• Tidak ada hasil yang ditemukan

Leadership Styles and Organizational Effectiveness in Education

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Membagikan "Leadership Styles and Organizational Effectiveness in Education"

Copied!
7
0
0

Teks penuh

(1)

Muhamad Zhafran Dana Caesario REFERENCES

• Adepoju. (1996). The factors militating against effective planning and implementation of educational policies in Nigeria. A paper presented at the WAEC monthly seminar.

• Adeyemi. (2011). Principals‟ Leadership Styles and Teachers‟ Job Performance in Senior Secondary Schools in Ondo State, Nigeria. Current Research Journal of Economic Theory, vol. 3, no. 3, 84-92.

• Avolio, B. a. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual, team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development Vol. 4 No. 1, 231.

• Baldoni. (2005). Motivation Secrets GreatMotivation Secrets of Grea tLeaders.

• Barchiesi, A. M. (2007). Leadership Styles of World's most Admired Companies A Holistic Approach to Measuring Leadership Effectiveness. International Conference on Management Science & Engineering.

• Bass. (1991). Bass & Stogdill handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial applications. New York.

• Belonio. (2013). The Effect Of Leadership Style On Employee Satisfaction And Performance Of Bank Employees In Bangkok. The Effect Of Leadership Style On Employee Satisfaction And Performance Of Bank Employees In Bangkok.

• Bendasolli. (2013). Theory Building in Qualitative Research: Reconsidering the Problem of Induction. Forum: Qualitative Social Research Volume 14, No. 1.

• Bennett, & Anderson. (2003). Rethinking Educational Leadership. London: sage publication.

• Bennis W. & Nanus, B. (1985). Leaders: the Strategies for Taking Charge.

(2)

Muhamad Zhafran Dana Caesario

• Bennis, c. i. (1991). Executive's portfolio of model speeches for all occasions. P 34.

• Bolarinwa. (2002). Motivation and Teachers Job Performance in Secondary Schools in Lokoja Local Governemnt Area of Kogi State”. Thesis University of Ado-Ekiti.

• Borman, & Motowidlo. (1997). Expanding the criterion domain to include elements of contextual performance. New York: Jossey-Bas.

• Burns. (1979). Two Excerpts from Leadership. Educational Leadership, Vol 36, No 6, 380-383.

• Campbell. (1990). Modeling the Performance Prediction Problem in Industrial and Organizational Psychology.

• Carver, & Nash. (2006). Doing data analysis with SPSS version 14. Belmont, CA:

Thomson Higher Education.

• Chen, & Silverthorne. (2005). Leadership effectiveness, leadership style and employee readiness. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 26(4), 280-288.

• Clark. (2015). Leadership Style. Retrieved from The Performance Juxtaposition:

http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/leader/leadstl.html

• Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th edition). New York: Routledge.

• Dubrin. (2001). Leadership: Research findings, practice, skills, 3rd ed. Boston:

Houghton Mifflin.

• Dulewicz, & Higgs. (2003). Leadership at the top: The need for emotional intelligence in organizations. International Journal of Organizational Analysis,Vol 11, No 3, 193-210.

(3)

Muhamad Zhafran Dana Caesario

• Fareed. (2015). Pros And Cons Of Laissez-faire Leadership. Retrieved from Pros

And Cons Of Laissez-faire Leadership:

http://fareedsiddiqui.com/index.php/tag/what-is-laissez-faire-leadership-and- what-are-its-pros-and-cons/

• Fayyaz, H., Naheed, R., & Hasan, A. (2014). Effect of Task Oriented and Relational Leadership Style on Employee Performance; Moderating Impact of Communicator Competence. Effect of Task Oriented and Relational Leadership Style on Employee Performance; Moderating Impact of Communicator Competence.

• Fry, L. (2003). Toward a theory of spiritual leadership. The leadership quarterly,Vol 14, No 6, P 693-727.

• Fry. (2003). Towards a Theory of Spiritual Leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 693-727.

• Goleman. (2002). Primal leadership: Realizing the power of emotional intelligence.

• Griffin, & Ebert. (2010). Business essentials (8th ed. ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ:

Prentice Hall.

• H, C. (2009). Flexibility for Whom? Working time Flexibility Practices of European Companies. Tilburg University.

• Hersey, P., & K.H., B. (1993). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utilizing Human Resources. (6th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall,.

• House. (1971). A path goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative science quarterly.

• Jonathan. (2015). Rumus - Rumus Populer Dalam SPSS 22 Untuk Riset Skripsi.

Yogyakarta, Indonesia: Andi Offset.

(4)

Muhamad Zhafran Dana Caesario

• Joseph. (2014). Advantages of an Autocratic Leadership Style. (Demand Media) Retrieved from Advantages of an Autocratic Leadership Style:

http://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-autocratic-leadership-style-2980.html

• Kavanaugh, & Ninemeier. (2001). Supervision in the Hospitality Industry. (3rd ed.). Michigan: The Educational Institute of the American Hotel & Lodging Association.

• Klein, M. (2014). 33 Ways to Define Leadership. Retrieved from Business News Daily: http://www.businessnewsdaily.com/3647-leadership-definition.html

• Kokemuller, N. (2013). Weaknesses of a Participative Style of Management.

Retrieved from Weaknesses of a Participative Style of Management:

http://smallbusiness.chron.com/weaknesses-participative-style-management- 77537.html

• Kruse, K. (2013). What Is Leadership? Forbes Magazine. . Retrieved from What

Is Leadership? Forbes Magazine. :

http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinkruse/2013/04/09/what-is-leadership/

• Lewin, K. L. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-301.

• Lewin. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created social climates. Journal of Social Psychology, 10, 271-301.

• Lussier, & Achua. (2001). Leadership theory, application and skill development.

South Western College.

• Maxwell, J. (2002). The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership Work . New York:

Thomas Nelson.

• McLaughlin, E. (2014). SearchCIO. Retrieved from SearchCIO:

http://searchcio.techtarget.com/definition/leadership-skills

(5)

Muhamad Zhafran Dana Caesario

• Miller, J., Walker, J. R., & K.E., D. (2002). Supervision in the Hospitality Industry.

(4th ed.). New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

• Mullins. (2004). Management and Organisational Behaviour. Pearson Higher Education FT Prentice Hall.

• Murpy, & Cleveland. (1995). Understanding performance appraisal: Social organizational, and goal-based perspectives. . Thousand Oaks.

• Murray, P. (2007). Uncovering Leadership Issues in Papua New Guinea. The 4th SMEs in a global economy conference.

• Newstorm, & Davis. (1993). Organization Behavior: Human Behavior at Work.

New York: McGraw-Hill.

• Northouse, P. (2004). Leadership Theory and Practice. Pastoral Psychology, Vol 56, No 4, P 403-411.

• Northouse. (2010). Leadership: Theory and practice (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

• Northouse, P. (2004). Leadership Theory and Practice. Pastoral Psychology, Vol 56, No 4, P 403-411.

• Oladipo K. S., J. O. (2013). Review of leadership theories and Organizational performances. International Business Management Journal, 7(1), 50-54.

• Oluwatoyin. (2003). Managing Behaviour and Performance in Organization.

Nigeria: Sege Prints.

• Omolayo. (2004). nfluence of job variables on workers’ commitment and satisfaction in four selected Nigerian manufacturing industries. Unpublished thesis, University of Ado-Ekiti. nfluence of job variables on workers’ commitment and satisfaction in four selected Nigerian manufacturing industries. Unpublished thesis, University of Ado-Ekiti.

(6)

Muhamad Zhafran Dana Caesario

• Podsakoff P. M., M. S. (1990). Transformational leader behaviors and their effects on followers trust in leader, satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors.

Leadership Quarterly, 107-142.

• Rasel. (2013). Advantages and Disadvantages of Democratic Leadership.

Retrieved from ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR:

http://bankofinfo.com/advantages-and-disadvantages-of-democratic-leadership/

• Root. (2014). About us: Small Business. Retrieved from Small Business Web site:

http://smallbusiness.chron.com

• Root. (2014). The Advantages of Participative Leadership. Retrieved from The

Advantages of Participative Leadership:

http://smallbusiness.chron.com/advantages-participative-leadership-17629.html

• Schermerhorn, O., & Hunt. (2008). Organizational Behavior (10thed.). USA: ohn Wiley & Sons, Inc.

• Schyns, B. &. (2007). In the Eyes of the Beholder: Personality and the Perception of Leadership. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol 37, No 10, P 2345-2363.

• Scotter, Motowidlo, & Cross. (2000). Effects of task performance and contextual performance on systemic rewards. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 526–535.

• Smith, & Peterson. (1988). Leadership, organization and culture. London: sage press.

• Spector. (2012). Industrial and organizational psychology: Research and practice (6th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

• Travis, B. (2007). A New Vision of Leadership. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

• Turner, & Muller. (2005). The project manager’s leadership style as a success factor on projects: A literature review. Project management journal, Vol 36, No 2, 49-61.

(7)

Muhamad Zhafran Dana Caesario

• Warrick, D. D. (1981). Leadership Styles and Their Consequences. University of Colorado.

• Williams. (2005). The school board president and superintendent: An examination of influence through the eyes of the decision makers. The politics of leadership:

Superintendents and school boards in changing time, 23-49.

• Yukl. (1999). n evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories. Leadership Quarterly, pp. 285-305.

• Yurchisin, & Park. (2010). Effects of Retail Store Image Attractiveness and Self- Evaluated Job Performance on Employee Retention. Journal of Business and Psychology, Vol 25, No 3, 441-450.

Referensi

Dokumen terkait

Abstract The research objectives are effect of transformational leadership style on employee performance through work motivation of employees of the Culture and Tourism Office of

F Test The F test aims to determine the effect of the independent variable Leadership Style X1, Job Satisfaction X2 on the dependent variable, namely Employee Performance Y the

Collaborative leadership style through work stress has an effect on improving employee performance, meaning that work stress can be an intermediary variable between collaborative

Organizational Climate Mediates the Effect of Leadership Style on Employee Performance The research results show that the p-value used to test the role of Organizational Climate in

Based on contradictory research findings and differences in research object, this study will examine effect of transformational leadership and job satisfaction on employee performance

The results of this research show that the autocratic leadership style and organizational change have a posittive and significant effect on employee performance during the pandemic at

“Effect of Transformational Leadership Style, Work Motivation and Work Environment on Employee Performance With Employee Commitment as Intervening Variable Study on Sub-District in

4, Number 1, February 2021 14 THE EFFECT OF STRATEGIC ECONIMIC MANAGEMENT AND LEADERSHIP STYLES ON JOB SATISFACTION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS ON EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE Survey in Teklom