THEOSTEOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE FAMILY ANGUIL-
LIDJE.
KV
Theodore
Gill, M. D., Ph. D.The
diversities within the restrictedApodes
(or those anguilliform fishes without developed interrnaxillariesand
with the"vomer"
pro- jectingand
forming, with the supramaxillaries, theupperarcade of the mouth) are very great, but were not appreciated till ProfessorCope
consideredthem
inhis'•ObservationsontheSystematicdelations of the Fishes."* That great naturalistwas
so impressedby them
that he distributedthem
undertwo orders, the EnchelycephaU,i embracing the Congridce, Anguillidce,and
Murcenesocidce,andtheCf>locephali,\ iuc\\i(\\ng theMurccnidwand
Ratahitridfv {=
Morin{juidw).While
Iam
not pre- paredyetto admitthe "orders" of Professor Cope, Iretain thegroups as suborders with modified characters,and
the families appear not only to be justified, but, it seems to me,must
be increased.A
com- parison of the skulls of Anguilla, Conger, Murcenesox, Simenchelys, Syna])hobranchu8, Ophichthys,and
Murcena hasconvincedme
ofthead- visability ofrecognizingforeach ofthem
family rank.The
characters ofthe familyAngiiillidcecontrasting with oneor otherof the other fam-ilies are
now
given in the order which I haveheretoforeemployed
for full descriptions offamiliesofnormalfishes.ANGUILLIDiE.
Synonymsasfamilynames.
<[ Pantopt<>re8,Dum^ril,Zool.Anal.,pp. Ill, 11.'), 1806.
<^ Anguillidi, Rafinesque, Indiced'lttiolog. Siciliana, p. 37, 1810.
<^Pantopteria,Bafinesqae, AnalysedelaNature,2'.'>fain.,j).
—
, 1815.<
Anguilliformes, Cuvier,RfegneAnimal[1"6(1.],t.2, p.229,1817; 2« ^d.,t.2,p. 348, 1829.<
Anguilloides,Latreille,Fain.Nat.,Rf^gne An.,p.142, 1825.<[Le3Miir^nides,Risso, Hist. Nat.Europeni6rid.,t. 3,p. 169,1826.
<;Mura;nida},^o«rt/?ar<e,Giorn.Accad.diScienze, v..'>2 (Saggio Distrib. Metod.Ani- mal) Vertebr. aSangueFreddo, p.34), 1832.
<
Munenidfo, Bonaparte,Nuovi AnnalidelleSci.Nat.,t.2,p.133,1838;t. 4,p.276,1840,<^Mura)nid;e,Sivainson, Nat.Hist,andClass.Fishes,etc., v.2,pp.195,333, 1839.
<
AnguiUares, Miiller, Archivf. Naturge8ch.,9..Jg.,B. l,p. 328, 1843.<Munenidie,Bonaparte, Cat. Metod. Pesci Europei,p. G",38*, 1846.
<
Murajnidaj,Adams, Man.Nat. Hist., p. 110, 1854.• Proc.Am. Aks. Adv.Science1871, v.20, pp. 317-:{43,1872.
t Oj).dt.,p. 334.
Proceedings NationalMuseam,Vol.XIII—No.803.
157
158 OSTEOLOGY OF ANGUILLID^E
GILL.=
AnguillidfB,Kaup, Arcbivf. Naturgesch.,22.Jg., B. l,p.54,1856.=
AnguillidPB, Eaup,Cat. Apod.FishB.M.,p. 32,1856.=
Anguillidae, Richardson,Eiic.Brit.8tbed.,v. 12, p.232, 1856.=
Auguilloidei, Bleeker,Enum.Sp. PisciumArchipel. Indico,p. xxxiii, 1859.<
Anguilloidei, Encr, Sitzungsb.k.Akad. Wissenscb.(Wien),v.42, p.1,1860.<Mura}uid0P, GUnther, Cat. FishesBrit. Mus.,v.8,p. 19,1870.
=
Angnillidse, Cope,Proc. Am.Assoc. Adv. Sci.,v.20,p. 334, 1872.=
Anguillidae, Gill,ArrangementFam. Fishes, p. 20, 1872.<^ Anguilla^,FUzinger,Sitzguugsber.k.Akad.der Wissenscb. (Wien),B.67,1.Abth., p.45,1873.
;=Mur0Bnidi, Poey, Anal. Soc. Esp.Hist. Nat.,v. 4, p. 10,1875.
<^Anguillidse,Mor€au,Ii\6t. Nat.Poiss.France,v.3,p.560, 1881.
<
Anguillida", Jordan4-Gilbert,Syn. Fishes N.Am.,p.357, 1882.—
Anguillidai,Gill,StandardNat.Hist.,v.3,p. 101, 1885.=
Anguillidae,Jordan,An. Rep.Com.Fish,for 1885,p.843,1887 (Sep.,p.55,1885).=
Anguillidae,Jordan, Man.Vertebrates North. U.S.,5thed., p. 89,1888.Synonymsassubfamily names.
<[Anguillinia,Bafine^qiie,Analyse delaNature,p.
—
,1815.<
Mursenini,Bonaparte,NuoviAunalid. Sci.Nat.,t. 2,p.1.33,1838; t. 4,p.276, 1840.<^ Anguillinse, Sivainson,Nat.Hist,andClass.Fishes,etc!,v. 1,p.220, 1838.
<
Anguillini,Bonaparte, Cat.Metod.PesciEuropei,p. 6*,38*, 1846.=
Anguillina?,Eaup, Archivf.Naturgesch.,22. Jg., B.1,p.54, 1856.<
Anguilliua, GUnther,Cat. FishesB.M.,v.8,pp.20, 23, 1870.=
Anguillinse,Jordan^
Gilbert,Syn. Fishes N.A.,p.357, 1882.DIAGNOSIS.
EnchelycephalousApodalswith conic head, well developedopercular apparatus, lateralmaxillines, cardiform teeth, distincttongue, vertical lateralbranchialapertures, continuous verticalfins withthe dorsal far from thehead, pectoralswell developed,scaly skin,
and
nearly perfect branchial skeleton.Description.
Body
typically anguilliform, anteriorly subcylindrical, compressed behind, robustand
with thecaudal portion gradually attenuated back- wards,and
with the anus in the anteriorhalf of thelength.Scales small, linearorelongated elliptical,distant,arranged insmall groupsobliquely atright angles tothose of theneighboringgroups.
Lateralline distinct.
Head
moderate,oblongconic,withall the bonesinvested in themus- cles or skins.Eyes
within the anteriorhalfofthehead, directed sideways, ofmod-
eratesize; notcoveredby
theskin.Nostrilsmostlylateral5 theposterior directlyin frontof theeyes,the anteriornear themarginof the snout
and
tubular.Mouth
with thecleftslightlyoblique,extending beloworlittlebehind theeves.Jaws
well developed5 maxillines approximated to the frontof the""^isgo"']
TROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM. 159
vomer, with the clampiDg processesselliformand
appressed closely to the sides of the ethino-vomer
behind itshead, with ledge-like exten- sions within,and
attenuated backwards.Mandible moderatelystout; thedentary with the coronoid process well developednear itsposteriorend; thearticularlittle producedex- ternally in front of the condyle, but considerablyextended
backwards and
below.Teethconic, in cardiform
bands
on thejaws and vomer.Lipsthick, mostly with free lateral mai^ins, but undifferentiated in front.
Tongue
welldevelopedand
free atitsanteriorportion as wellassides.Periorbitalbones moderatelydeveloped.
Opercular apparatuswelldeveloped; operculumlamelliform
and
ob- long,insertedhighup
on thehyomandibular; suboperculum falciform, bordering theoperculum; interoperculum large,.partly coveredby
the preoperculum; preoperculumwelldeveloped, lamelliform.Branchial apertures lateralverticalslitsiufrontof
and
lowerthanthe inferiorrays of the pectoralfins.Branchiostegal rays in moderate
number
(about twelve),some
at- tached to the ceratohjalaud
others totheepihyals, quite robustand much
bowed.Dorsal, anal,
and
caudal confluent in one uninterrupted fin withthe raysreadilyperceptible through the thin skin; dorsalcommencing
far behindtheheadand
littlebefore the anus; analclose behind the anus;
caudaljirominent.
Pectorals welldeveloped, nearerthe breast than back, with the rays distinct, unbranched,
and
articulated.Branchialarches nearly complete,withwelldevelopedglossohyal
and
urohyal,but withthe firstand
secondbasibranchials onlyossified; thefirst
and
second hypobranchialsossified,thirdand
fourth cartilaginous;ceratobranchials
and
epibranchials, of four pairs, ossified; pharyngo- branchials offirstand
secondpairs, rod-like; ofthirdand
fourthpairs, incloseappositionand
developedasdentigerous epipharyngeals; hypo- pharyngeals oblongand
closelyapposedand
superincumbent on arudi-mentary
fifth arch, covered withcardiform teeth. Interbranchialslitsextended.
Thereare
numerous
other characterswhichsupjjortthe familydistinc- tionof the Anguillidse,butthe only ones that need be hereadded
are the separation of thetwo
frontals, the oblique,forward trend of the suspensorium,and
themoderatedevelopment ofthehyomandibular.Only
one genusof the family isknown —
that generallycalled An- guiUa, but alsoby
Bleekerand some
othersendowed
with thename
3hira'na.
Anguillais generallyascribed
by
authorsto "Thunberg," but without any definitereference to placeofpublication. Agassiz,in his"Nomen-
clator Zoologicus," refers to "Anguilla, Thimb., Nuov.
Mem.
Stock.,160 OSTEOLOGY OF ANGUILLIDiE
—
GILL.
179-,"
and
Giiiither to "Anguilla(Tliuuberg)Cuv.Eegne
Anim."; butno
suchuame
istobe found iu theMemoirs
of the StockholmAcademy.
The
firstdivisionoftheohl genns,Murcena appearstohave beenmade by Thuuberg
orAhl
In 1789 in an inaugural dissertation.* Therein the genus Murccna is subdivided into,Murwna
restricted to species without pectoral fins,and
OpliiGlithus proposed for those with suchfins.
The
speciesenumerated are asfollows:
Miirseua. OphicMhus.
1. M. lielenaL. 1. O. opliis.
2. M. nebulosa. 2. O. serpens.
3. M. picta. 3. O. ciuereus.
4. M. anuulata. 4. O. myrns.
5. M. fasciata. 5. O. conger.
6. O. anguilla.
The name Murwna was
thus definitely restricted to species without pectoralfins,and
therefore the subsequentrestrictionof ittospecies with pectoralfins,and
especially toM.
anguilla, as Professors Jordan and Gilbert! have already shown,was
illegitimate. If not belonging to OphicMhus, itwas
necessary, consequently, that another genericname
should begiventothe Anguilla. Ophichthus,indeed, provedtobe a very incongruousgroup, each species representing a peculiargenus.Genera
were proposedforthem
as follows:
O. opMs. Ophichtbys,Ahl., 1789.
O. serpens. LeptognatliusSw.1839.}:
O. cinerens. Munenesox, McCl., 1843.
O. myrus. MyrnsKanp.,1856.
O. conger. Conger,Cuv., 1817.
O. anguilla. AnguillaShaw,1803,
The name
Anguillatherefore rightlybelongs tothedivision sonamed, but (unlessthere issome memoir
that hasbeen overlooked)must
be creditedtoShaw and
notThuuberg.The synonymy
of thegenuswillthenbe,in brief,as follows
:
ANGUILLA.
<
Anguilla Shaw, Gen.Zool., v. 4,p.15, 1803.<^AnguillaCuvier, Rfeo;uo,Animal, v.2, p. 230, 1817.
=
AnguillaKaiq),Cat. ApodalFish,p. 32,1856.=
Muia3naBleelxrAtlas, Ich.Ind. Neerlaud,v.4, p. 1,1864.Muraniasp.anct. vet.
Ophichthussp.Thunberg, Ahl.
*Specimen ichthyologicura de Miinvna et Ophichtho quod seria exp. fac. nied.
Ups.iira^sid. Carol Vet. Thunberg lequite,etc. modeste ofl'crt JonasNicol. Ahl.27.
Jan. 1739. Upsalia.
tOn the nomenclatureof the genus Ophichthus <^Proc. U. S. Nat. Mus.,v.5,pp.
648-651.
XSeeJordan«& Gilbert, op. cit.