a
. t:
vol. 5, Nq. 1, APRIL 2017
qe"Entum
$ffi
frS$r* ; 333S-4S4e
,r**
I r /*\" <&<r3<\
rt ,i '\ I 1' ,i
\-l '\-2' :-L&i
Improvingthe
Qudity of fnglish Etiuer
i.:t.
Grd@?rcgrminEnglish Education
: Unlvers ity of Palan$ka'Raya
;t ':B*
ff.l
.$,Ff
iE'f, *Lg*fl*
i+:-. ..Fl.. Ti *r--: "l*.?:
i"--. it J i*; ;j;
5, I{O. I, APRIL 2gt7
Special Edition
ISSN:233W42
Iournal
knproving the Quality of English Education
The Effect of iletacognitive Strategy {MS} and Vocabulary
Self4ollection
Strategy {VSS} on the Students' Reading Comprehension of NarrativeText at the Eighth Grade of S[nP Darul
]liirah
Putera lfrartapura by Buhari Muslim, Natalina AsiThe Effect of Learning itranagement System: Edmodo and Schoology on Students' Achievemenb in Writing Narrative Text of the Fourth Semester
of University of Palangka Raya by Heri Santoso, Wahyuningsih Usadiati
The Effect of Pair Recording iilethod (PRM) on Students' Speaking Skil!
of Procedure Text at the Tenth Grade Package C of PKBM Luthfillah
by Ade Salahudin Permadi, Elanneri Karani
The Effect of Learning English Based on Local Content and Content Based
tlaterials
by Using CALL on the Eleventh GradeStudenE'Writing
Skill of Report Text at SMA N
{
Katingan Tengah by Predi Gantara, Maria Arina LuardiniDeveloping A
ilodel
of Supplementary English Instructional Materials Based on Local Content for the Eighth Grade Studenb of SMP Negeri 9Palangka Raya
by Nurliana, Wahyuningsih Usadiati
Ileveloping Assessment of Speaking Skill by Doing Proiect Based Learning for the Fouilh Grade Students in SDS Golden Christian School
in Academic Year 2A16nO17 by Monae Trisiska, Elanneri Karani
,o'$'+:*-
". ,- ::t i1
.$.
.
lrTl-. i -,i
t:.,59*::ir' ,"
-.- - --,=J'n
Published by:
Graduate Proglram in English tanguage Education
Univensity of Palangka Raya
We would like to thank the Almighty God who
enablesus to publish the
secondvolume journal of
GraduateProgram in English
LanguageEducation of
Palangka Raya University, Palangka Raya, Central Kalimantan."Compound:
Improving
theQuality of
English Education"journal is
a peer-reviewedjournal published twice a year by
GraduateProgram in English Language
Education, Palangka RayaUniversity. This journal is dedicated to its
members and otherswho
areinterested
in
English language teaching. The purposeof
thisjournal
publication is to provide aforum for
exchanginginformation
aboutpractices,
opinions, recent issues, and researchesin
English language teaching.This volume
consistsof
8 articlesfrom
graduate students and teachers in English Language Education.We
would like to
extend ourthankful to
theDirector of
Graduate Program, Palangka RayaUniversity who has
supportedthe publication of this journal, to the
reviewers and authors who havesignificantly
contributed in this publication.We
hope thatthis publication will benefit individuals
andinstitutions who
concernthe improvement of English
languageteaching, to stimulate new thinking and
enrich understandingofrecent
issues about English language teaching practices.Palangka Raya,
Aprll
2017Editors
ISSN: 2338-4042 Vol. 5, No.
l,
APzuL 2OI7
Special Edition Improving the Quality
of
Enslish Education
CONTENT
The Effect of Metacognitive Strategy (MS) and Vocabulary
Self-Collection Strategy(VSS)
onthe
Students' Reading Comprehensionof Narrative Text
at the Eighth Gradeof
SMP DarulHijrah
Putera MartapuraBuhari Muslim, Natalina
Asi...
1-12The
Effect of
Leaming Management System: Edmodo and Schoology on Students' Achievementsin Writing Narrative Text of the Fourth
Semesterof University of
Palangka Raya
Heri
Santoso, Wahyuningsih t3-25The Effect of Pair Recording Method (PRM) on Students'
SpeakingSkill of
Procedure Text at the Tenth Grade Package C of
PKBM Luthfillah
Ade Salahudin Permadi, Elanneri
Karani
26-36The Effect of Learning English
Based Materials by UsingCALL
on the Eleventh Text at SMAN
1 Katingan TengahPredi
Gantara,Maria Arina Luardini
37 -44Developing
A Model of
SupplementaryEnglish
InstructionalMaterials
Based on Local Content for the Eighth Grade Studentsof
SMP Negeri 9 Palangka RayaNurliana,
WahyuningsihUsadiati
45-53Developing Assessment
of
SpeakingSkill
by Doing Project Based Learningfor
theFourth Grade Students in SDS Golden Christian School in Academic
Year 201612017Monae Trisiska, s4-64
on Local Content
and Grade Students'Writing
Content
BasedSkill
of Reportilt
Buhari Muslim, Natalina Asi Vol. 4, No. 1, April 2017 :
L-
12JournalCompound ISSN:2338-4042
THE EFFECT OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGY (MS) AND VOCABULARY SELF-COLLECTION STRATEGY
(VSS)ON THE STUDENTS'READING
COMPREHENSION OF NARRATIVE TEXT AT THE EIGHTH GRADE OF
SMPDARUL HIJRAH PUTERA MARTAPURA
Buhari
Muslim
NatalinaAsi
Graduate Program in English Education
P alangka Raya Univ ers
ity
AhstractThis research was conducted to
find out
the effectof
Metacognitive Strategy (MS)and
Vocabulary Self-collection Strategy (VSS) on the students' reading comprehensionof norrative text.
Besides,this research was also
conducted tofind out the
comparisonbetween Metacognitive Strateglt (MS) and Vocabulary Self-collection Strateg,t (VSS) on the students' reading comprehension of naruative text. The
population
of this research was the eighth grade students of SMPDarul Htjrah
PuteraMartrapura.
The number of sample was 50 students. Reading comprehension testsof narrative
text was used as the instrument inorder to collect the data
needed. Besides,the questionnaire was also used as
theinstrument in order to support the main data which
cannotgain only by a test.
The research design was quasi-experimental design and there were two groups: Experimentaland Control
Groups. Thedata
were processedand
analyzedaccording to
thefollowing
steps: assigning the groups,
giving
theprelest to
both Experimental andControl
Groups,giving
treatments,giving
the post-test, and the lastdistributing
the questionnaire. The dataof reading
tests were analyzed by usingPaired
Sample T-test byIBM
^SPS^S2j
program.Furthermore, the data of
questionnaires were analyzedby
usingformula
of percentage adaptedfrom Sudijono(2012:
318). The results of this research showed that the significant valueof
the data of post-testin
theControl
Group was 0.185. Thesignificant
valueof
the data of post-testin
Experimental Groupof
MS was 0.000 and thesignificant
valueof
thedataof
post-testinExperimental
Groupof
VSSwas 0.000.As
0.185J
0.05 and 0.000 A 0.05in
this research, thefirst
and the secondnull
hypothesizes were rejected and thefirst
and
the secondalternative
hypothesizes were accepted. Therefore, there wassignificant effect on the ability of the
studentsin reading
comprehensionof narrative text
using Metacognitive Strategy (MS) and there wassignificant
effect on theability of
the studentsin reading
comprehensionof narrative text using Vocabulary Self-collection
Strategy (YSS).And
thesignificant value of
thedata
of post-testin
comparison between MS and VSSwas 0.023. It meant MS had more significant effect than
VSSon the
students' achievement in reading comprehension ofnarrative
text. Moreover,from
questionnaires,it
could be stoted that students and English teacher thought that Metacognitive Strategy (MS) and Vocabulary Self-collectionStrategt
(VSS) were very useful to them.Keywords: Metacognitive Strategy, Vocobulary Self-collection Strategy,
ReadingComprehens ion,
Narrative
TextBuhari Muslim, Natalina Asi Vol. 4, No. 1, April ZOLT : L
-
tZINTRODUCTION
Most of the students in Indonesia have
difficulties in comprehending
English texts althoughthey
have studied Englishsince they were in
elementary schools."Ihere were
two main
factors consideredas the problems in
reading comprehension, they were classified intotwo
categories: (1) Internalfactor,
and(2) External factor. The Internal factors were related to vocabulary mastery and readingstrategy, while the external factor
wasrelated to the teaching
technique.(Prihastuti 2013:
l)
In
some schoolsin
Indonesia whichhave not applied Curriculum 2013,
thecurriculum applied is called Kurikulum
Tingkat Satuan pendidikan
(KTSP).KTSP was declared
by
Dinas pendidikanwhich
stated that the reading textof
SMp consistsof five
formsof
text: descriptive,recount, naruative, procedure,
andreport. Narrative text is
oneof the
text typesthat
should be learnedby
students.Narrative text is
interestingtext
and the students can leam fromit.
The purposeof
narrative text is to entertain, to
tell
a story or to provide literary experience.Nevertheless, the objective of teaching
reading in SMp Darul Hijrah
pureraMartapura was not yet
fulfilled.
Based onthe observation
which
had been done, thestudents of SMp Darul Hijrah
putera{lrtapura, especially the eighth
gradestill had problems in ."idirg
comprehension.
It
becausethe
internaland the external factors. The
intemalfactors were related to the
students, vocabulary mastery and reading strategy.In vocabulary mastery most of
themdidn't know
the meaningof
some wordsin the texts.
Thus,they couldn,t
answerthe reading comprehension
questionscorrectly. It was
relatedto the
research conducted previouslyby Hafidian
(2010)entitled Reading
ComprehensionAbility
of Students in Narrative Text at
theE_ighth Grade of SMp Darul Hijrah
Putera Kabupaten Banjar and Muslim
2
JournalCompound ISSN:2338-4042 (2015) entitled The Students,problems in R_eading Comprehension
at the Eighth Grade of SMP Darul Hijrah putera
Academic Year 2014/2015. Both
of
them statedthat the ability of the
students atthe eighth grade of SMp Darul Hijrah Putera in reading
comprehensions wasstill low. The
studentswere still
facingdiffrculties in vocabulary mastery. In reading strategies the students didn,t know
the way to understand the text. The studentsusually
matchthe words in
themultiple
choice optionswith
the words inthe text
astheir
strategyto
answer the questions,while the external factor
wasrelated to the teaching technique.
The teaching technique became aproblem in reading comprehension at the
EighthGrade of SMp Darul Hijrah
puteraMartapura. It
seemedthat the
teacherused conventional strategy as a technique
in his teaching process. In
thepresentation stage, the teacher
gavelimited exploration about the text.
The teacheronly
asks some questions about the typeof
thetext without
exploring thetopic. Then, in the practice stage
thestudents were asked
to
read theteit.
Theteacher didn't guide them in
comprehending the text.In
the last stage,the
students answeredthe
questions thatfollowed the text.
Then,it
wasfollowed
by the
discussionsection in which
the teachercalled on
somethe
students to answer the questions.After
discussingall
of
questions,the
teacher translated thetext into their native language
andpointed out the difficult
questionwhile
the students wrote down the words.All of those problems needed to be
solvedbecause they gave impact on their
reading achievement which was low.To solve the problems occurring
in
the teaching and learning processof riading,
teaching reading strategiesto
students is considered valuable as atool for
solvingthe problems that the students
may encounterin the text. Thus, the
teacherneeded
to
use a techniqueto
increase theBuhari Muslim, Natalina Asi Vol. 4, No. 1, April2OtT :
t -
L2CO$KI-IN (2010: 36-37) states the use
of metacognitive strategies
activatesone's thinking and leads to
improvedperformance in leaming in
general.Learners who have
metacognitiveabilities seem to have the following
advantages over others who are not aware of the role metacognitive strategy:
1.
They are more strategic learners.2. Their rate of
progressin learning
aswell
as thequality
and speedof their
cognitive engagement is faster.3.
They are confidentin their
abilities to learn4. They do not
hesitateto obtain
helpfrom
peers, teachers,or family
when needed.5.
They provide accurate assessmentsof
way they are successful learners.
6.
Theythink clearly
about inaccuracieswhen failure occurs during
anactivity.
7. Their tactics
matchthe learning
taskand
adjustmentsare
madeto
reflect changing circumstances.8. They perceive themselves
ascontinual learners and
cansuccessfully cope
with
new situation.Metacognitive
strategiesdo not only
helpthe
learning generallybut
also havea lot to offer to
vocabularycomprehension specifically. According to
Goh ( 2008 ) lists
someof the
positiveeffects
of
metacognitive strategy training on vocabulary comprehension. She states thatit
improves students' confidence andmakes them less anxious in
thevocabulary process.
According to Misa (2014 305)
theimplementation of the
metacognitivestrategy in teaching
readingcomprehension
which consists of
three stages of instruction;1. Pre-reading activities
covered(planning)
2. Whilst-reading activities
covered (monitoring and evaluation),4
JournalCompound ISSN:2338-4042
3.
Post-reading activities.First, in pre-reading
(planning)activity could be categorized
asconveying learning objective, introducing
the topic and activating the
students'background knowledge. Activating schemata supports comprehension
bycalling up
stable background knowledge representations that supports and interpretthe text knowledge. Misa (2014:
305)adds that by activating
backgroundknowledge and
experiencethe
studentscould easily understand the
materials, becausethe broader this is, the
morelikely
the students are to be able to tackle materialsof
greaterdifficulty
drawn from awider
rangeof
subject areas. Breadthof the
scope breeds more breadth aswell
as greater depthof
understanding.In
short,eliciting
the students'prior
knowledge in advancewill help them to
comprehend the text easily.Second,
in whilst-reading
(monitoring and evaluation)activity,
the teacher does some steps.The
teacher also guides the studentsto form in groups (a group of four) and pointing student as a
leader, recorder/secretary, checker and reporter.These
ways could facilitate the
studentsto
focustheir
attentionin
understandingthe
contentof the text. In line with
this, groupwork
has at leastfour
advantages,namely (1) generates
interactivelanguage, (2) offers an
embracingeffective climate, (3) promotes
learnerresponsibility
and autonomy, and(4) it
isa
steptoward individualizing
instruction.And then, they are 1) giving a text for each group, 2) guiding the
studentsin
reading fast and silently. Increasing silent expeditious reading speed can be done byskimming
and scanning.In
skimming the reader goesthrough a text quickly,
notnoting
everyword but trying to
get mainidea of what the text is
about. Whereasscanning involve searching for
aparticular piece of intonation
in
a text, the readerswere thinking when they
used at
;1
Buhari Muslim, Natalina Asi Vol. 4, No. 1, April2Ol7 :
1- t2
particular symbol in the text,
suchtechniques would allow
detailedexploration of processing
problems associatedwith
particular featuresof
textand the
strategiesthat
readersused
toovercome such problems, finding
thewriter's main
ideasand key
supportingdetails that can help to
understand thecontent of the course,
demonstrate understanding and establishthe
ideas,it
includes: read and
trouble-shoot.Troubleshooting is also needed
by teacher whenhe or
she monitors groupswork activities,
seeshow well they
aredoing
and deciding whetheror not to
go over and intervene, 3) guiding students to discusshow to do the
task based on thepassage that they have read.
4)Monitoring the students' activities
andgiving them assistance, 6)
leadingstudents
to read the tasks individually.
Misa
(2014:306) emphasizes that the taskis most specific type of small
groupactivity in
the language class.It
can havea variety of
goals,which
students select depending on their level and interest.To
comprehend the reading materials, the teachergive
students some questionsdealing with the text in group.
Thisactivity aimed to
measurethe
students' comprehension on the text they had read.The teacher monitors this activity
bychecking
their works to
ensure that theycould follow
the instruction. The teacherasks the volunteer of the groups
toanswer the questions and give
the responses.Third,
post readingactivity is
the last stageof the
procedure,this activity
isaimed to guide students to
makeconclusion of lessons that they
haveleamed and do reflection of
learningFocess. The
teacher assiststhe
studentsrto got the difficulty in
applyingmetacognitive strategy by leading with
some questions. Thus,by
conducting thisactivity the teacher could
makewaluation of the learning
process. Thisactivity belongs to reflective
teaching.Joumal Compound
ISSN: 23i18-tl0tl2
Reflecting teaching is an approach
to teachingwhich is
basedon a belief
that teachers can improvetheir
understandingof
teaching andthe quality of their
or*n teachingby reflecting critically on their teaching experiences and develop
theskills of
considering the teaching processthoughtfully,
analytically, and objectivelyas a way of improving
classroom practices.Vocabulary Self-collection Strategy
Vocabulary Self-collection Strategy is a reading strategythat
usedfor
teachingreading. It has its primary
goal incorporationof new
contentwords
into studentsworking
vocabularies. Wood andHarmon (2001:43) said that
vocabulary Self-collection Strategy or VSS is another method of teaching and practicing the useof
contextto
determineword
meanings.According to Martin
(2002:88),"Vocabulary Self-collection
Strategy(VSS) is an
interactive-learning instructional strategy that promotes word consciousness,as students are
actively engagedin indentifying
important words from their readingto
sharewith
membersof their
class".It
means thatthis
strategy makes the students activein
teaching andlearning process. They can find
theimportant word through
teacher's instructions. Then,they
can interact eachother to share the words with their
classmates.The Vocabulary
Self-Collection Strategy(VSS)
has purposesto give
an opportunityto the
studentsto
understand the conceptof
atext
andto
determine themeaning of the words based on
thecontext.
Fatonah(2015:27)
stated"The
purpose
of
the vocabulary self-collection strategy(VSS) is to motivate
students tolearn new words by promoting a
long-term acquisition
and developmentof
the vocabularyof
academic disciplineswith
the goal
of
integrating new content wordsinto
studentsworking
vocabularies."Buhari Muslim, Natalina Asi Vol. 4, No. 1, Apri! 2017 :
L-
L2ability, vocabulary knowledge, prior knowledge of the topic
considered, and relevant strategies to make senseof
a textand understand it. Mehrpour et
al.(2A12:129). Mehrpour et
al.
also says the same thing that reading comprehension isoften discussed in terms of being
aprocess involving the integration of
decoding
ability,
vocabulary knowledge,prior
knowledgeof
thetopic
considered, and relevant strategies to make senseof
atext and understand it.
Reading comprehension
is a
complex process: the reader constructions meaningby
interactingwith text using his or
her previousknowledge
and experience andthe information that
canbe found in
thetext. The more background
information relatedto the text the
reader possesses,the easier it is for him or her to
understandthe text. When reading
thetext he or she activates the
previousknowledge
abouttopic. Moreover,
eachtext is
unique as regardsthe
structureof the text, its genre, vocabulary,
andlanguage. Several factors influence
a reader's interaction:how
easy thetext
isto read, how accurately it follows
the conventionsof its
genreor
structure, the languageit is written in, and even
thetlpe
and the sizeof font
(Strom,2006:l-
2).
The
successor failure of
studentsin
their future studies will depend
verymuch on their mastery in reading.
Theabilrty to read and
understanding whatthey read is a goal as well as
afundamental basic tool of
education.Reading
comprehensionis not only
amatter
of
understanding theh4 it is the creation of meaning by ombining
what theprint tells with
whatfu reader already possesses
asknowledge. To achieve comprehension,
it
fo crucial for the reader to make use of his previous experiences. Salmi
QAll:
698).The
definition
above is similar to whatblair-larsen means that
readingcomprehension
is an
essentialskill for
Joumal Compound ISSN:23i18-4042
children
in
school settings and beyond-A
broad rangeof
task requireschildren
to comprehendwritten text, particularly
aschildren progress in school and
isexpected to learn more
independently.The most familiar
readingtask,
and theone that children frequently
encounterduring early exposures to text,
iscomprehension
of a story or
narrative passage. Eason et al (2012:515).Narrative Text
Narrative
text
is oneof
genresof
text.It is
also a commontype of texts.
Thereare some genres of text, such
as:descriptive, procedure, narrative, recount,
and report. According to Al-Hapidz
(2014:72-73),
narrativetext is
a text that has a purposeto
entertain and the readeror listener. However, narrative can
alsobe written to
teachor inform, to
change attitudesor social opinions
andto
showthe moral of a
story.Kaliszewski (2AB:
4) defines narrative as "the representation
of
an eventor a
seriesof
events". Someexamples of narrative text are
fantasynovel, historical fiction and
stories.Wardimana et al (2008: 98),
Narrative text is akind of
genre that social functionto
amuse, entertain and dealwith
actual or vicarious experiencein
different ways.Narrative
dealswith problematic
eventswhich
leadto
acrisis or turning point of some kind, which in turn finds
aresolution.
Example ol Narrative'I ext Text
Organi zation
The Story
The Prince and His Best Friends
Orientat ion
Once upon a time, there lived
a kind young prince
named Jonathan.He was
loved, and adoredby
his people.His
two close friends were Peter Piper, the servant ofthe palace and Franklin Greedv. the son of an Aristocrat.Compli cation
Buhari Muslim, Natalina Asi Vol. 4, No. 1, April2OLT :1,
- t2
JournalCompound ISSN:2338-4042
The
Admissibility
of the DataCriteria for the admissibility of
the data in this research were asfollows:
1. The first
datawere taken from
bothcontrol and experimental
groups.They were the students' scores
inreading narrative text before
theexperimental group was given
MS andVSS
asthe
treatment.This
was considered as pre-test.2. The second data were taken
fromboth control group
and experimentalgroups. They were the
students' scoresin
readingnarrative text
after the experimental group was given MS andVSS
asthe
treatment.This
was considered as post-test.Data Collecting
ProceduresTwo
data collection were employed inthis research which were a test
and questionnaire.In collecting the data of
the test, the
writer
gave pre-test and post-test to
seewhether there is
significant effect or not on the students' achievementin
reading narrativetext
after theMS
and VSS was given. The testin this
researchwas narrative text of
readingcomprehension test in the form of multiple
choice items.In collecting
dataof the
questionnaire,the writer
collectedby distributing questionnaire to
theEnglish teacher and students of the eighth
grade of SMP Darul Hijrah
Putera.Meanwhile,
the
dataof
the questionnairewere
neededto support the main
datawhich
cannot be gained only by a test.Data Analysis
ProceduresThe first data of the
researchwas
atest.
The
proceduresto
analyzethe
data of a test were asfollows:
1.
The data collectedcarefully from
thestudents' answer
sheetsof
reading comprehension of narrative text test.One day, The Prince, Peter Piper, and Franklin Greedy were
walking through the
forest.Suddenly
a
groupof
bandits attacked the three boys near anold house. They entered the old house and blockaded the gate and
doors.
The three boys
weretrapped inside the house.
Franklin was very terrified and
asked
the
Princeto
surrenderimmediately, but Peter was not afraid. He urged and supported
the Prince not
to
give up. The Prince decided notto
surrender because he realized that he would become a hostage for the banditsto
ask for ransomto
his father,but
Franklinwas
scared and wanted to make a deal,it
made Peter suspicious about Franklin's behaviour. So he quietly made up a plan for him and the Prince toMETHODS AND PROCEDURES Data
Data were taken from
reading comprehension testsresult of the
eighthgrade students of SMP Darul Hijrah
Putera Martapuraby
conducting pre-test and post-test of reading narrative text.Go
Resoluti on
Early at dawn,
Franklin openedthe front gate
and unlocked the doors. The bandits entered the house in search ofthe Prince. When they cameto
theroom
wherethe
Prince was supposed to be sleeping, no one was there. Suddenly they heard a horse runningoutside the house and saw over the window that Peter Piper and
the Prince were riding away on one ofthe bandit's horses.
It tums out, Peter
Piper sneakedout of
the house andwaited
in the
yard,while
thePrince was hiding behind the
house.
The
bandits were very angry at Franklin and took him with them while the Prince and Peter went safely going back to the Caoital.Buhari Muslim, Natalina Asi Vol. 4, No. 1, April2OtT : L
-
L22.
The checking andgiving the
score tothe
students' answer sheets had done using the formula as follows:Score:
Number of Correct Answers
x
L00Number of the Test Items
(Sudijono,
2012:318)
3. Tabulating, calculating,
andpresenting the data.
4. After tabulating, calculating,
and presentingthe data, it is
needed toknow that the data obtained
werenormally distributed and
homogeneous. Therefore, test of normality and test of
homogeneitywere conducted before
hypothesistesting.
Instrumentation
Instrument Development
In this research the
readingcomprehension test and
questionnaire were used as the instrument. The reading comprehension tests werein the form of
multiple choice items, while
questionnaire
was used to find out
the information related to the implementationof MS and VSS in teaching
readingcomprehension of narrative text
in reading class.Instrument Try Out
Before the instrument was used to test the sample, they were tried out
in
orderto
know whether the instruments
were suitableor not. The try out
washeld in
another classof
the eighth grade students at SMPDarul Hijrah
Putera Martapura asthe
sampleof
thetry
out,in
equal gradewith
the sample of this research.Instrument Validity
There were
two kinds of validity
thatwere used in this
research.They
were constructvalidity
and contentvalidity.
loumal Compound ISSN:2338-4042
Instru
mentReliability
In this research the
writer
analyzed thereliability of
the test by using Cronbach's alphain
SPSS 23 program.Population
and SamplePopulation
The population in this research was the
eighth grade students of SMP
DarulHijrah Putera in 6
classes.Each
classconsisted of 25 students. The
total number of population was 150 students.Sample
In
this research, thewriter
used clusterrandom
sampling.A lottery
system wasused to select two classes from
six classes.Research
Methodology
This research used
experimental research design.It
investigatesthe
effectof MS and VSS towards the
students'reading
comprehensionof narrative
text scores.RESULT OF THE RESEARCH
The data analysis result
waselaborated as follows.
l) There was significant effect on
theability of the students in
reading comprehensionof
narrativetext
after using Metacognitive Strategy (MS).It
related to the theory of Metacognitive
Strategy which stated
thatMetacognitive Strategy is
notsomething new
in
the education field.This
strategyis
applied and taught to studentsto
enhance the understandingof a text that has been read.
Theapplication of the
MetacognitiveStrategy during reading
andcomprehension lessons is
alsobelieved to help students think
methodically in all three levels of reading processes, namely
beforereading, during reading and
afterreading (Othman et al
2014:103).Besides that Metacognitive Strategies is also a sequential processes that one
Buhari Muslim, Natalina Asi Vol. 4, No. 1, April2OL7 :
t - !2
of which uses to control
cognitiveactivities, and to ensure that
acognitive goal
(e.g., understanding atext)
has beenmet.
These processes help to regulate, oversee the learning,and consist of planning
andmonitoring cognitive activities,
aswell as checking the outcomes of those activities
(Chauhan&
Singh,2014: 22). Thus, it means
thatteaching involves not only
howinformation
getsfrom the
teacher tothe
learnerbut
alsohow the
leameruses it, interacts with it,
receivesguidance and receives feedback. And
it also related to the result of
questionnaires
that had given to
thestudents and the English
teacherwhich showed that MS could
helpthem in understanding
readingEnglish texts. Table of
PairedSamples Statistics of the experimental
group MS
showedthe summary of
mean and Standard
Deviation of
pre-test
and post-test.The
meanof
pre- testwas
59.2A and the meanof
post-test was 76.32. If we
compared themeans
of pre-test and
post-test, wecould
seethat the
meanof
post-test was higher than pre-testwhich
meansthat the
students madeany
progresshelping by MS. This
meansthat
thefirst null hypothesis (H0l)
wasrejected and the first
alternativehypothesis (Hal) was accepted. It
could be concluded
that Metacognitive Strategy(MS)
affectedsignificantly on the
students'achievement in reading narrative text.
2) There was significant effect on
theability of the students in
readingcomprehension
of
narrativetext
afterusing Vocabulary
Self-collectionStrategy (VSS). It related to
thetheory of Vocabulary
Self-collection Strategywhich
stated that VocabularySelf-collection Strategy is
theinteresting strategy to
teachvocabulary in Junior High
School.JournalCompound
ISSN: 2338-4042
The
studentscan be more active
tocollect and hnd the
meaningof
key vocabularies found in the text. this thestrategy can be implemented
in teaching reading comprehension sinceit is
relatedto
vocabularyleaming
inwhich the
studentscan
comprehendthe text if they understand
themeaning of the words
basedon
thecontext (Juwita & Sunaryo
2013).And it also related to the result of
questionnaires
that had given to
thestudents and the English
teacherwhich
showedthat VSS could
helpthem in understanding
readingEnglish texts. Table of
PairedSamples Statistics of the experimental
group VSS
showedthe
summaryof
mean and Standard
Deviation of
pre-test
and post-test.The
meanof
pre- testwas
59.20 and the meanof
post-test was 76.32. If we
compared the meansof pre-test and post-test,
we can see that the meanof
post-test was higher than pre-testwhich
means thatthe students made any
progresshelping by
VSS.This
means that thesecond null hypothesis (Ho2)
wasrejected and the second
alternativehypothesis (Ha2) was accepted. It could be
concludedthat
VocabularySelf-collection Strategy
(VSS)affected
significantly
on the students' achievement in reading narrative text.Students
made better progress with
helpof
usingMS
than VSS. Tableof
Paired Samples Statistics (Table 4.18)
of
comparison betweenMS
and VSSshowed the summary of mean
and StandardDeviation of post-test
MS and post-test VSS. The meanof
post- testMS was 16.32
andthe
meanof post-test VSS was 71.20. If
wecompared the means
of MS
and VSS,we could
seethat the mean of MS, was higher than VSS which
meansthat the
students madeany
progresshelping by MS. This
meansthat
thethird null hypothesis (Ho3)
was 3)10
Buhari Muslim, Natalina Asi Vol. 4, No. 1, April 2017 :
t - t2
rejected and the third
alternativehypothesis (Ha3) was accepted. It
could be concluded that MS had moresignificant effect than VSS on
thestudents' achievement in
readingcomprehension of narrative text.
CONCLUSION
Based
on the data
analysisresult, it
can be concluded as
follows:
1.
Metacognitive Strategy(MS)
affectedsignificantly on the
students'achievement in reading narrative text.
2. Vocabulary Self-collection
Strategy(VSS) affected significantly on
thesfudents' achievement in
readingnarrative text.
3- MS had more significant effect
thanVSS
onthe
students' achievement inreading
comprehensionof
narrative text.REFERENCES
N-Hafrzh, Muhd. And Nisa,
Fahrun.2011. Teacing Writing
aNarrative Text by Using
ComicCreator (Bitstrips) as a
Mediumto Second Grade Students of Junior High School.
Journal.English Department Faculty of Language and Arts
StateUniversity of Padang.
JELT
Vol 3No.l
Serie AAntang, Heny Asihai. 2016. Effects of Experience Text
Relationship(ETR) and Vocabulary
SeA-Collection Strategt
(VSS)on
the students' Reading Comprehens ionof Narrative
Textat
the Eleventh Grade Students'of
SMANegri j
Palangka Raya.
Thesis Magester of English Language Education.Chauhan, Ankit and Singh,
Namrata.2014. Metacognition:
AConceptual Framework.
International Journal of Education and
PsychologicalResearch (IJEPR)
Volume 3,Issue 3, September 2014Joumal C-ornpound ISSN:23!18-4042
CO$KUN, Abdullah.2010.
The EffectOf Metacognitive Strategl Training
On The Listening PerformanceAf Beginner Students.
Joumal.Novitas-ROYAL (Research
on Youth and Language),2010,4(l),
35-50.
Eason,
S. H., et al.
2012. Reader-TextInteractions: How Dffirential
Text and Question
TypesInfluence Cognitive Skills Needed
.fo, Reading
Comprehension.Journal of
Psycholog,t.
Educational American Psychological Asoociation
l2
(2):515.
Fatonah, Safitri N. 2015.
UsingVocabulary
Self-CollectionStrateglt (VSS) to
ImproveReading Comprehension of
Seventh Grade Students
of
SMPN4 Kalasan in Academic Year of 2014/2A15. Skripsi.
EnglishEducation Faculty of
Languageand Arts Yogyakarta
State University.Goh, C.
2008. Metacognitive instruction.for second language
listeningdevelopment: Theory, practice and
researchimplications
RELC Journal, 39 (2),I
88-2 I 3.Juwita, Indrian &
Sunaryo. 2014. UsingVocabulary S"A
CoilectionStrategy (VSS) to
IncreaseMastery the
Juniour High
SchoolStudents' Vocabulary.
EnglishDepartment
FBS State Universityof Padang. Journal of
EnglishLanguage, Vol. 2 No. l,
September 2013, Serie B.
Prihastuti, Yuli S.
2013.Improving
the Reading Comprehensionof
GradeEight Students of SMP N I
Wonosari
by Using
VisualizationStrategt in
the Academic Yearof 2012/2013. Skripsi.
EnglishEducation Department Faculty
Of
Languages
And Arts
Yogyakarta State University.7
L1,
Buhari Muslim, Natalina Asi Vol. 4, No. L, April2OLT : L
-
12Hafidian, Dedy. 2010.
ReadingComprehension Ability of
Students
in Naruative
Textat
theEighrh Grade of SMP Darul Hijrah
Putera KabupatenBanjar.
Unpublished
Skripsi.Banjarmasin:
STKIP-PGRI Banjarmasin.Martin, A.2002.
Essential Strategiesfor
Teaching Vocabulary: A Brief
Overview of
Vocabulary Development.http ://www. sagepub.com/.
Accessed on January T8th,2017.
Mehrpour, Sadighi, &
Bahagheri. 2012.Teaching Reading
Comprehension Strategies
toIranian EFL
Pre-University Students. TheJournal
of TeachingLanguage Skills UTLS 4
(1),,rpring 20 I 2, Ser.66/4 (Previously
Journal of Social Sciences &
Humanities). I
2
(2) : I 29.Misa,
Mikhael.
2014. The Useof
GuidedMetacognitive Strateglt
toImprove Students'
ReadingComprehension.
Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris-UniversitasTimor. Jurnal
PendidikanHumaniora.
Yol. 2 No. 4,Hal304- 3l),December
2014.Othman, Y., Mahamud Z. & Jaidi N.
2014. The Effects of Metacognitive Strategy in
Reading Expository
Text.Journal. International
EducationStudies; Yol. 7, No. 13;
2014.Canadian
Centerof
Scienceand
Education.Salmi,
M. A.
2011. Schema (backgroundknowledge) and
ReadingComprehension
for EFL
Students.Reseach Journal
SpecificEducation. Faculty of
SpecificEducation,
ManusouraUniversity. I
I
(1):698.Strom,
M.
2006. Primary school students'reading comprehension
skills.Retrieved February 12,
2015,1.2
JournalCompound ISSN:2338-4042
from
ht tp : //pr im ary s c h o o I s tu dents r e a d
i
ngcomprehension.pdfSudijono, Anas. 2012.
PengantarEvaluasi Pendidikan
Jakarta:Raja Grafindo Persada.
Wardiman, Artono.,
Jahur,Masduki
B., and Djusm&,M.
Sukirman. 2008.Developing English in Focus
2:.fo, Grade VIII Junior High
School (SMP/MTs). Jakarta: Setia Purna Inves.