30/5/2018 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/761/820 1/2
REVIEW FORM RESPONSE
Referee’s Report .
1. Title * Appropriate Should be changed 2. Abstract
Is the length reasonable? * Yes
No
Is it an appropriate summary of the content? * Yes
No 3. Main Text
Is there anything new in this work? * Yes
No
Is the relation to previous studies adequately stated? * Yes
No
Are the assumption(s) and/or method(s) described comprehensively? * Yes
No
Are the new results adequately emphasized? * Yes
No
Referee's Comments
30/5/2018 Review Form Response
http://aij.batan.go.id/index.php/aij/sectionEditor/viewReviewFormResponse/761/820 2/2
- Section INTRODUCTION is too long compared to other section.
- You mentioned "The objectives of this research were to investigate the heat transfer phenomena in vertical straight wickless- heat pipe using Graphene nanofluid working fluid and to know its influences in the thermal performance of vertical straight wickless-heat pipe." Why do you need to do this? Please justify.
- The heat loads of the evaporator were varied to 1000 W, 1500 W, 2000 W, and 2500 W. Please provide your justification to choose these values.
- Why do you choose the filling ratios of 40%, 60%, and 80%? Please provide your justification
- The coolant volumetric flow rates were varied at 4 L/min, 6 L/min, and 8 L/min. Why? Please provide your justification.
- The coolant temperature was maintained at 26°C. Why?
- You did not discuss the effect of heat load variation. What is your objective to vary heat loads and coolant volumetric flow rates with the
constant filling ratio? Please discuss.
- What is FR in page 9?
- In Page 9 Column 1, you mentioned "This phenomena shows that the increasing of filling ratio charged to the evaporator pool will produce more bubbles and vapor from the boiling process." How do you justify this? Is there any figure showing this phenomenon?
- In Figure 16, Please use dot to represent decimal numbers.
- In page 10 before the conclusion, you write "This investigation results are in agreement with the results obtained by Tharayil et al., Kim et al., Sadeghinezad et al., and Rosidi et al." What is the reference number? Reference style is numbering system.
Final comments and recommendations: *
Authors need to majorly revise the manuscript.
This Paper is recommended to be * Accepted without further revision Accepted with minor revision Major Revision is required Rejected
Close
* Denotes required field
