88
GeneralNote*..[^
aunkatLarch
mo
ntonLong
IslandSound
onJulyxSandinCentral Park,New-York
City, on August29. Dr.Mearns
does not include itinhis 'Bird15 of theHudson
Highlands,'andDr. Fisher tellsme
he has notmet
with it at Sing Sing. Mr. J. Rowley, Jr., informsme
that at Hastings-on-theHudson
afewmiles north of Yonkers hesees one or two of these birds each year. Butthe most interesting evidence concerning the CarolinaWren
in theHudson-
Valley is furnished by Mr. Bicknellwhose
notes weremade
atRiverdaleontheeastern shore of theriver,exactlyopposite Englewood. Mr. Bicknell writes: "About
Riverdalethe CarolinaWren
iscertainly
more common
than itused to be.Up
to 1879,when
I founditbreedingatSpuyten Duyvil,Iregarded itas an accidental visitor.
My
brotherswerecloseobserversofbirdsbefore me,andthey hadnever seen
it, althoughone had been shotat Riverdale in the late
autumn
of 1873.Of
late yearsIhavecome
to lookupon
itas a regularly irregular visitor, and everyyear I expecttomeetwithitat leasttwo or three times. . . .It has seemed to
me
theeasternshore of theHudson
gets the overflow from theWren
population of the slopes of the Palisades,which
has undoubtedlybeen increasing. Foryearspaston occasional visits to the Palisades from springuntil late inautumn
I haveneverfailed to hear the CarolinaWren,
and havefrequentlyheardtwosinging atthesame
time.On
one occasion I heard two singing andsaw
still another,all at thesame moment." My own more
recent experience with this bird on the Palisades, as herein recorded, confirms Mr. Bicknell's remarks, and itwould appear that, having
become
permanently established there, it isgradually spreadingthrough thesurroundingcountry.
—
Frank M. Chap- man, American Museum
ofNatural
History, NetvTork
City.Sittacanadensisappearing in
Numbers
in the District of Columbia.—
Last
autumn
thewritercollected birds quiteextensivelyatTakoma,
D.C., andvicinity,especially inthe southern part ofMontgomery
County,Mary- land.During
allthattimeandthe following winter not a single speci-men
of the Red-breasted Nuthatch (S. canadensis) was observed, and there isevery reason tobelieve thattheywerenotat allrepresentedamong
the fall migrants of that season (1891-1892). This autumn, however, (1892) the case is entirely different,for in the
same
localities the birdcame
early, andinmost
unusual numbers.They
have appeared inloose flocks,associatedwith theusualautumn
small birds, as Juncos, Titmice, Wrens, etc., andupon
several occasions one could count asmany
as thirtyorfortyofthem
froma singlepoint of observation. Therewould
be notroubleincollecting asmany
as fifty specimens in a day.Many
birds of theyearare