Henning Grosse Ruse - Khan, Center for Intellectual Property and Information Law, University of Cambridge Law School (UK). Naazima Kamardeen, Faculty of Law, University of Colombo (Sri Lanka) Ataul Karim, Department of Law, East West University, Dhaka (Bangladesh) Annette Kur, Max Planck Institute for Innovation and Competition (Germany). Caroline Ncube, SARChI Research Chair in IP, Innovation and Development, Department of Business Law, Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town (South Africa).
Sentro para iti Komparatibo ken Transnasional a Linteg, Fakultad ti Linteg, Ti Insik nga Unibersidad ti Hong Kong (Hong Kong, Tsina). Sentro para iti Intelektual a Sanikua ken Linteg ti Impormasion, Fakultad ti Linteg, Unibersidad ti Cambridge (UK). Departamento ti Linteg, Shaheed Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto Unibersidad ti Linteg (Pakistan) Departamento ti Linteg, Unibersidad ti San Andres (Argentina).
Faculty of Law, University of Turin (Italy) (*approved in principle, formal approval to follow in November). Academy of Intellectual Property and Faculty of Law, Renmin University of China (People's Republic of China). SARChI Research Chair in IP, Innovation and Development, Department of Business Law, Faculty of Law, University of Cape Town (South Africa).
University of South Africa Faculty of Law (South Africa) Singapore University of Social Sciences (Singapore).
P ARALLEL S ESSIONS (4)
Let us know if you need help converting the time to your time zone!
B IOS
In addition, Paula is a geographical indications consultant in the field of food and a lawyer in the field of intellectual property and commercial law. Ranggalawe Suryasaladin is a lecturer at the Universitas Indonesia (UI) Faculty of Law for the Intellectual Property Law course, the International Trade Law course and the Investment Law course in the Undergraduate Program and IP Litigation and Dispute Settlement in the UI Faculty of Law Postgraduate Program. Ranggalawe is a member of the Indonesia BAR Association and IP Consultant Association and also practices as an IP Consultant at Suryasaladin Intellectual Property Consultant & Co.
Althaf Marsoof is Assistant Professor of Law at Nanyang Technological University (NTU) in Singapore. Before joining NTU, he spent three years at the Dickson Poon School of Law at King's College London, where he completed his doctoral studies, which was fully funded by the Dickson Poon Doctoral Scholarship grant. Srijan Mishra is a Research Assistant with the IPR Chair of DPIIT at Maharashtra National Law University Nagpur.
In 2019, he completed his MA in Energy and Telecommunication Law from Maharashtra National Law University Nagpur and B.A. Hons.) with specialization in Intellectual Property Rights from Assam National Law University and Judicial Academy in 2018. Yulia graduated in Law in 1998 and applied for Master of Laws in 2003 at Padjadjaran University, Bandung. Nidhi Buch, works as Assistant Professor at Gujarat State Law University, India's premier law school.
She obtained her doctorate from Gujarat National Law University in the field of Intellectual Property Rights. She gained wide experience as a Consultant on Intellectual Property Rights at National Institute of Design, Ahmedabad, India during the years 2001-2004. She is associated with several Law Schools and Management Institutes in the capacity of a Visiting Faculty.
As a qualified advocate, she has also served in the Senior Advocate Panel of the Gujarat High Court. It is also associated with the Gujarat State Judicial Academy as a visiting faculty where it imparts training to newly recruited judicial judges for the state of Gujarat. In addition, in her role as Director of the Center of Excellence on Intellectual Property Rights at GNLU, she is actively involved in teaching, research and extension activities organized by the Center along with three Chairs viz., Microsoft India Chair on Intellectual Property Rights, GNLU-Gujarat Research Center of Excellence of the Council for Science and Technology (GUJCOST) on Intellectual Property Laws, Policies and Practices and the DPIIT Chair for Intellectual Property Rights.
A BSTRACTS
Our presentation will focus on elaborating and analyzing the issues and challenges of using GI in the coffee industry in Indonesia, especially how to improve the management of the GI coffee organization/association in order to support coffee farmers and stakeholders to benefited from the GI system. But more often than not, GIs in the developing world have been unable to deliver on that promise. Rather, the problem lies in the uneven distribution of premiums generated by GIs within supply/value chains.
Srijan MISHRA, Maharashtra National Law University, Nagpur Protection of Geographical Indications in the Market Driven Era. In this era of globalization, the nature and scope of intellectual property rights are changing and new forms of intellectual property are receiving protection under national and international law. In this period of globalization and industrialization, the protection of old practices has become important.
Studies have shown that GI holders themselves sometimes engage in "self-dilution" of their own GI product in order to meet market demand and remain competitive. Chinese material was used in these sarees and thus the essence of the GI was in jeopardy. Potential for protecting Aceh community handicrafts as a geographical indication in Indonesia.
Geographical indications indicate the place of origin from which a product derives its characteristics, which are influenced by natural factor or human factor, or a combination of the two. Multifaceted Role of the State in Ensuring Sustainable GI System: Challenges and Opportunities in the Indian Legal Framework. Geographical Indication (GI) which was once considered a sleeping beauty is now considered as one of the most important tools for rural development.
One of the most important aspects of any GI regime in terms of its governance is the involvement of the state, whether the country has just introduced the system of GI protection or it has been a part of its history. Given the complexity and diversity of the GI protection system, the involvement of the state at the national, regional and local levels is critically examined and analyzed from the Indian point of view. Finally, the conclusion about the role of the state in harnessing the GI potential as a tool for development will be drawn keeping in mind the purpose of the Indian GI system, the status of the majority of producers who are underprivileged, complexities and technicalities involved in the GI application, absence of a strong producer organization and a mechanism for distributing benefits by subsidy.
Zoom Guidelines for Chair and Speakers
They will only present the slides on the day of the presentation by sharing their screen. Geographical indication is one of the protections related to the character of the product,1 which emphasizes the importance of the relationships between the owners of the quality signal and the suppliers in the value chain of many agricultural products,2 and traditional products. In relation to trade aspects of intellectual property rights (TRIPs Agreement), it established geographical indications, which are a development of the rules relating to the 'designation of origin' as set out in the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of 1883, i.e.
Designation of origin refers to a sign indicating that a product comes from a specific geographical region only if the characteristic properties of the product are due to the geographical environment, including natural and human factors. Identification of Geographical Indications under Law of Number 20 Year 2016, Geographical Indications are protected during the maintenance of the reputation, quality and characteristics underlying the granting of protection of Geographical Indications to a good in Article 61.1 of Law of Number 20/ 2016. The coffee product of Gayo societies was exported to many countries in the world.5 0 The protection of geographical indications of Gayo Arabica coffee is based on the consideration that Gayo.
While Jeruk Keprok Gayo was registered by the Jeruk Keprok Gayo Community of the Protection of Geographical Indications in April 2016 with registration number ID G based on data in the General Directorate of Intellectual Property Rights in October 2018. Aceh's handicrafts show the authenticity of the place where the product was made in Aceh society. Because the case of copying Aceh's craft motif by irresponsible people has an impact on the existence of Aceh's craft values as a cultural value of.
People from Aceh.64 Because the example of duplicating handmade motifs from Aceh by irresponsible people affects the existence of handicraft values in Aceh as a cultural value of the people from Aceh. It shows the product's location of origin, which is not the same as other regions. International regulations have confirmed the protection of geographical indications with the indicated source and designation of origin.
Therefore, the protection of GIs of the Acehnese people's handicrafts can avoid the occurrence of violations of the Acehnese handicraft motifs. 2 Velcovska, Sarka et al, The System of the Geographical Indication – Important component of the politics of consumer protection in the European Union, Amfiteatru Economic Journal. 31 Massimo Vittori, The International Debate on Geographical Indications (GIs): The Point of View of the Global Coalition of GI Producers origin.
55 Jeffrey Neilson, Geographical Indications and Value Capture in the Indonesia Coffee Sector, Journal of Rural Studies. The potential for protection of ACEH community crafts as a geographical indication in Indonesia.
THIRD IP & INNOVATION RESEARCHERS OF ASIA (IPIRA) CONFERENCE
