The amendment of the statute was approved by the Minister of Justice and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia no. The amendment of the notarial record was recorded by the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia in Decree no. AHU-AH dated December 12, 2017. This document was approved by the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia by Decision No.
The amendment of the statutes of the Company is based on Act No. This amendment of the statutes was approved by the Decree of the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. The last amendment in the statutes of the Company is based on Act No.
The amendment of the articles was accepted and approved by the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia no. Minutes of the meeting on the scope of service exploitation activities in the area of the company's ports no. The consolidated financial statements include the group's financial statements, as described in note 1.b.
The entity and the reporting entity are members of the same group (meaning that each parent, subsidiary and peer subsidiary are related to the others); The Deed was approved by the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia No. This Deed was approved by the Minister of Law and Human Rights of the Republic of Indonesia by Decree No.
Selisih Perubahan Ekuitas Entitas Anak dan Dampak Transaksi Dengan Kepentingan
Based on our Minutes of the Annual General Meeting on the Approval of the Company's Annual Report 2018 Annual Report no. Based on our minutes of the annual meeting of shareholders on the approval of the annual report 2017 of the company's annual report no. Concession Agreement between the Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Indonesia and the Company relating to the concession of Teluk Lamong Multipurpose Terminal in Surabaya.
Based on the Concession Agreement between the Ministry of Transport of the Republic of Indonesia (first party) with the Company (second party), on the Concession Terminal Multipurpose Teluk Lamong dated 19 May 2015 No. Submission of assets at the end of the concession period to the First Party under this Agreement. The provision of port services in the concession area which is the implementation area of the port terminal multi-purpose Teluk Lamong;.
Provides input to the development of performance standards and service systems in the field of port concessions, which is the delivery area of the multi-purpose Teluk Lamong Port Terminal, as determined by the first client; Use of waters around the concession area for operational purposes Teluk Lamong Multipurpose Terminal;. The implementation of development activities in this concession agreement for the development of terminals and port facilities in the concession area may be carried out by the second party in accordance with the master plan of the port and the recommendation of the first party.
The company has an obligation to report to the first party report covers operating results and earnings reports on the implementation of Multipurpose Terminal Teluk Lamong exploitation activities in the concession area are used to perform calculations concession income / concession fee. In case of delayed payment of concession revenue, then the first party imposed a penalty for delay to the second party in accordance with the provisions of the legislation in the field of non-tax revenue. The SSA covered the terms and conditions for the posting to PT Terminal Petikemas Suarabaya of the company's staff who had previously worked at the Tanjung Perak Container Terminal Unit.
The SSA included provisions relating to the rights and obligations of the Company in relation to the return of seconded Company personnel. On April 29, 1999, PT Terminal Petikemas Surabaya signed a lease agreement with the Company for the same period as that of the Authorization Agreement. On April 29, 2014, KSOP sent a letter No.PP.008/04/10/Ksop.Gsk-2014 to the General Manager of Marine Transportation regarding the company's application for appointment as executive development executive of the Port of Gresik.
Perjanjian-Perjanjian dan Ikatan Penting (Lanjutan)
PT Timur Nusantara assumed that the agreement was extended according to the side letter (side letters) issued by the President Director of the Company. Through the decision of the Supreme Court of Indonesia, then the case has been legally binding. Regarding the real execution of the assets owned by PT Timur Nusantara, Determination of the President of the Surabaya District Court Number 06 / EKS / 2018 / PN.Sby No.
The company is still waiting for the Surabaya District Court auction after the seizure. According to the decision of the Surabaya High Court, the plaintiff filed an action with the Supreme Court through the Surabaya District Court as Relaas Credential Declaration No. Until this contingency, the company was proceeding with the submission of a Contra cassation memorandum on the matter.
The case is currently in the cassation phase by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Until this report was released, the current status of the case was under review by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. When filing the appeal, the Company, through the Legal Deputy Director, submitted a Cassation Counter Memory Counter, as evidenced by the Cassation Counter Memory Receipt Number 865 / Pdt.G / 2017 / PN.Sby jo.
315 / Pdt.G / 2018 / PN.Sby requested an appeal, which informed that the case was decided by the Surabaya High Court on appeal and that the Surabaya District Court had ordered the results of the decision for the parties. As of the publication of this report, the status of the case was still under appeal at the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. The case process is currently still under appeal at the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
Based on the appeal, based on the Record of Decision of the Supreme Court Decision no. The company is currently awaiting an official copy of the proceeding decision. The Company's lawyer has declared and submitted the Cassation Memorandum to the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia through the Surabaya District Court, as evidenced in the Cassation Claim Act No. 76 / Deed.Pdt.
In fact, the plaintiff is a cultivator of the land and should have rights to the cultivated land. The status of the case until the preparation of this report is under review at the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
Tanggung Jawab dan Penerbitan Atas Laporan Keuangan Konsolidasian
