ITB Towards World University ITB Towards World University
Prepared by:
Prepared by:
Prepared by:
Prepared by:
Dr.
Dr. Syafruddin Syafruddin A. A. Temenggung Temenggung MWA ITB
MWA ITB
Jakarta, May 14, 2014
Jakarta, May 14, 2014
HEALTH & SOCIAL ARTS & ENGINEERING LIFE SCIENCE SCIENCE HUMANITY TECHNOLOGY
1 Teaching : The Learning Environment 27.5 32.5 37.5 30 30
2 Research : Volume, Income, and Reputation 27.5 32.5 37.5 30 30
3 Citations Per Paper 35 25 15 27.5 30
INDICATOR
NO. TOTAL
INDICATOR OF WORLD UNIVERSITY
3 Citations Per Paper 35 25 15 27.5 30
4 Industry Income : Innovation 2.5 2.5 2.5 5 2.5
5 International Outlook 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.5
Sources : Times Higher Education 2013
Notes : 1. Teaching : Student/Academic Staff; PhD Awards/Bachelor; PhD/Academic; Reputation Survey;
Institutional Income/Academic Staff
2. Research : Scholarly Papers/Academic Staff; Research Income/Academic Staff; Reputation Survey 3. Citations : Research Impact
4. Industry Income : Income from Industry/Academic Staff
5. International Outlook : Ratio of International to Domestic Staff; International Co-Anthorship;
Ratio of International to Domestic Students
TOTAL % ENDOWMENT % GIFTS % RESEARCH REVENUES REVENUE & BEQUEST SPONSOR (in billion $)
1 HARVARD 4.2 36% 19% 8% 20% 17%
2 YALE 2.97 34% 9% 5% 23% 29%
3 PRINCETON 1.52 47% 20% 8% 19% 7%
% TUITION UNIVERSITY
NO. % OTHERS
WORLD UNIVERSITY OPERATING REVENUE 2013
3 PRINCETON 1.52 47% 20% 8% 19% 7%
4 STANFORD 4.8 21% 16% 6% 19% 38% *)
5 M I T 3.19 18.8% 9.7% 5.6% 53.8% 12.1%
6 CORNEL 3.42 8.8% 25.9% 5.4% 17.1% 42.8% **)
Note : *) 15% From Health Care
**) 24% From Medical Operation
OPERATING
FUND RETURN % % ANNUAL FUND INCOME FUND
(in billion $) TO OPERATING INCOME (in billion $) COMPANY
1 HARVARD 32.7 11.3% 36% 4.2 Harvard Management
Company (HMC)
2 YALE 20.8 12.5% 34% 2.97 Office of Treasury
3 PRINCETON 18.2 11.7% 47% 1.52 Office of Treasury
4 STANFORD 18.7 12.2% 21% 4.8 Stanford Management
NO. UNIVERSITY
WORLD UNIVERSITIES ENDOWMENT FUND 2013 (in billion $)
4 STANFORD 18.7 12.2% 21% 4.8 Stanford Management
Company (SMC)
5 M I T 11 11.1% 18.8% 3.19
MIT Investment
Management Company (MITIMCO)
6 CORNEL 5.2 11.2% 8.4% 3.42 Office of Treasury
OVERALL SCORE
1 Caltech United States 94.9
2 University of Oxford United Kingdom 93.9 2 Harvard University United States 93.9 4 Stanford University United States 93.8
5 M I T United States 93
RANK INSTITUTION LOCATION OVERALL
SCORE 15 Johns Hopkins University United States 83.7 16 University of Pennsylvania United States 81 17 Duke University United States 79.3 18 University of Michigan United States 79.2 19 Cornell University United States 79.1
RANK INSTITUTION LOCATION
WORLD UNIVERSITY RANGKINGS
5 M I T United States 93
6 Princeton University United States 92.7 7 University of Cambridge United Kingdom 92.3 8 University of California, BarkeleyUnited States 89.8 9 University of Chicago United States 87.8 10 Imperial College London United Kingdom 87.5 11 Yale University United States 87.4
12 U C L A United States 86.3
13 Columbia University United States 85.2
14 ETH Zürich Switzerland 84.5
19 Cornell University United States 79.1 20 University of Toronto Canada 78.3
21 U C L United Kingdom 77.6
22 Northwestern University United States 77.1 23 The University of Tokyo Japan 76.4
26 N U S Singapore 72.4
43 The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 65.3 44 Seoul National University Rep. of Korea 65.2
45 Peking University China 65
50 Tsinghua University China 63.5
ASIA UNIVERSITY RANKINGS
OVERALL SCORE 1 The University of Tokyo Japan 78.3
2 N U S Singapore 77.5
3 The University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 75.6
4 Peking University China 70.7
5 Postech Rep. of Korea 69.4
RANK INSTITUTION LOCATION
OVERALLSCORE13 Tokyo Institute of Technology Japan 53.7 14 National Taiwan University Taiwan 53.2 15 Hebrew University of Jerusalem Israel 53.1
15 Tohoku University Japan 53.1
17 Osaka University Japan 52
18 Tel Aviv University Israel 50.5
RANK INSTITUTION LOCATION
5 Postech Rep. of Korea 69.4
6 Tsingua University China 67.1
7 Kyoto University Japan 66.8
8 Seoul National University Rep. of Korea 65.9 9 Hong Kong University of
Science and Technology Hong Kong 64.4
10 KAIST Rep. of Korea 64
11 Nanyang Technological University Singapore 59.4 12 Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 54.4
18 Tel Aviv University Israel 50.5
19 City University of Hong Kong Hong Kong 48.5 20 Yonsei University Rep. of Korea 48.2 21 Technion Israel Institute of
Technology Israel 46.9
22 Middle East Technical University Turkey 45.8
23 SKKU Rep. of Korea 45.3
24 Fudan University China 44.9
25 University of Science and
Technology of China China 44.8
NUMBER OF UNIVERSITY IN TOP 100 ASIA
India Israel Turkey Hong Kong Korea China Taiwan Japan
7 6 5 4 3 2 1
2117 16 14 6
5 4 3
0 5 10 15 20 25
U A E Lebanon Malaysia Singapore Saudi Arabia Iran Thailand India
1 5 1 4 1 3 1 2 1 1 1 0 9 8
33 3 3
1 1 1
2
Source : Times Higher Education, 2013
KEY FEATURES OF WORLD UNIVERSITY
Teaching Research
I N D
A L
GOVERNMENT
University
Enterprises
U S T R Y
U M
N I
COMMUNITY
QUALITY :
- Teaching The Learning Environment Student, Faculty, Staff, Facility - Research Volume, Income and Reputation Faculty, Institution
- Enterprise Industry Income and International Outlook
CONNECTIVITY :
- The Quality, State or Capability of being Connected
WHAT MAKES ITB BECOMES WORLD UNIVERSITY
The Ability to Connect or Communicate with Other Stakeholders Beyond ITB (Government, Community, Industry and Alumni
COLLABORATION
- To Work Jointly with Other Research and Educational Institutions (National and International) in an Intellectual Endeavor to Promote High Quality of Education and Research
The Quality, State or Capability of being connected The ability to connect or communicate with other stakeholders beyond ITB
CONNECTIVITY
I T B
• Improve Government Performances
• Sources of Fund
• Basic and Applied Research
• Improve Industry Value Chains (Supply and Demand)
• Sources of Research Fund
• Education Quality
• Human Development
• Sources of Endowment Fund
• Well Trained & Soft Skilled
• Strong Character &
Professional
• Sources of Endowment Fund
G I C A
COLLABORATION
To work jointly with other Research and Educational Institutions (national and international) in an intellectual endeavor to promote high quality of Education and Research
I T B
Research Centers Universities
Centers Universities
High Quality of
Education and Research Industry
Community
National Development
COMPARISON : ITB AND WORLD UNIVERSITY ( 1 )
Student 20.901 11.380 2.231 21.159
Faculty 1.175 1.030 900 2.262
QUALITY I T B M I T CALTECH HARVARD
Faculty 1.175 1.030 900 2.262
Ratio F / S 1 : 18 1 : 11 1 : 3 1 : 9
Schools 13 6 6 15
Research Institute ? 42 52 > 100
COMPARISON : ITB AND WORLD UNIVERSITY ( 2 )
Pasca Sarjana Bisnis & Manajemen
Teknologi Industri Mesin & Dirgantara Elektro & Informatika All Schools
Chemistry & Chemical Engineering
Engineering & Applied Sciences
All Schools Management
Engineering
I T B M I T
CALTECH
Sipil & Lingkungan
Pertambangan & Perminyakan Matematika IPA
Ilmu & Teknologi Kebumian Ilmu & Teknologi Hayati
Farmasi
Arsitektur, Perencana Pengembangan Kebijakan
Seni Rupa & Desain Physics, Math &
Astronomy Geological & Planetary
Sciences Biology & Biological
Engineering
Humanities & Social Sciences
Science
Health Science Technology
Architecture & Planning Humanities, Arts &
Social Sciences
I T B
HARVARD MODEL
M I T
• University or General Model
ITB TOWARDS WORLD UNIVERSITY
M I T MODEL
• Institute or Technology Related Model
• Which Model Vision; Direction
• How Policy; Strategy
• When Stages of Development
Reorientation of Organization to Commit to: Quality; Connectivity and Collaboration
Rectorat Level :
- V.R Finance V.R Finance and Treasury o Manage Endowment Fund o Develop Policy Portfolio
o Integrate Investment Strategy and Risk Management
o Embryo for ITB Investment Management
ITB : PLANNED TRANSFORMATION (1) INSTITUTIONS
o Embryo for ITB Investment Management Company (Harvard & MIT Models)
- V.R Research & V.R Research, Innovation and Application
Innovation o Connect with Industry & Collaborate with other Research Centers
o Develop ITB Research Centers to Cater Current and Future Demand
o Coordinate & Synergize Research Programs - V.R Communication V.R Communication Alumni & External Relations
Partnership and o Coordinate Alumni Activities Alumni o Connect to G, I, C, A
o Form Strategic Partnership with Industry
o With V.R Finance & Treasury to Establish Enterprise and Potential Investment
COLLABORATION WITH OTHER -Universities -Research Centers
CONNECTIVITY - Government QUALITY
TEACHING RESEARCH INSTITUTIONS
FACULTY
FACILITY
Research Enhancement
ITB : BUILDING MOZAICS OF WORLD UNIVERSITY
- Government - Community - Industry - Alumni ENTERPRISES
RESOURCES
ENDOWMENT FUND
REVENUE GENERATION
INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
COMPANY
