Online-only supplemental documents
eTable 1- 23 Food groups used for the plant-based diet index and examples of food items included in each of the food groups
12 Plant-based food groups
Fruits
Apple, banana, pear, orange, strawberry, grapes, other fruitsVegetables
Cauliflower, broccoli, spinach, carrots, onion, lettuce, tomato, cabbage, cooked vegetablesWhole grains
Whole grain bread, dark bread, rye bread, whole grain breakfast oats, whole grain pasta, brown riceNuts
Peanuts, walnuts, other nuts, peanut butterLegumes
Legumes, tofu, soybeans, other soy productsVegetable oils
Olive oil, vegetable oils used for cooking, and all margarinesTea and coffee
Black tea, green tea, herbal tea, coffeePotatoes
Potatoes, friesRefined grains
Cornflakes, white bread, croissants, raisin bread, white pasta, white riceSweets
Sugar, cookies, cake, chocolate, candy-bars, honey, sweets, chocolate toppings, other sweet toppingsSugary beverages
Carbonated beverages with sugar, non-carbonated beverages with sugar, orange juice, fruit juiceAlcoholic beverages
Red wine, white wine, beer, liquor, Dutch-eggnog11 Animal-based food groups
Low-fat milk
Skimmed milk, semi-skimmed milk, skimmed coffee creamer, semi-skimmed coffee creamerLow-fat yoghurt
Skimmed yoghurt, semi-skimmed yoghurt, skimmed quark, buttermilkFull-fat milk
Full-fat milk, cream, coffee-creamFull-fat yoghurt
Full-fat yoghurt, semi-skimmed quark, full quarkCheese
Full fat cheese, low fat cheese, cheese fondue, other cheeseDesserts and sugary dairy
Custard, cream, ice cream, mousse, cream, chocolate milk, fruit yoghurt, yoghurt drinksUnprocessed lean meat
ChickenFish
Salmon, tuna, trout, herring, mussels, other fishEggs
Boiled eggs, fried eggsAnimal fat
Butter on bread, butter used for cooking, lardProcessed and red meat
Beef, pork, meatballs, sate, bacon, liver, processed meatseTable 2- Intake of 23 food groups across quintiles of the plant-based diet index Plant-based diet index
Quintile 1 Quintile 2 Quintile 3 Quintile 4 Quintile 5
Score≤43 43<score≤47 47<score ≤50 50<score≤55 score˃55
Median=40 Median=46 Median=49 Median=53 Median=59
n=2212 n=1976 n=1639 n=2171 n=1635
Food intake (grams/day)a
-Fruits 170.6 (91.2, 266.2) 195.0 (109.6, 299.5) 213.7 (122.4, 322.7) 220.4 (124.5, 329.2) 249.6 (150.6, 375.6)
-Vegetables 178.7 (127.4, 244.2) 196.4 (141.4, 268.3) 201.8 (146.7, 272.3) 210.7 (151.5, 283.9) 234.4 (178.1, 313)
-Whole grains 93.4 (56.0, 129.9) 102.4 (57.0, 142.3) 110.0 (70.0, 151.6) 116.1 (70.1, 162.5) 138.8 (80.9, 188.7)
-Legumes 0.0 (0.0, 7.8) 0.0 (0.0, 12.9) 0.0 (0.0, 15.8) 4.5 (0.0, 19.4) 10.7 (0.0, 31.0)
-Nuts 0.0 (0.0, 4.4) 1.1 (0.0, 8.1) 2.4 (0.0, 9.6) 4.3 (0.0, 12.8) 8.5 (2.2, 18.1)
-Vegetable oils 12.0 (3.0, 22.0) 18.0 (8.0, 27.4) 21.0 (11.5, 30.7) 24.5 (14.6, 34.1) 28.7 (19.6, 39.7)
-Tea and coffee 750.0 (500.0, 875.0) 750.0 (550.0, 1000.0) 754.5 (593.8, 1000.0) 825.0 (625.0, 1025.0) 933.1 (750.0, 1125.0)
-Refined grains 33.5 (14.1, 70.0) 42.3 (20.0, 86.2) 42.7 (20.4, 88.3) 52.2 (26.2, 104.9) 58.4 (30.0, 115.1)
-Potatoes 85.5 (56.6, 128.2) 96.4 (64.1, 142.5) 106.9 (71.2, 149.6) 114.3 (73.3, 170.0) 128.2 (87.3, 178.1)
-Sweets 48.3 (26.1, 81.3) 57.1 (31.8, 89.1) 63.9 (39.0, 96.7) 71.2 (42.3, 105.8) 82.9 (53.6, 118.3)
-Sugary beverages 9.2 (0.0, 79.8) 26.8 (0.0, 139.3) 50.0 (0.0, 139.6) 53.8 (0.0, 142.5) 87.3 (15.0, 174.5)
-Alcoholic beverages 21.4 (0.3, 106.3) 37.5 (1.6, 134.9) 42.7 (3.3, 147.0) 56.9 (4.3, 149.6) 71.4 (10.8, 176.4)
-Low-fat yoghurt 74.8 (0.0, 192.9) 60.2 (0.0, 166.1) 64.1 (0.0, 164.6) 53.6 (0.0, 158.6) 21.4 (0.0, 149.6)
-Full-fat yoghurt 0.0 (0.0, 37.4) 0.0 (0.0, 9.9) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
-Low-fat milk 107.1 (1.6, 278.6) 100.2 (2.2, 264.4) 94.6 (0.0, 231.7) 79.0 (0.0, 224.4) 42.9 (0.0, 196.5)
-Full-fat milk 0.0 (0.0, 23.5) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
-Cheese 33.4 (21.4, 48.1) 32.4 (20.4, 48.4) 30.8 (20.0; 46.6) 29.6 (19.9, 45.5) 29.3 (18.6, 46.2)
-Fish 18.7 (5.9, 32.1) 15.9 (3.3, 31.5) 13.7 (2.1, 28.5) 12.8 (1.0, 28.5) 8.9 (0.0, 23.9)
-Eggs 14.3 (8.6, 21.4) 14.3 (7.1, 21.4) 14.3 (7.1, 17.8) 14.3 (7.1, 17.1) 10.1 (7.1, 16.6)
-Animal fat 0.7 (0.0, 14.7) 0.0 (0.0, 3.0) 0.0 (0.0, 0.3) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0) 0.0 (0.0, 0.0)
-Desserts/dairy with sugars 20.5 (0.0, 63.9) 17.1 (0.0, 61.6) 13.8 (0.0, 52.3) 10.3 (0.0, 51.7) 5.4 (0.0, 41.0)
-Unprocessed lean meat 14.3 (5.4, 21.4) 12.4 (5.4, 21.4) 10.7 (3.9, 17.9) 10.0 (3.7, 16.4) 7.1 (0.0, 14.9)
-Processed meat / red meat 92.5 (65.5, 126.5) 88.7 (64.6, 118.3) 88.3 (62.0, 120.4) 85.7 (60.1, 116.6) 81.6 (55.0, 114.8)
aValues are median (25th percentile–75th percentile) for continuous variables with a skew distribution.
eTable 3 –Repeated measurements of BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage
Timea (years)
BMI n=9620
Waist circumference
n=9474
Timeb (years)
Fat mass index n=6153
Body fat percentage
n=6153
Mean (SD) Mean(SD)
RS-I n=5416
RS-I-1 (1989-93) 0.0 (0.0) 5397 5083 NA NA NA
RS-I-2 (1993-95) 2.0 (0.6) 4483 NA NA NA NA
RS-I-3 (1997-99) 6.5 (0.4) 3512 3517 NA NA NA
RS-I-4 (2002-04) 11.0 (0.5) 2540 2652 11.6 (0.5) 2329 2329
RS-I-5 (2009-11) 17.6 (0.5) 1477 1473 17.2 (0.5) 1297 1297
RS-I-6 (2014-15) 22.5 (0.7) 741 741 22.1 (0.3) 698 698
RS-II n=1624
RS-II-1 (2000-01) 0.0 (0.0) 1620 1623 NA NA NA
RS-II-2 (2004-05) 4.0 (0.5) 1319 1339 4.0 (0.4) 659 659
RS-II-3 (2011-12) 10.6 (0.4) 1033 1035 10.8 (0.3) 993 993
RS-II-4 (2015-16) 15.0 (0.2) 797 820 15.0 (0.2) 797 797
RS-III n=2581
RS-III-1 (2006-08) 0.0 (0.0) 2561 2481 0.0 (0.0) 2079 2079
RS-III-2 (2012-14) 5.6 (0.4) 2142 2139 5.8 (0.4) 2059 2059
At baseline and follow-up in RS-I, RS-II, and RS-III, 9620 participants had at least one time measurement of BMI; 9474 participants had at least one time measurement of waist circumference; 6153 participants had at least one time measurement of fat mass index, and body fat percentage.
aTime variable is calculated as time scale for each measurement of BMI and waist circumference by subtracting baseline date from date of each measurement of BMI and waist circumference at follow-up period.
bTime variable is calculated as time scale for each measurement of fat mass index and body fat percentage by subtracting baseline date from date of each measurement of fat mass index and body fat percentage at follow-up period.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; RS, Rotterdam Study; NA, not available
eTable 4- Missing values
aPhysical activity Education level Smoking status RS-I n=5426 NA=1551 (28.6%) NA=26 (0.48%) NA=32 (0.59%) RS-II n=1624 NA=11 (0.68%) NA=23 (1.4%) NA=8 (0.49%) RS-III n=2583 NA=238 (9.2%) NA=7 (0.27%) NA=6 (0.23%) Total n=9633 NA=1800 (18.7%) NA=56 (0.58%) NA=46 (0.47%)
aIn our main analyses, only three variables: physical activity, education level, and smoking status were with missing values.
Abbreviations: NA, not available, (numbers of participants with missing values); RS, Rotterdam Study
eTable 5- Interactions between plant-based diet score and baseline age, or sex for longitudinal BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage (additional analyses)
BMI (kg/m
2)
Waist circumference (cm)
Fat mass index (kg/m
2)
Body fat percentage
n=9620 n=9474 n=6153 n=6153
β (95% CI), p value β (95% CI), p value β (95% CI), p value β (95% CI), p value
Plant-based diet score × baseline age
0.01 (-0.01, 0.02), p=0.32 0.03 (-0.01, 0.07), p=0.11 0.02 (-0.01, 0.05), p=0.22 0.03 (-0.03, 0.10), p=0.31Plant-based diet score × sex
-0.13 (-0.46, 0.20), P=0.45 -0.32 (-0.92, 0.27), p=0.29 -0.21 (-0.57, 0.15), p=0.35 -0.09 (-0.51, 0.34), p=0.69 Values are regression coefficients and 95%CIs for interactions between plant-based diet score and baseline age or sex for body adiposity outcomes.Models include plant-based diet score, age (years), sex, total energy (kcal/day), RS sub-cohort (RS-I, -II, or -III), time of repeated measurements of BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage education level (primary, lower/intermediate, intermediate, or higher), smoking status (never, ever, current), physical activity (z-score of metabolic equivalent of task -hours/week), and food supplement use (yes or no), and interaction between plant-based diet score and baseline age or sex.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; RS, Rotterdam Study
eTable 6- Associations of plant-based diet score with BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage by excluding alcoholic beverages (sensitivity analyses)
BMI (kg/m
2)
Waist circumference (cm)
Fat mass index
(kg/m
2) Body fat percentage
n=9620 n=9474 n=6153 n=6153
Plant-based diet score
β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI)Excluding alcoholic beverages -0.63 (-0.74, -0.51) -1.8 (-2.1, -1.5) -0.53 (-0.64, -0.42) -0.94 (-1.2, -0.72)
Values are regression coefficients and 95%CIs based on linear mixed models, and reflect differences in BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage averaged across the median follow-up of 7.1 years per 10 points higher score on the plant-based diet score without alcoholic beverages.
Models are adjusted for baseline age (years), sex, total energy (kcal/day), RS sub-cohort (RS-I, -II, or -III), time of repeated measurements of BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage education level (primary, lower/intermediate, intermediate, or higher), smoking status (never, ever, current), physical activity (z-score of metabolic equivalent of task -hours/week), and food supplement use (yes or no).
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; RS, Rotterdam Study
eTable 7- Associations of plant-based diet score with BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage by additionally adjusting for baseline diet quality reflecting dietary guidelines or for dietary intake at RS-I-5 and RS-II-3 (sensitivity analyses)
BMI (kg/m
2)
Waist circumference (cm)
Fat mass index
(kg/m
2) Body fat percentage Plant-based diet score
n=9620 n=9474 n=6153 n=6153
Adjusting for diet quality reflecting adherence
to dietary guidelinesa β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI)
-0.67 (-0.78, -0.55) -1.8 (-2.2, -1.5) -0.59 (-0.70, -0.48) -1.0 (-1.2, -0.79)
n=2178 n=2178 n=2133 n=2133
Adjusting for dietary intake at RS-I-5 and RS- II-3b
β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI)
-0.57 (-0.79,-0.34) -1.5 (-2.2, -0.92) -0.42 (-0.61, -0.24) -0.75 (-1.1, -0.40) Values are regression coefficients and 95%CIs based on linear mixed models, and reflect differences in BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage averaged across the median follow-up of 7.1 years per 10 points higher score on the plant-based diet score without alcoholic beverages or with additional adjustment for diet quality score reflecting adherence to dietary guidelines.
aModels are adjusted for baseline age (years), sex, total energy (kcal/day), RS sub-cohort (RS-I, -II, or -III), time of repeated measurements of BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage education level (primary, lower/intermediate, intermediate, or higher), smoking status (never, ever, current), physical activity (z-score of metabolic equivalent of task-hours/week), food supplement use (yes or no) and diet quality reflecting adherence to dietary guidelines.
bAnalyses are performed with adjustment for baseline age (years), sex, total energy (kcal/day), RS sub-cohort (RS-I, or -II), time of repeated measurements of longitudinal BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage, education level (primary, lower/intermediate, intermediate, or higher), smoking status (never, ever, current), physical activity (z-score of metabolic equivalent of task -hours/week) at baseline and at RS-I-5 and RS-II-3, food supplement use (yes or no), and plant-based diet score at RS-I-5 and RS-II-3.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; RS, Rotterdam Study
eTable 8- Associations of plant-based diet score with BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage by excluding less healthy plant-based foods or healthy plant-based foods (sensitivity analyses)
BMI (kg/m
2)
Waist circumference (cm)
Fat mass index
(kg/m
2) Body fat percentage
n=9620 n=9474 n=6153 n=6153
Plant-based diet score
β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI)Excluding less healthy plant-based foods -0.68 (-0.80, -0.56) -1.9 (-2.2, -1.6) -0.64 (-0.74, -0.53) -1.4 (-2.3, -0.60)
Excluding healthy plant-based foods -0.42 (-0.56, -0.28) -1.1 (-1.5, -0.71) -0.40 (-0.54, -0.26) -0.64 (-0.92, -0.36)
Values are regression coefficients and 95%CIs based on linear mixed models, and reflect differences in BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage averaged across the median follow-up of 7.1 years per 10 points higher score on the plant-based diet index without less healthy plant-based foods or healthy plant-based foods.
Models are adjusted for baseline age (years), sex, total energy (kcal/day), RS sub-cohort (RS-I, -II, or -III), time of repeated measurements of BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage education level (primary, lower/intermediate, intermediate, or higher), smoking status (never, ever, current), physical activity (z-score of metabolic equivalent of task -hours/week), and food supplement use (yes or no).
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; RS, Rotterdam Study
eTable 9– Associations of plant-based diet score with BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage after adding positive scores from fish, eggs, low-fat milk, and low-fat yoghurt
BMI (kg/m
2)
Waist circumference (cm)
Fat mass index (kg/m
2)
Body fat percentage
n=9620 n=9474 n=6153 n=6153
Plant-based diet score
β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI)-0.54 (-0.76, -0.32) -1.4 (-1.9, -0.93) -0.46 (-0.68, -0.18) -0.71 (-0.90, -0.52) Values are regression coefficients and 95%CIs based on linear mixed models, and reflect differences in BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage averaged across the median follow-up of 16.1 years in participants from RS-I and RS-II with available data per 10 points higher score.
Analyses are performed for associations of modification of plant-based dietby scoring fish, egg, low-fat milk, and low-fat yoghurt positive scores with adjustment for baseline age (years), sex, total energy (kcal/day), RS sub-cohort (RS-I, -II or -III,), time of repeated measurements of longitudinal BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage education level (primary, lower/intermediate, intermediate, or higher), smoking status (never, ever, current), physical activity (z-score of metabolic equivalent of task -hours/week), and food supplement use (yes or no).
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index;RS, Rotterdam Study
eTable 10- Associations of the plant-based diet score with BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage by additionally adjusting for baseline health condition or excluding participants with obesity, diabetes, coronary heart disease, cancers at baseline and censoring body composition data collected after onset of diabetes, coronary heart disease, and cancers at follow-up
Values are regression coefficients and 95%CIs based on linear mixed models, and reflect differences in BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage averaged across the follow-up period per 10 points higher score on the plant-based diet index.
aAnalyses are performed with adjustment for baseline age (years), sex, total energy (kcal/day), RS sub-cohort (RS-I, -II, or -III), time of repeated measurements of longitudinal BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, or body fat percentage, education level (primary, lower/intermediate, intermediate, or higher), smoking status (never, ever, current), physical activity (z-score of MET-hours/week), food supplement use (yes or no), baseline diabetes (yes or no), baseline obesity (yes or no), baseline coronary heart disease (yes or no), and baseline cancers (yes or no).
bAnalyses are performed based on body composition data collected before onset of diabetes, coronary heart disease, and cancers at follow-up in participants without obesity, diabetes, coronary heart disease, or cancers at baseline and adjusted for baseline age (years), sex, total energy (kcal), RS sub-cohort (RS-I, -II, or -III), time of repeated measurements of BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, or body fat percentage, education level (primary, lower/intermediate, intermediate, or higher), smoking status (never, ever, current), physical activity (z-score of metabolic equivalent of task- hours/week), and food supplement use (yes or no).
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; RS, Rotterdam Study
BMI (kg/m
2)
Waist circumference (cm)
Fat mass index (kg/m
2)
Body fat percentage Plant-based diet score
n=9620 n=9474 n=6153 n=6153
Additionally adjusting for baseline health conditiona β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI)
-0.67 (-0.82, -0.51) -1.9 (-2.1, -1.7) -0.63 (-0.75, -0.50) -1.0 (-1.2, -0.87)
n=6364 n=6080 n=2741 n=2741
Excluding participants with chronic diseases at baseline and censoring data measured after onset of diabetes, coronary heart disease , and cancersb
β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI)
-0.63 (-0.76, -0.49) -1.5 (-1.9, -1.1) -0.48 (-0.62, -0.34) -0.72 (-0.96, -0.46)
eTable 11- Associations of plant-based diet score with BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage in the three sub- cohorts
BMI (kg/m
2)
Waist circumference (cm)
Fat mass index
(kg/m
2) Body fat percentage
Plant-based diet score
β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI) β (95% CI)RS-Ia -0.62 (-0.78, -0.46) -1.6 (-2.1, -1.2) -0.44 (-0.62, -0.26) -0.85 (-1.2, -0.50)
RS-IIb -0.63 (-0.97, -0.29) -2.2 (-3.0, -1.5) -0.76 (-1.0, -0.51) -1.3 (-1.8, -0.87)
RS-IIIc -0.88 (-1.2, -0.61) -2.6 (-3.3, -1.9) -0.68 (-0.88, -0.48) -1.2 (-1.6, -0.81)
Values are regression coefficients and 95%CIs based on linear mixed models, and reflect differences in BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, and body fat percentage averaged across the follow-up period per 10 points higher score on the plant-based diet index in three sub-cohorts, respectively. Analyses were performed with adjustment for baseline age (years), sex, total energy (kcal/day), time of repeated measurements of BMI, waist circumference, fat mass index, or body fat percentage, education level (primary, lower/intermediate, intermediate, or higher), smoking status (never, ever, current), physical activity (z-score of metabolic equivalent of task -hours/week), and food supplement use (yes or no).
aIn RS-I, 5416 participants with BMI measurements; 5281 participants with waist circumference measurements; 2477 participants with fat mass index, and body fat percentage measurements.
bIn RS-II, 1624 participants with BMI measurements; 1624 participants with waist circumference measurements; 1189 participants with waist circumference measurements, and body fat percentage measurements.
cIn RS-III, 2580 participants with BMI measurements; 2569 participants with waist circumference measurements; 2487 participants with fat mass index, and body fat percentage measurements.
Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; RS, Rotterdam Study