Magnetic Properties And Magnetocaloric Effect In Layered NdMn
1.9Ti
0.1Si
2M.F. Md Din1,4*, J.L. Wang1,2, S.J. Kennedy2, S.J Campbell3 and S.X. Dou1
1Institute of Superconducting & Electronic Material, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia
2Bragg Institute, ANSTO, Lucas Heights, NSW 2234, Australia
3School of Physical, Environmental and Mathematical Sciences, UNSW, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
4Department Electric & Electronic Engineering, National Defence University of Malaysia, 57000 Kuala Lumpur,Malaysia
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T AIJ use only:
Received date Revised date Accepted date Keywords:
Neutron diffraction X-ray diffraction Magnetocaloric effect First order magnetic transition Small hysteresis issue
The structural and magnetic properties of the compounds NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 have been studied by high intensity X-ray and high resolution neutron powder diffraction, specific heat, dc magnetization, and differential scanning calorimetry measurements over the temperature range 3-450 K. The Curie temperature and Néel temperature of layered NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 are been indicate at TC ~ 22 K and TN ~ 374 K respectively.
The first order magnetic transition from antiferromagnetic [AFil-type] to ferromagnetic [F(Nd)+Fmc]around TC is found in layered NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 associated withlargemagnetocaloric effect. This behavior has been confirmed as contribution of the magnetostructural coupling by using neutron and X-ray powder diffraction.
The magnetic entropy change –ΔSM ~ 15.3Jkg/K and adiabatic temperature change ΔTad ~ 4.7 K have been determined using magnetization and specific heat measurement under 0-5 T field applied.This compound belongs with the almost no thermal and magnetic hysteresis characteristic providing potential material in low temperature region for magnetic refrigerator material application.
© 2010 Atom Indonesia. All rights reserved
INTRODUCTION
The magnetocaloric effect (MCE) topic study has become an interesting area of research in the field of magnetic materials, with increasing prospects as the basis of magnetic cooling to replace conventional refrigeration systems over appropriate temperature regions [1-3]. Recently, magnetic materials with large MCE have been extensively studied experimentally and theoretically in order to produce very favourable material for real application[4-6]. The first order magnetic phase transition material show the promising candidate however normally is accompanied by large thermal and field hysteresis in the temperature and magnetic field dependent magnetization. This behavior limits their usage in practical applications. The research objective in probing suitable new materials is to find a large MCE that is free from any hysteresis. Such compounds need further investigation, and it is really important to understand their basic properties which contribute to the large MCE.
The ternary intermetallic compounds of the
Corresponding author.
E-mail address:[email protected]
RT2X2 (R = rare earth, T = transition metal, X = Si or Ge) family have attracted considerable attention due to their rich variety of interesting phenomena, including superconductivity, magnetism, mixed valence, heavy fermions, and Kondo behavior [7, 8].
The RT2X2 compound form in the ThCr2Si2 structure (space group I4/mmm), and the naturally layered nature of this crystal structure leadsto an extreme sensitivity of the magnetic order to the interatomic distances.
Here, we present a detailed investigation of the influence of replacing Mn atoms by Ti atoms on the magnetic structure and magnetic phase transition in NdMn2-xTixSi2 compounds (NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2). The main interest is to explore the effects of replacing Mn atoms of atomic radius r(Mn) = 1.35 Å and electronic configuration Mn (3d54s2) with larger Ti atoms of atomic radius r(Ti) = 1.45 Å and electron configuration Ti (3d24s2). In the case of NdMn2- xCoxSi2 [9] for example, replacement of Mn by the smaller Co atoms, r(Co) = 1.25 Å of electronic configuration Co (3d74s2), leads to a decrease in magnetic entropy change from ~ 14.4 J kg-1 K-1 with x=0.2 to 12.4 J kg-1 K-1 with x=0.4 (ΔB = 0- 5 T) but the Curie temperature TC ~ 45 K does not change
with (x=0.2, 0.4, 0.8 and 1). Inthis study, we will explore the effects of Ti substitution for Mn in NdMn2Si2 compound on the structural and magnetic properties which are expected to increase the distance between magnetic atoms, thus modifying the magnetic states of both the Nd and the Mnsublattices.
EXPERIMENTAL METHOD
The layered NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2were prepared by arc melting and then annealed at 900°C for one week in an evacuated quartz tube to improve crystallization of the sample [10], and then quenched into water. The crystal structureof the samples were checked by room temperature powder X-ray diffraction (XRD) measurements using CuΚα1
radiation with the diffraction patterns refined using the Fullprof software package [11]. The magnetic behavior and transitions were investigated by superconducting quantum interference device (10–
300 K) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (300–450 K) measurements. The crystallographic and magnetic structural behaviors of the layeredNdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2samples were investigated over the temperature range 3-450 K by powder neutron diffraction experiments using the high resolution powder diffractometer Echidna (wavelength = 1.622(1) Å) at the Open Pool Australian Light Water Reactor (OPAL), Lucas Heights, Australia and high intensity powder diffractometer(wavelength = 0.688(1) Å) at Australian Synchrotron.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
The room temperature X-ray diffraction (XRD) data in figure 1 shown that layered NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 crystallize in the ThCr2Si2 type structure with space group I4/mmm[12]. The measured data from the diffraction patterns were analysed using the Rietveld refinement technique [11], indicating substitution of Ti for Mn does not change the crystal structure but leads to an expansion of the unit cell compared with pure NdMn2Si2 [22, 28]. The lattice constants a = 4.0088 (5) Å and c = 10.557 (5) Å, and correspondingly the unit cell volumes V = 169.656 (5) Å, were found to increase with the Ti content consistent with the larger atomic radius of Ti compared to Mn.
Fig. 1. X-ray diffraction of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 compoundat roomtemperature respectively.
The temperature dependence of the magnetization of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 measured in a magnetic field of B = 0.01 T over the temperature range ~ 10-300 K is shown in figure 2 together with the differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) curves over the temperature range ~ 300-450 K. The values of the Néel temperature TN ~ 374 K and the Curie temperature TC ~ 22 K, forthe compound as defined by 1/M versus temperature and the maxima of the dM/dTversus temperaturegraphs respectively (inset figure 2). For the DSC measurements, the phase transition temperatures were determined by the maxima of the DSC signals. Comparison of results obtained under otherwise identical conditions for cooling and warming revealed no thermal hysteresis.
Fig. 2. Temperature dependence of magnetization of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 as measured in a field of 0.01 T (left axis; red symbols for zero field cooling, ZFC, and blue symbol for field cooling, FC); and differential scanning calorimetry measurements for the temperature range 300-450 K (right axis;
solid green symbols). The value of TC is defined from dM/dT (inset).
On the other hand,substitution Ti concentration is also expected to weaken the exchange interactions of Mn-Mn between layers and the Mn-Nd due to the magnetic dilution effect.
Moreover, the change in electronic environment on replacing Mn (3d54s2) by Ti (3d24s2) is also expected to influence the magnetic structures and states of the NdMn2-xTixSi2 compounds as confirmed from other study[13]. This is supported by Density Functional Theory calculations for RMn2Ge2 (R = Y or Ca) compounds [14] which indicate that to a large extent, the magnetic moment is determined mainly by the interatomic Mn-Mn distances, while the interstitial electron density contributes to the change in magnetic structures as been confirmed by neutron diffraction analysis[13].
Basically, giant MCE values and magnetic entropy changes are usually obtained with a first order magnetic transition due to a large rate of change of magnetisation compared with materials that exhibit a second order transition. The magnetization curves for NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 for fields in the range B = 0 - 5 T around their ferromagnetic ordering temperatures for increase and decrease field found almost nomagnetic hysteresis and very small hysteresis loss around 0.8 J kg-1 as defined from other reference[13] indicating the favourable this material for real application. Furthermore, the Arrott plots are found to exhibit in particular the S- shaped nature of the Arrott plot near TC denotes a negative order of the sign of the coefficient c2(T) in the Landau expansion of the magnetic free energy [15], thereby denoting a first order magnetic transition.
Fig. 3. Magnetic entropy change values of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 as measured in a field of 0-5 T (left axis; red symbols for decrease and black symbol for increase field); and adiabatic temperature values of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 as measured in a field of 0,2 and 5 T (right axis; green symbols).
The magnetic entropy change, -∆SM, has been determined for the NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 compound from the magnetization curves for both increasing and de- creasing field values as functions of temperature and magnetic field (∆B = 0-5 T) as shown in figure 3.
The magnetic entropy change has been derived by applying the standard Maxwell relation [16]:
∆ SM(T , H)=
∫
0
H
(
∂ M∂ T)
HdH .(1)As shown by figure 3, the -∆SM values (from in- creasing and decreasing field) have a small different respectively. The changes in magnetic entropy for the NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 compound ferromagnetic order- ing temperatures are indicated in this paper as calcu- lated from decreasing applied fields in order to sat- isfy the suitability of different experimental and re- lated analytical approaches to establish the isother- mal entropy change [17].The entropy values at the respective Curie temperatures are: -∆SM~15.3 J kg-1 K-1 (∆B = 0-5 T); -∆SM~ 9.8 J kg-1 K-1 (∆B = 0-2 T) at TC = 22 K respectively. Never the less it is noted that the MCE values of -∆SM ~ 15.3 J kg-1 K-1 for NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 at 0-5 T applied field is comparable with MCE values for other materials[18, 19]in the temperature region below 100 K importantly very small field hysteresis losses.
The magnetic entropy change, -∆SM (T,B) has also been derived from heat calorimetric measure- ments of the field dependence of the heat capacity using the expression [2, 20, 21]:
- ∆ SM(T , B)=
∫
0
T
(
C(T , B)−TC(T ,0))
dT (2)whereC(T,B) and C(T,0) are the values of the heat capacity measured in field B and zero field, respec- tively. The corresponding adiabatic temperature change, ΔTad can be evaluated from -∆SM (T,B) and the zero field heat capacity data as:
∆ Tad(T , B)=
∫
0
B T
CB , P
(
∂ M∂ T)
BdB (3)
The ∆ Tad values calculated from the set of heat capacity measurement obtained for NdM- n1.9Ti0.1Si2 with B = 0, 2 and 5 T. The corresponding
∆ Tad values are shown in figure 3(left side). The peak value of the adiabatic temperature change is
∆ Tadmax ~ 4.7 K for ΔB = 0-5 T. As shown in fig- ure 3, the maximum magnetic entropy change for NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 as determined from magnetic mea- surements using the Maxwell relation -∆SMmax ~ 15.3 J kg-1 K-1 and 9.8 J kg-1 K-1 forΔB = 0-5 T and 0-2 T are comparable to the maximum entropy change -∆SMmax ~ 15 J kg-1 K-1 and 9.3 J kg-1 K-1 as deter- mined from the heat capacity measurement (ref[13]). The good agreement between the two sets of measurements confirms that the -∆SM values de- rived for NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2from the magnetization measurements represent the MCE behaviour within experimental errors [4, 5, 22].
As shown by the series of X-ray diffraction patterns in figure 4, the NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 compound is single phase and exhibits the body-centred tetrago- nal ThCr2Si2-type structure (space group I4/mmm) over the temperature range ~10-300 K. No change in crystal structure is observed over this temperature range although, as discussed below, the a lattice pa- rameter is found to increase slightly around TC ~ 22 K while the c lattice parameter decreases. The pat- terns have been analysed using FULLPROF[11]
software, and the changes in lattices parameters a and c around TC (as volume change ΔV/V ~ 0.4%) found to agree well with the neutron data as dis- cussed below. The X-ray diffraction analysis in fig- ure 4 (inset) together with coexistence of two phases (AFil and Fmc + F (Nd) phases) across magnetic transition as indicator for first order magnetic be- haviour.
Fig. 4. X-ray diffraction patterns of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 over the temperature range T = 10-300 K (λ= 0.8265(8) Å);
andcoexistence behaviour of two phases AFil and Fmc + F (Nd) phases as indicated by arrow (inset).
The NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 compound was investi- gated by neutron diffraction measurements over the
temperature range 3-450 K as the aims were to de- termine the magnetic structures and to explore struc- tural changes at the transition temperatures. The dif- fraction patterns ( = 1.622(1) Å) and Rietveld re- finements obtained for NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 at 450 K, 100 K and 3 K are shown in figure 5(a-c) respectively.
The selected temperatures typify the behaviour of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 in the three magnetic regions (para- magnetic-antiferromagnetic-ferromagnetic) as indi- cated from the magnetisation and DSC measure- ments of figure 1.Rietveld refinements of the neu- tron diffraction pattern at 450 K (figure 5(a)) con- firm that NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 has the ThCr2Si2 structure as expected. The absence of magnetic scattering above TN ~ 374 K in reflections such as (101), (111) and (112) is consistent with a paramagnetic (PM) state. (cf. e.g. the disordered magnetic states (PM) observed in similar materials[10, 23, 24].NdM- n1.9Ti0.1Si2 is found to exhibit the antiferromagnetic interlayer coupling structure (AFil) down to TC ~ 22 K (see e.g. the 100 K pattern of figure 5(b)) below TN ~ 374 K. The AFil structure − a collinear antifer- romagnetic structure between adjacent Mn planes in a + - + - sequence along the c-axis − is indicated by the magnetic scattering observed at the (111), (113) and (201) reflections; (extinction rules h + k = 2n and h + k + l = 2n+1) in agreement with Dinceret al[24]. Furthermore, the absence of magnetic scat- tering from the (111), (113) and (201) reflections at 3 K in figure 5(c), combined with the increase in in- tensity of the (112) and (101) peaks, indicate that the interlayer spin components of the Mn moments align parallel, thus leading to a canted ferromagnetic structure (Fmc) for the Mnsublattice. The presence of the purely magnetic peak (001) below TC indi- cates the existence of antiferromagnetic component of Mn moment in the ab-plane[25]. At lower tem- perature (e.g. 3 K; figure 5(c)), the increase in the intensities of the (112) (contributions from both Nd- and Mn-sublattices) and (101) (contribution only from Nd-sublattice[25]) reflections further indicates an additional contribution from Nd moments cou- pled parallel to the Mn moments along c-axis thereby leading to the formation of Fmc+F(Nd) magnetic structure as depicted in figures 6. This be- havior agrees well with the results of Welter et al[26] who demonstrated that in the RMn2Ge2 com- pounds with R= Pr and Nd rare earth moments fer- romagnetically coupled with the Mnsublattice at low temperatures. This behaviour, also applicable to NdMn2Si2[25] and NdMn2Si1.6Ge0.4[5] compounds, is due to the exchange interaction between the light rare earth elements and 3d transition metal as re-
ported by Coey[27]. Ordering of the Ndsublattice in NdMn2Si2 below TC has also been confirmed by- Chatterjiet al[28]from inelastic neutron scattering.
Fig. 5.(a), (b), and (c) Neutron diffraction patterns for NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 at 450 K, 100 K, and 3 K respectively. The star symbols represent the observed patterns and the red solid lines the refined patterns. The blue lines represent the differences between the observed and refined patterns; the vertical bars indicate the Bragg peak positions for the nuclear (top), Fmc magnetic (middle) and AFil magnetic (bottom) structure respectively.
The variation in the a and c lattice parameters with temperature are plotted in figure 6. Both the a and c values exhibit a monotonic decrease with tem- perature in the region of the antiferromagnetic tran- sition between TN = 374 K and TC = 22 K, while be- low TC = 22 K, the a lattice parameter expands slightly from 3.998 Å at 35 K to 4.001Å at 3 K whereas the c lattice parameter decreases from 10.536 Å at 35 K to 10.523Å at 3 K.The variation in lattice parameters a and c shown in figure 6 for the PM, AFil, and Fmc+F(Nd) states is comparable and agree well with X-ray diffraction pattern. The changes in lattice parameter at TC ~ 22 K when the magnetic state changes from AFil to Fmc+F(Nd) structure, indicates the presence of strong magne- tostructural coupling around TC. As discussed re- cently [8, 29], the strong magnetostructural coupling leads to a large structural entropy change around the magnetic phase transition, thereby contributing to the total entropy change around TC. The structure volume expand in contribute to MCE value under
ΔB = 0-5 T is found around -∆Sstructural~ 1.25 J kg-1 K-
1 as estimated using the method from K. A. Gschnei- dneret al.[29].
Fig. 6.The lattice parameters of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 as a function of temperature defined from neutron (open symbols) and X-ray (closed symbols) diffraction pattern; magnetic structure for Fmc + F(Nd)-type below and AFil-type above TC as shown together in figure including percentage of volume change.
CONCLUSION
A systematic investigation of the structural and magnetic characteristics of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2
compound has been carried out. Substitution of Ti for Mn leads to decreases in the Curie temperature and the Néel temperature from TC ~ 36 K and TN ~ 380 K for NdMn2Si2 to TC ~ 22 K and TN ~ 374 K. A metamagnetic transition from the antiferromagnetic (AFil-type) to the ferromagnetic state due to the application of magnetic field was observed above TC
for NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2compound. Substitution of Mn by Ti found slightly leads to a reduction of the magnetic entropy change. However, analysis of the magnetisation data demonstrates that the first order magnetic transition of NdMn2Si2around TC remains unchanged on replacement of Mn by Ti, and this substitution leads to significant eliminated in thermal and reduction magnetic hysteresis providing promising material for magnetic refrigerator.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This work was supported in part by a grant from the Australian Research Council Discovery Projects (DP0879070; DP110102386).M. F Md Din acknowledges the Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia for a PhD scholarship.
REFERENCES
1. J. Glanz, Making a Bigger Chill With Magnets, Science, 279 (1998) 2045.
2. K.A. Gschneidner Jr, V.K. Pecharsky, Thirty years of near room temperature magnetic cooling: Where we are today and future prospects, International Journal of Refrigeration, 31 (2008) 945-961.
3. A. Fujita, H. Yako, Stability of metallic, magnetic and electronic states in NaZn13- type La(FexSi1−x)13 magnetocaloric compounds, Scripta Materialia, 67 (2012) 578-583.
4. V.K. Pecharsky, J.K.A. Gschneidner, Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in Gd_{5}
(Si_{2}Ge_{2}), Physical Review Letters, 78 (1997) 4494-4497.
5. J.L. Wang, S.J. Campbell, J.M. Cadogan, A.J. Studer, R. Zeng, S.X. Dou, Magnetocaloric effect in layered NdMn[sub 2]Ge[sub 0.4]Si[sub 1.6], Applied Physics Letters, 98 (2011) 232509-232503.
6. M.F. Md Din, J.L. Wang, R. Zeng, P.
Shamba, J.C. Debnath, S.X. Dou, Effects of Cu substitution on structural and magnetic properties of La0.7Pr0.3Fe11.4Si1.6 compounds, Intermetallics, 36 (2013) 1-7.
7. A. Szytuła, J. Leciejewicz, Chapter 83 Magnetic properties of ternary intermetallic compounds of the RT2X2 type, in: Karl A.
Gschneidner, Jr., E. LeRoy (Eds.) Handbook on the Physics and Chemistry of Rare Earths, Elsevier, 1989, pp. 133-211.
8. J.L. Wang, L. Caron, S.J. Campbell, S.J.
Kennedy, M. Hofmann, Z.X. Cheng, M.F.
Md Din, A.J. Studer, E. Brück, S.X. Dou, Driving Magnetostructural Transitions in Layered Intermetallic Compounds, Physical Review Letters, 110 (2013) 217211.
9. S.M. Yusuf, M. Halder, A.K. Rajarajan, A.K. Nigam, S. Banerjee, Magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect in intermetallic compounds NdMn[sub 2 - x]Co[sub x]Si[sub 2], Journal of Applied Physics, 111 (2012) 093914-093918.
10. J.L. Wang, S.J. Campbell, A.J. Studer, M.
Avdeev, M. Hofmann, M. Hoelzel, S.X.
Dou, Magnetic structures and phase transitions in PrMn[sub 2 - x]Fe[sub x]Ge[sub 2], Journal of Applied Physics, 104 (2008) 103911-103912.
11. L. B. McCusker, R. B. Von Dreele, D. E.
Cox, D. Louër, P. Scardi, Rietveld refinement guidelines, Journal of Applied Crystallography, 32 (1999) 36-50.
12. S. Siek, A. Szytuła, J. Leciejewicz, Crystals and magnetic structure of RMn2Si2 (R = Pr, Nd, Y) and YMn2Ge2, Solid State Communications, 39 (1981) 863-866.
13. M.F.M. Din, J.L. Wang, S.J. Campbell, R.
Zeng, W.D. Hutchison, M. Avdeev, S.J.
Kennedy, S.X. Dou, Magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect of NdMn 2− x Ti x Si 2 compounds, Journal of Physics D:
Applied Physics, 46 (2013) 445002.
14. S. Di Napoli, A.M. Llois, G. Bihlmayer, S.
Blügel, Magnetic order in RMn_{2}Ge_{2}
(R=Y,Ca) compounds and their solid solutions with LaMn_{2}Ge_{2}, Physical Review B, 75 (2007) 104406.
15. R. Zeng, J.L. Wang, L. Lu, W.X. Li, S.J.
Campbell, S.X. Dou, Three first order magnetic phase transitions in re-entrant ferromagnet PrMn1.4Fe0.6Ge2, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 505 (2010) L38- L42.
16. H. Feng-xia, S. Bao-gen, S. Ji-rong, C.
Zhao-hua, Z. Xi-xiang, Magnetic entropy change in La(Fe 0.98 Co 0.02 ) 11.7 Al 1.3, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 12 (2000) L691.
17. L. Caron, Z.Q. Ou, T.T. Nguyen, D.T. Cam Thanh, O. Tegus, E. Brück, On the determination of the magnetic entropy change in materials with first-order transitions, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 321 (2009) 3559-3566.
18. B. Li, W.J. Hu, X.G. Liu, F. Yang, W.J.
Ren, X.G. Zhao, Z.D. Zhang, Large reversible magnetocaloric effect in TbCoC[sub 2] in low magnetic field, Applied Physics Letters, 92 (2008) 242508- 242503.
19. X.X. Zhang, F.W. Wang, G.H. Wen, Magnetic entropy change in RCoAl (R = Gd, Tb, Dy, and Ho) compounds: candidate materials for providing magnetic refrigeration in the temperature range 10 K to 100 K, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 13 (2001) L747.
20. V.K. Pecharsky, J.K.A. Gschneidner, Magnetocaloric effect from indirect measurements: Magnetization and heat capacity, Journal of Applied Physics, 86 (1999) 565-575.
21. B. Ekkes, Developments in magnetocaloric refrigeration, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 38 (2005) R381.
22. K.A. GschneidnerJr, V.K. Pecharsky, A.O.
Tsokol, Recent developments in
magnetocaloric materials, Reports on Progress in Physics, 68 (2005) 1479.
23. M. Hofmann, S.J. Campbell, A.V.J. Edge, EuMn_{2}Ge_{2} and EuMn_{2}Si_{2}:
Magnetic structures and valence transitions, Physical Review B, 69 (2004) 174432.
24. I. Dincer, Y. Elerman, A. Elmali, H.
Ehrenberg, G. André, Neutron diffraction study of the (, 0.7 and 1) compounds and the general description of the magnetic behavior of Mn in and, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 313 (2007) 342-353.
25. R. Welter, G. Venturini, D. Fruchart, B.
Malaman, Magnetic structures of PrMn2Si2 and NdMn2Si2 from neutron diffraction studies, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 191 (1993) 263-270.
26. R. Welter, G. Venturini, E. Ressouche, B.
Malaman, Neutron diffraction study of CeMn2Ge2, PrMn2Ge2 and NdMn2Ge2:
evidence of dominant antiferromagnetic components within the (001) Mn planes in ferromagnetic ThCr2Si2-type manganese ternary compounds, Journal of Alloys and Compounds, 218 (1995) 204-215.
27. J.M.D. Coey, ferromagnetism, Solid State Sciences, 7 (2005) 660-667.
28. T. Chatterji, J. Combet, B. Frick, A. Szyula, Direct evidence for the magnetic ordering of Nd ions in NdMn2Si2 and NdMn2Ge2 by high resolution inelastic neutron scattering, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials, 324 (2012) 1030-1033.
29. K.A. Gschneidner Jr, Y. Mudryk, V.K.
Pecharsky, On the nature of the magnetocaloric effect of the first-order magnetostructural transition, Scripta Materialia, 67 (2012) 572-577.
If you find difficulties in placing figures or table in the text above, please insert them in this page!
Figures and captions.
Fig. 1.Refinement of X-ray diffraction patternat room temperature forNdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 compoundrespectively.
Fig. 2.Temperature dependence of magnetization of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 as measured in a field of 0.01 T (left axis; red symbols for zero field cooling, ZFC, and blue symbol for field cooling, FC); and differential scanning calorimetry measurements for the temperature range 300-450 K (right axis; solid green symbols). The value of TC is defined from dM/dT(inset).
Fig. 3. Magnetic entropy change values of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 as measured in a field of 0-5 T (left axis; red symbols for decrease and black symbol for increase field); and adiabatic temperature values of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 as measured in a field of 0,2 and 5 T (right axis;
green symbols).
Fig. 4. X-ray diffraction patterns of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 over the temperature range T = 10-300 K (λ= 0.8265(8) Å); andcoexistence behaviour of two phases AFil and Fmc + F (Nd) phases as indicated by arrow (inset).
Fig. 5.(a), (b), and (c) Neutron diffraction patterns for NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 at 450 K, 100 K, and 3 K respectively. The star symbols represent the observed patterns and the red solid lines the refined patterns. The blue lines represent the differences between the observed and refined patterns; the vertical bars indicate the Bragg peak positions for the nuclear (top), Fmc magnetic (middle) and AFil magnetic (bottom) structure respectively.
Fig. 6.The lattice parameters of NdMn1.9Ti0.1Si2 as a function of temperature defined from neutron (open symbols) and X-ray (closed symbols) diffraction pattern; magnetic structure for Fmc + F(Nd)-type below and AFil-type above TC as shown together in figure including percentage of volume change.