SMITHSONIAN MISCELLANEOUS COLLECTIONS.
—302
•THE TONER LECTURES
INSTITUTED TO
ENCOURAGE THE
DISCOVERY OPNEW TRUTHS FOR THE ADVANCEMENT
OP MEDICINE.Lecture VI.
SUBCUTANEOUS SURGERY:
ITS
PRINCIPLES, AND
ITSRECENT EXTENSION
INPRACTICE.
BY
WILLIAM ADAMS,
M.D.,P.R.C.S., PRESIDENT OF THE MEDICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON.DELIVERED SEPTEMBER13,1876.
WASHINGTON:
BMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION,
APRIL,1S77.
ADVERTISEMENT.
The "Toner
Lectures" have been instituted atWashington,
D.C, by Joseph M.
Toner,M.D.,who
has placed incharge of aBoard
of Trustees, consisting of the Secretary of the Smitli- sonian Institution, the Surgeon-General of the United StatesArmy,
the Surgeon-General of the United StatesNavy, and
the President of theMedical Society of the District ofColum-
bia, a fund, "the interest ofwhich is to be appliedfor at least
two
annualmemoirs
or essay's relative tosome
brancli ofmedi- cal science, andcontainingsome new
truthfully establishedby
experiment or observation."As
these lectures areintended toincrease and diffuseknowl- edge, they have been accepted for publicationby
the Smith- sonian Institution in its "Miscellaneous Collections."The
FirstLecture
of this serieswas
deliveredMarch
28, 1873,by
Dr.J. J.Woodavard, "On
the Structure of Cancer- ousTumors
andtheMode
in whichadjacent parts are invaded."Published
by
the Smithsonian Institution,November,
1873.44 pp. 8vo.
The Second Lecture was
delivered April 22, 1874,hy
Dr.C. E. Brow.n-Sequard, on the
"Dual
Characterof the Brain."Published
by
the Smithsonian Institution, January, 1877. 25 pp. 8vo.The Third Lecture was
deliveredMay
14, 1874,by
Dr. J.M. Da
Costa,on
"Strain and Over-Action of the Heart."Published
by
the Institution, August, 1874. 32 pp. 8vo.(iii)
IV
ADVERTISEMENT.
The Fourth Lecture was
deliveredJanuary
20, 1875,by
Dr.Horatio
C.Wood,
on"A Study
of the Nature andMe-
chanism of Fever." Publishedby
the Institution, February, 1875. 48 pp. 8vo.The Fifth Lecture was
delivered February 17, 1876,by
Dr.William W. Keen,
"On
the Surgical Complications and Sequels of the Continued Fevers." Publishedby
the Institu- tion, April, 1877. 72 pp. 8vo.JOSEPH HENRY,
Secretary Smithsonian Institution.
Smithsonian
Institution,Washington,
April, 1877.LECTURE VI.
DeliveredSeptember13,1876.
ON SUBCUTANEOUS SURGERY
: ITS PRINCIPLES,AND
ITSRECENT EXTENSION
IN PRACTICE.ByWilliamAdams,M.D., F.R.C.S.
Gentlemen
: Beforecommencing
the subject-matter of the present address, I feel it to bemy
first duty,and
one whichI have the greatest pleasure in performing, to
acknowledge
the honorconferredupon me by
an invitationtodeliverin this cityanaddress under the auspices of the trustees of theToner
fund; anendowment
which one ofyour most
distinguished physicians, Dr. Toner,was prompted by
a noble spirit tomake
for the benefit of mankind,by
encouraging eflbrts for theadvancement
of medical science.The
only hesitationwhich I felt in accepting an invitation, at once so honorableand
gratifying to myself,was
that Imight
not be able worthily to fulfil its requirements, and Icould hardlyhopetooffer
you
an addresssufl3cientlyattractive inthe novelty of its subject-matter.However,
trusting to the indulgence ofmy
audience, I will proceed to offersome
observationson
a subject which has formany
years engagedmy
attention, viz., the principlesand
recent extension in practice of subcutaneous surgery.There are a considerable
number
of surgical operations whichowe
their immunit}'- from inflammation, and absolute freedom from danger, to the factof their being performed in such amanner
as effectually to exclude the admission of air.These
operations are performedby
puncture instead of ex- ternalincision, averyuarrow-bladed knife being used,formost
^ (1)
^
THE TONER
LECTURES.purposes only an eighth of an inch in width.
The
puncturemust
always bemade
atalittle distance from the structure to be divided, so that a subcutaneous track exists between the cutaneous punctureand
the structure divided. These opera- tions are allgovernedin theirmode
ofperformance,the nature of the reparative process,and their terminations, b}-thesame
general law,andmay
therefore be grouped togetherand spoken of as subcutaneoussurgery.It
must
not, however, beassumed
that the exclusion of air offers an absoluteimmunity
from inflammation under all circumstances, and independently of theamount
ofdamage
done to the deeply seated structures, or of the constitutional condition of the patient.When
thesubcutaneousmethod
isapplied to theperformance of operations of unusual magnitude, such as division of the neck of the thigh-bone, division of the shaft of the femur or humerus, itwould
be unreasonableto expect the uniformityin favorable results which follow the subcutaneous division of tendons, because the conditionsupon
which the safet}'' of the subcutaneousmethod
depends, cannot all be with certainty fulfilled.In these large operations the air
may
beeffectuallyexcluded, but the injurytothe deeplyseated structuresmay
beexcessive, either from cutting or laceratinghy
thesaw
; deep-seated suppuration,therefore, will occasional!}' followsuch operations, although the rarity of such a result has astonished every surgeonwho
has practised such operations.As we
recognize the importance of theamount
of injur}' inflicted on thedee[)ly seated structures, in addition to the exclusion of air, it willbe obvious thatmuch
willdependupon
theskill of the operator;
andthe conditions which
must
coexist to render tlie subcuta- neous operationsexempt
from inflammationmay
be stated to be as follows:—
1.
That
the knife and otherinstrumentsused be ofsmallsize.ON SUBCUTANEOUS
SURGERY. 32.
That
the operationmust
beperformed quicklyand ncatl}',with decision rather than force,
and
withas little disturbance to thesoftparts aspossible.3.
That
thewound must
be immediatel}' closed,and
a compress andbandage
applied so as to support the partand
preventtheeffusion of blood underthe skin.4.
That
perfect quiescence to the i:)artbe insured for three or four days, andthe dressing remain undisturbed."When
all these conditions are strictlyobserved, it matters little whether large muscles, tendons, ligaments, or bones are divided, or even whether the large joints of thebody
are opened; there is no better establishedfact in surgical practice than that subcutaneouswounds
seldom inflame or suppuratewhen
the above-named conditions are fulfilled.The
influence of the exposure to airupon
the reparative process inwounds
seems firstto have attracted the attention of that distinguished surgeon and physiologist,John
Hunter, who, observingthe vast difference as to the healing process inwounds
exposed to the air andwounds
not exposed totlie air,was
so deeply impressed with the importance ofthe subject, as tomake
itthe basis ofhis classificationofwounds
andinjuries.John
Hunter, in his " Treatise on the Blood, Inflammation,and Gunshot Wounds,"
published in the year 1794, points out as a great fundamental principle, in reference to the healingofwounds,
thedifierence betweentwo
formsofinjuries, of which one is subcutaneousand
the other open to the air.He
says : "The
injuries done to sound parts I shall divide intotwo
sorts, according to theeffects ofthe accident.""
The
first kind consist of those in which the injured partsdo
notcommunicate
externally, as concussions of the wholebody
or of particular parts, strains, bruises,and
simple fractures, either of bone or tendon, which form a large division."
The
second consists of thosewhich
have an external4
THE TONER
LECTURES.communication; comprehending wounds
of all kinds,and compound
fractures."Bruises which have destroyed the lifeof the part
may
be considered as a third kind; partaking,at thebeginning, of the natureof the first, but finally terminatinglike the second."
The
injuries of thefirst division, inVv-hich the partsdo
notcommunicate
externally, seldom inflame; while those of the secondcommonly
both inflame and suppurate."'Here
there is a law of the reparative process in thesetwo
great classesof injuries."In
these sentences," observes SirJames
Paget, "Hunter
hasembodied
the principleon
whichis founded the whole practice of s^ibcutaneous surgery; a principle,of which, indeed,it seems hardlypossible toexagge- rate the importance."^ It is a remarkable fact that
Hunter
never applied this law to surgical practice, at least, so far aswe
are aware; but it is interesting toknow
that, in the experiments he performed on animals for the purpose of Investigating the reparative process intendons^(some
of the preparations from which are pi'eserved inthemuseum
of theRoyal
College of Surgeons),Hunter
divided the tendons subcutaneously insome
instances, andby open-wound
in others, for the sake ofcomparing
the diflTerences in the reparative process. In"The
LifeofJohn
Hunter,"by Drewry
Ottlej^, it is stated that in the year 1767,
Hunter
ruptured his Achilles tendon, whilst dancing,and
thisaccident ledhim
toexamine
into the processby which
divided tendons are reunited. "He
divided thesame
tendon in several dogs,by
introducing a couching-needle underthe skin atsome
distance from it, and killed thedogs
at different periods to see the progress of the union,whichwas
found to be similar to that' See"Hunter'sWorks," byJ. F.Palmer,vol.iii. p. 240.
2 "Lectures on Surgical Pathology,"London,1853.
3 The
Works
of Hunter,withnotes, byJ.F. Palmer,page 34; Lon- don, 1837,ON SUBCUTANEOUS
SURGERY; O of fractured boueswhere
the skin is notwounded." The
illustrations given
by
Hunter, in proof of the general law adverted to,are sufficiently conclusive.No
surgeon, he tells us, could have failed to observe the difference between a simple and acompound
fracture, in reference to the progressand
result of the case.How
rarely is a simple fracturefollowed
by
suppurative inflammation,and how
seldom does acompound
fracture unite without suppuration, evenwhen
the
wound
is smalland
apparentlyinsignificant! Here, then,we
havetwo
similar accidents produced in thesame
way,by
thesame amount
of mechanical violence; or, itmay
be that the simple fracture is occasionedby
a greateramount
of mechanical violence than thecompound
fracture.The
only difference is, that an externalwound
exists in the one caseand
not in the other; yet,
how
different the results!And who
can supposethat thedifferencedependsupon
the additional injury tothe soft parts, skin,and
cellular tissue—
which alonedistinguishes the
compound
from the simple fracture?The
exceptional cases in which suppuration occurs after simple fracture or dislocation are undoubtedly^ very rare. I have only seen three cases of this kind, and in each of
them
the injuries were associated with an unusualamount
of deep bruising, and this, I believe, sufficiently explains the occur- rence of suppurative inflammation, the liability towhichHun-
terdescribed intheclass of bruises, orcontused wounds.
Two
of these cases were the result of railway accidents;
one a fracture of the humerus, which
seemed
to progress favorably, but suppuration at the seat of fracture occurred,and
the individual died ofpyaemiaon the tenthday
; several ribs werealso fractured,and
hehad
sustained otherinjuries.The
other casewas
oneof dislocation of the hip-joint, whichwe
were not able to reduce; otherinjuries existed, andIhad
previouslyamputated
the opposite leg.The
efforts atreduc- tion could not be continued in consequence of the sinking condition of the patient, who, however, survived eight days,6
THE TONER
LECTURES.and
then itwas
found that suppuration in the hip-joint had taken place.The
third casewas
alsoone of fracturedhume-
rus in an old gentleman over seventj' years of age, atall andheavy man,
a colonel in the Indian army,who
felldown
a stone staircase.No
other important injuries were sustained, butthe bruisingwas
extensive, and a largeamount
of extra vasated bloodexistedattheseatoffracture,where suppurationoccurred,and
he died from exhaustion; his general condition precluded amputation.The
occurrence of deep bruisingby
which the vitality of the tissue is seriously impaired, togetherwiththe presenceof' extravasated blood, which, under such circumstances, will sometimes breakdown,
is, I believe, a correctand
sufficient explanation of the occurrence of suppuration in these subcu- taneous injuries.The
suppuration in these cases is clearly independent of the admission of air, and therefore does not admit of explanationby
the germ-theory so strongly advo- catedby
Professor Lister of Edinburgh. Professor Lister, indeed, thinks thatwe
should effectually guard against the occasional suppuration which isknown
to occur after subcu- taneous operations,by
adopting the antiseptic method,and
operating underthe carbolic or antiseptic spray.My
beliefis,however, that the antiseptic principle sui)eradded to the sub- cutaneous
would
affordno
additional protection, and tome
itseems like gilding pure gold.
Although
I admit the great value of Prof. Lister's antiseptic method, especiallywhen
carried out
by
himselfwithall the attentionto the minutest details which he bestows, and haveno
hesitation in stating thatwhen
in Edinburgh, a year ago, I witnessed a largernumber
ofgood
results after capital operations, such asampu-
tations, excisions, ligature of arteries, etc., than I have ever seen before under
any
other treatment, I cannot but think that the only cases at all connected with the class of opera- tionswe
arenow
considering, to which itwould
be applicable,ON SUBCUTANEOUS
SURGERY. 7 are those of an imperfectlysubcutaneous character,such as a case of osteotomy inwhich
the gimlet and chiselare used,and
repeatedly introduced,and
reintroduced during a prolonged operation. In this class, additional protectionwould
probably be affordedby
the addition of theantiseptic method.Within
the last fewmonths
I have been present attwo
operations for subcutaneous osteotomy, inLondon,
oneby
Mr. Willett, at St. Bartholomew's Hospital, in which he divided the neckof the femurupon
themethod recommended by
myself;and
oneby Mr.
Croft, at St.Thomas's
Hospital,in wliich he divided the shaftof thefemur
just below the small trochanter, accordingto Dr. Gant'smethod
; andthe antisepticmethod was
carefullyemployed
in both these operations,yet deep suppurationoccurred inbothinstances. I havenow
given a few general illustrations of the subcutaneous lawof the i-e- parative process,and
have alluded to the exceptional cases inwhich
suppuration occurs,without an}'-fear that the truth of the observationsmade by
Hunter,that subcutaneouswounds
seldom inflame, andthatwounds exposed
to the aircommonly
both inflameand
suppurate, will be doubtedby any
scientific surgeon.We now
approach anotherand
extremely interesting part of these inquiries in a scientific point of view,viz., the phy- siologyand
pathology of the subject in reference firstto themodus
ojyerandi of atmospheric air in the production of inflammation; and second, the differences observed on micro- scopical examination, in themode
ofdevelopment
of the material effused duringthe reparative process in subcutaneous andopen
wounds, corresponding to the differences in the clinical history of thesetwo
classes of injuries.The
first question is then,how
docs the air act in excitinginflamma- tion? First, is itmerely thepresence of the air acting,quoad
air^
by
virtue ofits chemical constitution—
the action of its8
THE TONER
LECTURES.oxygen upon
the bloodand
cut surfaces producing chemical changes? Or, second,does the injurious actionof the air de-pend upon
the presence of minute organisms floating init, andwhen
brought into contact with cut sui'faces, acting like the yeast-plant in the ordinary process of fermentation,and
pro- ducingirritationand
decomposition of theorganic elements of the tissues with which they are brought in contact—
in shortthe so-called germ-theorj^ of putrefaction, fermentation,
and
disease? Third, is themere
contact of the air with divided surfaces, but without externalwound,
sufficient to produce inflammation? Or,fourth, is it necessary that the continued exposure to the air which externalwounds
generally involve, should exist as anessential condition to the production of in-flammation?
It
would
be impossible to enter at length intoall thedetails necessary to the solution of these questions, if indeed they are j^et capable of solution ; but in reference to the first—
I
may
state in favor of the direct action of the 0x3'genof the air,and
on the authority of the late Dr.Snow,
so wellknown
for his early labors on the production of anaesthesia and the action
and
administration of chloroform and other substances, that, in a course of experiments performedby Jean
Ingen Housz,aDutch
physician,in thelatterpart of thelastcentury,it has been shown,that wlien a blistered surface is exposed to nitrogen gas, the pain is diminislied,
when
exposed to the atmosphere it is increased,and when
exposed tooxygen
gasit is still further increased.
Being
desirous of verifying these experiments, I agreed with Dr.Snow
to repeat them, and, on the 27thMay,
1857, applied a blister, the size of a half-crown,on
theouter sideofmy
left arm, and on the 28th, the experiments were conductedby
Dr.Snow,
and the sub- joined description written outby him
frommy
account of the effectsproducedby
the gases and vapors employed.May
28, 1857: the cuticlewas
stripped off from the small blister whichhad
been raised in the arm, and theraw
andON SUBCUTANEOUS
SURGERY. 9 inflamed surfacewas
consequentlyexposedto the air; a sensa- tion of smarting, heat,and
prickingwas
felt.The
blistered partwas
covered with a small glassjar,mto
which nitrogen gaswas
introduced from another jarcommunicating
with itby means
of a stopcock, and anelastic tube. Intwo
or three minutes the smarting and pricking were removed, a sensation of comfortablewarmth was
experiencedwhen
the attentionwas
directed to it,but at other times, therewas
hardlyany
sensation.The
nitrogenwas
applied fortwelve minutes,and
the relief continuedto the end of the application.The
nitro- gen gaswas
then displacedby oxygen
from another jar.There
was
a little return of pricking at themoment when
the gas was introduced.
The oxygen was
continued for ten minutes,during which timethe prickingand warmth
remained.The
glass being removed, a current ofoxygen was
appliedfrom
the end of atubeand
thepartsmarted a littlemore
after- this.The oxygen was
applied againin the jar; it occasioned a sensation of heat to discomfortwithout smartingor pricking.After the blister had been exposed for a short time tothe
common
air,hydrogen
gaswas
applied in a jar,in thesame manner
as the other gases; in the trial, smarting and pricking diminished.After the blistered surface
had
been again exposed to the air for a short time, carbonic acid gaswas
applied. It caused decided increase ofsmarting,whichchanged
to a senseofheat.In three minutes the smarting
was
quite gone, and the heathad
subsided to a gentlewarmth. The
above experiments confirm the observations ofIngen Housz. The}^show
thatnitro- gen, hydrogen, and carbonic acid gases relieve and prevent the smarting which atmospheric air causes on an abraded surface, the last of these gases, however, having an iri'itant effect in the first instance, before its soothing or narcotic influence is develoiped.Pure oxygen
gas causedmore
pain than atmospheric air.Although
these experimentswere per-10
THE TONER
LECTURES.formed
ueaily twenty years ago, I havea verylively recollec- tion of the painful,smarting, pricking,and
sensation of heat occasionedby
the oxj'gen gas, and the soothing eflect of the carbonic acidgas. Tlie vaporof amyline andalso chloroform vaporwas
afterwards applied. Tiiey both irritatedand
caused a burning and smarting sensation; the chloroformmore
so than the amyline.When
the surface of the sorewas
touched with the finger after the application of chloroform, distinct sensationwas
found to be present.The
smarting quickly subsided duringthe application of carbonic acid gas. I have always reliedupon
the explanationofoxygen
and moisture as suflflcient to account for the decomposition of animaland
vegetable substances exposed to their influence,and
tlierefore have always taken care to avoid asmuch
as possible the ex- posure ofwounds
toairand
water, andwhen
cut surfaces are necessarily exposed to their influence forsome
time, as in surgical operations, I alwa^'s, before closing thewound, wash
the surfacewithsome
antiseptic lotion—
withcarbolic acid,onepart in forty; or chloride of zinc lotion, one part in forty
—
which will prevent decomposition of fluids remaining in the
wound,
theexuded
serum, and thewater; and*this practice I shall always continue to adopt, whether the explanation be purely chemical orupon
the gei'm theory, as it undoubtedly promotes a rapidandhealthy reparative process.With
respect to the second question, as to M^hether the action of theairinproducing inflammationistobeexplainedby
the germ-theory, itis certain thatamongst
our best observersand
scientific investigators,much
difference of opinion still exists, and it will be long before the germ-theoryof putrefac- tive fermentation inwounds
will receive the general support of the profession. Nevertheless, the valuable andnumerous
experiments performedby
Pasteurand
Professor Listeron
the action of filteredand
unfiltered atmospheric airwhen
'
ON SUBCUTANEOUS
SURGERY. 11 brought into contact with organic fluids of vegetableand
animal origin, have carried the conviction of the truth of the germ-theory tomany minds
; and the practical application ofit to surgical practice is undoubtedly spreading in the profes- sion, through the untiring zeal
and
enthusiasm with which Professor Lister endeavors to instruct the profession in all the detailsand
minutiaewhich he has found to be necessary tothe successful applicationof his method, both in operatingand
in thedressing ofwounds.Then
with regard to the third question, which relates to the conditions necessary to the irritating influence of the air, itmust
be admitted that themere
contact of the air with divided surfaces, but without an externalwound,
is not sufficient to produce inflammation, or, at least, that it seldom does so.Of
thiswe
see evidence inordinary cases ofemphy- sema
connected with fractured ribs, in which, as a rule,no
Inflammationof thecellular tissue follows,though
theemphy- sema may
be veryextensive.Abundant
evidence of thesame
factwas
suppliedby
Mal- gaigne, in the important discussion on the "SubcutaneousMethod,"
asM.
Guerin called it, which took place in the"
Acad^mie
de Medecine" of Paris in the year 1857.M.
Malgaigne brought forwardaseries ofexperimentson animals, first rendered
emphysematous,
and then su.bjected to various subcutaneous operations, so that the airwas
in contact with the cut surfaces, fractured bones etc.;no
inflammation fol-lowed.
The
explanation which the advocates of the germ-theorywould
probably give,would
be that inemphysema,
the ex- travasated air in contact with fractured bone or cut surfaces has undergone a process of filtration, and that the filtered air deprived ofitsgerms
is harmless.M.
Malgaignecame
forward as theopponent oftheextended12
THE TONER
LECTURES.application of the subcutaneous
method
advocatedby M.
Gu4- rin/and
furnished uswitha historicalresume
of the opinions of the older surgeonswho
have advocated, aswell as of thosewho
have denied, the injurious influence of the airupon
the healing of wounds. In thisresume
are included themost
interesting points in the historj^ of subcutaneous operations;
but time will not permit
me
to enterupon
this part of our subject.With
respect to the fourth query, as to the necessity of prolonged exposure to the air, as essential to the production of inflammation, there can beno
doubt that the prolonged exposure of awound
to the air is invariably followedby
inflammation and generallyby
suppuration, and there can be as little doubt that this was the condition to whichHunter
especially referred; whilst, on the other hand, open
wounds
which are quickly closedproceed asfavorablyinthe reparative process ina large majority of cases, as subcutaneouswounds.
Prolonged exposure to aircannot, however, be regarded asan essentialcondition to theproductionofinflammationinwounds.
The
next subject to which Iwould
direct attention is the pathology, or Imight
call it the physiological pathology of the reparative processin relation to the subcutaneous method.M.
Guerin^was
undoubtedl}-^ the first to call attention to the perfectionof the reparative processinsubcutaneous operations,and what
he called " the immediate organization," i. e., the exudation and development of a reparative material indepen- dently of inflammatory products, which is utilized in the re- generation oftissue, such as tendon, nerve, bone, and cellular tissue, inthemost
perfectmanner.We
see the reparative process in wounds, under various conditions, proceeding with or without inflammation.The
» Bulletin de rAcad6mie Imp6riale de M6decine,vol. xxii. pp.427- 724,1857.
" Essaissur lametliode sous-cutanie; Paris, 1841.
ON
SUBCUTANEOUS
SURGERY. 13 relation of the reparative process tothat of inflammation has beenmost
carefullystudiedby
SirJames
Paget,whose
investi- gations, both experimental andclinical, concerning the general pathology of the reparative process in all its phases, are wellknown.
Itmay,
at the pi-esent time, be regarded as an established doctrine, deduced directlyfrom
pathological and clinical observation, that the reparative processin wounds,the result either of accident or surgical operations, ismore
perfect in proportion to the absence of inflammation,and
that the danger arising fromwounds
verymuch
dependsupon
the extentof the inflammatorycomplications.Microscopical examination of the material effused during the reparative process, in the
two
great classes ofwounds
—
viz., the
open and
the subcutaneous—
has confirmed the accu- racy of thelaw,which
expresses thedifference in themode
of development—
perhaps indicating differences in the nature of the material effused for the purpose of repair in thesetwo
classes of wounds.The
observation of this factis due to SirJames
Paget, wlio states "thatthematerials produced forthe repair of openwounds
are not usually the same, or, at least,do not develop themselves in the
same manner
as those for the repair of closed or subcutaneous ones.'"The
general truth appears to be that the material of repair, for subcuta- neouswounds
of the soft parts, is developed through the formation of nucleated blastema; while that for repairby
primar}^ adhesionand by
granulation, is develojied through nucleatedcells.I need only observethat the processofdevelopment through large nucleated cells, which gradually elongate and form deli- cate filaments,is the process
by
which cellular adhesions are formedfrom
inflammatorylymph
as in inflammationof serousmembranes
etc., andby
which granulationand
cicatrization' Lectures on SurgicalPathology, vol. i. p. 172.
14
THE TONER
LECTURES.takeplace inopen wounds.
When
inflammation exists,tliere- fore,tliismode
of development is alwaysfound,andit appears to be a lessperfect process of healing than that accomplished through nucleated blaslema, a material which SirJames
Paget proposed todistinguish by tiiename
of 7-eparative lymph. In this material small oval and elongated nucleiareformed, which are easily rendered distinctby
acetic acid, but thelarge nucle- ated cellsdo
not appear.The
ultimate disposition of these nuclei is uncertain; SirJames
Paget thinks they shriveland
disappear; but Henle describesthem
as developing into fibres,and with thisview I
am
disposed to agree, frommy own
obser- vation innumerous
experimentswhich
I have performedon
rabbits.'
The
nucleatedblastema is thematerial from M'hichbonds
of connection are formed after subcutaneous operations; divided tendonsand
muscles are thus connected.The
process of development through nucleated hlaHtema is found proceeding in all subcutaneous operations, in proportion to the absence of inflammation.When
inflammation takes place in subcu- taneous o[)erations, thetwo
processesmay
coexist, and their products mingle, but SirJames
Paget observes"they bearan inverseproportion to each other,and
themore
manifest the signs of inflammation, the less the quantity of the proper repai-ative materialand
the slower in the end the process of repair."Having
thusshown
that the reparative j^rocess after subcu- taneous operations, proceedsmore
perfectly than that after openwounds,
in the formation of a connectingbond
of union between tlie divided structure, and tothe perfect regeneration ofstructurewhere
this is possible,asintendons, bones, nerves,and
cellular tissue,we
can understand the importanee attached' See Trans. Path. Soc,vol. vi., for accountof "a seriesof experi, ments illustratingthereparative process inthe tendonsofrabbits aftew divisioaby subcutaneousand openwounds, read
May
1,1855; andalso awork"On
the licparativePrcjcessinHuman
Tendons,"byW.
Adams,p.87. J. Churchill, Loudon, 18G0.
ON SUBCUTANEOUS
SURGERY. 15bj M,
Guerin towhat
lie describes as the "immediateorgani- zation."The
subcutaneous law in its full breadthand
practical significancewas more
fully recognizedby M.
Guerni thanby any
other authority, and itis undoubtedlj^tohim
thatwe owe
the first attempt to bring together in one grouj^ the facts observed in subcutaneous injuries
and
subcutaneous opera- tions, andgeneralizing fromthefacts presented, toshow
that, fortheimmunity from
inflammation which they enjoy,and
the perfection of the reparative process, suchwounds
especiallj'^depend
upon
thesame
general law.Although
I refuse to admitM.
Guerin's claim to originality in thediscorvery of the subcutaneous law,which is purely Hunterian,there can beno doubt
thatforitsdevelopment and surgical applicationwe
are principally indebted to the labors ofM.
Guerin.If time permitted, it
would
be interesting here to pass in review, perhaps in chronological order, the surgical operations performedon
the subcutaneous principle, but they are toonumerous
to admitof this,and
I will, therefore, merel}'^ refer to themore
important and familiar examples, such as subcu- taneous tenotomy,the subcutaneousoperationsforthe removal of loose cartilagesfrom
the knee-joint; a largenumber
of ope- rationsin ophthalmic surgery; the subcutaneous operation for theradical cureof hernia,aswell as thosefor ununitedfracture, varicoseveins, navi, and also forthe obliteration of depressed cicatrices; thesubcutaneousmethod
of opening abscessesand
cystic tumors; the subcutaneousdivisionofstricture; andalso several operations of amore
or less perfectly subcutaneous character,which have been performedin casesof anchylosis of the hip,knee,andelbow-joints,in severerachiticdistortion of thetibia, in severeknock-knee,andsome
otheranalogousaffec- tions.The
last mentioned operations are collectivelyspoken of as subcutaneous osteotomy,and
with very few exceptions Shcyhave proved tobe as safe as subcutaneous tenotomy.