJS, Stovern, O, Porcari, JP, et al. The acute effects of foam rolling on ankle and knee range of motion, hamstring flexibility, agility, and vertical jump height. Int J Res Ex Phys 14(2): 44-54, 2019.

9. Hodgson, DD, Quigley, PJ, Whitten, JHD, Reid, JC, Behm, DG. Impact of 10-minute interval roller massage on performance and active range of motion. J Strength Cond Res 33(6): 1512-1523, 2017.

10. Jo, E, Juache, GA, Saralegui, DE, Weng, D, Falatoonzadeh, S. The acute effects of foam rolling on fatigue- related impairments of muscular performance. Sports (Basel) 6(4): 2018.

11. Jones, AB, Brown, LE, Coburn, JW, Noffal, GJ. Effects of foam rolling on vertical jump performance. Int J Kinesiol Sport Sci : 338-342, 2015.

12. Peacock, CA, Krein, DD, Silver, TA, Sanders GJ, VON Carlowitz, KA. An actute bout of self-myofascial release in the form of foam rolling improves performance testing. Int J Exerc Sci 7(3): 202-211, 2014.

13. Phillips, J, Diggin, D, King, DL, Sforzo, GA. Effect of varying self-myofascial release duration on subsequent athletic performance. J Strength Cond Res: 2018.

14. Romero-Moraleda, B, Gonzalez-Garcia, J, Cuellar-Rayo, A, et al. Effects of vibration and non-vibration foam

rolling on recovery after exercise with induced muscle damage. J Sports Sci Med 18(1): 172-180, 2019.

(6)

15. Sagiroglu, ISA, Ali, SS, Ates, O, Kurt, C. Acute effect of self myofascial release exercise volume to vertical jump performance and flexibility in well-trained women volleyball players. Int Refereed Academic J Sports, Health Med Sci 25: 74-85, 2015.

16. Smith, JC, Pridgeon, B, Hall, MC. Acute effect of foam rolling and dynamic stretching on flexibility and jump height. J Strength Cond Res 32(8): 2209-2215, 2018.

17. Yildiz, M. An acute bout of self myofascial release increases flexibility without a concomitant deficit in muscle

performance in football players. Int J Physio 5(3): 92-97, 2018.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

The same case with asset turnover owned by manufacturing and non-manufacturing companies which actively participated in ISRA tend to be more effective in using assets

ﺎــﺑ ﻦــﯾا لﺎــﺣ ــﺴﻣ ﯿ ﺎﻫﺮ ي ﻗد ــﯿ ﻖ ﯽﯾﺎــﻧاﻮﺗ و ﺖﻈﻓﺎﺤﻣ لﻮﻠﺳ ﻦﯾا ﺎﻫ زا ﻊﺑﺎﻨﻣ ﻒﻠﺘﺨﻣ ﻪﺑ رﻮﻃ ﻞﻣﺎﮐ ﯽﺳرﺮﺑ هﺪﺸﻧ .ﺖﺳا شور و داﻮﻣ :ﺎﻫ زاMSCs ﺖﻓﺎﺑ ﯽﺑﺮﭼ و ﭗﻟﺎﭘ نﺎﺴﻧا ناﺪﻧد اﺪﺟ تاﺮــﺛا و

ﺎــﺑ ﻦــﯾا لﺎــﺣ ــﺴﻣ ﯿ ﺎﻫﺮ ي ﻗد ــﯿ ﻖ ﯽﯾﺎــﻧاﻮﺗ و ﺖﻈﻓﺎﺤﻣ لﻮﻠﺳ ﻦﯾا ﺎﻫ زا ﻊﺑﺎﻨﻣ ﻒﻠﺘﺨﻣ ﻪﺑ رﻮﻃ ﻞﻣﺎﮐ ﯽﺳرﺮﺑ هﺪﺸﻧ .ﺖﺳا شور و داﻮﻣ :ﺎﻫ زاMSCs ﺖﻓﺎﺑ ﯽﺑﺮﭼ و ﭗﻟﺎﭘ نﺎﺴﻧا ناﺪﻧد اﺪﺟ تاﺮــﺛا و

ﺎــﺑ ﻦــﯾا لﺎــﺣ ــﺴﻣ ﯿ ﺎﻫﺮ ي ﻗد ــﯿ ﻖ ﯽﯾﺎــﻧاﻮﺗ و ﺖﻈﻓﺎﺤﻣ لﻮﻠﺳ ﻦﯾا ﺎﻫ زا ﻊﺑﺎﻨﻣ ﻒﻠﺘﺨﻣ ﻪﺑ رﻮﻃ ﻞﻣﺎﮐ ﯽﺳرﺮﺑ هﺪﺸﻧ .ﺖﺳا شور و داﻮﻣ :ﺎﻫ زاMSCs ﺖﻓﺎﺑ ﯽﺑﺮﭼ و ﭗﻟﺎﭘ نﺎﺴﻧا ناﺪﻧد اﺪﺟ تاﺮــﺛا و

There are six performance criteria in building performance evaluation, namely: spatial functional comfort, indoor air quality, visual comfort, thermal comfort, acoustic comfort and

136 LIST OF ABREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ADO Academic Development Officer DoE Department of Education DUT Durban University of Technology FAO Food and Agriculture Organization HET

Weekly live body weight Supplementation of diets with maize and palm oil group on the live body weight of broilers at different ages is presented in Table 4.1.. It was evident from the

All identified variables such as inputs and outputs used are all consistent with those variables employed by previous studies in performing productivity analysis, This paper calculates