The present research was designed to investigate the mediating effect of career success between the relationship of Business Strategy and organizational performance. Organizational performance was taken as a dependent variable and Business Strategy acted as an independent variable. Many researchers have already found Business strategy has a positive effect on organizational performance (Yanney, 2014; Zahra and Pearce, 1990).
The current research was designed to investigate the relationship between Career Success, Business Strategy and Organizational Performance. Career Success is treated as a mediating variable and Business Strategy is treated as an independent variable, while Organizational Performance is treated as a dependent variable. To examine the impact of perceived business strategy on career success and perceived organizational performance.
H1: There is significant positive influence of the business strategy and its dimensions (1a-Prospectors, 1b- Analyzers, 1c-Defenders, 1d- Reactors) on perceived organizational performance. Career success has an effect on organizational performance, which is suggested but has not been empirically tested (Dahan and Dufour 2012). Based on the above discussion, this research suggests that career success can be used as a mediator between the relationship between business strategy and organizational performance.
H4: The relationship between Business Strategy (4a-Prospectors, 4b- Analysts, 4c-Defenders, 4d- Reactors) and Organizational Performance is mediated by Career Success.
METHODOLOGY
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 1 RELIABILITY STATISTICS
From this table, the β value is 0.310, which shows that a one unit increase in the value of business strategy causes 31% variation in organizational performance. Moreover, the β value is 0.179, which shows that one unit increase in the value of corporate strategy defenders causes 17.9% variation in organizational performance. From this table, the β value is 0.179, which indicates that one unit increase in the value of the business strategy defender causes 17.9% variation in organizational performance.
6a, the β value is 0.622, indicating that one unit increase in the value of business strategy results in a 62% variation in career success. Hypotheses (1a and 1c) about the influence of business strategy prospectors and business strategy advocates on career success are accepted because their value is p < 0.01. Hypotheses (1a and 1c) about the influence of prospectors and advocates of business strategy on career success are accepted because their values are p < 0.01.
The result of the Sobel test shows that the indirect effect of career success between the relationship of Business Strategy and Organizational Performance is statistically significant (z = 6.9879, p < 0.01). The mediating effect of career success between the relationship of business strategy seekers and organizational performance. The mediating effect of career success between the relationship of business strategy advocates and organizational performance.
The mediating effect of career success between the relationship between the business strategy dimensions and the Organizational Performance Testing Step. For step 1 of the mediation analysis (path c), the four types of business strategy are regressed on organizational performance. Prospectors' Business Strategy is related to perceived organizational performance (p < 0.01); its standardized regression coefficient value is 0.184.
Business Strategy Defenders is also related to organizational performance (p < 0.05); the value of the standardized regression coefficient is 0.179. Business strategy 'Prospectors' is related to organizational performance (p < 0.01); the value of the standardized regression coefficient is 0.323. Business Strategy Defenders is also related to organizational performance (p < 0.01); the value of the standardized regression coefficient is 0.296.
The result of the Sobel test shows that the indirect effect of career success between the relationship of Business Strategy Researchers and organizational performance is statistically significant (z = 3.213, p <. 0.01). The result of the Sobel test shows that the indirect effect of career success between the relationship of business strategy advocates and organizational performance is statistically significant (z = 3.213, p <. 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Strategic effectiveness of human resource management and firm performance.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 12, no. Human Resource Management and Knowledge Management: A Guide to Improving Organizational Performance.” Journal of the American Academy of Business 11, no. The Impacts of Corporate Social Responsibility, Employee Commitment and Organizational Performance.” African Journal of Business Management 4, no.
Strategic orientation, managerial characteristics and performance: A study of Spanish SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management 43, no. Inter-organizational and collective strategies in small firms: environmental effects and performance.” Journal of Management. The relationship between companies' strategic orientations and strategic planning process." International Journal of Business and Management 5, no.
An Assessment of Performance Measurement in International Business Research." Journal of International Business Studies. The Relationship Between Miles and Snow Strategic Types and Organizational Performance in Polish Manufacturing Firms." Journal of Management and Business Economics 24, No. An Examination of Organizational Strategies, Structures, Cultural Dimensions, and Management Control Systems in Different Retail Formats.” Journal of International Business Strategy 12, no.
Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, Agency costs and Ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics. Testing the applicability of the concierge's generic strategies in the digital age: a study of Korean cyber malls. Journal of Business Strategies 21, no. Leader-Member Exchange and Job Satisfaction Relationship and Predicted Employee Turnover.” Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies 15, no.
Impact of Career Success on Organizational Performance: A Study of the Healthcare Sector." Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences 9, no. The Mediating Role of Organizational Capabilities between Organizational Performance and Its Determinants." Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research 9, no Human resource management systems and organizational performance: An analysis of the Spanish manufacturing industry The International Journal of Human Resource Management 14, no.
Innovative Human Resource Management and Firm Performance in the Context of Economic Liberalization in India.” The International Journal of Human Resource Management 19, no. Cross-Cultural Management and Organizational Performance: A Content Analysis Perspective.” International Journal of Business and Management 8, no.
